Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 103
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Xenotransplantation ; 30(6): e12829, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37793086

RESUMEN

A conference on progress in the development of xenotransplantation in China was held in Neijiang, Sichuan, in May 2023, and was attended by approximately 100 established researchers and trainees. Progress in xenotransplantation research was reviewed by both Chinese and foreign experts. The topics discussed ranged from genetic engineering of pigs and the results of pig-to-nonhuman primate organ transplantation to the requirements for designated pathogen-free (DPF) pig facilities and regulation of xenotransplantation. This conference served as an opportunity to collectively advance the development of xenotransplantation in China and pave the way for its clinical application.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Órganos , Animales , Porcinos , Trasplante Heterólogo/métodos , Ingeniería Genética , China , Animales Modificados Genéticamente
2.
Xenotransplantation ; 30(5): e12815, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37616183

RESUMEN

Xenotransplantation has the potential to address shortages of organs available for clinical transplantation, but concerns exist regarding potential risks posed by porcine microorganisms and parasites (MP) to the health of human recipients. In this study, a risk-based framework was developed, and expert opinion was elicited to evaluate porcine MP based on swine exposure and risk to human health. Experts identified 255 MP to include in the risk assessment. These were rated by experts for five criteria regarding potential swine exposure in the USA and human health risks. MP were subsequently categorized into three risk mitigation groups according to pre-defined rules: disqualifying porcine MP (due to their pathogenic potential, n = 130); non-disqualifying porcine MP (still relevant to consider for biosecurity or monitoring efforts, n = 40); and alert/watch list (not reported in the USA or MP not in swine, n = 85). Most disqualifying (n = 126) and non-disqualifying (n = 36) porcine MP can effectively be eliminated with high biosecurity programs. This approach supports surveillance and risk mitigation strategies for porcine MP in swine produced for xenotransplantation, such as documentation of freedom from porcine MP, or use of porcine MP screening, monitoring, or elimination options. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first effort to comprehensively identify all relevant porcine MP systematically and transparently evaluate the risk of infection of both donor animals and immunosuppressed human recipients, and the potential health impacts for immunosuppressed human recipients from infected xenotransplantation products from pigs.


Asunto(s)
Parásitos , Animales , Porcinos , Humanos , Trasplante Heterólogo , Testimonio de Experto , Medición de Riesgo , Huésped Inmunocomprometido
3.
Xenotransplantation ; 28(6): e12715, 2021 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34644438

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Pigs deficient in three glycosyltransferase enzymes (triple-knockout [TKO] pigs, that is, not expressing the three known carbohydrate xenoantigens) and expressing 'protective' human transgenes are considered a likely source of organs for transplantation into human recipients. Some human sera have no or minimal natural antibody binding to red blood cells (RBCs) and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from TKO pigs. However, all Old World monkeys exhibit natural antibody binding to TKO pig cells. The xenoantigen targets of Old World monkey natural antibodies are postulated to be carbohydrate moieties exposed when the expression of the carbohydrate N-glycolylneuraminic acid (Neu5Gc) is deleted. The aim of this study was to compare the survival in baboons and histopathology of renal grafts from pigs that either (a) expressed Neu5Gc (GTKO pigs; Group 1) or (b) did not express Neu5Gc (GTKO/CMAHKO [DKO] or TKO pigs; Group 2). METHODS: Life-supporting renal transplants were carried out using GTKO (n = 5) or DKO/TKO (n = 5) pig kidneys under an anti-CD40mAb-based immunosuppressive regimen. RESULTS: Group 1 baboons survived longer than Group 2 baboons (median 237 vs. 35 days; mean 196 vs. 57 days; p < 0.07) and exhibited histopathological features of antibody-mediated rejection in only two kidneys. Group 2 exhibited histopathological features of antibody-mediated rejection in all five grafts, with IgM and IgG binding to renal interstitial arteries and peritubular capillaries. Rejection-free survival was significantly longer in Group 1 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The absence of expression of Neu5Gc on pig kidney grafts is associated with increased binding of baboon antibodies to pig endothelium and reduced graft survival.


