The visual status of older persons residing in nursing homes.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize habitual visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, spectacle use, and eye care utilization in a large sample of older adults residing in nursing homes. METHODS: Of 33 nursing homes identified in Birmingham, Alabama, 17 served as sites. Eligibility criteria included age 55 years or older, English-speaking, and Mini-Mental State Examination score of 13 or higher. Habitual distance and near visual acuity and contrast sensitivity were measured for each eye and binocularly. Residents and a family member/guardian were interviewed about spectacle use and eye care utilization. Medical records provided information on demographics, chronic medical conditions, date of last eye examination, duration of residence in the nursing home, and health insurance. RESULTS: Of 380 enrollees, 57% had distance visual acuity in the better eye worse than 20/40; 10% had visual acuity of 20/200 or worse. Near visual acuity was slightly worse on average by a line than distance acuity. Three-fourths of residents had abnormal binocular contrast sensitivity. The medical record had no record of or reference to an eye examination for 66% of enrollees despite 90% having health insurance. CONCLUSION: The high rate of visual impairment in nursing homes underscores the need to understand its causes and to evaluate interventions to address this public health challenge.

Effect of refractive error correction on health-related quality of life and depression in older nursing home residents.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of treating uncorrected refractive error through spectacle correction on vision-targeted health-related quality of life and depressive symptoms in nursing home residents. METHODS: Persons aged 55 years or older residing in nursing homes in Birmingham, Alabama, having uncorrected refractive error were randomly assigned to either immediate spectacle correction of uncorrected refractive error or delayed correction (after the 2-month follow-up visit). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Vision-targeted health-related quality of life (measured with the Nursing Home Vision-Targeted Health-Related Quality-of-Life Questionnaire and the VF-14) and depressive symptoms (measured with the Geriatric Depression Scale), assessed at baseline and at 2 months. RESULTS: At the 2-month follow-up, the immediate refractive error correction group as compared with the delayed correction group had higher scores on the Nursing Home Vision-Targeted Health-Related Quality-of-Life Questionnaire subscales of general vision, reading, psychological distress, activities and hobbies, and social interaction (all P < .04) and the VF-14 (P < .001) as well as fewer depressive symptoms on the Geriatric Depression Scale (P = .003), adjusting for mental status and baseline outcome variables. CONCLUSIONS: Dispensing spectacles to treat uncorrected refractive error in nursing home residents leads to improved quality of life and decreased symptoms of depression. APPLICATION TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: This study demonstrates that older adults residing in nursing homes can personally benefit from access to the most basic of eye care services. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00347620.

Impact of cataract surgery on health-related quality of life in nursing home residents.

AIM: To assess the impact of cataract surgery in nursing home residents on health-related quality of life, as compared to those who have cataracts but who do not undergo surgery. METHODS: A prospective cohort study enrolled 30 nursing home residents (>or=60 years old) who had cataracts and underwent cataract surgery, and evaluated vision-targeted and generic health-related quality of life and depressive symptoms before and approximately 4 months after surgery. This cataract surgery group was compared to 15 nursing home residents who had cataracts but who did not have surgery, over the same timeframe. RESULTS: Visual acuity for near and distance and contrast sensitivity improved following cataract surgery (p<0.001). Adjusting for age differences in the two groups, the cataract surgery group exhibited significant score improvement in the general vision (p = 0.005), reading (p = 0.001), psychological distress (p = 0.015), and social interaction (p = 0.033) subscales of the Nursing Home Vision-targeted Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire and the VF-14 (p = 0.004). There were no group differences in the SF-36, Geriatric Depression Scale or the Cataract Symptom Score. CONCLUSION: Nursing home residents who underwent cataract surgery because of functional problems experienced significant improvements in their vision-targeted health-related quality of life, in addition to dramatically improved vision.

Development of a questionnaire to assess vision problems under low luminance in age-related maculopathy.

