Dosing and switching of paliperidone ER in patients with schizophrenia: recommendations for clinical practice.

Many patients with schizophrenia receive long-term treatment with antipsychotic medication. Switching of antipsychotic medication due to lack of efficacy, tolerability issues, and partial/non-adherence is common. Despite this, consensus strategies for switching between antipsychotics are lacking. This manuscript provides practical recommendations for switching antipsychotic medication to ensure optimal management of patients with schizophrenia, with a particular focus on paliperidone extended release (ER). The authors drew on their clinical experience supported by detailed discussion of literature describing antipsychotic switching techniques and strategies and findings from paliperidone ER clinical trials. Antipsychotic switching strategies should be individualized and take into consideration the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties of the pre- and post-switch medication. The use of temporary concomitant medications may be appropriate in some scenarios. Abrupt withdrawal of pre-switch medication may be appropriate in some instances but carries a greater risk of rebound and withdrawal symptoms than other strategies. Cross-tapering is the method most widely used in clinical practice. Paliperidone ER can be initiated without dose titration. The EU SmPC recommended dose of paliperidone ER is 6 mg/day; but doses should be individualized within the approved range of 3-12 mg/day. Higher doses may be required due to insufficient efficacy of the previous antipsychotic or in patients with acute symptoms. Recently diagnosed patients, those with renal impairment, or patients who have previously experienced tolerability issues with other antipsychotics may require lower doses. When switching from risperidone, higher doses of paliperidone ER may be required compared with risperidone. When switching from antipsychotics that have sedative and/or significant anticholinergic activity, the pre-switch antipsychotic should be tapered off gradually. Antipsychotics with less sedating and little anticholinergic activity can be tapered off over a shorter period. Temporary concomitant sedative medication may be beneficial when switching from antipsychotics with relatively higher sedative propensities. Switching from another antipsychotic to paliperidone ER requires individualized switching strategies and dosing, dependent on the characteristics of the patient and the PK and PD properties of the pre-switch medication. Cross-tapering strategies should be considered as a means of reducing the risk of rebound and withdrawal symptoms.

Attitudes towards the administration of long-acting antipsychotics: a survey of physicians and nurses.

BACKGROUND: Discontinuation of antipsychotic treatment for schizophrenia can interrupt improvement and exacerbate the illness. Reasons for discontinuing treatment are multifactorial and include adherence, efficacy and tolerability issues. Poor adherence may be addressed through non-pharmacological approaches as well as through pharmacological ones, ie ensured delivery of medication, such as that achieved with long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics. However, attitudes of healthcare professionals (HCPs) towards LAI antipsychotics may influence their prescribing decisions and may influence medication choices offered to patients. We therefore conducted a survey to investigate factors driving LAI use as well as physician and nurse attitudes to LAI antipsychotics and to different injection sites. METHODS: An independent market research agency conducted the survey of HCPs across Europe. Participants were recruited by telephone and completed the survey online. Using conjoint analyses (a multivariate statistical technique analysing preferences on the basis of ranking a limited number of attributes which are presented repetitively), attitudes to oral versus LAI medication and gluteal versus deltoid injection routes were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 891 HCPs across Europe were surveyed. Of these, 40% would choose LAI antipsychotics for first episode patients whereas 90% would select LAI antipsychotics for chronic patients with two to five psychotic episodes. Dominant elements in antipsychotic choice were low sedation but no tardive dyskinesia, no or mild pain at injection and low risk of embarrassment or impact upon therapeutic alliance. Eighty-six per cent of respondents considered that having the choice of a deltoid as well as gluteal administration site was beneficial over not having that choice. Two thirds of respondents said they agreed that medication administration via the deltoid muscle may reduce social embarrassment associated with LAI antipsychotics and most respondents (61%) believed that administration of LAI antipsychotics into the deltoid muscle as opposed to the gluteal muscle may be more respectful to the patient. CONCLUSIONS: In this survey of physicians and nurses, attitudes towards LAI antipsychotics compared with oral medication were generally positive. Respondents considered that the availability of a deltoid administration route would offer increased choice in LAI antipsychotic administration and may be perceived as more respectful and less socially embarrassing.

Definitions and drivers of relapse in patients with schizophrenia: a systematic literature review.