Asunto(s)
Riñón , Leucocitos Mononucleares , Animales , Animales Modificados Genéticamente , Carbohidratos , Rechazo de Injerto , Papio , Porcinos , Trasplante Heterólogo
4.
Xenotransplantation ; 27(3): e12608, 2020 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32500587

RESUMEN

During the last years, progress has been made in survival and function of pig-to-non-human primate organ xenotransplantation using organs from genetically modified pigs and immunosuppression regimens that are clinically acceptable. This, together with increased insights into a low risk of pig-to-human transmission of porcine endogenous retrovirus, has opened the perspective of starting with first-in-human trials with xenogeneic organs. The regulatory path to clinical development is complex. Unlike an organ from human donors, an organ from pigs, either genetically modified or wild-type pigs, is considered a medicinal product for human use and hence is under regulatory oversight, in the United States by the Food and Drug Administration and in Europe by the national competent authorities of the member states as well as the European Medicines Agency. Related to the status of medicinal product, "(current) good practices" apply in the process of generating a xenogeneic organ through to the transplantation into a patient and life-long follow-up. In addition, guidances for xenotransplantation products and genetically modified organisms do apply as well. This commentary focuses on regulatory aspects of transplantation of organs from genetically modified pigs into humans, with the intention to facilitate the interactions between regulatory agencies and institutions (sponsors) in research and clinical development of these organs, to support the perspective of speeding up the process with a proper entry in clinical application, to fill an unmet medical need in patients with end-stage organ disease.


Asunto(s)
Regulación Gubernamental , Donantes de Tejidos , Trasplante Heterólogo/normas , Animales , Animales Modificados Genéticamente , Xenoinjertos , Humanos , Terapia de Inmunosupresión , Primates , Porcinos
5.
Xenotransplantation ; 27(5): e12596, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32585053

RESUMEN

Genetically engineered pigs are now available for xenotransplantation in which all three known carbohydrate xenoantigens, against which humans have natural antibodies, have been deleted (triple-knockout [TKO] pigs). Furthermore, multiple human transgenes have been expressed in the TKO pigs, all of which are aimed at protecting the cells from the human immune response. Many human sera demonstrate no or minimal antibody binding to, and little or no cytotoxicity of, cells from these pigs, and this is associated with a relatively low T-cell proliferative response. Unfortunately, baboons and other Old World NHPs have antibodies against TKO pig cells, apparently directed to a fourth xenoantigen that appears to be exposed after TKO. In our experience, most, if not all, humans do not have natural antibodies against this fourth xenoantigen. This discrepancy between NHPs and humans is providing a hurdle to successful translation of pig organ transplantation into the clinic, and making it difficult to provide pre-clinical data that support initiation of a clinical trial. The potential methods by which this obstacle might be overcome are discussed. We conclude that, whatever currently available genetically engineered pig is selected for the final pre-clinical studies, this may not be the optimal pig for clinical trials.


Asunto(s)
Antígenos Heterófilos , Rechazo de Injerto , Trasplante Heterólogo , Animales , Animales Modificados Genéticamente , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Xenoinjertos , Humanos , Papio , Porcinos
6.
Xenotransplantation ; 25(4): e12428, 2018 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30264879

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We established a Source Animal (barrier) Facility (SAF) for generating designated pathogen-free (DPF) pigs to serve as donors of viable organs, tissues, or cells for xenotransplantation into clinical patients. This facility was populated with caesarian derived, colostrum deprived (CDCD) piglets, from sows of conventional-specific (or specified) pathogen-free (SPF) health status in six cohorts over a 10-month period. In all cases, CDCD piglets fulfilled DPF status including negativity for porcine circovirus (PCV), a particularly environmentally robust and difficult to inactivate virus which at the time of SAF population was epidemic in the US commercial swine production industry. Two outbreaks of PCV infection were subsequently detected during sentinel testing. The first occurred several weeks after PCV-negative animals were moved under quarantine from the nursery into an animal holding room. The apparent origin of PCV was newly installed stainless steel penning, which was not sufficiently degreased thereby protecting viral particles from disinfection. The second outbreak was apparently transmitted via employee activities in the Caesarian-section suite adjacent to the barrier facility. In both cases, PCV was contained in the animal holding room where it was diagnosed making a complete facility depopulation-repopulation unnecessary. METHOD: Infectious PCV was eliminated during both outbreaks by the following: euthanizing infected animals, disposing of all removable items from the affected animal holding room, extensive cleaning with detergents and degreasing agents, sterilization of equipment and rooms with chlorine dioxide, vaporized hydrogen peroxide, and potassium peroxymonosulfate, and for the second outbreak also glutaraldehyde/quaternary ammonium. Impact on other barrier animals throughout the process was monitored by frequent PCV diagnostic testing. RESULT: After close monitoring for 6 months indicating PCV absence from all rooms and animals, herd animals were removed from quarantine status. CONCLUSION: Ten years after PCV clearance following the second outbreak, due to strict adherence to biosecurity protocols and based on ongoing sentinel diagnostic monitoring (currently monthly), the herd remains DPF including PCV negative.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Circoviridae/prevención & control , Circovirus/patogenicidad , Organismos Libres de Patógenos Específicos , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/prevención & control , Trasplante Heterólogo , Animales , Xenoinjertos/virología , Porcinos , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/virología , Trasplante Heterólogo/instrumentación , Trasplante Heterólogo/métodos
8.
Xenotransplantation ; 24(3)2017 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28261903

