Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 101
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
Allergy ; 70(2): 220-6, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25582652

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Aluminium tubes for pharmaceutical use are internally lacquered with epoxy resins (ER) based on bisphenol A diglycidyl ether (BADGE). Recently, it was shown that remnants of ER polymerization like BADGE are extractable from epoxy-based coatings of commercially available tubes and may leach into semi-solid drug preparations. We aimed to evaluate the safety of BADGE-contaminated macrogol ointments in individuals sensitized to ER based on BADGE by use tests. METHODS: Repeated open application testing (ROAT) in 11 patients sensitized to ER based on BADGE with BADGE in macrogol ointments (3 mg/kg; 30 mg/kg, equivalent to BADGE concentration determined in macrogol ointment after storage in a commercially available tube; 300 mg/kg). RESULTS: The 30 mg/kg BADGE ointment elicited reactions in three patients, and another three patients reacted to 300 mg/kg BADGE ointment. No reactions to the vehicle control and 3 mg/kg BADGE were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated BADGE concentrations in ER-coated aluminium tubes pose a risk of developing contact dermatitis to patients sensitized to ER based on BADGE. Quality standards are deemed necessary for the production of ER-coated aluminium tubes intended for pharmaceutical use and should consider the results of the present ROAT study.


Asunto(s)
Compuestos de Bencidrilo/efectos adversos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Compuestos Epoxi/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Aluminio/química , Compuestos de Bencidrilo/química , Compuestos Epoxi/química , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pomadas , Pruebas del Parche , Adulto Joven
3.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 29(6): 1071-81, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25288472

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Ingredients of leave-on cosmetics and body care products may sensitize. However, not every case of cosmetic intolerance is due to contact sensitization. OBJECTIVE: To describe the frequency of contact sensitization due to cosmetics in a large clinic population, and a possible particular allergen pattern. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of data from the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology, 2006-2011. RESULTS: Of 69 487 patients tested, 'cosmetics, creams, sunscreens' was the only suspected allergen source category in 10 124 patients (14.6%). A final diagnosis 'allergic contact dermatitis' was stated in 2658 of these patients (26.3%).Compared to a control group, there were significantly more reactions to fragrance mixes I and II, balsam of Peru, methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone (MCI/MI) and lanolin alcohols. No special pattern of fragrance sensitization could be identified. Among the preservatives, MI was by far the leading allergen, while sensitization to other widely used compounds like parabens or phenoxyethanol was rare. CONCLUSIONS: True allergic reactions to cosmetic ingredients are rarer than generally assumed. Limitation of exposure to MI in leave-on cosmetics and body care products is urgently needed.


Asunto(s)
Cosméticos/efectos adversos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Adulto , Anciano , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Bálsamos/efectos adversos , Bufexamac/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pruebas del Parche , Perfumes/efectos adversos , Conservadores Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Crema para la Piel/efectos adversos , Protectores Solares/efectos adversos , Tiazoles/efectos adversos , Adulto Joven
4.
Hautarzt ; 66(9): 646-51, 2015 Sep.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26285898