Relapse in patients with schizophrenia has devastating repercussions, including worsening symptoms, impaired functioning, cognitive deterioration and reduced quality of life. This progressive decline exacerbates the burden of illness on patients and their families. Relapse prevention is identified as a key therapeutic aim; however, the absence of widely accepted relapse definition criteria considerably hampers achieving this goal. We conducted a literature review in order to investigate the reporting of relapses and the validity of hospitalization as a proxy for relapse in patients with schizophrenia. The primary aim was to assess the range and validity of methods used to define relapse in observational or naturalistic settings. The secondary aim was to capture information on factors that predicted or influenced the risk of relapse. A structured search of the PubMed database identified articles that discussed relapse, and hospitalization as a proxy of relapse, in patients with schizophrenia. National and international guidelines were also reviewed. Of the 150 publications and guidelines identified, 87 defined relapse and 62% of these discussed hospitalization. Where hospitalization was discussed, this was as a proxy for, or a component of, relapse in the majority of cases. However, hospitalization duration and type varied and were not always well defined. Scales were used to define relapse in 53 instances; 10 different scales were used and multiple scales often appeared within the same definition. There were 95 references to factors that may drive relapse, including non-adherence to antipsychotic medication (21/95), stress/depression (11/95) and substance abuse (9/95). Twenty-five publications discussed the potential of antipsychotic therapy to reduce relapse rates-continuous antipsychotic therapy was associated with reduced frequency and duration of hospitalization. Non-pharmacological interventions, such as psychoeducation and cognitive behavioural therapy, were also commonly reported as factors that may reduce relapse. In conclusion, this review identified numerous factors used to define relapse. Hospitalization was the factor most frequently used and represents a useful proxy for relapse when reporting in a naturalistic setting. Several factors were reported to increase the risk of relapse, and observation of these may aid the identification of at-risk patients.

Psychiatrists' perceptions of the clinical importance, assessment and management of patient functioning in schizophrenia in Europe, the Middle East and Africa.

BACKGROUND: It has been estimated that as many as two thirds of patients with schizophrenia are unable to perform basic personal and social roles or activities. Occupational functioning and social functioning, as well as independent living, are considered as core domains of patient functioning. Improvement in patient functioning has also been recognized as an important treatment goal in guidelines and an important outcome by regulatory agencies. Nevertheless, information is lacking on how these aspects are being considered by psychiatrists across the world and how they are being assessed and managed. METHODS: The 'Europe, the Middle East and Africa functioning survey' was designed to canvas opinions of psychiatrists across these regions to ascertain their perceptions of the clinical importance, assessment and management of functioning amongst their patients with schizophrenia. The survey comprised 17 questions and was conducted from March to April 2011 in 42 countries. Data collected included the demographics of respondents and their opinions regarding personal and social functioning in patients with schizophrenia. RESULTS: Results were obtained from 4,163 clinicians. Psychiatrists estimated that more than two thirds (70%) of their patients with schizophrenia showed impaired or very poor levels of functioning. The majority of psychiatrists (92%) believed that personal and social functioning was an important treatment goal for patients with schizophrenia, and 91% believed it was an important goal for patients' families. The majority of psychiatrists (55%) assess the personal and social functioning of their patient at each visit; however, 81% reported that they determine the level of functioning through clinical interview and not by using a specific assessment scale. To manage personal and social functioning in their patients, 26% of psychiatrists prefer pharmacological interventions, whereas 46% prefer psychosocial interventions. CONCLUSION: Psychiatrists recognize that functioning is impaired/very poor in patients with schizophrenia, and there is still an important need to address functioning as a main treatment goal for patients with schizophrenia.

Functional recovery results from the risperidone long-acting injectable versus quetiapine relapse prevention trial (ConstaTRE).