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is no standard therapy for acute liver failure. Hepatocyte transplantation has been proposed for temporary liver function support, while the injured liver regenerates or while waiting for transplantation. We have previously shown such efficacy for microencapsulated porcine hepatocytes in mice with fulminant liver failure. We aimed to establish a large animal model for fulminant liver failure to assess the efficacy of microencapsulated porcine hepatocytes in temporary liver function support. METHODS: The model was developed in baboons; for testing microencapsulated hepatocytes, the best condition was 75% hepatectomy and 60 min warm ischemia time. Fulminant liver failure was characterized by steep increases in liver biochemical parameters, severe steatosis, and massive hepatocyte necrosis during the first 10 days. Hepatocytes from miniature swine were microencapsulated in alginate-poly-l-lysine microspheres, and transplanted intraperitoneally immediately after hepatectomy and warm ischemia (80-120 mL packed hepatocytes in 200-350 mL microspheres, about 30%-50% of the baboon's native liver volume). RESULTS: In the control group, three of five animals were sacrificed after 6-10 days because of fulminant liver failure, and two of five animals recovered normal liver function and survived until elective euthanasia (28 days). In the treatment group of four animals, one animal developed liver failure but survived to 21 days, and three animals recovered completely with normal liver function. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that microencapsulated porcine hepatocytes provide temporary liver function support in baboons with fulminant liver failure. These data support development of this cell therapy product toward clinical trials in patients with acute liver failure.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células/métodos , Hepatocitos/trasplante , Fallo Hepático Agudo/terapia , Trasplante Heterólogo/métodos , Animales , Separación Celular/métodos , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Inmunohistoquímica , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Antígeno Ki-67/metabolismo , Fallo Hepático Agudo/patología , Fallo Hepático Agudo/fisiopatología , Masculino , Ratones , Microesferas , Papio hamadryas , Porcinos , Porcinos Enanos
11.
Xenotransplantation ; 21(5): 397-419, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25176336

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The pig-to-non-human primate model is the standard choice for in vivo studies of organ and cell xenotransplantation. In 1998, Lambrigts and his colleagues surveyed the entire world literature and reported all experimental studies in this model. With the increasing number of genetically engineered pigs that have become available during the past few years, this model is being utilized ever more frequently. METHODS: We have now reviewed the literature again and have compiled the data we have been able to find for the period January 1, 1998 to December 31, 2013, a period of 16 yr. RESULTS: The data are presented for transplants of the heart (heterotopic and orthotopic), kidney, liver, lung, islets, neuronal cells, hepatocytes, corneas, artery patches, and skin. Heart, kidney, and, particularly, islet xenograft survival have increased significantly since 1998. DISCUSSION: The reasons for this are briefly discussed. A comment on the limitations of the model has been made, particularly with regard to those that will affect progression of xenotransplantation toward the clinic.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células/métodos , Modelos Animales , Trasplante de Órganos/métodos , Primates , Porcinos , Trasplante Heterólogo/métodos , Animales
13.
Xenotransplantation ; 20(1): 5-17, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23190260