RESUMEN

Allergic contact eczema in children is frequent. If clinically suspected, a patch test should be performed. In the present study, data obtained from 116,742 patients who had undergone a patch test from 2005-2014 were analysed. The children group (range 0-12 years) included 925 patients. If at least 700 tested individuals were considered, the most frequent sensitizations in this group were nickel sulfate (8.5 %), fragrance mix I (5.5 %), and colophony (3.4 %), whereby sensitisation in adults was higher for nickel sulfate (15.5 %) and fragrance mix 1 (8.4 %), while being similar for colophony (3.7 %). In adolescents with and without a profession, nickel sulfate (11.1 and 13.6 %, respectively) and cobalt (II) chloride (3.9 and 3.4 %, respectively) were the most frequent positively tested contact allergens. Sensitisations toward fragrance mix I was low (3.9 and 3.4 %, respectively) in comparison to the adult group (8.4 %). In both children and adolescents, toluene diamine and paraphenylenediamine sensitizations were not infrequent, but it must be considered that these allergens were only tested if suspected. The data show that the sensitisation profile among children and adolescents display patterns similar to those in adults. Sensitisations in childhood and adolescence towards dyes like paraphenylendiamine may be associated with increased use of tattooing in these groups.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Dermatitis Profesional/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Profesional/epidemiología , Pruebas del Parche/estadística & datos numéricos , Tatuaje/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Salud del Adolescente/estadística & datos numéricos , Distribución por Edad , Niño , Salud Infantil/estadística & datos numéricos , Preescolar , Colorantes , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/inmunología , Dermatitis Profesional/inmunología , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Factores de Riesgo , Distribución por Sexo
5.
Orthopade ; 44(11): 905-8, 2015 Nov.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26438196

RESUMEN

Intolerance reactions to metal implants may be caused by metal allergy. However, prior to implantation, patch testing should not be done in a prophylactic-prophetic approach. Pre-implant patch testing should only be performed to verify or exclude metal allergy in patients with a reported respective history. In the case of implant-in particular arthroplasty-related complications like, for example, pain, effusion, skin changes, reduced range of motion, or loosening, orthopedic-surgical differential diagnostics should be performed first. Allergological workup of suspected metal implant allergy should be done with the DKG baseline series which contains nickel-, cobalt- and chromium-preparations. Various studies assessing the usefulness of metal alloy discs for patch testing proved that this approach does not give reliable information about metal allergy. Positive patch test reactions to the discs cannot be assigned to a specific metal within the disc alloy components. Furthermore, availability of such metal discs might be an invitation to uncritical testing. Accordingly, due to lack of benefit in comparison to patch testing with standardized metal salt preparations, we do not recommend patch testing with metal alloy discs.


Asunto(s)
Aleaciones/efectos adversos , Dermatitis por Contacto/diagnóstico , Metales/efectos adversos , Pruebas del Parche/instrumentación , Prótesis e Implantes/efectos adversos , Dermatitis por Contacto/etiología , Diseño de Equipo , Análisis de Falla de Equipo/métodos , Humanos , Ensayo de Materiales/métodos , Pruebas del Parche/métodos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
6.
Br J Dermatol ; 171(1): 115-23, 2014 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24593017

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: As previous observations have indicated an inter-relationship between irritant and allergic skin reactions we analysed data of synchronous allergen and sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) patch tests in terms of a relationship between SLS responsiveness and allergic patch test reactions. OBJECTIVES: To analyse differences in terms of allergen-specific and overall reaction profiles between patients with vs. those without an irritant reaction to SLS. METHODS: Clinical data of 26 879 patients patch tested from 2008 to 2011 by members of the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology were analysed. After descriptive analyses, including the MOAHLFA index, the positivity ratio and the reaction index, a negative binomial hurdle model was adopted to investigate the correlation between SLS reactivity and positive patch test reactions. RESULTS: Men, patients aged ≥ 40 years and patients with an occupational dermatitis background were over-represented in the SLS-reactive group. Patients with an irritant reaction to SLS showed a higher proportion of weak positive reactions, as well as more questionable and irritant reactions to contact allergens than patients not reactive to SLS. The risk of an additional positive patch test reaction increased by 22% for SLS-reactive patients compared with those who were SLS negative. CONCLUSIONS: The marked association between SLS reactivity and the number of positive reactions in patch test patients may be due to nonspecific increased skin reactivity at the moment of patch testing only. However, increased SLS reactivity could also be due to longer-lasting enhanced skin irritability, which may have promoted (poly-)sensitization. Further studies, for example with longitudinal data on patients repeatedly patch tested with SLS and contact allergens, are necessary.


