Opioid and Non-Opioid Pharmacotherapy Use for Pain Management Among Privately Insured Pediatric Patients With Cancer in the United States.

BACKGROUND: This study examined the trends and patterns of opioid and non-opioid pharmacotherapy use among a large national sample of privately insured pediatric patients with cancer in the United States. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified pediatric (aged < 21) patients diagnosed with central nervous system (CNS), lymphoma, gonadal, leukemia, or bone cancer from MarketScan data 2005-2019. We examined the proportion of patients who filled a prescription for the following 5 types of pharmacotherapy: opioid, anticonvulsant, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), antidepressant, and muscle relaxant during active cancer treatment. We assessed the trends and patterns in pharmacotherapy using multivariable logistic regressions. RESULTS: Among 4174 patients included, 2979 (71%) had an opioid prescription; 746 (18%), 384 (9%), 202 (5%), and 169 (4%) had anticonvulsant, NSAID, antidepressant and muscle relaxant prescriptions, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression showed a nonlinear trend in the use of opioids among pediatric patients with cancer over time such that use slightly increased until 2012 (OR of 1.40 [95% CI, 1.12-1.73] for 2012 vs. 2006) but then decreased thereafter (OR of 0.51 [0.37-0.68] for 2018 vs. 2012). The use of anticonvulsants, NSAIDs, and muscle relaxants increased significantly linearly over time (all P < .005). CONCLUSION: There has been a downward trend in the use of opioids in recent years among pediatric patients with cancer and an upward trend in the use of non-opioid pharmacotherapy for pain management potentially as an alternative to opioids.

Association between Medicaid Expansion and Cutaneous Melanoma Diagnosis and Outcomes: Does Where You Live Make a Difference?

BACKGROUND: Early detection and standardized treatment are crucial for enhancing outcomes for patients with cutaneous melanoma, the commonly diagnosed skin cancer. However, access to quality health care services remains a critical barrier for many patients, particularly the uninsured. Whereas Medicaid expansion (ME) has had a positive impact on some cancers, its specific influence on cutaneous melanoma remains understudied. METHODS: The National Cancer Database identified 87,512 patients 40-64 years of age with a diagnosis of non-metastatic cutaneous melanoma between 2004 and 2017. In this study, patient demographics, disease characteristics, and treatment variables were analyzed, and ME status was determined based on state policies. Standard univariate statistics were used to compare patients with a diagnosis of non-metastatic cutaneous melanoma between ME and non-ME states. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests were used to evaluate overall survival (OS) between ME and non-ME states. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to examine associations with OS. RESULTS: Overall, 28.6 % (n = 25,031) of the overall cohort was in ME states. The patients in ME states were more likely to be insured, live in neighborhoods with higher median income quartiles, receive treatment at academic/research cancer centers, have lower stages of disease, and receive surgery than the patients in non-ME states. Kaplan-Meier analysis found enhanced 5-year OS for the patients in ME states across all stages. Cox regression showed improved survival in ME states for stage II (hazard ratio [HR], 0.84) and stage III (HR, 0.75) melanoma. CONCLUSIONS: This study underscores the positive association between ME and improved diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes for patients with non-metastatic cutaneous melanoma. These findings advocate for continued efforts to enhance health care accessibility for vulnerable populations.

Management of Male Patients With Occult Breast Cancer: Analysis of the National Cancer Database.

INTRODUCTION: Occult breast cancer (OBC) consists of <0.1% of breast cancer cases in the United States. Male occult breast cancer (mOBC) has not been well-studied outside of case reports, and management is largely based on female OBC (fOBC) studies. We aim to examine the prevalence of mOBC among those in the National Cancer Database with breast cancer and describe treatment modalities received by mOBC compared to fOBC. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with OBC from 2004 to 2018. Chi-Square test and Fisher's exact tests compared patient, clinical, and facility characteristics by sex. Treatment modalities [systemic therapy, radiation therapy, axillary lymph node dissection, modified radical mastectomy (MRM)] were compared. A subgroup analysis examined pathologic upstaging in patients who underwent MRM. RESULTS: Of 23,374 male patients with breast cancer, 0.13% were identified to have mOBC [versus 0.09% in fOBC]. cN2/N3 disease was significantly more prevalent in the mOBC cohort (61.3%) than in the fOBC cohort (30.7%, P < 0.001). Receipt of axillary lymph node dissection or MRM was not significantly different by sex. Male OBC (mOBC) patients were less likely to receive trimodality treatment than fOBC patients. In patients who underwent MRM, more mOBC patients [75%] were pathologically upstaged as T+ after mastectomy than fOBC patients [30%, P < 0.001], questioning the adequacy of diagnostic workup for mOBC compared to fOBC. CONCLUSIONS: This review confirms mOBC as an extremely rare disease. Multimodal treatments have been highly utilized to optimize care in this patient population. Further investigation is warranted to examine the survival benefit of treatment regimens for mOBC.