PURPOSE: To develop a questionnaire for assessing self-reported visual problems under low luminance and at night for use in studies on age-related maculopathy (ARM). METHODS: The questionnaire was developed in three steps: (1) Content for questionnaire items was identified through focus groups of older adults with ARM and those exhibiting normal retinal aging. The topic for discussion was "vision at night and under low lighting." Discussion was audiotaped, transcribed, and subjected to content analysis to identify problem categories expressed by patients. (2) This content was used to develop a preliminary questionnaire administered by telephone to persons with ARM or normal retinal aging. Principal-components analysis identified groups of items that formed the questionnaire's subscales that were evaluated for internal consistency, and an item-reduction strategy was implemented to generate a briefer questionnaire. (3) Psychometric properties of the shortened Low-Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) were determined, including construct validity, criterion validity, and test-retest reliability. RESULTS: The 32-item LLQ has six subscales (driving, extreme lighting, mobility, emotional distress, general dim lighting, and peripheral vision), all with good internal consistency (Cronbach alpha > or = 0.82). Scores on LLQ subscales correlated moderately with nearly all National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ)-25 subscales and decreased in value (indicating more disability) for patients with increasing ARM disease severity. Whereas rod-mediated parameters of dark adaptation were significantly associated with LLQ subscale scores (r = 0.19-0.43, all P < 0.03), cone-mediated parameters were not. Test-retest reliability ranged from 0.74 to 0.88 for all subscales (P < 0.0001), except for peripheral vision (0.46; P = 0.0003), which also exhibited a ceiling effect in almost half of the respondents. CONCLUSIONS: The 32-item LLQ, derived from the content of focus group comments by persons with ARM, has good construct validity, subscale scores related to rod-mediated visual function, and good test-retest reliability for five of six subscales. The LLQ may ultimately be useful in patient-centered evaluation of the outcome of interventions to prevent ARM or to arrest progression of early disease.

Perceived barriers to care and attitudes about vision and eye care: focus groups with older African Americans and eye care providers.

PURPOSE: To identify by using focus group methods the perceived barriers to eye care and attitudes about vision and eye care among older African Americans as well as among ophthalmologists and optometrists serving their communities. METHODS: Seventeen focus groups of older African Americans residing in the Birmingham or Montgomery, Alabama, areas were led by an experienced facilitator. Discussion was stimulated by a semistructured script focused on their perceived barriers to eye care and attitudes about vision and eye care. Six focus groups of ophthalmologists and optometrists who practiced in this geographic region addressed the same topics. Discussion was audiotaped and transcribed. Comments were coded using a multistep content analysis protocol. RESULTS: One hundred nineteen African Americans (age range, 59-97 years) and 35 eye care providers (51% ophthalmologists, 49% optometrists) participated. The barrier-to-care problem most frequently cited by both African Americans and eye care providers was transportation. The next most common problems mentioned by African Americans were trusting the doctor, communicating with the doctor, and the cost of eye care; and for eye care providers, the next most common problems were cost, trust, and insurance. With respect to older African Americans' comments on their attitudes about vision and eye care, these comments were predominantly positive (69%), highlighting the importance of eye care and behavior in their lives and attitudes that facilitated care. However, when eye care providers relayed their impressions of African Americans' attitudes about vision and eye care, their comments were largely negative (74%) centering on concerns and frustrations that older African Americans did not have attitudes or engage in behavior that facilitate eye care. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide some guidance for the design of interventions to increase the use of routine eye care in this population. At a societal level, there is a need for affordable and accessible transportation services for older African Americans seeking eye care. For ophthalmologists, optometrists, and their staffs, there is a need for continuing education that imparts culturally sensitive and age-appropriate communication and trust-building skills for interactions with this population. In addition to reinforcing the generally positive attitudes of older African Americans toward the importance of eye care, community-based educational programs should be focused on strategies for overcoming the common barriers to care.

Impact of cataract surgery on self-reported visual difficulties: comparison with a no-surgery reference group.