OBJECTIVE: ConstaTRE is an open-label, randomised, controlled, relapse prevention trial in patients with stable schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder switched to risperidone long-acting injectable (RLAI) or oral quetiapine, and was designed to test the hypothesis that injectable antipsychotic treatment with risperidone would be more effective than oral therapy with quetiapine. Here we report the functional recovery results from the ConstaTRE trial. METHODS: Clinically stable adults previously treated with oral risperidone, olanzapine, or oral first-generation antipsychotics were randomised to RLAI or quetiapine for 24 months. Functional recovery was assessed using the Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS) and two quality-of-life (QoL) measures [Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form-12 (SF-12) and Schizophrenia Quality-of-Life Scale Revision 4 (SQLS-R4)]. RESULTS: A total of 666 patients were randomised and treated with RLAI (n = 329) or quetiapine (n = 337). Relapse occurred in 16.5% RLAI and 31.3% quetiapine patients. Significant improvements in SOFAS, SF-12, and SQLS-R4 scores were observed from baseline to month 24 with both RLAI and quetiapine. At months 6, and 12, and endpoint, improvement in SOFAS score was significantly greater for RLAI than quetiapine (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with stable schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, the likelihood of functional recovery appears to be higher in those switching to RLAI than to quetiapine, although improvements in functional status and QoL were observed with both treatments.

Metabolic effects of paliperidone extended release versus oral olanzapine in patients with schizophrenia: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

Metabolic effects are generally more pronounced with second-generation than first-generation antipsychotics. This study was designed to compare long-term metabolic effects and efficacy of paliperidone extended release (ER) with those of oral olanzapine in patients with schizophrenia. In this 6-month, multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label, parallel-group study, adults with schizophrenia were treated with paliperidone ER (6-9 mg/d; n = 239) or oral olanzapine (10-15 mg/d; n = 220). The primary outcome was mean change in the ratio of serum triglyceride level to high-density lipoprotein level (TG/HDL), a marker of insulin resistance. Other outcome measures included the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale scores, measures of lipid and glucose metabolism, and body weight. Significant improvements in psychotic symptoms were observed with both treatments (P < 0.0001). The TG/HDL ratio was significantly higher at end point versus baseline with olanzapine compared with that of paliperidone ER. Mean end point change in TG/HDL ratio was 0.97 ± 2.72 [corrected] for olanzapine (P < 0.0001, reflecting worsening), with no significant change for paliperidone ER (-0.17 ± 2.51). Newly diagnosed impairment in TG and metabolic syndrome was more common with olanzapine (P < 0.05). Insulin resistance, as measured by the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, worsened significantly with olanzapine (P = 0.0003), but not with paliperidone ER. Glucose sensitivity for insulin worsened significantly with olanzapine (P < 0.03), with no significant changes for paliperidone ER. End point increase in body weight was significantly higher with olanzapine than paliperidone ER (3.8 vs 1.2 kg; P = 0.0013). In summary, both paliperidone ER and olanzapine effectively treated schizophrenia; however, undesirable metabolic effects were significantly greater with olanzapine.

Descriptive analyses of the aripiprazole arm in the risperidone long-acting injectable versus quetiapine relapse prevention trial (ConstaTRE).

A recent randomized, open-label, relapse prevention trial (ConstaTRE) compared outcomes with risperidone long-acting injectable (RLAI) versus the oral atypical antipsychotic quetiapine. This study also included a small descriptive arm in which patients could also be randomized to aripiprazole. Results of this exploratory analysis are described here. Clinically stable adults with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder previously treated with oral risperidone, olanzapine, or an oral conventional antipsychotic were randomized to RLAI or aripiprazole. Efficacy and tolerability were monitored for up to 24 months. A total of 45 patients were treated with aripiprazole (10-30 mg/day) and 329 patients with RLAI (25-50 mg i.m. every 2 weeks). Relapse occurred in 27.3% (95% CI: 15.0-42.8%) of aripiprazole-treated and 16.5% (95% CI: 12.7-21.0%) of RLAI-treated patients. Kaplan-Meier estimates of mean (standard error) relapse-free period were 313.7 (20.4) days for aripiprazole and 607.1 (11.4) days for RLAI patients. Remission was achieved by 34.1% (95% CI: 20.5-49.9%) of aripiprazole and 51.1% (95% CI: 45.5-56.6%) of RLAI patients. Clinical global impression-change was improved ("minimally improved" to "very much improved") in 26.4% with RLAI and 15.9% with aripiprazole patients. Tolerability was generally good for both treatment groups. Weight gain (7.0% with RLAI vs. 4.4% with aripiprazole), extrapyramidal adverse events (AEs) (10.3% vs. 4.4%), and potentially prolactin-related AEs (4.6% vs. 0%) were more common with RLAI treatment, and gastrointestinal disorders were more common in aripiprazole-treated patients (22.2% vs. 6.1%). Time-to-relapse in stable patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder was numerically longer in RLAI-treated patients than in aripiprazole-treated patients although not statistically significant. Both treatments were generally well tolerated.