Disparities in Surgical Treatment of Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma at Minority Serving Hospitals.

INTRODUCTION: Minority serving hospitals (MSH) are those serving a disproportionally high number of minority patients. Previous research has demonstrated that treatment at MSH is associated with worse outcomes. We hypothesize that patients treated at MSH are less likely to undergo surgical resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma compared to patients treated at non-MSH. METHODS: Patients with resectable pancreatic cancer were identified using the National Cancer Database. Institutions treating Black and Hispanic patients in the top decile were categorized as an MSH. Factors associated with the primary outcome of definitive surgical resection were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression. Univariate and multivariable survival analysis was performed. RESULTS: Of the 75,513 patients included in this study, 7.2% were treated at MSH. Patients treated at MSH were younger, more likely to be uninsured, and higher stage compared to those treated at non-MSH (P < 0.001). Patients treated at MSH underwent surgical resection at lower rates (MSH 40% versus non-MSH 44.5%, P < 0.001). On multivariable logistic regression, treatment at MSH was associated with decreased likelihood of undergoing definitive surgery (odds ratio 0.91, P = 0.006). Of those who underwent surgical resection, multivariable survival analysis revealed that treatment at an MSH was associated with increased morality (hazard ratio 1.12, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated at MSH are less likely to undergo surgical resection compared to those treated at non-MSH. Targeted interventions are needed to address the unique barriers facing MSH facilities in providing care to patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Characteristics and variations in young adults with cutaneous melanoma: A national cancer database analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Many cancers in young adulthood differ in terms of biology, histologic variation, and prognosis compared to cancer in other older age groups. Differences in cutaneous melanoma among young adults compared to other older age groups, as well as between sexes in young adults are not well studied. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for patients diagnosed with cutaneous melanoma between 2004 and 2017. Patient characteristics, disease factors, and treatment were stratified by age-based cohorts and compared using standard univariate statistics. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests were used to evaluate overall survival (OS) between age-based cohorts and young adult sexes. RESULTS: Of the 329 765 patients identified, 10.5% were between 18 and 39 years of age at diagnosis. Compared with other older age groups, young adult patients were more likely to be female and uninsured with higher proportions of superficial spreading melanoma, melanoma of the trunk and extremities, and earlier-stage disease. Young adults had improved OS compared to other older age groups. Young male patients had a greater proportion of no insurance, nodular melanoma, higher-stage disease, and decreased OS compared to young female patients. Additionally, while the 5-year OS difference was statistically significant across all stages of disease between young males and females, the clinical significance is likely limited to later stages. CONCLUSIONS: Age and sex-specific differences in cutaneous melanoma highlight distinct patterns and characteristics, emphasizing the need for tailored approaches to screening, diagnosis, and treatment.

The Association of Guideline-Concordant Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Melanoma at Minority-Serving Hospitals.

BACKGROUND: Minority-serving hospitals (MSHs) have been associated with lower guideline adherence and worse outcomes for various cancers. However, the relationship among MSH status, concordance with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) guidelines, and overall survival (OS) for patients with cutaneous melanoma is not well studied. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for patients diagnosed with T1a*, T2, and T3 melanoma between 2012 and 2017. MSHs were defined as the top decile of institutions ranked by the proportion of minorities treated for melanoma. Based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, guideline-concordant care (GCC) was defined as not undergoing SLNB if thickness was < 0.76 mm without ulceration, mitosis ≥ 1/mm2, or lymphovascular invasion (T1a*), and performing SLNB for patients with intermediate thickness melanomas between 1.0 and 4.0 mm (T2/T3). Multivariable logistic regressions examined associations with GCC. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests were used to evaluate OS between MSH and non-MSH facilities. RESULTS: Overall, 5.9% (N = 2182/36,934) of the overall cohort and 37.8% of minorities (n = 199/527) were managed at MSHs. GCC rates were 89.5% (n = 33,065/36,934) in the overall cohort and 85.4% (n = 450/527) in the minority subgroup. Patients in the overall cohort (odds ratio [OR] 0.85; p = 0.02) and the minority subgroup (OR 0.55; p = 0.02) were less likely to obtain GCC if they received their care at MSHs compared with non-MSHs. Minority patients receiving care at MSHs had a decreased survival compared with those treated at non-MSHs (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to SLNB guidelines for melanoma was lower at MSHs. Continued focus is needed on equity in melanoma care for minority patients in the United States.

