Increased hospital volume is associated with reduced mortality after thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: Contemporary data on outcomes in open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair are limited to reports from major aortic referral centers showing excellent outcomes. This study aimed to characterize the national experience of open TAAA repair using national outcomes data, with a primary focus on the association of hospital volume with mortality and morbidity. METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was queried from 1998 to 2011, and all patients with a diagnosis of TAAA who underwent open operative repair were included. These patients were further stratified into tertiles based on the operative volume of the institution that performed the operation: low volume (LV), <3 cases/y; medium volume (MV), 3 to 11 cases/y; and high volume (HV), ≥12 cases/y. Baseline demographics as well as perioperative outcomes were compared between these groups. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine predictors of operative mortality and morbidity. Subgroup analyses were performed for patients presenting for elective surgery and for those presenting for urgent and emergent surgery. RESULTS: Overall operative mortality was 21% for the entire cohort. Operative mortality was higher at LV (26%) and MV (21%) centers compared with HV centers (15%; P < .001). This difference was similar in both elective surgery (LV, 18%; MV, 14%; HV, 12%; P < .001) and urgent and emergent surgery (LV, 34%; MV, 30%; HV, 19%; P < .001). Furthermore, rates of blood transfusion and acute renal failure were significantly lower in the HV group. Multivariable analysis revealed that compared with the HV group, patients operated on at LV centers (odds ratio [OR], 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7-2.1; P < .001) and MV centers (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.4-1.7; P < .001) had at least 1.5 times the odds of in-hospital mortality. The HV group also had significantly lower odds of dying in the subgroup analyses of both elective surgery and urgent and emergent surgery. Increasing TAAA volume was associated with increased use of distal aortic perfusion (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.02-1.03; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with TAAA in the United States operated on at HV centers have significantly lower mortality and morbidity compared with patients operated on at lower volume centers. Consideration of referral to HV centers may be warranted, but further research is required to justify this conclusion.

Anatomic considerations after commando double valve reconstruction: insights for future valve-in-valve therapies.

OBJECTIVES: The Commando technique for reconstruction of the aortomitral intervalvular fibrous body is effective to facilitate double valve surgery in cases of endocarditis or infiltrative calcification. The length of patch utilized in reconstruction of the intervalvular fibrous body has an important relationship to the geometry of the mitral valve (MV) and aortic valve (AV) and may impact on potential future valve-in-valve (VIV) therapy. Here we report anatomic measurements after Commando reconstruction in a small group of patients and analyse the impact of reconstruction techniques on transcatheter VIV therapies. METHODS: Seven patients from January 2018 to April 2022 who underwent double valve surgery with the Commando technique with postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans were identified. Computed tomographic reconstruction of the AV and MV was performed using 3mensio software and virtual transcatheter valve replacement was performed. Two of these patients who had preoperative imaging was analysed to assess the change in aortomitral geometry resulting from reconstruction. RESULTS: Measurements for each patient post-reconstruction are given in the table. Aortomitral length was grossly inversely proportional to aortomitral angle (AMA). AMA and aortomitral curtain (AMC) length were significantly altered post-Commando in 2 analysed patients with pre- and postoperative computed tomography scan. Transcatheter AV and MV replacements were feasible in all patients post-Commando. The AMA was larger and more favorable for mitral VIV in patients in which the AMC was short. CONCLUSIONS: AMC length, as determined by location of AV annular sutures, may be an important consideration in surgical decision-making for VIV after the Commando procedure.

A Boulder in the Chest: Case of Massive Pulmonary Artery Sarcoma.

A 79-year-old woman presented with dyspnea and cough. Workup revealed a pulmonary artery mass. After undergoing surgery, she was treated with adjuvant immunotherapy for an undifferentiated pulmonary artery sarcoma. Fifteen months after surgery, there was no evidence of recurrence. The case is discussed, imaging presented, and the published reports reviewed. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).

Disaster Averted: Surgical Treatment of Paradoxical Embolus in Transit.

A 46-year-old woman presented with a syncopal episode and was found to have a large thrombus traversing an atrial septal defect extending across the mitral valve. She was taken to the operating room for emergent thrombectomy. We present the case, imaging, and a review of published cases. (Level of Difficulty: Beginner.).

Higher Institutional Volume Reduces Mortality in Reoperative Proximal Thoracic Aortic Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine the impact of institutional volume on mortality in reoperative proximal thoracic aortic surgery patients using national outcomes data. METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was queried from 1998 to 2011 for patients with diagnoses of thoracic aneurysm and/or dissection who underwent open mediastinal repair. A total of 103,860 patients were identified. A total of 1,430 patients had prior cardiac surgery. Patients were further stratified into groups by institutional aortic volume: low (<12 cases/year), medium (12-39 cases/year), and high (40+ cases/year) volume. Multivariable risk-adjusted analysis accounting for emergent status and aortic dissection among other factors was performed to determine the impact of institutional volume on mortality. RESULTS: Overall mortality was 12% in the reoperative population. When the redo cohort was divided into tertiles, high-volume group had a 5% operative mortality compared with 9 and 15% for the medium- and low-volume groups, respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed that patients operated on at low- (odds ratio [OR] = 5.0, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.6-9.6, p < 0.001) and medium-volume centers (OR = 2.1, 95% CI: 1.1-4.2, p = 0.03) had higher odds of mortality when compared with patients operated on at high-volume centers. CONCLUSIONS: High-volume aortic centers can significantly reduce mortality for reoperative aortic surgery, compared with lower volume institutions.

The rapid transformation of cardiac surgery practice in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: insights and clinical strategies from a centre at the epicentre.

OBJECTIVES: The onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has forced our cardiac surgery programme and hospital to enact drastic measures that has forced us to change how we care for cardiac surgery patients, assist with COVID-19 care and enable support for the hospital in terms of physical resources, providers and resident training. METHODS: In this review, we review the cardiovascular manifestations of COVID-19 and describe our system-wide adaptations to the pandemic, including the use of telemedicine, how a severe reduction in operative volume affected our programme, the process of redeployment of staff, repurposing of residents into specific task teams, the creation of operation room intensive care units, and the challenges that we faced in this process. RESULTS: We offer a revised set of definitions of surgical priority during this pandemic and how this was applied to our system, followed by specific considerations in coronary/valve, aortic, heart failure and transplant surgery. Finally, we outline a path forward for cardiac surgery for the near future. CONCLUSIONS: We recognize that individual programmes around the world will eventually face COVID-19 with varying levels of infection burden and different resources, and we hope this document can assist programmes to plan for the future.

The rapid transformation of cardiac surgery practice in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: Insights and clinical strategies from a center at the epicenter.

BACKGROUND: The onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has forced our cardiac surgery program and hospital to enact drastic measures that has forced us to change how we care for cardiac surgery patients, assist with COVID-19 care, and enable support for the hospital in terms of physical resources, providers, and resident training. METHODS: In this review, we review the cardiovascular manifestations of COVID-19 and describe our system-wide adaptations to the pandemic, including the use of telemedicine, how a severe reduction in operative volume affected our program, the process of redeployment of staff, repurposing of residents into specific task teams, the creation of operation room intensive care units, and the challenges that we faced in this process. RESULTS: We offer a revised set of definitions of surgical priority during this pandemic and how this was applied to our system, followed by specific considerations in coronary/valve, aortic, heart failure and transplant surgery. Finally, we outline a path forward for cardiac surgery for the near future. CONCLUSIONS: We recognize that individual programs around the world will eventually face COVID-19 with varying levels of infection burden and different resources, and we hope this document can assist programs to plan for the future.

The Rapid Transformation of Cardiac Surgery Practice in the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic: Insights and Clinical Strategies From a Center at the Epicenter.

BACKGROUND: The onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has forced our cardiac surgery program and hospital to enact drastic measures that has forced us to change how we care for cardiac surgery patients, assist with COVID-19 care, and enable support for the hospital in terms of physical resources, providers, and resident training. METHODS: In this review, we review the cardiovascular manifestations of COVID-19 and describe our system-wide adaptations to the pandemic, including the use of telemedicine, how a severe reduction in operative volume affected our program, the process of redeployment of staff, repurposing of residents into specific task teams, the creation of operation room intensive care units, and the challenges that we faced in this process. RESULTS: We offer a revised set of definitions of surgical priority during this pandemic and how this was applied to our system, followed by specific considerations in coronary/valve, aortic, heart failure and transplant surgery. Finally, we outline a path forward for cardiac surgery for the near future. CONCLUSIONS: We recognize that individual programs around the world will eventually face COVID-19 with varying levels of infection burden and different resources, and we hope this document can assist programs to plan for the future.

Improving Outcomes of Iatrogenic Type A Aortic Dissection during Cardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Iatrogenic Type A aortic dissection (IAD) is a rare but devastating complication of cardiac and aortic surgery with reported operative mortality of 30 to 50%. In this study, we report our experience with IAD and propose a standardized approach to management. METHODS: From January 1, 2000 through December 31, 2016, 23,275 patients underwent cardiac surgery at our institution. We identified 15 patients who developed IAD. Our approach to management included (1) immediate repair, (2) involvement of a second attending surgeon, (3) aggressive monitoring of malperfusion, (4) securing true lumen arterial perfusion access and systemic cooling, and (5) performance of hemiarch or total arch replacement based on the presence of suspected brain malperfusion. The index operation was also completed at the same time. Patient preoperative characteristics, operative sequence and technique, complications, and outcomes were analyzed with chart review. RESULTS: The incidence of IAD at our institution was 0.06% (n = 15). A disproportionate percentage of patients had aneurysmal ascending aortas (33.3%). The index surgery consisted of aortic surgery in five patients (33.3%), coronary bypass in three patients, valve surgery in five patients, and transplantation in one patient. The mechanism of dissection was aortic cannulation in 66.7% and aortic root vent site cannulation in 13.3%. In 46.7% of patients, the IAD was first recognized based on clinical evidence such as aortic hematoma, pericardial bleeding, or abnormal perfusion line pressures. In 40.0%, the diagnosis was made with intraoperative echocardiography without any clinical manifestations. The timing of the diagnosis was at the initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass initiation in 60.0%, while in 40.0% it was recognized after discontinuation of bypass. Hemiarch was done in 73.3% and total arch replacement performed in 13.3%. Isolated ascending repairs were done in two patients. Bypass and cross-clamp times were 229.5 ± 212.7 minutes and 130.5 ± 109.5 minutes, respectively. In-hospital mortality in our cohort was 6.7%. While stroke occurred in one patient, no visceral organ malperfusion was recognized. CONCLUSIONS: Incidence of IAD is low with cannulation of an aneurysmal aorta being a risk factor. A standardized approach may result in reduced operative mortality.

Model-based analyses: Promises, pitfalls, and example applications to the study of cognitive control.

We discuss a recent approach to investigating cognitive control, which has the potential to deal with some of the challenges inherent in this endeavour. In a model-based approach, the researcher defines a formal, computational model that performs the task at hand and whose performance matches that of a research participant. The internal variables in such a model might then be taken as proxies for latent variables computed in the brain. We discuss the potential advantages of such an approach for the study of the neural underpinnings of cognitive control and its pitfalls, and we make explicit the assumptions underlying the interpretation of data obtained using this approach.