Premorbid functioning and treatment response in recent-onset schizophrenia: prospective study with risperidone long-acting injectable.

Premorbid functioning may be associated with treatment response, but this is confounded by a lack of prospective longitudinal data and controls for medication compliance. This study tested the hypothesis that good premorbid functioning will be associated with better antipsychotic treatment response after controlling for drug adherence by using a long-acting injectable antipsychotic. This was a 6-month, open label, multicenter, phase IV trial in recent-onset schizophrenia treated with flexible doses of risperidone long-acting injectable (25-50 mg every 14 days). Premorbid functioning was assessed with the Premorbid Adjustment Scale (PAS)-Structured Interview; efficacy was evaluated with clinician-rated Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, Clinical Global Impression scale of Severity of Illness, Clinical Global Impression scale of Change, Global Assessment of Functioning Scale, and trial participant completed SF-36. Analyses controlled for baseline scores and demographics. With the use of a priori PAS scoring criteria, the participants' premorbid functioning was categorized as stable-good (n = 142), stable-poor (n = 116), and deteriorating (n = 36). At baseline, the stable-good group had the best functioning on most efficacy measures. All groups showed significant improvement on efficacy measures with treatment. Improvement was significantly higher for the stable-good group. The PAS global assessment of highest level of functioning scale (excellent, n = 75; good, n = 117; fair, n = 78; and poor, n = 31) showed a strong association with baseline functioning and improvement and had a significant linear association with meeting Remission in Schizophrenia Working Group symptom criteria at baseline (P = 0.003) and attained and sustained remission for 3 months during study (47.7%, 49.3%, 29.6%, and 22.2%; P = 0.006). Good premorbid functioning corresponds with better treatment response in recent-onset psychosis as captured on both clinician and patient-reported measures.

Relationship between clinical outcomes measures and personal and social performance functioning in a prospective, interventional study in schizophrenia.

OBJECTIVES: To explore clinical and demographic characteristics impacting patient functioning by determining extent of overlap in factors driving change in Personal and Social Performance (PSP) and other clinical outcomes. METHODS: Post-hoc analysis from a single-arm trial of paliperidone extended release in adult patients with nonacute symptomatic schizophrenia. Psychosocial functioning measures: PSP, Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S), Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Short-Form 36 (SF-36), treatment satisfaction, sleep quality/daytime drowsiness, and Extrapyramidal Symptoms Rating Scale. RESULTS: Highest correlations with PSP total score change included PANSS total score change (Spearman's r = 0.607), PANSS general psychopathology change (r = 0.579), and CGI-S change (r = 0.569). A PSP score change of -32 predicted 90% probability of deterioration in CGI-S (score change of ≥1). The power of PSP change to predict PANSS total score change was lower. Linear stepwise regression demonstrated independent relationships for PSP change and: PANSS total change; CGI-S change; SF-36 Mental Component change; treatment satisfaction at endpoint; PSP at baseline; previous psychiatric hospitalizations. R 2 = 0.55 meant that 45% of PSP variation could not be explained by other clinical outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: Psychosocial functioning improvement is important in schizophrenia. PSP may be valuable for assessing functioning; it encompasses psychosocial and clinical factors not measured by other established assessments.

Topiramate in patients with epilepsy and intellectual disability.

This noninterventional single-arm study explored effectiveness and behavioral outcomes in intellectually disabled patients treated with topiramate for epilepsy. Data from 21 patients diagnosed with cerebral palsy were available for evaluation. Behavioral changes were assessed using the validated Aberrant Behavior Checklist and Matson Evaluation of Social Skills for Individuals with Severe Retardation (MESSIER) scales. Some improvement in nearly all behavioral aspects was observed under concomitant topiramate therapy; for example, the Aberrant Behavior Checklist total score changed from 33.7+/-25.8 to 25.3+/-19.1 (P=0.047). In addition, seizure frequency decreased from 16.1+/-22.2/4 weeks to 12.2+/-17.0/4 weeks (N=21, P=0.164). Fifty-two percent of the patients experienced at least 50% seizure reduction during the 24-week treatment period. The safety profile is in accordance with the current Summary of Product Characteristics of Topiramate. Two unexpected deaths were attributed to sudden unexpected death in epilepsy.