Association of Surgery and Chemotherapy in Stage IV Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: The survival benefit of chemotherapy for patients with metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (GEP-NECs) is well established. However, reasons for underutilization of chemotherapy are unknown. METHODS: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for metastatic GEP-NECs from 2009 to 2016. The cohort was stratified by patients who had received chemotherapy and who did not receive chemotherapy. Demographic, socioeconomic, clinical, and treatment characteristics were captured. Multivariable logistic regression examined factors associated with chemotherapy utilization. RESULTS: Of the 2367 stage IV GEP-NECs patients identified, 1647 (69.6%) received chemotherapy. Patients with primary site at colon and small bowel, age ≥75, no insurance, and ≥2 comorbidities were less likely to receive chemotherapy than patients with other primary sites, age <75, private insurance, and no comorbidities (P < 0.005). The small bowel and colon were the primary sites with the greatest percentage of patients who received surgery (46.4% and 41.8%, respectively). In these subgroup of patients, surgical intervention was also associated with lower probability of receiving chemotherapy (odds ratio = 0.60, P < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: About 30% of patients with metastatic GEP-NECs did not receive chemotherapy. Primary site location and receipt of surgery were significantly associated with receipt of chemotherapy, with NECs in small bowel and colon being more likely to receive surgery and less likely to receive chemotherapy. While surgery may be considered on an individual basis, increasing efforts to ensure patients with colon or small bowel NECs receive guideline-concordant chemotherapy will positively impact survival. In addition, interventions to improve health insurance coverage to increase receipt of chemotherapy are warranted.

Depression Is Associated With Non-Home Discharge After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft.

INTRODUCTION: Depression is disproportionately high in patients with coronary artery disease and has been associated with adverse outcomes following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). One quality metric, non-home discharge (NHD), can have substantial implications for patients and health care resource utilization. Depression increases the risk of NHD after many operations, but it has not been studied after CABG. We hypothesized that a history of depression would be associated with an increased risk of NHD following CABG. METHODS: CABG cases were identified from the 2018 National Inpatient Sample using ICD-10 codes. Depression, demographic data, comorbidities, length of stay (LOS), rate of NHD were analyzed using appropriate statistical tests where a P-value < 0.05 was defined as statistically significant. Adjusted multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess independent association between depression and NHD as well as LOS while controlling for confounders. RESULTS: There were 31,309 patients, of which 2743 (8.8%) had depression. Depressed patients were younger, females, in a lower income quartile, and more medically complex. They also demonstrated more frequent NHD and prolonged LOS. After adjusted multivariable analysis, depressed patients had a 70% increased odds of NHD (adjusted odds ratio: 1.70 [1.52-1.89] P < 0.001) and a 24% increased odds of prolonged LOS (AOR: 1.24 [1.12-1.38] P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: From a national sample, depressed patients were associated with more frequent NHD following CABG. To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate this, and it highlights the need for improved preoperative identification in order to improve risk stratification and timely allocation of discharge services.

Survival According to Primary Tumor Location, Stage, and Treatment Patterns in Locoregional Gastroenteropancreatic High-grade Neuroendocrine Carcinomas.

BACKGROUND: Although the gastrointestinal tract (including the pancreas, gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) is the most common site for extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC), the current treatment patterns of locoregional GEP NEC and in particular, the role of surgical resection is unclear. METHODS: Data from the National Cancer Database between 2004 and 2016 were used for this study. RESULTS: Of 2314 GEP NEC cases (stages I-III), 52.5% were stage III. Colon was the most common site (30%); 30.9% of all cases were small cell morphology. Age, morphology, stage, and primary site were associated with significant differences in treatment patterns. Management of NEC mimicked that of adenocarcinomas arising at the respective sites: colon NEC most likely to be treated with surgery and chemotherapy; anal and esophageal NEC was primarily likely to receive chemotherapy and radiation, and rectal NEC mostly likely to receive trimodality therapy. However, 25%-40% of patients did not undergo surgical resection even at sites typically managed with curative resection, and there was a trend toward lesser resection over time. The prognostic impact of surgical resection was significant across all stages and correlated with variations in survival across primary sites. Even in patients undergoing chemoradiation, surgery was the only prognostic variable that significantly affected survival in stages I-II patients (HR 0.63) and showed a strong trend in stage III (HR 0.77) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment patterns in GEP NEC vary considerably according to stage and primary tumor site. Surgery significantly improved survival in stages I-II patients and showed a strong trend in stage III patients regardless of primary tumor location and other perioperative therapies.