PURPOSE: To examine the impact of cataract surgery on older adults' self-reported visual difficulties and compare them with those of patients with cataract who declined surgery over the same period. SETTING: Twelve area practices. METHODS: This was a consecutive chart review over a 6-month period. Primary inclusion criteria were 55 years or older, cataract in 1 or both eyes with 20/40 visual acuity or worse (best corrected, distance), and no previous cataract surgery in either eye. The Activities of Daily Vision Scale (ADVS) and visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and disability glare tests were administered at baseline and at a 1-year follow-up visit. RESULTS: This study comprised 245 patients, 156 of whom elected to have cataract surgery and 89 of whom declined. Those electing surgery were more likely to be white, female, and have worse visual acuity and no ocular comorbidities. At baseline, ADVS subscale scores ranged from 53 to 76 in the surgery group and from 72 to 89 in the no-surgery group. In the surgery group, subscale scores improved by 15 to 21 points on average at the 1-year follow-up; scores were unchanged or worse in the no-surgery group over this period. This difference between the groups remained statistically significant after adjustment for group baseline differences in demographics, vision, and ADVS score. In the surgery group, visual acuity improvement in the first eye was an independent predictor of increases in the ADVS overall score and night driving and glare disability subscales; contrast sensitivity was an independent predictor of improvement in the night driving subscale. A reduction in disability glare in the second eye was independently linked to increases in the overall ADVS score and the night driving, near vision, and glare disability subscales. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline findings suggest that cataract patients who have surgery have more difficulty in visual tasks than those who decline surgery. After surgery, patients reported less difficulty with visual tasks. In the no-surgery group, no change was reported. Improvements in visual acuity and contrast sensitivity and reductions in disability glare after surgery were independently linked to improvements in ADVS scores.

Vision-specific health-related quality of life in age-related maculopathy patients presenting for low vision services.

Few studies have examined the effectiveness of low vision rehabilitation for age-related maculopathy (ARM) patients and its impact on vision-specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL). However, before a multi-site clinical trial can be conducted, appropriate outcome measures need to be identified for ARM patients who seek out low vision rehabilitation, including a vision-specific HR QoL instrument. The 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) was developed to assess vision-specific HRQoL for low vision patients, including those with ARM. This study examines the performance of the NEI VFQ-25 among ARM patients who seek out low vision services and examines its relationship with visual acuity and self-reported use of low vision aids. One hundred and twenty-seven patients were recruited from a University-affiliated low vision clinic. During two telephone interviews, subjects completed the NEI VFQ-25 and a short cognitive test and provided information on general health and use of low vision aids. Additional information on visual acuity and eye health were collected from the medical record. Our results indicate that ARM patients who seek out low vision services report significant impairment in their vision-specific HRQoL. Their NEI VFQ-25 scores were lower compared to other ARM and low vision rehabilitation samples previously studied. The VFQ subscales with the largest deficits were near and distance visual acuities and psychosocial issues (near vision, distance vision, role difficulties, dependency, social functioning, mental health). These subscale scores were lower for those with greater visual acuity impairment. The VFQ subscale scores most impacted by the disease had wide variability and were higher for those who used low vision aids, suggesting that the NEI VFQ-25 is suitable for measuring further decline and treatment-related improvements. Thus, it should be strongly considered for a multi-site clinical trial on the effectiveness of low vision rehabilitation.