Asunto(s)
Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Dermatitis Irritante/etiología , Dermatitis Profesional/etiología , Irritantes/efectos adversos , Dodecil Sulfato de Sodio/efectos adversos , Tensoactivos/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Dermatitis Irritante/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Profesional/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pruebas de Irritación de la Piel/métodos
8.
Br J Dermatol ; 169(3): 611-7, 2013 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23647229

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: 'Polysensitization' (PS) is usually defined as contact sensitization to three or more unrelated haptens of the baseline patch test series. Despite PS being an important clinical phenotype indicating increased susceptibility to contact allergy, statistical approaches to analyse PS have hitherto been preliminary. OBJECTIVES: To apply an appropriate regression model for count data, namely, negative binomial hurdle regression, to a large set of clinical patch test data with the aim of estimating PS risk in more detail than previously achieved. METHODS: The detailed information provided by the hurdle model includes a separate estimation of an 'increment factor' quantifying the likelihood of further positive reactions, i.e. PS. Clinical data of 126 878 patients patch tested by departments comprising the IVDK (Information Network of Departments of Dermatology) network (www.ivdk.org) between 1995 and 2010 were included. RESULTS: Regarding anatomical sites as exposure (surrogate), the axillae and the feet were found to be strong PS risk factors. Moreover, age was a strong PS risk factor, and less so, female sex. In comparison, atopic eczema and occupational dermatitis were less important risk factors. Single allergens contributed to PS to a varying extent. CONCLUSIONS: The data presented point to some, very likely exposure-related, risk factors which need to be considered in future PS research, e.g. addressing the genetic basis for PS.


Asunto(s)
Alérgenos/inmunología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/inmunología , Adulto , Anciano , Axila , Dermatitis Profesional/inmunología , Extremidades , Femenino , Cabeza , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pruebas del Parche , Perineo , Factores de Riesgo , Torso
9.
Br J Dermatol ; 169(4): 854-8, 2013 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23909687

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Nickel allergy is common worldwide. It is associated with hand dermatitis, and sensitization is often induced by nickel-releasing jewellery. The European Union (EU) introduced legislation to control nickel content and release from jewellery and other consumer items through the EU Nickel Directive 1994, which came into force in 2001 and is now part of the REACH regulation. OBJECTIVES: To examine the effects of the EU nickel regulations on the prevalence of nickel allergy in four European countries. METHODS: Nickel patch-test data from 180,390 patients were collected from national databases in Denmark, Germany, Italy and the U.K. from between 1985 and 2002 to 2010. Patients with suspected allergic contact dermatitis who had been patch tested with nickel sulfate 5% in petrolatum were included in the analysis. The main outcomes studied were the percentage of positive results to nickel patch tests, and changes in trends with time in an age- and sex-stratified analysis. RESULTS: A statistically significant decrease in nickel allergy was observed in Danish, German and Italian women aged below 30 years. In female patients in the U.K. this was observed between 2004 and 2010. In young men, a statistically significant decrease in nickel allergy was observed in Germany and the U.K., whereas a nonsignificant increase was observed in Italy. CONCLUSIONS: There has been a reduction in the prevalence of nickel allergy in young women, contemporaneous with the introduction of the nickel regulation. A reduction is also suggested in men in Germany and the U.K. A causative effect of the regulatory intervention is the most likely explanation.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Níquel/toxicidad , Adulto , Anciano , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/legislación & jurisprudencia , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/prevención & control , Unión Europea , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Irritantes , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pruebas del Parche/métodos , Prevalencia
10.
Cell Mol Life Sci ; 69(5): 763-81, 2012 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21997384

RESUMEN

Contact allergies are complex diseases, and one of the important challenges for public health and immunology. The German 'Federal Institute for Risk Assessment' hosted an 'International Workshop on Contact Dermatitis'. The scope of the workshop was to discuss new discoveries and developments in the field of contact dermatitis. This included the epidemiology and molecular biology of contact allergy, as well as the development of new in vitro methods. Furthermore, it considered regulatory aspects aiming to reduce exposure to contact sensitisers. An estimated 15-20% of the general population suffers from contact allergy. Workplace exposure, age, sex, use of consumer products and genetic predispositions were identified as the most important risk factors. Research highlights included: advances in understanding of immune responses to contact sensitisers, the importance of autoxidation or enzyme-mediated oxidation for the activation of chemicals, the mechanisms through which hapten-protein conjugates are formed and the development of novel in vitro strategies for the identification of skin-sensitising chemicals. Dendritic cell cultures and structure-activity relationships are being developed to identify potential contact allergens. However, the local lymph node assay (LLNA) presently remains the validated method of choice for hazard identification and characterisation. At the workshop the use of the LLNA for regulatory purposes and for quantitative risk assessment was also discussed.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/metabolismo , Alérgenos/inmunología , Congresos como Asunto , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/prevención & control , Humanos , Inmunidad Innata , Queratinocitos/citología , Queratinocitos/fisiología , Ensayo del Nódulo Linfático Local , Células T Asesinas Naturales/citología , Células T Asesinas Naturales/fisiología , Factores de Riesgo
11.
Allergy ; 67(7): 847-57, 2012 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22563651

RESUMEN

Contact allergy (CA) surveillance networks provide information to a multitude of stakeholders, which is indispensable for evidence-based decision-making in the field of prevention. Methods and results of the German surveillance system on CA are reviewed and discussed with reference to other systems. The German network structure comprises 56 departments of dermatology and includes all patients who are patch-tested for suspected CA. Data analysis considers the results of patch testing and further pertinent information for each patient. Following aspects are addressed: (i) the description of the clinical population, (ii) evaluation of patch test reactions, (iii) relationship between patch test results and population characteristics. Trend analyses on chromate (decreasing), epoxy resin (increasing) and nickel (heterogeneous) served as examples for surveillance system analyses, with the identification of sentinel events, as well as proof of success or failure of prevention. In addition, external data sources can be used such as sales data of patch test preparations to estimate frequencies of sensitization on a population level. National prescription data of drugs and statistics of labelling of preservatives on cosmetics can be included, the latter two approaches allowing for risk estimates conferred by specific allergens.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/prevención & control , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Servicios de Información , Exposición Profesional , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos , Salud Pública , Sistema de Registros
12.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22373845

RESUMEN

A total of 56 departments of dermatology from Germany, Austria, and Switzerland collaborate to study the clinical epidemiology of contact allergies (CA). Data generated in the course of the diagnostic work-up of CA (e.g., patch test data) have been stored since 1989 in the data center in Göttingen, Germany, including data for more than 200,000 patients (March 2011). These data can be used as a register and as a surveillance system. Analysis of the register may identify and quantify risk factors of sensitization to an allergen, which is exemplified with the case of the allergen para-phenylenediamine. It turned out that-in addition to the risk factor hair dyeing-other important risk factors must be considered. In contrast, data collected every 6 months (from approximately 6,000 patients) allow for time-trend analyses of allergens, thus, identifying allergens of concern, which is of utmost importance for early preventive intervention. Here, the epidemiology of allergies to epoxy resins serves as an example. Continuous monitoring of contact allergens will also be mandatory in the future, as the CA premarketing screening systems will have imperfect predictive values with regard to human CA risk. Unfortunately, the (current) national regulatory framework severely hampers clinical surveillance/epidemiology of contact sensitization and, thus, prevention of contact allergy.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/prevención & control , Dermatitis Profesional/epidemiología , Dermatitis Profesional/prevención & control , Vigilancia de la Población , Sistema de Registros , Adulto , Austria , Colorantes/efectos adversos , Comorbilidad , Reacciones Cruzadas/inmunología , Estudios Transversales , Resinas Epoxi/efectos adversos , Femenino , Fungicidas Industriales/efectos adversos , Alemania , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Masculino , Fenilendiaminas/inmunología , Salud Pública , Factores de Riesgo , Dodecil Sulfato de Sodio/efectos adversos , Tensoactivos/efectos adversos , Suiza , Tiram/inmunología
13.
Br J Dermatol ; 164(6): 1316-25, 2011 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21332463