Preventing Cross-Contamination during Lyophilization: GMP and Occupational Cleaning Requirements for Nonproduct and Indirect Product-Contact Parts.

A detailed overview is provided for the possible patient exposure to highly potent active pharmaceutical ingredients (HPAPIs) from potential cross-contamination through the lyophilization process. The intent of this paper is to raise awareness of the risk(s) to patients and stimulate the implementation of adequate risk-based controls, such as containment process(es), use of adequate surrogates in cleaning validation/verification, and test method-sensitivity-based cleaning validation acceptance conditions. Although lyophilizers are considered to be nonproduct-contact surfaces because their surfaces and fixtures do not usually come into direct contact with the product, product contamination can occur at critical locations within a lyophilizer and/or during the unloading process. Contamination of the air because of released product particles can also create a risk. Therefore, special attention should be paid to HPAPIs, as the permitted daily exposures (PDEs) for patients are particularly low. During a lyophilizer cycle, areas of concern are spreading of the lyophilizer HPAPI powder because of air turbulence, contaminated plates, mechanical transfer systems, and spreading because of damaged vials or contaminated stainless steel or plastic surfaces. Specific considerations for contamination containment for the lyophilizer unloading process are presented. Suggestions are provided for the prevention of patient exposure through cross-contamination via direct-contact areas and prevention of manufacturing personnel exposure via non-direct-contact areas. A surface limit(s) of 1 PDE per square decimeter for nonproduct-contact surfaces inside a lyophilizer is proposed. Risk-based cleaning validation/verification strategies are discussed, with specific consideration of the quality control test method sensitivity expectations and use of suitable surrogates for lyophilized products in the cleaning verification studies.LAY ABSTRACT: This paper provides an overview of important points to consider during the manufacture of highly potent active pharmaceutical ingredients (HPAPI) with the intention to limit patient exposure and/or manufacturing personnel exposure to these highly toxic HPAPIs. HPAPI can potentially be spread during the freeze-drying process (lyophilization) and may cross-contaminate products. Manufacturing personnel and patients taking other freeze-dried products made in the same lyophilizer could be contaminated. It is therefore necessary to implement rigorous contamination controls. Within the lyophilizer, areas of concern are spreading of the lyophilizer HPAPI powder because of air turbulence, contaminated plates, mechanical transfer systems, and spreading because of damaged vials or contaminated stainless steel or plastic surfaces. Cleaning validation/verification studies, intended to demonstrate sufficient cleanability of the freeze-drying process as well as the recommended test method sensitivity to detect these highly toxic HPAPIs, are reviewed. Limits for the relevant production surface areas where cross-contamination and/or personnel exposure (through direct contact) could occur are proposed in this paper.

Paliperidone extended-release tablets in schizophrenia patients previously treated with risperidone.

To assess the effect of paliperidone extended-release (ER) tablets in patients with acute symptoms who had previously received risperidone. Data for this post-hoc analysis were pooled from three 6-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in patients treated with paliperidone ER 3-12 mg/day or placebo. Patients had to have received risperidone for > or =4 weeks within 2 weeks of study entry. Assessments were done using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, Clinical Global Impressions-Severity scale, Personal and Social Performance scale, the Simpson-Angus Scale , and adverse event (AE) reports. Altogether, 198 patients (paliperidone ER, n=142; placebo, n=56) met the established criteria. Mean (SD) duration of prior risperidone treatment and dose were 418.8 (572.8) days and 4.4 (2.5) mg/day for paliperidone ER and 527.0 (805.3) days and 4.1 (2.5) mg/day for placebo. Study completion rates were 61.3% for paliperidone ER versus 42.9% for placebo. At endpoint, paliperidone ER showed significant improvement versus placebo (P<0.05) in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, Clinical Global Impressions-Severity, and Personal and Social Performance scores. Mean baseline Simpson-Angus Scale scores were low, with no significant changes at endpoint in either group. AEs > or =10% with paliperidone ER versus placebo were headache (16.2 vs. 16.1%), insomnia (14.1 vs. 16.1%), and agitation (8.5 vs. 10.7%). AE-related discontinuations were 2.1% with paliperidone ER and 5.4% with placebo. In patients who had received risperidone previously but remained sufficiently symptomatic for enrollment, paliperidone ER was significantly more effective than placebo in reducing symptoms and producing functional gains.

