Pediatric Presentation of Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Review of Recent Literature With Estimation of Local Prevalence.

We aimed to investigate the epidemiology, the clinical and laboratory characteristics of the pediatric involvement of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), by performing a review of the current evidence and reviewing local experience in the Northwest Italy. To achieve this, we performed a detailed literature search to identify articles describing clinical and laboratory characteristics of pediatric APS. In concomitance, we conducted a registry-based study collecting data from the Piedmont and Aosta Valley Rare Disease Registry including pediatric patients diagnosed with APS in the last 11 years. The literature review led to inclusion of six articles with a total of 386 pediatric patients (65% females, 50% with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) as concomitant diagnosis). Rates of venous and arterial thrombosis were 57 and 35%, respectively. "Extra-criteria manifestations" included mostly hematologic and neurologic involvement. Almost one-quarter of patients (19%) reported recurrent events and 13% manifested as catastrophic APS. A total of 17 pediatric patients (mean age 15.1 ± 2.8, 76% female) developed APS in the Northwest of Italy. In 29% of cases, SLE was a concomitant diagnosis. Deep vein thrombosis was the most frequent manifestation (28%) followed by catastrophic APS (6%). The estimated prevalence of pediatric APS in Piedmont and Aosta Valley Region is 2.5/100,000 people, whereas the estimated annual incidence is 0.2/100,000 inhabitants. In conclusion, clinical manifestations of pediatric APS seem to be more severe and with a high prevalence of noncriteria manifestations. International efforts are needed to better characterize this condition and to develop new specific diagnostic criteria to avoid missed/delayed diagnosis in children with APS.

Epidemiology of antiphospholipid syndrome: macro- and microvascular manifestations.

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by thrombotic and non-thrombotic macro- and microvascular manifestations and pregnancy complications in the setting of persistent antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), namely anticardiolipin antibodies, anti-ß2 glycoprotein-I antibodies and lupus anticoagulant. Four decades after its first description, APS prevalence and incidence are still not completely understood due to the limited number of well-designed, population-based multi-ethnic studies. Furthermore, despite decades of efforts to standardise aPL immunoassays, considerable intraassay and interlaboratory variances in aPL measures still exist. Large multicentre APS cohorts have shown a 10-year survival of ∼91% and the presence of catastrophic APS occurs in about 1% of the entire population, associated with a 50% mortality rate. Clinically, any organ can be affected in the context of large, medium or small vessel (artery and/or vein) thrombosis. Macrovascular thrombosis is the hallmark of the disease and veins are more frequently affected than arteries. Deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism thromboembolic disease is the most common APS manifestation, while stroke and transient ischaemic attack are the most frequent arterial thrombosis events. Myocardial infarction can also occur and contributes to increased mortality in APS. A minority of patients present with thrombosis affecting the intraabdominal organs, including the liver, spleen, small and large bowel, and the kidneys. Microvascular thrombosis, including APS nephropathy, chronic skin ulcers and livedoid vasculopathy represent a diagnostic challenge requiring histologic confirmation. In this narrative review we summarize the available evidence on APS epidemiology, focusing on the description of the prevalence of macro- and microvascular manifestations of the disease.

2023 ACR/EULAR classification criteria in existing research cohorts: an international study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of the updated ACR/EULAR APS classification criteria on two large research cohorts. METHODS: Consecutive patients who tested persistently positive for at least one aPL in the last three years were enrolled. The first APS Sydney index event was considered and computed for the comparison between Sydney and 2023 APS criteria. When computing the 2023 APS criteria, additional manifestations were also considered. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 249 patients (185 with APS and 64 aPL carriers according to Sydney criteria). The 185 patients had as first index event venous thrombosis in 55 cases (29.8%), arterial thrombosis in 63 (34%) and pregnancy morbidity in 67 (36.2%). When applying the updated criteria, 90 subjects (48.7%) failed to reach the composite score of the new criteria. The percentage of thrombotic APS per Sydney criteria decreased from 47.3% to 34.9% because of high cardiovascular risk in 23 cases, IgM aPL profile in six cases and in two patients for both reasons. Patients with pregnancy morbidity decreased from 26.9% to 3.2% (39 cases of recurrent early pregnancy loss and 20 of fetal losses). Consequently, the percentage of aPL carriers increased from 26% to 61%. When looking at the disease evolution at follow-up, 32 additional patients out of 90 (35.6%) fulfilled the new APS criteria, after developing additional clinical manifestation following index event. CONCLUSION: When applying the new APS criteria to our research cohorts, not-negligible differences exist in patients' classification. A multidisciplinary approach will be mandatory to assess the impact of the new criteria on research and, ultimately, patients' care.

Damage measured by Damage Index for Antiphospholipid Syndrome (DIAPS) in antiphospholipid antibody-positive patients included in the APS ACTION registry.

OBJECTIVES: Our primary objective was to quantify damage burden measured by Damage Index for Antiphospholipid Syndrome (DIAPS) in aPL-positive patients with or without a history of thrombosis in an international cohort (the APS ACTION cohort). Secondly, we aimed to identify clinical and laboratory characteristics associated with damage in aPL-positive patients. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we analysed the baseline damage in aPL-positive patients with or without APS classification. We excluded patients with other autoimmune diseases. We analysed the demographic, clinical and laboratory characteristics based on two subgroups: (i) thrombotic APS patients with high vs low damage; and (ii) non-thrombotic aPL-positive patients with vs without damage. RESULTS: Of the 826 aPL-positive patients included in the registry as of April 2020, 586 with no other systemic autoimmune diseases were included in the analysis (412 thrombotic and 174 non-thrombotic). In the thrombotic group, hyperlipidaemia (odds ratio [OR] 1.82; 95% CI 1.05, 3.15; adjusted P = 0.032), obesity (OR 2.14; 95% CI 1.23, 3.71; adjusted P = 0.007), aß2GPI high titres (OR 2.33; 95% CI 1.36, 4.02; adjusted P = 0.002) and corticosteroid use (ever) (OR 3.73; 95% CI 1.80, 7.75; adjusted P < 0.001) were independently associated with high damage at baseline. In the non-thrombotic group, hypertension (OR 4.55; 95% CI 1.82, 11.35; adjusted P = 0.001) and hyperlipidaemia (OR 4.32; 95% CI 1.37, 13.65; adjusted P = 0.013) were independent predictors of damage at baseline; conversely, single aPL positivity was inversely correlated with damage (OR 0.24; 95% CI 0.075, 0.77; adjusted P = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: DIAPS indicates substantial damage in aPL-positive patients in the APS ACTION cohort. Selected traditional cardiovascular risk factors, steroids use and specific aPL profiles may help to identify patients more prone to present with a higher damage burden.

ANA-positive versus ANA-negative Antiphospholipid Antibody-positive Patients: Results from the APS ACTION Clinical Database and Repository.

OBJECTIVES: This study focused on the prevalence and impact of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) in antiphospholipid antibody (aPL)-positive patients without concomitant systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs). METHODS: Data from aPL-positive patients with or without Revised Sapporo APS classification criteria were retrieved from the APS ACTION Registry. Patients with concomitant SARDs were excluded. RESULTS: 430 aPL-positive patients were included in the analysis, 56% ANA-positive and 44% negative. ANA positivity was significantly associated with history of hematologic manifestations (persistent autoimmune hemolytic anaemia, thrombocytopenia, leukopenia and/or lymphopenia) (16% of ANA-positive vs 7% of ANA-negative, p= 0.006). Triple aPL-positivity was more frequent in the ANA-positive subgroup (p= 0.02), along with low baseline C3 and C4 levels (p= 0.05 and p= 0.009, respectively), and higher frequency for extractable nuclear antigens (ENA). Among aPL-positive patients with no APS classification, ANA-positive patients showed a higher rate of arthritis (p= 0.006). Among female patients who have experienced at least one pregnancy, 113 were ANA-positive and 96 were ANA-negative; ANA-negative patients had a higher number of pregnancies (p= 0.018), and number of live births (p= 0.014). A wider proportion of ANA-positive patients were treated with hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) (p< 0.001). CONCLUSION: When we analysed aPL-positive patients with no other SARDs, ANA status was not associated with thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity. Interestingly, ANA-positive patients showed higher rates of systemic autoimmune features, including hematologic manifestations, multiple aPL positivity, lower complement levels, ENA positivity, and joint involvement, and were more often treated with HCQ. Finally, aPL-positive subjects who were ANA-negative had a higher rate of pregnancies and live births.

The estimated prevalence of antiphospholipid antibodies and criteria-antiphospholipid syndrome in subjects with renal thrombotic microangiopathy.

BACKGROUND: While the prevalence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) in venous and arterial thrombotic events had already been estimated by previous studies, the prevalence of aPL in subjects with Thrombotic Microangiopathy (TMA) is still not fully elucidated. Thus, we conducted a systematic review to estimate the frequency of aPL in subjects with biopsy-proven renal TMA. METHODS: We conducted in the PubMed database a search for English-language studies investigating the presence of aPL in subjects with biopsy-proven renal TMA from January 1985 to December 2022. Keywords used in the search included: 'antiphospholipid syndrome', 'antiphospholipid antibodies' and 'thrombotic microangiopathy'. Cohorts of HUS patients were excluded due to the risk of over-estimating the prevalence of aPL in these populations. The median frequency for positive aPL including anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL), antibodies against ß2-glycoprotein-I (anti-ß2GPI) and lupus anticoagulant (LA) was then calculated. RESULTS: 522 articles were identified through the literature search. Six studies, assessing the prevalence of aPL in 211 subjects with renal TMA, were retrieved. The overall aPL prevalence was estimated as 24.4% (range 22-56). The estimated prevalence of aCL (IgG/IgM), anti-ß2GPI, (IgG/IgM) and LA was 4.0% (range 3-27), 4.0% (range 3-16) and 18.9% (range 13-25), respectively. APS was diagnosed in 16.3% (range 11-29) of the patients. Of note, a high level of heterogeneity was observed when comparing the reported aPL profiles for each study. CONCLUSIONS: This comprehensive systematic analysis of studies investigating the prevalence of aPL in renal TMA showed that, despite the high heterogeneity of the included studies, aPL are present in about one case out of four renal-TMA cases.

Lymphatic System and the Kidney: From Lymphangiogenesis to Renal Inflammation and Fibrosis Development.

The lymphatic kidney system plays a crucial role in managing interstitial fluid removal, regulating fluid balance, and tuning immune response. It also assists in the reabsorption of proteins, electrolytes, cytokines, growth factors, and immune cells. Pathological conditions, including tissue damage, excessive interstitial fluid, high blood glucose levels, and inflammation, can initiate lymphangiogenesis-the formation of new lymphatic vessels. This process is associated with various kidney diseases, including polycystic kidney disease, hypertension, ultrafiltration challenges, and complications post-organ transplantation. Although lymphangiogenesis has beneficial effects in removing excess fluid and immune cells, it may also contribute to inflammation and fibrosis within the kidneys. In this review, we aim to discuss the biology of the lymphatic system, from its development and function to its response to disease stimuli, with an emphasis on renal pathophysiology. Furthermore, we explore how innovative treatments targeting the lymphatic system could potentially enhance the management of kidney diseases.

Obstetric outcomes in women with rheumatic disease and COVID-19 in the context of vaccination status.

OBJECTIVE: To describe obstetric outcomes based on COVID-19 vaccination status, in women with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) who developed COVID-19 during pregnancy. METHODS: Data regarding pregnant women entered into the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance registry from 24 March 2020-25 February 2022 were analysed. Obstetric outcomes were stratified by number of COVID-19 vaccine doses received prior to COVID-19 infection in pregnancy. Descriptive differences between groups were tested using the chi-squared or Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: There were 73 pregnancies in 73 women with RMD and COVID-19. Overall, 24.7% (18) of pregnancies were ongoing, while of the 55 completed pregnancies, 90.9% (50) of pregnancies resulted in livebirths. At the time of COVID-19 diagnosis, 60.3% (n = 44) of women were unvaccinated, 4.1% (n = 3) had received one vaccine dose while 35.6% (n = 26) had two or more doses. Although 83.6% (n = 61) of women required no treatment for COVID-19, 20.5% (n = 15) required hospital admission. COVID-19 resulted in delivery in 6.8% (n = 3) of unvaccinated women and 3.8% (n = 1) of fully vaccinated women. There was a greater number of preterm births (PTB) in unvaccinated women compared with fully vaccinated 29.5% (n = 13) vs 18.2% (n = 2). CONCLUSIONS: In this descriptive study, unvaccinated pregnant women with RMD and COVID-19 had a greater number of PTB compared with those fully vaccinated against COVID-19. Additionally, the need for COVID-19 pharmacological treatment was uncommon in pregnant women with RMD regardless of vaccination status. These results support active promotion of COVID-19 vaccination in women with RMD who are pregnant or planning a pregnancy.

Thrombosis and APS: Lessons Learned from Another Black Swan Tale.

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a chronic systemic autoimmune disease characterized by venous, arterial, and microvascular thromboses and/or recurrent pregnancy morbidity, that occur in the persistent presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). APS can present with a wide range of clinical manifestations often reffered as "extra-criteria". These features, although apparently less common, can severely impact patients' outcome. Here, we report the case of a patient with a newly diagnosed APS. He previously experienced a recurrence of venous thrombosis after discontinuation of anticoagulant therapy in association with cutaneous ulcerations as presenting symptoms. Interestingly, skin lesions did not improve with full anticoagulant treatment. Due to concomitant presence of thrombotic and microvascular involvement, immunomodulatory therapy with steroid pulses followed by intravenous injections of belimumab was started, with progressive and significant amelioration, leading to complete recovery. Following the presentation of the current case report, we highlight the importance of suspecting APS in young patients experiencing unprovoked thrombosis. We also emphasized the critical issue of testing aPL during anticoagulant treatment and focused on the need of aPL retesting in patients with positivity at high titers. We also highlight the double nature of aPL-mediated clinical manifestations. While most patients presented with pure thrombotic complications, one should always remember that APS is an autoimmune-mediated disease, which can benefit from alternative therapeutic approaches beyond anticoagulation.

Open-label, prospective, phase II descriptive pilot trial of belimumab therapy for refractory and/or non-criteria manifestations of antiphospholipid syndrome: study protocol.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of belimumab given for 24 months in patients persistently positive for antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) with clinical features attributable to aPL [refractory and/or non-criteria manifestations of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS)]. METHODS: In this investigator-initiated, single-centre, open-label, prospective, phase II descriptive pilot trial, belimumab will be administered in 15 patients attending San Giovanni Bosco Hospital (Turin) showing refractory and/or non-criteria manifestations of APS. Subjects will receive belimumab 10 mg/kg intravenously (in addition to their ongoing APS treatment) with regimen at 0, 2, 4 weeks and every 4 weeks thereafter (up to week 104). Study endpoints determined at 4, 16, 24, 36, 52 and 104 weeks will include: primary (safety and adverse events) and secondary outcomes, such as changes in clinical outcomes (recurrent thromboses, thrombocytopenia, haemolytic anaemia, cardiovascular events, skin ulcer, aPL-related nephropathy and cognitive dysfunction), laboratory outcomes (routine tests, aPL, ENA and anti-dsDNA tests, thrombin generation assay, interferon-signature analysis, lymphocytes immunophenotyping, BLyS determination) and QoL evaluation. RESULTS: Study endpoints determined at 4, 16, 24, 36, 52 and 104 weeks will include: primary (safety and adverse events) and secondary outcomes, such as changes in clinical outcomes (recurrent thromboses, thrombocytopenia, haemolytic anaemia, cardiovascular events, skin ulcer, aPL-related nephropathy and cognitive dysfunction), laboratory outcomes (routine tests, aPL, ENA and anti-dsDNA tests, thrombin generation assay, interferon-signature analysis, lymphocytes immunophenotyping, BLyS determination) and QoL evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: Targeting B-cells is emerging as an appealing strategy for patients with APS. Preliminary observations showed aPL negativisation after starting therapy with belimumab. The clinical relevance of these findings will be investigated in this prospective study. If confirmed, the current 'anti-thrombotic' approach to APS patients could be complemented, at least in selected cases, with an 'immunomodulatory' strategy.

ERN ReCONNET points to consider for treating patients living with autoimmune rheumatic diseases with antiviral therapies and anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody products.

Recent studies have shown that people who are immunocompromised may inadvertently play a role in spurring the mutations of the virus that create new variants. This is because some immunocompromised individuals remain at risk of getting COVID-19 despite vaccination, experience more severe disease, are susceptible to being chronically infected and remain contagious for longer if they become infected and considering that immunocompromised individuals represent approximately 2% of the overall population, this aspect should be carefully considered. So far, some autoimmune rheumatic disease (ARD) patients with COVID-19 have been treated with antiviral therapies or anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody products. However, there is no homogeneous approach to these treatment strategies. This issue was addressed within the European Reference Network (ERN) on Rare and Complex Connective Tissue and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ReCONNET) in a discussion among experts and patient's representatives in the context of the rare and complex connective tissue diseases (rCTDs) covered by the Network. ERN ReCONNET is one of the 24 ERNs launched by the European Commission in 2017 with the aim of tackling low prevalence and rare diseases that require highly specialised treatment and promoting concentration of knowledge and resources through virtual networks involving healthcare providers (HCPs) across the European Union (EU). Considering the urgent need to provide guidance not only to the rCTDs community, but also to the whole ARDs community, a multidisciplinary Task Force, including expert clinicians and European Patient Advocacy Group (ePAG) Advocates, was created in the framework of ERN ReCONNET with the aim of developing overarching principles (OP) and points-to-consider (PtC) on a homogenous approach to treat immunocompromised patients with ARDs (with a particular focus on CTDs) affected by COVID-19 using antiviral therapies and anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody products. The present work reports the final OP and PtC agreed by the Task Force.

Antiphospholipid Syndrome and Kidney Involvement.

BACKGROUND: Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disease characterized by the development of autoantibodies and the impairment of the coagulation system. Knowledge about this syndrome is increasing over time, but kidney involvement, especially APS nephropathy, still represents a challenge for physicians. SUMMARY: A "two hit" model has been hypothesized to explain APS pathophysiology, and the role played by some factors, such as the complement system, is becoming more and more clear. From a clinical point of view, along with thrombosis in any site and/or obstetric morbidities, that are the hallmarks of APS, a constellation of several other clinical symptoms is related to APS. These symptoms alone are not sufficient to fulfill Sydney criteria for APS and this could potentially lead to omitting some diagnoses. The mainstay of management of APS is antithrombotic therapy, but there are expectations for new drugs that regulate the immune system. APS could affect the kidneys in many ways and among them, APS nephropathy is an intriguing entity that has been overlooked in recent years. Novel studies on APS nephropathy are lacking. KEY MESSAGES: In this review, we discuss what we currently know about APS and its relationship with the kidney, with an eye toward the future perspectives. Multicenter studies on APS nephropathy are necessary in order to develop targeted therapies.

Finding the Needle in the Haystack: Serological and Urinary Biomarkers in Behçet's Disease: A Systematic Review.

Urinary and serological markers play an essential role in the diagnostic process of autoimmune diseases. However, to date, specific and reliable biomarkers for diagnosing Behçet's disease (BD) are still lacking, negatively affecting the management of these patients. To analyze the currently available literature on serological and urinary BD biomarkers investigated in the last 25 years, we performed a systematic literature review using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcomes (PICO) strategy. One hundred eleven studies met the eligibility criteria (6301 BD patients, 5163 controls). Most of them were retrospective, while five (5%) were prospective. One hundred ten studies (99%) investigated serological biomarkers and only two (2%) focused on urinary biomarkers. One hundred three studies (93%) explored the diagnostic potential of the biomolecules, whereas sixty-two (56%) tested their effect on disease activity monitoring. Most articles reported an increase in inflammatory markers and pro-oxidant molecules, with a decrease in antioxidants. Promising results have been shown by the omics sciences, offering a more holistic approach. Despite the vast number of investigated markers, existing evidence indicates a persistent gap in BD diagnostic/prognostic indices. While new steps have been taken in the direction of pathogenesis and disease monitoring, international efforts for the search of a diagnostic marker for BD are still needed.

EULAR recommendations for cardiovascular risk management in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases, including systemic lupus erythematosus and antiphospholipid syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To develop recommendations for cardiovascular risk (CVR) management in gout, vasculitis, systemic sclerosis (SSc), myositis, mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD), Sjögren's syndrome (SS), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). METHODS: Following European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) standardised procedures, a multidisciplinary task force formulated recommendations for CVR prediction and management based on systematic literature reviews and expert opinion. RESULTS: Four overarching principles emphasising the need of regular screening and management of modifiable CVR factors and patient education were endorsed. Nineteen recommendations (eleven for gout, vasculitis, SSc, MCTD, myositis, SS; eight for SLE, APS) were developed covering three topics: (1) CVR prediction tools; (2) interventions on traditional CVR factors and (3) interventions on disease-related CVR factors. Several statements relied on expert opinion because high-quality evidence was lacking. Use of generic CVR prediction tools is recommended due to lack of validated rheumatic diseases-specific tools. Diuretics should be avoided in gout and beta-blockers in SSc, and a blood pressure target <130/80 mm Hg should be considered in SLE. Lipid management should follow general population guidelines, and antiplatelet use in SLE, APS and large-vessel vasculitis should follow prior EULAR recommendations. A serum uric acid level <0.36 mmol/L (<6 mg/dL) in gout, and disease activity control and glucocorticoid dose minimisation in SLE and vasculitis, are recommended. Hydroxychloroquine is recommended in SLE because it may also reduce CVR, while no particular immunosuppressive treatment in SLE or urate-lowering therapy in gout has been associated with CVR lowering. CONCLUSION: These recommendations can guide clinical practice and future research for improving CVR management in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases.

Clinical and peculiar immunological manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 infection in systemic lupus erythematosus patients.

OBJECTIVES: The impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in patients with SLE remains unclear and data on clinical manifestations after infection are lacking. The aim of this multicentre study is to describe the effect of SARS-CoV-2 in SLE patients. METHODS: SLE patients referring to four Italian centres were monitored between February 2020 and March 2021. All patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection were included. Disease characteristics, treatment, disease activity and SARS-CoV-2-related symptoms were recorded before and after the infection. RESULTS: Fifty-one (6.14%) SLE patients were included among 830 who were regularly followed up. Nine (17.6%) had an asymptomatic infection and 5 (9.8%) out of 42 (82.6%) symptomatic patients developed interstitial pneumonia (no identified risk factor). The presence of SLE major organ involvement (particularly renal involvement) was associated with asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection (P = 0.02). Chronic corticosteroid therapy was found to be associated with asymptomatic infection (P = 0.018). Three SLE flares (5.9%) were developed after SARS-CoV-2 infection: one of them was characterized by MPO-ANCA-positive pauci-immune crescentic necrotizing glomerulonephritis and granulomatous pneumonia. CONCLUSIONS: SARS-CoV-2 infection determined autoimmune flares in a small number of patients. Our data seem to confirm that there was not an increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 in SLE. Patients with asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections were those having major SLE organ involvement. This may be explained by the high doses of corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents used for SLE treatment.

Efficacy and safety of TNF-α antagonists and tocilizumab in Takayasu arteritis: multicentre retrospective study of 209 patients.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and the efficacy of TNF-α antagonists and tocilizumab in patients with Takayasu arteritis (TAK). METHODS: A total of 209 patients with TAK [median age 29 years (interquartile range 7-62)], 186 (89%) females] were included. They received either TNF-α antagonists [n = 132 (63%) with 172 lines; infliximab (n = 109), adalimumab (n = 45), golimumab (n = 8), certolizumab (n = 6) and etanercept (n = 5)] or tocilizumab [n = 77 (37%) with 121 lines; i.v. and s.c. in 95 and 26 cases, respectively]. RESULTS: A complete response at 6 months was evidenced in 101/152 (66%) patients on TNF-α antagonists and 75/107 (70%) patients on tocilizumab. Age ≥30 years [odds ratio 2.09 (95% CI 1.09, 3.99)] was associated with complete response, whereas vascular signs [OR 0.26 (95% CI 0.1, 0.65)], baseline prednisone ≥20 mg/day [OR 0.51 (95% CI 0.28, 0.93)] were negatively associated with the complete response to TNF-α antagonists or tocilizumab. During a median follow-up of 36 months, 103 relapses were noted. Supra-aortic branches and thoracic aorta involvement [HR 2.44 (95% CI 1.06, 5.65) and 3.66 (1.18, 11.4), respectively] and systemic signs at baseline [HR 2.01 (95% CI 1.30, 3.11)] were significantly associated with relapse. The cumulative incidence of treatment discontinuation and relapse were similar in TNF-α antagonists and tocilizumab. Fifty-eight (20%) adverse effects occurred on biologic targeted therapies [37 (21%) on TNF-α antagonists and 21 (17%) on tocilizumab (P = 0.4), respectively]. CONCLUSION: This large multicentre study shows high efficacy of biologic targeted treatments in refractory TAK. Efficacy, relapse and drug retention rate were equivalent with TNF-α antagonists and tocilizumab.

New Onset Biopsy-Proven Nephropathies after COVID Vaccination.

INTRODUCTION: To date, almost 7 billion doses of the different types of vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 have been administered worldwide. Although the severity of new cases of SARS-CoV-2 has progressively decreased, and the pressure on national health systems has declined, the development of de novo glomerular injuries has been suggested. METHODS: This study aimed to examine the patients who were hospitalized in our Unit between April and November 2021 and underwent renal biopsy for new-onset urinary abnormalities (UA) and/or renal impairment within 3 months of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. RESULTS: We identified 17 patients who developed UA and/or renal insufficiency within 3 months of vaccination. Minimal change disease was the most common disease in our cohort (5 patients, 29.4%) followed by acute tubulointerstitial nephritis (TIN; 3 patients, 17.6%), membranous nephropathy (3 patients, 17.6%), and rapidly progressive IgA nephropathy (2 patients, 11.8%). The other 4 patients had a diagnosis of membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (1 patient), systemic lupus erythematosus (1 patient), ANCA-associated vasculitis (1 patient), and tip-variant focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (1 patient), respectively. Eight out of the 17 patients (47.1%) developed acute kidney injury. Two patients with acute TIN had to start hemodialysis that was discontinued after 1 and 2 months, respectively, due to the recovery of renal function. All patients underwent treatment with corticosteroids and/or immunosuppressants. DISCUSSION: Although it is not possible to conclusively determine whether there is a causal relationship between SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and new-onset nephropathies, based on the appearance of UA and/or renal insufficiency shortly after vaccination, we hypothesize that the immune response to the COVID-19 vaccine may be a trigger of nephropathies. Therefore, our results highlight the need for pharmacovigilance. However, this report should not lead to vaccine hesitation during this pandemic as the benefits of vaccination strongly outweigh the potential risks.

Immunosuppression use in primary antiphospholipid antibody-positive patients: Descriptive analysis of the AntiPhospholipid Syndrome Alliance for Clinical Trials and InternatiOnal Networking (APS ACTION) Clinical Database and Repository ("Registry").

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: APS ACTION Registry was created to study the outcomes of patients with persistently positive antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) with or without other systemic autoimmune disease (SAIDx). Given that immunosuppression (IS) is used for certain aPL manifestations, for example, thrombocytopenia (TP), our primary objective was to describe the indications for IS in aPL-positive patients without other SAIDx. Secondly, we report the type of IS used in patients with selected microvascular or non-thrombotic aPL manifestations. METHODS: An online database is used to collect clinical data. The inclusion criteria are positive aPL based on the laboratory section of the APS Classification Criteria, tested at least twice within one year prior to enrollment. Patients are followed every 12 ± 3 months. For this descriptive retrospective and prospective analysis, we included aPL-positive patients without other SAIDx and excluded those with new SAIDx classification during follow-up. For each patient, we retrieved clinical data at baseline and follow-up including selected aPL manifestations (diffuse alveolar hemorrhage [DAH], antiphospholipid-nephropathy [aPL-N], livedoid vasculopathy [LV]-related skin ulcers, TP, autoimmune hemolytic anemia [AIHA], cardiac valve disease [VD]), and IS medications. RESULTS: Of 899 patients enrolled, 537 were included in this analysis (mean age 45 ± 13 years, female 377 [70%], APS Classification in 438 [82%], and at least one selected microvascular or non-thrombotic aPL manifestation in 141 (26%)). Of 537 patients, 76 (14%) were reported to use IS (ever), and 41/76 (54%) received IS primarily for selected aPL manifestation. In six of 8 (75%) DAH patients, 6/19 (32%) aPL-N, 4/28 (14%) LV, 25/88 (28%) TP, 6/11 (55%) AIHA, and 1/43 (2%) VD, the IS (excluding corticosteroids/hydroxychloroquine) indication was specific for selected aPL manifestation. CONCLUSION: In our international cohort, 14% of aPL-positive patients without other SAIDx were reported to receive IS; the indication was at least one of the selected microvascular and/or non-thrombotic aPL-related manifestations in half. Thrombocytopenia was the most frequent among those selected aPL-related manifestations; however, approximately one-third received IS specifically for that indication. Diffuse alveolar hemorrhage was frequently treated with IS followed by AIHA and aPL-N. Systematic controlled studies are urgently needed to better define the role of IS in APS.

Disease evolution in a long-term follow-up of 104 undifferentiated connective tissue disease patients.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the rate of disease evolution in a cohort of patients with undifferentiated connective tissue disease (UCTD) and to determine clinical and immunological features more frequently associated with disease progression. METHODS: This retrospective single-centre long-term follow-up cohort study included patients with UCTD diagnosis, ANA positive, with a follow-up of at least 2 years. RESULTS: A total of 100 UCTD patients were recruited. During the follow-up (6.2±2.1 years), 44 patients (44%) developed novel clinical and/or laboratory features (rate of development patient/year of 7%), and 21 patients (21%) evolved into a definite connective tissue disease (CTD) after a mean time of 7±5.5 years with a rate of disease evolution (patient/year) of 3%. New clinical manifestations (39 patients) included: joints (36%), haematological (30%), cutaneous (13%), pulmonary (10%) and renal (10%) involvement. New laboratory findings (17 patients (17%)) included: 2 anti-ENA positivity, 3 anti-dsDNA antibodies positivity and 6 low complement levels. At follow-up, 13 patients (61.9%) met the classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus, 1 patient (4.8%) for mixed CTD, 5 patients (23.8%) for systemic sclerosis and 2 patients (9.5%) for Sjögren's syndrome. Patients evolving towards a new diagnosis had longer disease duration (15.2±9.7 years vs. 10±5.8 years; respectively, p<0.005), had a higher prevalence of anti-Ro/SSA antibodies (63.2% vs. 28.4%; respectively, p<0.05) and anti-RNP antibodies (21.1% vs. 7.4%; respectively, p<0.05). The statistical difference was also confirmed after the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Up to 45% of UCTD patients might develop novel clinical and/or laboratory features during the follow-up, leading to evolution into a definite CTD in 1 out 5 cases.

How the Availability of Anti-C5a Agents Could Change the Management of Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis.

BACKGROUND: Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV) is a cluster of potentially life-threatening disorders, often involving the kidney with a necrotizing crescentic glomerulonephritis with scanty deposition of immunoglobulins and complement. Historically the role of complement has been considered ancillary. Recently, an anti-myeloperoxidase (MPO) AAV model in complement-deficient mice has shown an involvement for the complement cascade in the development of the renal injuries. Further animal studies showing that in contrast to mice deficient for factor B and C5 animals deficient for C4 were susceptible to AAV development by injection of anti-MPO antibodies emphasized the specific involvement of the alternative pathway. Consonantly, the C5a receptor (Cd88) blockade was found to protect mice from MPO-AAV. CCX168, i.e., avacopan, a powerful inhibitor of C5a receptor that can be administered orally, was shown to reduce the proinflammatory effects of C5a and abolish the activation of neutrophils, their migration and adherence to endothelium, and the vascular endothelial cell retraction that increases permeability. SUMMARY: Avacopan was found to be safe in healthy volunteers given a wide range of doses in a phase 1 clinical trial. The phase 2 trial CLEAR assessed the possibility to decrease dose or entirely replace glucocorticosteroids in the standard-of-care therapy of AAV. Avacopan, added to CYC or RTX either in combination with GCs or not, shortened the time to remission in patients with either newly diagnosed or relapsing AAV. The phase 3 ADVOCATE study compared the ability of an avacopan-associated regimen to induce and sustain remission in AAV patients versus a conventional GC-associated scheme. Remission at week 26 was observed in 72.3% of patients given avacopan and in 70.1% of those given prednisone. Sustained remission at week 52 (second primary endpoint) was obtained in 65.7% of patients given avacopan and in 54.9% receiving prednisone. The avacopan-associated regimen was noninferior at week 26 and superior at week 52 in sustaining remission as compared to the GC-based scheme. KEY MESSAGES: The results of the ADVOCATE trial opened new prospects for the treatment of AAV and also other immune-mediated diseases with renal involvement. The possible position of avacopan in a routine clinical setting and its possible indications in specific subsets of patients with AAV are extensively discussed.