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Preservatives are well-known and important contact allergens. OBJECTIVES: To examine the frequency of sensitization to preservatives, including time trends. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of data on patch testing of preservatives contained in the standard series and special series collected by the IVDK during 1996-2009. RESULTS: Some 120,000 and 80,000 patients were tested with the baseline and the preservative series, respectively. Sensitization frequencies of the standard series allergens all ranged above 1%: methyldibromoglutaronitrile (MDBGN) 2·36-4·5%, methy(chloro)isothiazolinone (MCI/MI) 2·22%, formaldehyde 1·54%, paraben mix 1·33% and Bronopol® 1·25%. Regarding the special preservative series, 1·54% reacted positive to methylisothiazolinone (MI), and < 1% to the other preservatives. Concomitant reactions to formaldehyde in formaldehyde releasers ranged from 15% to almost 50%, and 67% of MI positives reacted to MCI/MI. As indicated by the MOAHLFA index, sensitization to MI, iodopropynylbutyl carbamate (IPBC) and quaternium 15 was associated more often with occupational dermatitis, whereas sensitization to imidazolidinyl urea and diazolidinyl urea was associated with face dermatitis, indicating cosmetic exposure. Epidemiologically relevant decreases (> 10%) were seen in chloroacetamide, benzyl alcohol and MDBGN. Epidemiologically relevant increases were noted in IPBC, sodium benzoate and MI. CONCLUSIONS: Preservatives are still important contact allergens. The introduction of new preservatives should consider the specific characteristics of occupational and of nonoccupational (cosmetic, household) exposure, and preventive measures should aim equally at both areas.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Profesional/etiología , Conservadores Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Dermatitis Profesional/epidemiología , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pruebas del Parche , Estudios Retrospectivos
14.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 61(1): 1-8, 2011 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21798301

RESUMEN

A systematic classification of substances (or mixtures of substances) with regard to various toxicological endpoints is a prerequisite for the implementation of occupational safety strategies. As its principal task the "Commission for the Investigation of Health Hazards of Chemical Compounds in the Work Area" of the "Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft" (DFG-MAK Commission) derives and recommends maximum workplace concentrations and biological tolerance values (MAK and BAT values) based exclusively on scientific arguments. Several endpoints are evaluated separately in detail, e.g. carcinogenicity, risks during pregnancy, germ cell mutagenicity or contribution to systemic toxicity after cutaneous absorption. Skin- and airway sensitization is also considered; the present paper focuses on these two endpoints.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis por Contacto/etiología , Unión Europea , Sustancias Peligrosas/clasificación , Sustancias Peligrosas/toxicidad , Exposición Profesional/clasificación , Exposición Profesional/legislación & jurisprudencia , Sistema Respiratorio/efectos de los fármacos , Piel/efectos de los fármacos , Dermatitis por Contacto/patología , Dermatitis por Contacto/fisiopatología , Femenino , Alemania , Guías como Asunto , Humanos , Internacionalidad , Masculino , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Exposición Profesional/normas , Embarazo , Pruebas de Toxicidad , Lugar de Trabajo
15.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 25(1): 59-63, 2011 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20456555

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In Lithuania, data on patch testing are lacking and the applicability of the European baseline series needs to be evaluated. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to examine the prevalence of contact allergy to the European baseline series in the population of patients with suspected allergic contact dermatitis in Lithuania. METHODS: Between April 2006 and October 2008, 816 consecutive adult patients referred to the Department of Skin and Venereal Diseases, Kaunas University of Medicine, with suspected allergic contact dermatitis were patch tested with the European baseline series. Demographic data were collected in accordance with the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies 'minimal data set'. RESULTS: The positive patch test was observed in 384 (47.4%) patients. The most prevalent contact allergens were nickel sulphate (17.1%), Myroxylon pereirae resin (8.0%), p-phenylenediamine (6.0%), methyldibromo glutaronitrile (5.5%) and colophonium (5.0%). The sex and age factors strongly influenced the prevalence of nickel sensitization. The lowest sensitization prevalences were found to N-isopropyl-N'-phenyl-p-phenylene diamine (0.1%) and 2-mercaptobenzothiazole (0.1%). Differences in the sensitization prevalences to some allergens of the European baseline series compared with other European countries were recognized. CONCLUSION: The current European baseline series is a suitable diagnostic tool for contact allergy in Lithuania.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Pruebas del Parche , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Lituania , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven
16.
Hautarzt ; 62(10): 732-8, 2011 Oct.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21904893

RESUMEN

The genetics of contact allergy (CA) is still only partly understood, despite decades of research. This might be due to inadequately defined phenotypes used in the past. Therefore we suggested studying an extreme phenotype, namely, polysensitization (sensitization to 3 or more unrelated allergens). Another approach to unravel the genetics of CA has been the study of candidate genes. In this review, we summarize studies on the associations between genetic variation (e.g. SNPs) in certain candidate genes and CA. The following polymorphisms and mutations were studied: (1) filaggrin, (2) N-acetyltransferase (NAT1 and 2), (3) glutathione-S-transferase (GST M and T), (4) manganese superoxide dismutase, (5) angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), (6) tumor necrosis factor (TNF), and (7) interleukin-16 (IL16). The polymorphisms of NAT1/2, GST M/T, ACE, TNF, and IL16 were shown to be associated with an increased risk of CA. In one of our studies, the increased risk conferred by the TNF and IL16 polymorphisms was confined to polysensitized individuals. Other relevant candidate genes may be identified by studying diseases related to CA in terms of clinical symptoms, a more general pathology (inflammation) and possibly an overlapping genetic background, such as irritant contact dermatitis.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/genética , Estudios de Asociación Genética , Fenotipo , Adulto , Arilamina N-Acetiltransferasa/genética , Niño , Análisis Mutacional de ADN , Enfermedades en Gemelos/diagnóstico , Enfermedades en Gemelos/genética , Proteínas Filagrina , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad/genética , Glutatión Transferasa/genética , Humanos , Interleucina-16/genética , Proteínas de Filamentos Intermediarios/genética , Isoenzimas/genética , Peptidil-Dipeptidasa A/genética , Polimorfismo Genético/genética , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/genética
17.
Hautarzt ; 62(10): 751-6, 2011 Oct.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21901563

RESUMEN

Ever-changing exposure to contact allergens, partly due to statutory directives (e.g. nickel, chromate, methyldibromo glutaronitrile) or recommendations from industrial associations (e.g. hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde), requires on-going epidemiologic surveillance of contact allergy. In this paper, the current state with special focus in fragrances and preservatives is described on the basis of data of the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) of the year 2010. In 2010, 12,574 patients were patch tested in the dermatology departments belonging to the IVDK. Nickel is still the most frequent contact allergen. However the continuously improved EU nickel directive already has some beneficial effect; sensitization frequency in young women is dropping. In Germany, chromate-reduced cement has been in use now for several years, leading to a decline in chromate sensitization in brick-layers. Two fragrance mixes are part of the German baseline series; they are still relevant. The most important fragrances in these mixes still are oak moss absolute and hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde. However, in relation to these leading allergens, sensitization frequency to other fragrances contained in the mixes seems to be increasing. Among the preservatives, MCI/MI has not lost its importance as contact allergen, in contrast to MDBGN. Sources of MCI/MI sensitization obviously are increasingly found in occupational context. Methylisothiazolinone is a significant allergen in occupational settings, and less frequently in body care products.