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Various groups have reported prolonged diabetes reversal and graft function after porcine islet transplantation into diabetic macaques using different experimental designs (macaque source, islet source, type of immunosuppression): subsequently, the International Xenotransplantation Association has published recommendations for entering a clinical trial. Our experiments showed limitations that affected consistent achievement of long-term survival. We aimed to identify these limitations and underlying causes to emphasize the translational value of this highly relevant type 1 diabetic macaque model. METHODS: We reviewed data from our institution and literature data on long-term porcine islet xenograft survival in the diabetic macaque model, especially focusing on aspects of incomplete diabetes reversal relative to macaque normal values. This phenomenon was compared with diabetes reversal in an allo-islet transplant model in macaques and with chronic insulin treatment of diabetic macaques, all with 180-day follow-up. This comparison enabled to identify potential model limitations and underlying causative factors. RESULTS: Especially in the xenograft model, the achievement of long-term graft survival revealed limitations including chronic, mild hyperglycemia and absence of body weight (BW) gain or even progressive BW loss. Metabolic incompatibilities in glycemic control (i.e., insulin kinetics) between the pig and macaque species underlie chronic, mild hyperglycemia. This phenomenon might not bear relevance for the pig-to-human species combination because the glycemic control in pigs and humans is similar and differs from that in nonhuman primates (NHP). Weight loss could be related to changes in the gastrointestinal tract related with local high exposure to orally administered immunosuppressants; these must be given at higher dose levels because of low bioavailability in macaques to achieve systemic exposure at therapeutic levels. This is aggravated by insufficient graft insulin production in proportion to the needs of macaques: this model limitation has no translational value to the pig-to-human setting. Nutritional deficits can result in incorrect interpretation of blood glucose levels and C-peptide levels regarding graft function. Likewise, nutritional status alters physiologic responses, influencing susceptibility to infectious and noninfectious complications. CONCLUSION: THE model-induced confounding described interferes with accurate interpretation of safety and efficacy studies, which affects the translational value of pig-to-NHP islet cell transplant studies to the pig-to-human transplant condition.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Experimental/cirugía , Trasplante de Islotes Pancreáticos/métodos , Trasplante Heterólogo , Animales , Glucemia/metabolismo , Diabetes Mellitus Experimental/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus Experimental/patología , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Terapia de Inmunosupresión , Trasplante de Islotes Pancreáticos/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Islotes Pancreáticos/inmunología , Macaca , Modelos Animales , Sus scrofa , Trasplante Heterólogo/efectos adversos , Trasplante Heterólogo/inmunología , Pérdida de Peso
15.
Xenotransplantation ; 20(6): 418-28, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23941232

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The manufacturing process of islets includes a culture step which was originally introduced to ease the logistics of procedures in preparing the graft and transplant recipient. It has been suggested that culture at room temperature has an advantage over culture at 37 °C, in part by reducing immunogenicity via preferential elimination of contaminating cells (such as passenger leukocytes) within islets. We investigated this using islets isolated from pancreata of adult pigs. METHODS: Porcine islets were isolated from three donors and cultured at 37 °C for 1 day, and then under three different conditions: 37 °C for 6 days (condition A); 22 °C for 6 days (condition B); or 22 °C for 5 days followed by 37 °C for 1 day (condition C). Recovery was assessed by DNA measurement, viability by oxygen consumption rate normalized for DNA (OCR/DNA), and gene expression by RT-PCR for a series of 9 lymphocyte markers, 11 lymphokines and chemokines, and 14 apoptotic and stress markers. RESULTS: Post-culture islet recoveries were similar for the three culture conditions. Average OCR/DNA values were 129-159 nmol/min·mgDNA before culture, and 259-291, 204-212, and 207-228 nmol/min·mgDNA, respectively, for culture under conditions A, B, and C, respectively. Irrespective of culture condition, examined gene expression in all three series of lymphocyte markers, lymphokines and chemokines, and apoptotic and stress markers manifested a statistically significant decrease upon culture for 7 days. This decrease was most dramatic for condition A: in particular, most of lymphocyte markers showed a >10-fold reduction and also six markers in the lymphokine and chemokine series; these reductions are consistent with the elimination of immune cells present within islets during culture. The reduction was less for apoptotic and stress markers. For culture under condition B, the reduction in gene expression was less, and culture under condition C resulted in gene expression levels similar to those under condition A: this indicates that 24 h at 37 °C is sufficient to re-equilibrate gene expression levels from those in islets cultured at 22 °C to those in islets cultured at 37 °C. Results were consistent among the preparations from the three donors. CONCLUSIONS: Culture of porcine islets at 37 °C provides benefits over culture at 22 °C with respect to OCR/DNA outcomes and reduced expression of genes encoding lymphocyte markers, lymphokines and chemokines, and markers for apoptosis and stress.


