RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Continued smoking after a cancer diagnosis can be associated with lower treatment tolerance, poorer outcomes, and reduced quality of life compared to non-smoking cancer patients or to those who have quit. Yet about 60% of patients continue to smoke after being diagnosed and find it difficult to quit. To address this problem, it is necessary to identify current and past smoking patterns (e.g., frequency of use, types of tobacco products) and determine whether there is motivation to quit. Similarly, factors associated with continued smoking should be identified. These data will provide the basis for the development of smoking cessation programs tailored to the needs of cancer patients. METHODS: A questionnaire was distributed to cancer patients older than 18 years in a German Comprehensive Cancer Center. Participating cancer patients were divided into three main groups: 1) patients who stopped smoking before being diagnosed with cancer (Ex-before); 2) patients who stopped smoking after a cancer diagnosis (Ex-after); and 3) patients who currently smoke cigarettes (CS). Sociodemographic, medical, and psychosocial data were collected, as well as smoking patterns and the motivation to quit smoking. RESULTS: About half of patients (51%) who smoked before diagnosis continue to smoke after a cancer diagnosis. Being diagnosed with a tobacco-related cancer type was associated with a decreased probability of continued smoking. Patients with tobacco-related tumors and receiving positive support in burdensome situations were more likely to have a higher cigarette dependence. Of all CS, 59.1% had intention to quit, and 22.7% reported having taken action to quit. The support by a smoking cessation program was considered important. CS were willing to spend up to 100 for support and were open to multiple sessions per week, group sessions, one-on-one sessions and/or online support. CONCLUSION: These findings underscore the importance of educating cancer patients about the consequences of smoking and to provide them with support to quit. Identified risk factors may further help to recognize cancer patients with high risk of continued smoking after diagnosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at OSF ( https://osf.io/3c9km ) and published as a study protocol at " https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/13/4/e069570 ".
Asunto(s)
Intención , Motivación , Neoplasias , Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Fumar , Humanos , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/psicología , Masculino , Femenino , Neoplasias/psicología , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Transversales , Alemania/epidemiología , Anciano , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Fumar/psicología , Fumar/epidemiología , Adulto , Calidad de VidaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To assess treatment adherence, effectiveness and safety outcomes of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) receiving ibrutinib in a real-world setting. METHODS: Patients enrolled in REALITY were ≥18 years with a confirmed diagnosis of CLL and were receiving ibrutinib as a first-line (1L), 2L or ≥3L therapy. Treatment retention, adherence, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and time to next therapy were assessed at 1 and 2 years overall, by typology and by cytogenetic subgroups. PFS and OS were analysed using Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS: Exactly 302 patients were enrolled across 57 sites in Germany, from January 2017 to July 2021. One-year retention rates were 69.9% overall (primary endpoint), 77.9% for 1L patients, and 77.6%/78.8% for high-risk patients with del17p/TP53. At 2 years, PFS/OS rates were 77.8%/90.7% overall (1L, 82.7%/90.4%), and were consistent across cytogenetic subgroups. PFS rates were higher for 1L versus ≥3L patients. Patients with the low-acceptance/low-control typology at baseline were less likely to retain treatment at 1 year versus the high-acceptance/high-control typology. No new safety signals were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The REALITY study provides further evidence of the effectiveness and safety of ibrutinib in patients with CLL in a real-world setting, particularly in earlier treatment lines.
Asunto(s)
Adenina/análogos & derivados , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B , Piperidinas , Humanos , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/tratamiento farmacológico , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/mortalidad , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/diagnóstico , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Alemania/epidemiología , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Resultado del Tratamiento , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/administración & dosificación , AdultoRESUMEN
On the clinical significance of reduced executive functions in elderly patients with mental illnesses Research question: Executive functions (EF) show increasing deficits in old age.There are also numerous studies demonstrating the importance of EF in relation to depression, anxiety disorders and post-traumatic stress disorder in older patients. METHODS: The study presented examined this question in a sample of patients in a psychosomatic clinic who were in middle (< 60years) and older age (≥ 60years) (N = 150) and compared them with a psychologically non-stressed comparison sample (N = 157).The survey instrument used to assess EF was the Trail-Making Test (TMT). RESULTS: The results show age and setting differences, i. e. older as well as mentally ill subjects showed worse results; an interaction effect was also found. Associations of symptoms and EF were found only in the elderly sample, but not in the middle-aged sample. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that the importance of impaired executive functions is a clinically relevant variable in psychotherapy of the elderly.
Asunto(s)
Función Ejecutiva , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Humanos , Relevancia Clínica , Prueba de Secuencia Alfanumérica , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/diagnóstico , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/terapia , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Stepped, evidence-based and integrated care service models have the potential to be used as a reference for mental health services. RECOVER aimed to evaluate cost savings, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of such a model within a two arm, assessor- and data analysist-blinded RCT in Hamburg, Germany. Participants aged 16-79 years with mental disorders were randomly assigned either to RECOVER or treatment as usual (TAU). Primary outcomes comprised costs, effectiveness (combined symptoms, functioning, quality of life), and cost-effectiveness, hierarchically ordered. Outcomes were evaluated according to the ITT principle, group differences regarding costs with adjusted generalized linear models, effectiveness with ANCOVA models, and cost-effectiveness with the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves (CEACs). Between 1/1/2018 and 12/31/2020, n = 891 were finally included (n = 477 in RECOVER, n = 444 in TAU). RECOVER was associated with significantly lower annual total costs (-22 %), health and social care costs (-25 %) and hospital costs (-50 %). Effectiveness analyses showed a significantly better outcome for RECOVER with the fully imputed data . The CEACs descriptively demonstrated that RECOVER was cost-effective with a probability of >95 %. Treatment in RECOVER resulted in substantial cost reductions with better cost-effectiveness. RECOVER can be recommended as a reference model for comprehensive and integrated mental health services.
Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud , Trastornos Mentales , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Adolescente , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Trastornos Mentales/economía , Adulto Joven , Alemania , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/economía , Servicios de Salud Mental/economía , Calidad de Vida , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de SaludRESUMEN
Introduction: Family members of autistic individuals often provide support for their autistic relative throughout the lifespan which can lead to massive burden themselves. Reduced health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in family caregivers is assumed; however, only a handful studies on the HRQoL of family caregivers providing care to adult relatives exist as opposed to autistic children. Thus, the current study aimed to (i) investigate the current state of physical and mental HRQoL of family caregivers of autistic adults compared to the general population, and (ii) examine caregiver-related (e.g., age, subjective caregiver burden) and care recipient-related variables (e.g., symptom severity, utilization of formal services) explaining variance in the caregivers' HRQoL. Methods: N = 149 family caregivers completed a nationwide online survey, including the Short-Form Health Survey (SF-8) in order to assess the HRQoL. T-tests were used to compare the HRQoL of family caregivers with the general population. Bivariate correlational and multiple linear regression analyses were conducted in order to identify predictors explaining variance in family caregivers' HRQoL. Results: Family caregivers of autistic adults reported significantly lower physical (M = 46.71, SD = 8.72, Cohen's d = 0.42) and mental HRQoL (M = 40.15, SD = 11.28, Cohen's d = 1.35) compared to the general population. Multiple linear regression with the mental HRQoL as the outcome showed a significant model (F(11, 95) = 5.53, p < .001, adj. R2 = .32) with increased subjective burden explaining most of the variance in mental HRQoL (ß = .32, GDW = .141, p < .001). Multiple linear regression analysis with the outcome physical HRQoL did not reveal a statistically significant model (F(11,95) = 1.09, p = .38). However, bivariate analyses also showed a positive correlation with the subjective caregiver burden (r= .20, p < .05). Discussion: Findings highlight the need to consider HRQoL (and caregiver burden) of family caregivers of autistic adults in several healthcare settings to monitor a potential comprised health status in early stages, with the long-term goal to improve family caregivers' HRQoL.