Benefits of Trimodality Therapy Compared with Systemic Therapy Alone in Male Patients with Stage IV Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Male breast cancer (MBC) represents <1% of all breast cancer (BC) diagnoses. Recent publications in female stage IV BC have shown that surgical intervention has a survival benefit. This study aims to determine the impact of surgical intervention in men with stage IV BC and known estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was used to identify 539 stage IV MBC patients with known ER/PR status from 2004 to 2017. Chi-square tests examined subgroup differences between the treatment modalities received. Overall survival (OS) was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models examined factors associated with survival. RESULTS: The Kaplan-Meier estimation showed that ER-positive (ER+) and PR-positive (PR+) patients who received surgery, systemic therapy, and radiation (Trimodality) or systemic therapy and surgery (ST+Surg) had improved survival compared with systemic therapy alone (ST) [ER+, p < 0.003; PR+, p < 0.033]. For ER+ patients, the 5-year OS rates by treatment were: Trimodality, 40%; ST+Surg, 27%; and ST, 20%. For PR+ patients, the 5-year OS rates were: Trimodality, 39%; ST+Surg, 24%; and ST, 20%. The Cox proportional hazard model revealed a survival advantage in patients who received Trimodality compared with ST (hazard ratio 0.622; p < 0.002). The timing of systemic therapy in relation to surgery was not found to be significant. CONCLUSIONS: Trimodality therapy has a survival benefit in stage IV MBC patients with known ER+ status than in male patients who receive systemic therapy alone.

Insurance Status and Travel Distance to Single Treatment Facility Predictive of Mastectomy.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the impact of insurance status and travel distance on the receipt of total mastectomy without reconstruction (TM) compared to breast conserving surgery with radiation (BCT) for early-stage breast cancer (BC) patients who received care at a single facility. We hypothesized that, lack of insurance and increased travel distance would be predictive of TM over BCT and disparities would vary by different races and/or ethnicities. METHODS: Using the National Cancer Database from 2010-2017, we examined surgical patients with stage I or II BC, who received care at one facility. Chi-square tests examined subgroup differences by BCT or TM. Multivariable logistic regressions evaluated patient, facility, and pathologic factors associated with the receipt of TM over BCT for the entire cohort and by races and/or ethnicities. RESULTS: Of the 284,202 patients, 70.1% received BCT while 29.9% received TM. After adjustment travel distance > 60 miles to a treatment facility, and non-insured patients were more likely to receive TM over BCT, when compared to travel distance < 20 miles and private insurance (all P < 0.05). Compared to other races and/or ethnicities, African Americans traveling > 60 miles were 65.4% more likely to receive TM over BCT compared to those traveling < 20 miles (P < .0001). Across all races and/or ethnicities after adjustment, lack of insurance was predictive for receipt of TM over BCT (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Despite treatment at one facility, increased travel distance and insurance status are independently predictive of the receipt of TM over BCT in patients with early-stage BC. While travel distance is particularly impactful for African Americans, the impact of not having insurance on surgical treatments is universal across all races and/or ethnicities.

Are Routine Chest Radiographs After Chest Tube Removal in Thoracic Surgery Patients Necessary?

INTRODUCTION: The routine use of chest x-ray (CXR) to evaluate the pleural space after chest tube removal is a common practice driven primarily by surgeon preference and institutional protocol. The results of these postpull CXRs frequently lead to additional interventions that serve only to increase health care costs and resource utilization. We investigated the utility of these postpull CXRs in thoracic surgery patients and assessed their effectiveness in predicting the need for tube replacement. METHODS: Single-institution retrospective study comprising thoracic surgery patients requiring postoperative chest tube drainage over a 3-y period. Demographics and surgical characteristics, including surgical approach, procedure, and procedure type, were recorded. Outcomes included postpull CXR findings, interventions resulting from radiographic abnormalities, and the additional health resource utilization incurred by obtaining these studies on asymptomatic patients. RESULTS: The study included 433 patients. Postpull CXRs were performed in 87.1% of patients, with 33.2% demonstrating an abnormality compared with the prior study. Among these, 65.7% resulted only in repeat imaging and 25.7% resulted in discharge delay. Overall, a total of 13 patients (3%) required chest tube replacement, three during the index hospitalization and the other 10 requiring readmission. Among those requiring chest tube replacement, 75% had normal postpull imaging, and all were symptomatic. CONCLUSIONS: Recurrent pneumothorax after chest tube removal requiring immediate tube reinsertion is relatively rare and does not occur in the absence of symptoms. Our study suggests that routine postpull CXRs have limited clinical utility and can be safely omitted in asymptomatic patients with appropriate clinical observation.

Predictors of Conversion During Minimally Invasive Gastrectomy for Malignancy.

INTRODUCTION: Implementation of minimally invasive gastrectomy (MIG) for malignancy is increasing. However, risk factors for conversion to open surgery during laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy are poorly understood. This study aimed to determine the risk factors for, and impact of, conversion during oncologic resection. METHODS: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was used to identify patients with clinical stage I-III gastric cancer from 2010 to 2017. Chi-squared test and t-test were used to compare the robotic versus laparoscopic groups. Propensity score weighted multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with conversion to open surgery. RESULTS: Of 6990 patients identified, 5702 (81.6%) underwent a laparoscopic resection and 1288 (18.4%) underwent robotic-assisted resection. Conversion rates were 14.7% and 7.8% for laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy, respectively. The robotic approach was associated with lower likelihood of conversion compared to laparoscopic approach (odds ratio [OR] = 0.470, P < 0.001). Other factors predictive of conversion included tumor size >5 cm compared to <2 cm (OR 1.714, P = 0.010), total gastrectomy compared to partial gastrectomy (OR 2.019, P < 0.001), antrum/pylorus (OR 2.345, P < 0.001), and body (OR 2.152, P < 0.001) tumors compared to cardia tumors. Compared to those treated with laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy, patients who underwent conversion experienced significantly longer hospital length of stay and higher rates of positive surgical margins. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic gastrectomy was associated with a higher conversion rate compared to robotic gastrectomy. Conversion to open surgery was associated with a significantly longer length of stay and higher rates of positive margins. Identification of risk factors for conversion can aid in appropriate modality selection.

Albumin-bilirubin score is superior to platelet-albumin-bilirubin score and model for end-state liver disease sodium for predicting posthepatectomy liver failure.

BACKGROUND: Risk stratification for patients undergoing hepatectomy can be attempted using established models. This study compares the platelet-albumin-bilirubin (PALBI) score with albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) and model for end-stage liver disease sodium (MELD-Na) for predicting posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) and 30-day mortality. METHODS: The 2014-2018 NSQIP database was queried for patients who underwent elective hepatectomy. Multivariable logistic regressions assessed associations of posthepatectomy outcomes with patient and clinical characteristics. Predictive accuracy of the grading systems was evaluated using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves and calculating area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: Severe PHLF (Grade B/C) and mortality were present in 2.58% (N = 369) and 1.2% (N = 171) of patients who underwent hepatectomy (N = 13 925), respectively. ALBI Grade 2/3 had a stronger association with severe PHLF (odds ratio [OR] = 1.62, p < 0.01) and mortality (OR = 2.06, p < 0.005) than PALBI Grade 2/3 (OR = 1.14, p = 0.43 for PHLF and OR = 2.01, p < 0.005 for mortality) or MELD-Na ≥10 (OR = 1.29, p = 0.25 for PHLF and OR = 1.84, p < 0.03). ALBI had a higher AUC (0.671) than PALBI (0.625) and MELD-Na (0.627) for predicting severe PHLF. ALBI had a higher AUC (0.695) than PALBI (0.642) for predicting 30-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: ALBI was a more accurate predictor of severe PHLF and 30-day mortality than MELD-Na and PALBI for patients who underwent hepatectomy.

Utilization and costs of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation testing and targeted therapy in Medicare patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines in 2013 and 2014 recommended Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) testing for metastatic lung adenocarcinoma patients as the efficacy of targeted therapies depends on the mutations. However, adherence to these guidelines and the corresponding costs have not been well-studied. METHODS: We identified 2362 patients at least 65 years old newly diagnosed with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma from January 2013 to December 2015 using the SEER-Medicare database. We examined the utilization patterns of EGFR testing and targeted therapies including erlotinib and afatinib. We further examined the costs of both EGFR testing and targeted therapy in terms of Medicare costs and patient out-of-pocket (OOP) costs. RESULTS: The EGFR testing rate increased from 38% in 2013 to 51% and 49% in 2014 and 2015 respectively. The testing rate was 54% among the 394 patients who received erlotinib, and 52% among the 42 patients who received afatinib. The median Medicare and OOP costs for testing were $1483 and $293. In contrast, the costs for targeted therapy were substantially higher with median 30-day costs at $6114 and $240 for erlotinib and $6239 and $471 for afatinib. CONCLUSION: This population-based study suggests that testing guidelines improved the use of EGFR testing, although there was still a large proportion of patients receiving targeted therapy without testing. The costs of targeted therapy were substantially higher than the testing costs, highlighting the need to improve adherence to testing guidelines in order to improve clinical outcomes while reducing the economic burden for both Medicare and patients.

Head and Neck Free Flap Reconstruction in an Academic versus a Community Setting.

BACKGROUND: Head and neck free flap reconstructions are complex procedures requiring extensive resources, and have the potential to be highly morbid. As such, it is imperative that they should be performed in an appropriate setting, optimizing outcomes while limiting morbidity. The aim of this study is to identify any disparities in the treatment outcomes of patients undergoing head and neck free flap reconstruction by a single surgeon in an academic versus a community hospital setting. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent head and neck free flap reconstruction for any indication by a single surgeon from 2009 to 2019 was conducted. All surgeries were performed at one of two hospitals: one academic medical center and one community hospital. Demographics and rates of partial or complete flap failure, medical complications, surgical complications, mortality, and other secondary outcomes were compared between the two settings. RESULTS: Ninety-two patients who underwent head and neck free flap reconstruction were included. Fifty-seven (62%) of free flap reconstructions were performed in the academic medical center, while 35 (38%) were performed in the community hospital. There were no significant differences in complete flap loss, either intraoperative or postoperative (p = 0.5060), partial flap loss (p = 0.5827), postoperative surgical complications (p = 0.2930), or medical complications (p = 0.7960) between groups. The in-hospital mortality rate was 0% (n = 0) at the university hospital as compared with 5.7% at the community hospital (p = 0.0681). The mean operative time was 702.3 minutes at the university hospital and 606.3 minutes at the community hospital (p = 0.0080). CONCLUSION: Head and neck free flap surgery can be performed safely in either an academic or a community setting, with no difference in primary outcomes of surgery. Preferential selection of either treatment setting should be based on consideration of patient needs and availability of auxiliary specialty services.

Undertreatment of Pancreatic Cancer: Role of Surgical Pathology.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend treatment of early-stage pancreatic cancer with surgical resection and chemotherapy. Undertreatment can occur after resection when patients fail to receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Final pathologic results have the potential to bias providers to omit adjuvant chemotherapy, however, the association of surgical pathology and adjuvant chemotherapy is unknown. METHODS: Data from the National Cancer Database identified patients who underwent surgery for stage I or II pancreatic cancer. Chi-square tests and logistic regression were used to determine differences between patients receiving surgery followed by chemotherapy and those who had resection alone. Survival analysis of subgroups with favorable pathology (node-negative disease, tumor size ≤ 2 cm, well-differentiated histology) was performed by the Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Of the 22,131 patients included in this study, 28% were considered undertreated (surgery alone). Favorable pathologic traits of negative lymph nodes, tumor 2 cm in size or smaller, and well-differentiated histology were associated with a 15-35% lower probability that adjuvant chemotherapy would be given than less favorable pathologic results (p < 0.001). Multivariable survival analysis showed significantly lower odds of mortality for patients who received resection and chemotherapy than for those who were undertreated among two subgroups: patients with node-negative disease (hazard ratio [HR] 0.774) and those with a tumor 2 cm in size or smaller (HR 0.771). CONCLUSION: The patients who had early-stage pancreatic cancer with favorable pathology after pancreatectomy were less likely than those with unfavorable pathology to receive adjuvant chemotherapy. This omission had significant survival consequences for subgroups with node-negative disease and tumors 2 cm in size or smaller. Recognition of patients with favorable pathology as an undertreated group is required for efforts to be directed toward encouraging guideline-concordant care and to combat undertreatment of pancreatic cancer.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Pancreatic Cancer is Associated with Improved Survival for Patients with Low-Risk Pathology.

BACKGROUND: With limited evidence, the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (AT) after completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NT) and surgical resection for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma is debated. Guidelines recommend 6 months of AT for patients receiving NT. However, the patient-derived benefit from additional AT remains unknown. METHODS: The National Cancer Database from 2006 to 2015 was used to identify patients undergoing NT. The chi-square test and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify differences between those receiving only NT and those receiving NT and AT. Survival analysis using the Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox proportional hazard ratio model was applied to the entire cohort and to subgroups with differing lymph node ratios (LNRs), tumor sizes, grades, and surgical margin statuses. RESULTS: Of the 3897 patients who received NT, 36.7 % received additional AT. Analysis of the entire cohort showed that associated survival was significantly improved with NT and AT compared with NT alone (hazard ratio [HR], 0.83; p < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis, the survival benefit of additional AT remained significant for those with negative nodal disease, an LNR lower than 0.15, low-grade histology, and negative margin status. Overall survival did not differ between those receiving NT only and those receiving NT and AT in the group with an LNR of 0.15 or higher, high-grade histology, and positive margins. CONCLUSION: This study identified an increasing trend in the use of AT after NT and showed an associated survival benefit for subgroups with low-risk pathologic features. These results suggest that the addition of AT after NT likely beneficial for these subgroups.

Benefits of Surgical Treatment of Stage IV Breast Cancer for Patients With Known Hormone Receptor and HER2 Status.

BACKGROUND: For the 6% of breast cancer patients with a diagnosis of stage IV disease, systemic therapy is the cornerstone of treatment, with an unclear role for surgery. Limited evidence exists to delineate treatment methods with regard to hormone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was used to identify 12,838 stage IV breast cancer patients with known hormone receptor and HER2 status from 2010 to 2015. Chi square tests examined subgroup differences between the treatment methods received. Using the Kaplan-Meier method, 5-year overall survival (OS) was assessed. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models examined factors associated with survival. RESULTS: A survival advantage was noted for patients who received either systemic therapy and surgery (ST + Surg: hazard ratio [HR] 0.723; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.671-0.779) or systemic therapy, surgery, and radiation (Trimodality: HR 0.640; 95% CI 0.591-0.694) (both p < 0.0001) compared with systemic therapy alone (ST). The HER2+ patients who received Trimodality or ST + Surg had a better 5-year OS rate than those who received ST (Trimodality [48%], ST + Surg [41%], ST [29%]; p < 0.0001). The sequence of chemotherapy in relation to surgery is significant, with the greatest survival advantage noted for recipients of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) compared with patients who had adjuvant chemotherapy when they had positive hormone receptor and HER2 status (HER2 + NAC: HR 0.477; estrogen receptor-positive [ER+] NAC: HR 0.453; progesterone receptor-positive [PR+] NAC: HR 0.448; all p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Surgery in addition to ST has a survival benefit for stage IV breast cancer patients with known hormone receptor and HER2 status and should be considered after NAC for patients with ER+, PR+, or HER2+ disease.

Clinical Preventive Services and Self-Management Practices Among Adult Cancer Survivors in the United States Over Time.

The objective of this research was to determine if the engagement/participation in health promotion activities of cancer survivors in the United States (US) changed between 2006 and 2015. We pooled two independent cross-sectional data of cancer survivors using Medical Expenditure Panel Surveys from 2006 (N = 791; weighted N = 9,532,674) and 2015 (N = 1067; weighted N = 15,744,959). Health promoting activities consisted of past year influenza immunization, routine physical examination, and dental visit. Self-care included maintaining normal weight, not smoking, and engagement in recommended vigorous physical activity. We conducted unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression analyses to examine the change in engagement in health promoting activities over time. We found rates of annual influenza immunization (66.8% vs 70.3%), dental visit (71.8% vs 70.3%), and normal weight (33.9% vs 33.5%) did not change from 2006 to 2015. The percent with physical examination (90.8% vs 93.8%; P = .03) and non-smokers increased (87.9% vs 91.2; P = .04). Between 2006 and 2015, despite guidelines and recommendations for personalized cancer survivorship health plans, health promoting activities among cancer survivors did not change significantly.