Treatment response and tolerability with once-monthly paliperidone palmitate initiated shortly after hospital admission in patients with schizophrenia.

OBJECTIVES: Partial or non-adherence in patients with schizophrenia is common and increases the risk of relapse. This study explored safety, tolerability and treatment outcomes in patients hospitalised for an exacerbation of schizophrenia initiated on maintenance treatment of once-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP1M). METHODS: A 6-week, observational cohort study of patients initiated on PP1M within 3 weeks after hospital admission. RESULTS: Overall, 367 patients were documented, 85.8% with paranoid schizophrenia subtype. Mean time from hospital admission to PP1M initiation was 9.4 ± 7.7 days. Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported by 22.9% of patients. From baseline to endpoint, significant improvements were observed in psychotic symptoms (Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale total score mean change -19.3 ± 12.6, P < .0001) and functioning (Personal and Social Performance scale total score mean change 14.3 ± 12.4, P < .0001). Overall, 6.0% of patients were very or extremely satisfied with their prior antipsychotic medication at baseline compared with 47.2% very or extremely satisfied with PP1M treatment at endpoint. CONCLUSIONS: Initiating PP1M in patients with exacerbated schizophrenia shortly after hospital admission was well tolerated and resulted in statistically significant and clinically relevant improvements in symptoms and patient functioning, suggesting that patients may benefit from early initiation of PP1M during their hospital stay.

Topiramate in children with west syndrome: a retrospective multicenter evaluation of 100 patients.

The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate in a large number of children with West syndrome. The authors performed a retrospective, questionnaire-based data collection in specialized epilepsy units in Germany. Patients with West syndrome and hypsarrhythmia could be included if topiramate treatment had started at an age of < or =3 years. Data of 100 patients were evaluated. Nearly all patients were severely affected and had been treated with multiple antiepileptic drugs with insufficient effect. Topiramate was introduced at a median age of 11.9 months. The median starting dosage was 1.6 mg/kg body weight per day, increased to a median maximum dosage of 12.0 mg/kg. Sixty-one patients received between 1 and 3 antiepileptic drugs in addition to topiramate. The median daily dose considered by the attending physicians to be most effective regarding seizure reduction was 10 mg/kg. A significant reduction in the number of seizures per week was achieved. A total of 17.5% of patients became free of seizures, and in 47%, the seizure frequency decreased by at least 50%. Hypsarrhythmia or status-like electroencephalography patterns remitted in 18 of 83 cases. Side effects were reported in 25% of children and included mostly sedation, loss of appetite, weight loss, and metabolic acidosis. These side effects were statistically related to the number of additional antiepileptic drugs but not to the topiramate dosage. In 17% of patients, topiramate treatment was discontinued because of side effects and in a further 4% because of worsening of seizures. In 44% of patients, treatment was continued for more than 3 months. In conclusion, the data suggest that topiramate is a useful drug in treating West syndrome. However, because of the inherent limitations of the retrospective study design, future prospective controlled studies should be performed.

Risperidone monotherapy in manic inpatients: an open label, multicentre trial.

OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of risperidone in acute mania has been established in several controlled clinical studies. However, this may not necessarily resemble the clinical effectiveness of this treatment, as patient populations in controlled studies are considered as being not representative. This study examined risperidone monotherapy in a sample of severe manic patients in admission ward settings. METHODS: Open label monotherapy with risperidone was examined for 3 weeks in 30 inpatients. Subjects were evaluated with structured clinical rating scales: Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), Clinical Global Impression, bipolar version (CGI-BP), and the Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale (ESRS). In addition, the amount of concomitant use of benzodiazepines was documented. Data were analysed using a last observation carried forward method on all subjects given medication at baseline. RESULTS: Significant improvement from baseline to exit was observed both for the YMRS and CGI-BP. Responder analysis revealed that two-thirds of the patients showed a reduction of 50% in the YMRS score, and 69% of the patients were rated as very much improved or much improved on the CGI-BP mania scale at study exit. Only three patients dropped out due to adverse events, in one case due to extrapyramidal symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of risperidone in the acute treatment of mania as observed in controlled studies could be replicated in this open monotherapy study in a severely manic inpatient population. Considering the mean maximal dosage of 5.5+/-0.9 mg risperidone, the tolerability and safety profile appeared satisfactory.

Early onset of treatment effects with oral risperidone.

BACKGROUND: The dogma of a delayed onset of antipsychotic treatment effects has been maintained over the past decades. However, recent studies have challenged this concept. We therefore performed an analysis of the onset of antipsychotic treatment effects in a sample of acutely decompensated patients with schizophrenia. METHODS: In this observational study, 48 inpatients with acutely decompensated schizophrenia were offered antipsychotic treatment with oral risperidone. PANSS-ratings were obtained on day 0, day 1, day 3, day 7 and day 14. RESULTS: Significant effects of treatment were already present on day 1 and continued throughout the study. The PANSS positive subscore and the PANSS total score improved significantly more than the PANSS negative subscore. CONCLUSION: Our results are consistent with the growing number of studies suggesting an early onset of antipsychotic treatment effects. However, non-pharmacological effects of treatment also need to be taken into consideration.

The effect of long-acting paliperidone palmitate once-monthly on negative and depressive symptoms in patients with schizophrenia switched from previous unsuccessful treatment with oral aripiprazole.

BACKGROUND: The negative symptoms of schizophrenia are generally harder to recognize, more difficult to treat than positive symptoms, and have a significant impact on patient functioning and overall outcomes. Treatment with aripiprazole may be associated with benefits on negative symptoms and functioning given its partial agonism to the dopamine D2 receptor. The aim of this subanalysis was to explore the impact of flexibly dosed, long-acting paliperidone palmitate once monthly (PP1M) on negative and depressive symptoms, disorganized thoughts, anxiety, extrapyramidal symptoms, and patient functioning in nonacute adult patients with schizophrenia previously unsuccessfully treated with oral aripiprazole monotherapy. METHODS: Post-hoc subanalysis of 46 nonacute but symptomatic patients enrolled in a prospective, interventional, single-arm, multicenter, open-label 6-month study. RESULTS: At endpoint, improvements of ⩾ 20% and ⩾ 50% in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score were observed in 52.2% and 21.7% of patients, respectively. Significant and clinically relevant improvements were observed at endpoint in mean (standard deviation [SD]) PANSS negative subscale score (-3.0 (5.0); p < 0.0001) and in the PANSS Marder factor scores for negative symptoms (-2.9 (5.4); p = 0.0006), disorganized thoughts (-2.8 (4.3); p < 0.0001) and anxiety/depression (-1.8 (3.9); p = 0.0031). Patient functioning assessed by mean (SD) Personal and Social Performance scale score (3.9 (13.2); p = 0.0409), Mini International Classification of Functioning rating for Activity and Participation Disorders in Psychological Illnesses total scores (-2.9 (7.1); p = 0.0079), and Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale scores (-0.6 (3.4); p = 0.0456) improved significantly at endpoint. PP1M was well tolerated with no new safety signals. CONCLUSIONS: Six-month treatment with flexibly dosed PP1M was associated with significant and clinically relevant improvements in negative and depressive symptoms, disorganized thoughts, functioning, and extrapyramidal symptoms in nonacute but symptomatic patients with schizophrenia previously unsuccessfully treated with oral aripiprazole.

Once-monthly paliperidone palmitate in early stage schizophrenia - a retrospective, non-interventional 1-year study of patients with newly diagnosed schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: Long-acting antipsychotic therapy may be best suited for patients in the early stage of schizophrenia, when the most can be done before disease progression associated with poor adherence occurs. We explored the patterns of use of once-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP1M), concomitant medication use, hospitalization, and clinical outcomes of adult, newly diagnosed patients with schizophrenia receiving continuous treatment with PP1M for at least 12 months. METHODS: This was an international, multicenter, exploratory, retrospective chart review of medical records of adult patients who were newly diagnosed (not more than 1 year before initiation of PP1M treatment) with schizophrenia and who had received continuous treatment with PP1M for ≥12 months in naturalistic clinical settings. RESULTS: A total of 84 (93.3%) patients were included in the analysis. All but one patient (98.8%, n=83) had received oral antipsychotic medication at least during the last month before the first PP1M administration. Three patients (3.6%) were newly hospitalized during the 12-month documentation period. The reason for hospitalization for all three was management of episode/relapse. A total of 79.2% of patients had a ≥20% improvement and 47.2% had a ≥50% improvement in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score from baseline to endpoint. Half of patients (53.3%) showed a significant improvement, as reflected by an increase in Personal and Social Performance (PSP) total score of at least 7 points from baseline to endpoint (mean [SD] 11.9 [15.0] points; P<0.001). One quarter of patients (24.4%, n=11) moved from a PSP score of 31-70 (ie, moderate to marked functional impairment) at baseline to a PSP score of mild to no functional impairment (PSP score ≥71) at endpoint. Most adverse drug reactions were mild or moderate in severity. CONCLUSION: Continuous treatment with PP1M over 12 months was associated with statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in psychotic symptoms, disease severity, and functional outcomes in patients with schizophrenia.

Switching from oral atypical antipsychotic monotherapy to paliperidone palmitate once-monthly in non-acute patients with schizophrenia: A prospective, open-label, interventional study.

RATIONALE: Long-acting injectable antipsychotic therapies may offer benefits over oral antipsychotics in patients with schizophrenia. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the safety, tolerability, and treatment response of paliperidone palmitate once-monthly in non-acute but symptomatic adult patients switched from previously unsuccessful monotherapy with frequently used oral atypical antipsychotics. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of a prospective, interventional, single-arm, international, multicenter, open-label, 6-month study. RESULTS: The patients (N = 472) were switched to paliperidone palmitate once-monthly (PP1M) from daily oral treatment with either aripiprazole (n = 46), olanzapine (n = 87), paliperidone extended-release (n = 104), quetiapine (n = 44), or risperidone (n = 191). In all groups, mean Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total (p < 0.0001) and Clinical Global Impression-Severity scores improved significantly (p = 0.0004 to p < 0.0001). An improvement of ≥50 % in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score was observed in 21.7 % (aripiprazole), 29.9 % (olanzapine), 29.8 % (paliperidone extended-release), 27.3 % (quetiapine), and 37.2 % (risperidone) of patients. The patients showed significant improvements in the Personal and Social Performance score (aripiprazole p = 0.0409, all others p ≤ 0.0015); Mini International Classification of Functionality, Disability and Health Rating for Activity and Participation Disorders in Psychological Illnesses total scores (all p < 0.01); and Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication Global Satisfaction score (olanzapine and risperidone p < 0.0001, quetiapine p = 0.0465, paliperidone extended-release p = 0.0571, aripiprazole p = NS). Paliperidone palmitate once-monthly was well tolerated, presenting no new safety signals. CONCLUSIONS: These data illustrate that stable, non-acute but symptomatic patients on oral antipsychotic monotherapy may show clinically meaningful improvement of symptoms, functioning, and treatment satisfaction after direct transition to PP1M. The findings are limited by the naturalistic study design; thus, further studies are required to confirm the current findings.

Differential early onset of therapeutic response with risperidone vs conventional antipsychotics in patients with chronic schizophrenia.

The present post-hoc analysis investigated the speed of onset of therapeutic effect of the atypical antipsychotic, risperidone, in direct comparison with conventional antipsychotics. Data were pooled from four double-blind active comparator-controlled clinical trials involving 757 patients with schizophrenia treated for up to 8 weeks with either risperidone (4-6 mg/day) or a conventional antipsychotic such as haloperidol (10 or 20 mg/day), perphenazine (mean dose 28 mg/day), or zuclopenthixol (mean dose 38 mg/day). Primary outcome was assessed using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. A significantly greater proportion of patients treated with risperidone achieved > or =20% reduction from baseline Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score at weeks 1, 2, 6, and at end point (last observation carried forward: P< or =0.04). A significant difference exists in mean reduction from baseline to end point in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total scores in favor of patients treated with risperidone compared with those treated with conventional antipsychotics (-18.4 vs -13.5; P=0.0013). The mean time to response was 23.8 days with risperidone and 28.2 days with conventional drugs (hazard ratio 1.3; 95% confidence interval 1.1-1.5). These findings are clinically relevant because the faster onset of therapeutic effect with atypical antipsychotics can be important in the acute setting and have a considerable impact on healthcare systems.