Quality of care in the nursing home: effects of staff assignment and work shift.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare a variety of resident and staff outcomes across two types of staffing patterns, permanent and rotating assignment, and work shift. Although studies have examined these staffing patterns as part of multicomponent intervention packages, few studies have examined the isolated effects of staffing pattern by using an experimental design. DESIGN AND METHODS: A between-groups comparison design was used to compare residents and certified nursing assistants (CNAs) from four nursing homes; two self-identified as using permanent assignment (PA) staffing and two as using rotating assignment (RA) staffing. Measures yielded data on verbal interaction among residents and staff, resident disruptive behavior, and specific aspects of resident-staff behavior during care routines. Other assessments included resident personal appearance and hygiene, expressed affect, and CNAs' job satisfaction, burnout, absenteeism, and turnover rates. A treatment fidelity check was conducted to confirm PA and RA staffing patterns. RESULTS: Staffing patterns were significantly different between self-identified PA and RA nursing homes. Residents in PA nursing homes and on morning shifts received significantly higher ratings of personal appearance and hygiene. Rates of expressed sadness and interest among residents differed by staffing patterns and shift. However, these differences do not appear to be clinically significant. Although absenteeism was higher in PA nursing homes, these CNAs reported greater job satisfaction than CNAs from RA nursing homes. As expected, evening shifts across nursing homes had significantly higher turnover rates and significantly more resident disruptive behavior. IMPLICATIONS: Quality-of-care outcomes were similar among the two types of nursing homes, despite significantly different staffing patterns. Though staff permanency rates in PA nursing homes (50%) were twice that of RA nursing homes (26%), more research is needed to determine feasibility of higher rates of staff permanency (i.e., > 50%) and effects on resident and CNA outcomes.

The personal burden of decreased vision-targeted health-related quality of life in nursing home residents.

OBJECTIVE: To present the bother subscales of the Nursing Home Vision-Targeted Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (NHVQoL) and to examine their relationship to the original NHVQoL subscales and objective measures of visual function. METHOD: 395 nursing home residents completed the bother subscales. Associations between bother subscales and original subscales and objectively measured vision were evaluated. RESULTS: Mean bother scores ranged from 1.97 to 2.30, reflecting an average rating of "a little" bother. For 20 NHVQoL items, more than 50% of participants reported "a lot" of bother. All NHVQoL original subscale scores were moderately correlated with bother subscales (p < .0001). Bother subscales and visual acuity were not highly correlated. DISCUSSION: Nursing home residents are bothered by reductions in vision-targeted health-related quality of life. The NHVQoL bother subscales may probe the personal burden of visual problems in this population that is not captured by the original subscales or objectively measuring visual function.

Vision-specific health-related quality of life: content areas for nursing home residents.

Nursing home residents have a high prevalence of remediable visual impairment and blindness. Future research on the effectiveness of providing eye care to nursing home residents will need to include a vision-targeted health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instrument appropriate for this population. The purpose of this study was to identify the core content areas for such an instrument. In-depth interviews on vision-related issues were conducted with 40 residents. Interviews were audio-taped, transcribed, and coded using a standardized protocol. Binocular distance and near visual acuity were assessed using the resident's 'walking around' correction to examine whether one vision-specific HRQOL measure could address the needs of residents with 'good' and 'poor' vision. Overall 1070 vision-related comments were identified. Residents mentioned 315 problem comments that were grouped into 13 categories, including ocular symptoms (18% of comments), reading (15%), general vision (13%), psychological distress (12%), and activities of daily living (ADLs) (7%). Compared to published data on vision-specific content areas most relevant to community based persons, nursing home residents focused more on ocular symptoms and basic ADLs, with no mention of issues related to driving, home care, and finances. The majority of categories mentioned did not differ on the proportion of comments made- by those with 'good' and 'poor' visual acuity, suggesting that one vision-specific HRQOL instrument would be appropriate for residents with varying levels of visual acuity. Future work will focus on developing a vision-specific HRQOL instrument for nursing home residents.

Driving habits and health-related quality of life in patients with age-related maculopathy.

PURPOSE: To characterize the driving habits of persons with age-related maculopathy who present to a low-vision rehabilitation clinic and to examine how driving status relates to vision-specific health-related quality of life. METHODS: The Driving Habits Questionnaire, the National Eye Institute Vision Function Questionnaire-25, and the Life Space Questionnaire were administered via telephone interview to 126 patients with age-related maculopathy who presented to a low-vision clinic during the previous year and were either past or current drivers. RESULTS: Twenty-four percent of the sample reported being a current driver. Compared with those who stopped driving, current drivers were more likely to be male, younger, have better visual acuity and higher National Eye Institute Vision Function Questionnaire-25 scores. Drivers reported driving an average of 4 days and 10 miles per week. Over 50% of drivers reported that because of their vision, they had difficulty with or did not drive at all in rain, at night, on freeways or interstate highways, in heavy traffic areas, or during rush hour. Drivers and nondrivers did not differ in their life space, the spatial extent of their excursions into their environment. CONCLUSION: Some individuals who present to a low-vision clinic with age-related maculopathy do drive, although their driving exposure is low and they report avoiding challenging on-road situations. Driving status in age-related maculopathy appears to be related to better eye visual acuity and vision-specific health-related quality of life.

Mobility function in older veterans improves after blind rehabilitation.

This study was conducted to investigate the effects of blind rehabilitation training on self-reported mobility function in visually impaired adults. Mobility function was assessed with a questionnaire administered before and 2 months after subjects completed a comprehensive blind rehabilitation program that included orientation and mobility training. Subjects rated the level of difficulty performing in 26 of 34 mobility situations as significantly lower after rehabilitation. Subjects also rated their confidence as higher after rehabilitation. Substantial improvement occurred in the self-reported mobility function of visually impaired adults after blind rehabilitation and mobility training.

Early age-related maculopathy and self-reported visual difficulty in daily life.

PURPOSE: To determine whether early age-related maculopathy (ARM) is associated with visual difficulty in daily activities beyond the difficulty that would be expected based on normal retinal aging; to determine whether scotopic sensitivity and visual acuity are associated with visual difficulties in these older adults. STUDY DESIGN: Comparative, cross-sectional questionnaire study. SUBJECTS: Ninety-two older adults with early ARM in at least one eye as defined by one or more large (>63 microm) drusen and/or focal hyperpigmentation but no choroidal neovascularization or geographic atrophy, acuity of 20/60 or better, and a reference group of 55 older adults in the same age range without these fundus features and acuity of 20/35 or better in each eye. METHOD: Tests of visual acuity and scotopic sensitivity and a general health questionnaire were carried out. The Activities of Daily Vision Scale (ADVS) was administered to assess self-reported visual difficulties in everyday tasks and expressed on a scale of 0 (extreme difficulty) to 100 (no difficulty). Fundus photographs were taken and graded to characterize the presence and severity of ARM to determine eligibility. RESULTS: For purposes of analysis, the early ARM group was divided into those whose fellow eye (FE) was 20/60 or better and those whose FE was worse than 20/60. ADVS subscale scores were substantially lower in the early ARM group with FE worse than 20/60 (medians, 58-83) compared with the normal retinal health group (medians, 97-100). Even for those with early ARM with FE 20/60 or better, four of five subscale scores were lower (medians, 81-97), albeit slightly in some cases, than those of the reference group. For both ARM subgroups, the night driving subscale had the lowest scores of all subscales. Persons with early ARM with FE 20/60 or better were more likely to report difficulty on the night driving (odds ratio [OR], 4.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6-11.4), near vision (OR, 5.0; 95% CI, 1.9-12.9), and glare disability (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.1-6.3) subscales compared with those in normal retinal health, adjusting for age, gender, medical comorbidities, and lens density. For early ARM patients with FE worse than 20/60, there was widespread reporting of difficulty on all subscales (ORs ranging from 4.7-52.9). Poor scotopic sensitivity was highly associated with difficulty on the night driving subscale (OR, 6.6; 95% CI, 1.2-35.5) but not with any other subscale. Acuity worse than 20/25 in both eyes was significantly associated with difficulty on all ADVS subscales; when this acuity impairment was present in one eye only, associations were still significantly present on some subscales, although they were weaker. CONCLUSIONS: Persons in the early phases of ARM, even when their fellow eye has relatively good acuity, are more likely to experience difficulty in night driving, near vision tasks, and glare disability compared with those in good retinal health. Scotopic dysfunction, a functional marker of early ARM, is linked to reported night driving problems. Even when acuity impairment occurs in one eye only, patients report difficulties with day driving and near and far vision tasks.