Asunto(s)
Alérgenos/inmunología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/inmunología , Adolescente , Aldehídos/inmunología , Niño , Cromatos/inmunología , Estudios Transversales , Ciclohexenos/inmunología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/prevención & control , Dermatitis Profesional/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Profesional/epidemiología , Dermatitis Profesional/inmunología , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina E/sangre , Níquel/inmunología , Nitrilos/inmunología , Pruebas del Parche , Perfumes/efectos adversos , Vigilancia de la Población , Conservadores Farmacéuticos , Piel/inmunología , Tiazoles/inmunología
18.
Br J Dermatol ; 162(3): 598-606, 2010 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19772525

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Exposure to fragrances is increasingly encountered in the environment. Some fragrances are known to be important skin and potential airway sensitizers. OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether patients with contact allergy to isoeugenol (ISO) or hydroxyisohexyl-3-carboxaldehyde (HICC) would react to inhalation exposure at the level of the airways and skin. METHODS: Eleven patients sensitized to ISO and 10 patients sensitized to HICC were exposed for 60 min to 1000 microg m(-3) of these compounds in an exposure chamber at rest, and to geraniol 1000 microg m(-3) as a control. Patients wore protective clothing to prevent skin exposure. Assessments were performed prior to exposure, and immediately, 2, 5, 24 and 72 h afterwards. RESULTS: There were no significant changes in lung function but a tendency towards an increased bronchial hyper-responsiveness after exposure to any of the compounds. Laboratory parameters of inflammation did not indicate responses. Single patients reported respiratory symptoms unrelated to objective measures. In contrast, the observed skin symptoms corresponded to the patients' specific sensitization. Four patients reported symptoms compatible with delayed-type hypersensitivity, and two demonstrated a flare after ISO. On re-exposure they did not respond to a lower, more realistic level of ISO. CONCLUSION: Inhalation of high concentrations of fragrance contact allergens apparently poses a risk for some patients of developing manifest haematogenic contact dermatitis, while the changes in the respiratory tract are limited to symptoms in some subjects without objective changes.


Asunto(s)
Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Exposición por Inhalación/efectos adversos , Perfumes/química , Hipersensibilidad Respiratoria/inducido químicamente , Adulto , Anciano , Alérgenos/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Perfumes/administración & dosificación , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Pruebas Cutáneas
20.
Br J Dermatol ; 161(3): 554-9, 2009 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19438463

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patch test (PT) guidelines recommend classifying PT reactions based on morphological criteria only, i.e. irrespective of context information such as substance, concentration and vehicle. OBJECTIVES: To analyse reclassification of PT reactions after revelation of context information subsequent to an initial blinded reading. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-two participants (experienced dermatologists and researchers) rated 20 digital images of different PT reactions twice, first blinded, then unblinded regarding substance, concentration and vehicle. Agreement between both ratings was quantified with Cohen's kappa, and systematic differences statistically examined with tests for marginal homogeneity. RESULTS: Mostly, ratings remained stable, e.g. in > 90% of cases of images showing typical strong or extreme positive PT reactions. Reclassification was comparatively often observed in images depicting irritant reactions. Conversely, 16 of 122 participants re-rated doubtful reactions to thiuram mix and dichromate, respectively, as 'allergic' (weak or strong positive) after knowing the substance. CONCLUSIONS: The considerable proportion of participants who choose an 'allergic' rating, despite a morphological presentation definitely not justifying this, points to a conceptual problem of the PT reading scale: the mixing up of morphological classification and interpretation. We therefore suggest amending the scale. Moreover, standardization of PT reading can be improved by continual PT training sessions.


Asunto(s)
Alérgenos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatología , Interpretación de Imagen Asistida por Computador/normas , Pruebas del Parche/normas , Humanos , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA