Effectiveness of a tablet-based intervention for people living with dementia in primary care-A cluster randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Primary care physicians (PCP) play a key role in the care of people living with dementia. However, the implementation and practicability of the German S3 Dementia Guideline in primary care remain unclear. The main objective of the present study was to evaluate an intervention for improving guideline-based dementia care in primary care. DESIGN: A two-arm, 9-month follow-up cluster-randomized controlled trial with two parallel groups. SETTING: 28 primary care practices in Berlin and the surrounding area in Germany. PARTICIPANTS: A total of N = 28 PCP, N = 91 people living with dementia, and N = 88 informal caregivers participated in the trial. INTERVENTION: A tablet-based intervention to improve adherence to the German S3 Dementia Guideline in primary care was compared to a control group (care as usual plus a handbook on dementia). MeasurementsAdherence to dementia guideline (primary outcome) was measured on PCP' (23 items) and informal caregivers' level (19 items) with a self-developed checklist. Secondary outcomes (quality of life, neuropsychiatric symptoms, activities of daily living, general health status, depression, and caregiver burden) were measured with standardized assessments. Also, post-hoc per-protocol analyses were conducted. RESULTS: No differences in guideline adherence between the intervention and the control group were observed. Further, no significant impact of the intervention on secondary outcomes was detected. CONCLUSION: The DemTab Study did not improve self-reported guideline adherence in PCP. However, important implementation barriers such as lack of interoperability and low applicability of existing German S3 Dementia Guideline in the primary care setting were identified and are being discussed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The DemTab trial was prospectively registered with the ISRCTN registry (Trial registration number: ISRCTN15854413). Registered 01 April 2019, https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN15854413.

Can clinical decision support systems be an asset in medical education? An experimental approach.

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic accuracy is one of the major cornerstones of appropriate and successful medical decision-making. Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) have recently been used to facilitate physician's diagnostic considerations. However, to date, little is known about the potential assets of CDSS for medical students in an educational setting. The purpose of our study was to explore the usefulness of CDSSs for medical students assessing their diagnostic performances and the influence of such software on students' trust in their own diagnostic abilities. METHODS: Based on paper cases students had to diagnose two different patients using a CDSS and conventional methods such as e.g. textbooks, respectively. Both patients had a common disease, in one setting the clinical presentation was a typical one (tonsillitis), in the other setting (pulmonary embolism), however, the patient presented atypically. We used a 2x2x2 between- and within-subjects cluster-randomised controlled trial to assess the diagnostic accuracy in medical students, also by changing the order of the used resources (CDSS first or second). RESULTS: Medical students in their 4th and 5th year performed equally well using conventional methods or the CDSS across the two cases (t(164) = 1,30; p = 0.197). Diagnostic accuracy and trust in the correct diagnosis were higher in the typical presentation condition than in the atypical presentation condition (t(85) = 19.97; p < .0001 and t(150) = 7.67; p < .0001).These results refute our main hypothesis that students diagnose more accurately when using conventional methods compared to the CDSS. CONCLUSIONS: Medical students in their 4th and 5th year performed equally well in diagnosing two cases of common diseases with typical or atypical clinical presentations using conventional methods or a CDSS. Students were proficient in diagnosing a common disease with a typical presentation but underestimated their own factual knowledge in this scenario. Also, students were aware of their own diagnostic limitations when presented with a challenging case with an atypical presentation for which the use of a CDSS seemingly provided no additional insights.

Statin Use and All-Cause Mortality in Nursing Home Residents With and Without Dementia: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using Claims Data.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Little is known about the benefits of statin therapy in older adults with dementia. We aimed to evaluate the role of statin use for all-cause mortality in nursing home residents with and without dementia. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used claims data collected between January 2015 and December 2019 from a German health and long-term care insurance provider. Propensity score-based Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the association of statin use with all-cause mortality and adjusted for potential confounders in nursing home residents. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the presence or absence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), statin intensity (low, moderate, high), dementia type, age, sex, and level of care required. RESULTS: A total of 282,693 participants were included in the study, of which 96,162 were matched. In total, 68.9% were women, and the mean age was 82.91 years (SD ±7.97). The average observation period was 2.25 years (SD ±1.35), and 54,269 deaths were recorded. Statin use in individuals with dementia resulted in lower all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.80, 95% CI 0.78-0.82, p < 0.001) compared with statin nonusers. Similarly, in individuals without dementia, statin use was associated with lower all-cause mortality (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.71-0.76, p < 0.001) compared with statin nonusers. Similar findings were observed in subanalyses excluding participants with a history of ASCVD and across subgroups stratified by age, sex, care level required, and dementia type. Statin benefits were consistent among individuals with and without dementia. DISCUSSION: Statin benefits were consistent among individuals with and without dementia. Statin therapy may be continued in nursing home residents with dementia to mitigate the risk of all-cause mortality. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that nursing home patients receiving statins have a lower mortality rate, whether they have a dementia diagnosis or not.