Asunto(s)
Islotes Pancreáticos/inmunología , Islotes Pancreáticos/metabolismo , Sus scrofa/inmunología , Técnicas de Cultivo de Tejidos/métodos , Animales , Quimiocinas/genética , Femenino , Expresión Génica , Marcadores Genéticos , Xenoinjertos , Humanos , Trasplante de Islotes Pancreáticos/inmunología , Trasplante de Islotes Pancreáticos/métodos , Linfocitos/inmunología , Linfocitos/metabolismo , Linfocinas/genética , Consumo de Oxígeno , Temperatura , Recolección de Tejidos y Órganos/métodos
16.
Xenotransplantation ; 20(2): 75-81, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23384163

RESUMEN

Porcine islet xenotransplantation is considered a potential cell-based therapy for type 1 diabetes. It is currently being evaluated in diabetic nonhuman primates (NHP) to assess safety and efficacy of the islet product. However, due to a variety of distinct differences between the respective species, including the insulin secretory characteristics of islets, the suitability and predictive value of the preclinical model in the extrapolation to the clinical setting remain a critical issue. Islets isolated from human (n = 3), NHP (n = 2), adult pig (AP, n = 3), and juvenile pig (JP, n = 4) pancreata were perifused with medium at basal glucose (2.5 mm) followed by high glucose (16.7 mm) concentrations. The total glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) was calculated from generated insulin secretion profiles. Nonhuman primate islets exhibited GSIS 3-fold higher than AP islets, while AP and JP islets exhibited GSIS 1/3 and 1/30 of human islets, respectively. The insulin content of NHP and AP islets was similar to that of human islets, whereas that of JP islets was 1/5 of human islets. Despite the fact that human, NHP, and AP islets contain similar amounts of insulin, the much higher GSIS for NHP islets than for AP and JP islets suggests the need for increased dosing of islets from JP and AP in pig-to-NHP transplantation. Porcine islet xenotransplantation to humans may require significantly higher dosing given the lower GSIS of AP islets compared to human islets.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/cirugía , Glucosa/farmacología , Insulina/metabolismo , Trasplante de Islotes Pancreáticos , Islotes Pancreáticos/metabolismo , Trasplante Heterólogo , Animales , Recuento de Células , Tamaño de la Célula , Humanos , Técnicas In Vitro , Secreción de Insulina , Islotes Pancreáticos/citología , Islotes Pancreáticos/efectos de los fármacos , Primates , Especificidad de la Especie , Porcinos
17.
Clin Transplant ; 27(2): E116-25, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23330863

RESUMEN

Recently, initiatives have been undertaken to establish an islet transplantation program in Athens, Greece. A major hurdle is the high cost associated with the establishment and maintenance of a clinical-grade islet manufacturing center. A collaboration was established with the University Hospitals of Geneva, Switzerland, to enable remote islet cell manufacturing with an established and validated fully operational team. However, remote islet manufacturing requires shipment of the pancreas from the procurement to the islet manufacturing site (in this case from anywhere in Greece to Geneva) and then shipment of the islets from the manufacturing site to the transplant site (from Geneva to Athens). To address challenges related to cold ischemia time of the pancreas and shipment time of islets, a collaboration was initiated with the University of Arizona, Tucson, USA. An international workshop was held in Athens, December 2011, to mark the start of this collaborative project. Experts in the field presented in three main sessions: (i) islet transplantation: state-of-the-art and the "network approach"; (ii) technical aspects of clinical islet transplantation and outcomes; and (iii) islet manufacturing - from the donated pancreas to the islet product. This manuscript presents a summary of the workshop.


Asunto(s)
Cooperación Internacional , Trasplante de Islotes Pancreáticos/métodos , Preservación de Órganos/métodos , Recolección de Tejidos y Órganos/métodos , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/organización & administración , Arizona , Grecia , Humanos , Suiza , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/métodos
18.
Nat Med ; 12(3): 301-3, 2006 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16491083

RESUMEN

Cell-based diabetes therapy requires an abundant cell source. Here, we report reversal of diabetes for more than 100 d in cynomolgus macaques after intraportal transplantation of cultured islets from genetically unmodified pigs without Gal-specific antibody manipulation. Immunotherapy with CD25-specific and CD154-specific monoclonal antibodies, FTY720 (or tacrolimus), everolimus and leflunomide suppressed indirect activation of T cells, elicitation of non-Gal pig-specific IgG antibody, intragraft expression of proinflammatory cytokines and invasion of infiltrating mononuclear cells into islets.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Experimental/cirugía , Terapia de Inmunosupresión , Trasplante de Islotes Pancreáticos , Macaca/inmunología , Macaca/cirugía , Porcinos , Trasplante Heterólogo , Animales , Tratamiento Basado en Trasplante de Células y Tejidos , Diabetes Mellitus Experimental/inducido químicamente , Diabetes Mellitus Experimental/inmunología , Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Supervivencia de Injerto/inmunología , Islotes Pancreáticos/citología , Sistema Porta/inmunología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA