Prediabetes is associated with proteinuria development but not with glomerular filtration rate decline: A longitudinal observational study.

AIMS: Diabetes is recognized as the leading cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD); however, the association of prediabetes with CKD remains unclear, in particular, the independent effect of prediabetes on proteinuria or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) has not been evaluated. This study aimed to investigate the associations of prediabetes with the proteinuria development and with eGFR decline separately in the Japanese general population without CKD. METHODS: Participants who underwent health check-ups in 2014 and had adequate data after 2 years were retrospectively analysed. A total of 405,487 participants without CKD (eGFR, ≥60 ml min-1  1.73 m-2 , with negative or trace urinary protein) at baseline were categorized according to fasting plasma glucose as having diabetes (≥126 mg/dl [7.0 mmol/l]), prediabetes (100-125 mg/dl [5.6-6.9 mmol/l]) or normal glucose level (˂100 mg/dl [5.6 mmol/l]). Logistic regression analysis was used to analyse the effects of prediabetes (vs. normal glucose level) on the proteinuria development (urinary protein of ≥1+) and eGFR decline (˂60 ml min-1  1.73 m-2 ) after 2 years. RESULTS: After 2 years, 7037 participants (1.7%) developed proteinuria alone, 19,015 (4.7%) presented eGFR decline alone and 636 (0.2%) showed both proteinuria and eGFR decline. Compared to normal glucose level and adjusting for prognostic factors, prediabetes was independently associated with the proteinuria development (odds ratio [OR] 1.233; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.170-1.301], whereas prediabetes was not associated with eGFR decline (OR 0.981; 95% CI 0.947-1.017). CONCLUSIONS: Prediabetes is associated with the proteinuria development but not with eGFR decline in the general population.

Healthy lifestyle reduces incidence of trace/positive proteinuria and rapid kidney function decline after 2 years: from the Japan Ningen Dock study.

BACKGROUND: Lifestyle modification is recommended for subjects with trace proteinuria during health checkups. However, whether overall healthy lifestyle reduces the incidence of trace/positive proteinuria or rapid decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is not clarified. METHODS: A total of 451 534 people (277 494 men and 174 040 women) ages 20-79 years with negative proteinuria were included. The number of three healthy lifestyle factors (LFs) was assessed: noncurrent smoking, healthy eating habits (late dinner, snacking and skipping breakfast <3 times/week) and body mass index <25. The incidence of trace (±) and positive (≥1+) proteinuria by the dipstick method and eGFR decline ≥20% over 2 years were compared with the number of healthy LFs. RESULTS: The incidence of trace/positive proteinuria and rapid eGFR decline decreased with an increasing number of healthy LFs as follows: odds ratios (ORs) for trace proteinuria, 0.91 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.86-0.96], 0.82 (0.78-0.87) and 0.72 (0.68-0.77); ORs for positive proteinuria, 0.76 (95% CI 0.67-0.86), 0.56 (0.50-0.63) and 0.46 (0.40-0.53); and ORs for an eGFR decline ≥20%, 0.93 (95% CI 0.82-1.05), 0.90 (0.79-1.02) and 0.81 (0.70-0.93) for those with one, two and three healthy LFs compared with those with none of the three healthy LFs, respectively. Overall, subjects with a healthy lifestyle showed 28, 54 and 19% reduced risk of developing trace proteinuria, positive proteinuria and eGFR decline ≥20%, respectively, compared with those with an unhealthy lifestyle after 2 years. This association was similarly observed even among subjects without hypertension (HT) or diabetes mellitus (DM). CONCLUSIONS: Subjects with an overall healthy lifestyle showed a lower incidence of trace/positive proteinuria by dipstick test and rapid eGFR decline over 2 years in a nationwide general population. Thus lifestyle modification should be recommended for subjects with trace proteinuria during health checkups, even for subjects without HT or DM.

Stroke Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic: International Expert Panel Review.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has placed a tremendous strain on healthcare services. This study, prepared by a large international panel of stroke experts, assesses the rapidly growing research and personal experience with COVID-19 stroke and offers recommendations for stroke management in this challenging new setting: modifications needed for prehospital emergency rescue and hyperacute care; inpatient intensive or stroke units; posthospitalization rehabilitation; follow-up including at-risk family and community; and multispecialty departmental developments in the allied professions. SUMMARY: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 uses spike proteins binding to tissue angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-2 receptors, most often through the respiratory system by virus inhalation and thence to other susceptible organ systems, leading to COVID-19. Clinicians facing the many etiologies for stroke have been sobered by the unusual incidence of combined etiologies and presentations, prominent among them are vasculitis, cardiomyopathy, hypercoagulable state, and endothelial dysfunction. International standards of acute stroke management remain in force, but COVID-19 adds the burdens of personal protections for the patient, rescue, and hospital staff and for some even into the postdischarge phase. For pending COVID-19 determination and also for those shown to be COVID-19 affected, strict infection control is needed at all times to reduce spread of infection and to protect healthcare staff, using the wealth of well-described methods. For COVID-19 patients with stroke, thrombolysis and thrombectomy should be continued, and the usual early management of hypertension applies, save that recent work suggests continuing ACE inhibitors and ARBs. Prothrombotic states, some acute and severe, encourage prophylactic LMWH unless bleeding risk is high. COVID-19-related cardiomyopathy adds risk of cardioembolic stroke, where heparin or warfarin may be preferable, with experience accumulating with DOACs. As ever, arteritis can prove a difficult diagnosis, especially if not obvious on the acute angiogram done for clot extraction. This field is under rapid development and may generate management recommendations which are as yet unsettled, even undiscovered. Beyond the acute management phase, COVID-19-related stroke also forces rehabilitation services to use protective precautions. As with all stroke patients, health workers should be aware of symptoms of depression, anxiety, insomnia, and/or distress developing in their patients and caregivers. Postdischarge outpatient care currently includes continued secondary prevention measures. Although hoping a COVID-19 stroke patient can be considered cured of the virus, those concerned for contact safety can take comfort in the increasing use of telemedicine, which is itself a growing source of patient-physician contacts. Many online resources are available to patients and physicians. Like prior challenges, stroke care teams will also overcome this one. Key Messages: Evidence-based stroke management should continue to be provided throughout the patient care journey, while strict infection control measures are enforced.

Global and regional burden of stroke during 1990-2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.

BACKGROUND: Although stroke is the second leading cause of death worldwide, no comprehensive and comparable assessment of incidence, prevalence, mortality, disability, and epidemiological trends has been estimated for most regions. We used data from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2010 (GBD 2010) to estimate the global and regional burden of stroke during 1990-2010. METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase, LILACS, Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct, Global Health Database, the WHO library, and WHO regional databases from 1990 to 2012 to identify relevant studies published between 1990 and 2010.We applied the GBD 2010 analytical technique (DisMod-MR), based on disease-specific, pre-specified associations between incidence, prevalence, and mortality, to calculate regional and country-specific estimates of stroke incidence, prevalence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) lost by age group (<75 years, ≥ 75 years, and in total)and country income level (high-income, and low-income and middle-income) for 1990, 2005, and 2010. FINDINGS: We included 119 studies (58 from high-income countries and 61 from low-income and middle-income countries). From 1990 to 2010, the age-standardised incidence of stroke significantly decreased by 12% (95% CI 6-17)in high-income countries, and increased by 12% (-3 to 22) in low-income and middle-income countries, albeit nonsignificantly. Mortality rates decreased significantly in both high income (37%, 31-41) and low-income and middle income countries (20%, 15-30). In 2010, the absolute numbers of people with fi rst stroke (16・9 million), stroke survivors (33 million), stroke-related deaths (5・9 million), and DALYs lost (102 million) were high and had significantly increased since 1990 (68%, 84%, 26%, and 12% increase, respectively), with most of the burden (68・6% incident strokes, 52・2% prevalent strokes, 70・9% stroke deaths, and 77・7% DALYs lost) in low-income and middle-income countries. In 2010, 5・2 million (31%) strokes were in children (aged <20 years old) and young and middle-aged adults(20-64 years), to which children and young and middle-aged adults from low-income and middle-income countries contributed almost 74 000 (89%) and 4・0 million (78%), respectively, of the burden. Additionally, we noted significant geographical differences of between three and ten times in stroke burden between GBD regions and countries. More than 62% of new strokes, 69・8% of prevalent strokes, 45・5% of deaths from stroke, and 71・7% of DALYs lost because of stroke were in people younger than 75 years. INTERPRETATION: Although age-standardised rates of stroke mortality have decreased worldwide in the past two decades,the absolute number of people who have a stroke every year, stroke survivors, related deaths, and the overall global burden of stroke (DALYs lost) are great and increasing. Further study is needed to improve understanding of stroke determinants and burden worldwide, and to establish causes of disparities and changes in trends in stroke burden between countries of different income levels. FUNDING: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Benefit of cilostazol in patients with high risk of bleeding: subanalysis of cilostazol stroke prevention study 2.

BACKGROUND: The Cilostazol Stroke Prevention Study 2 (CSPS 2) showed that cilostazol significantly reduced the risk of stroke by 25.7% relative to aspirin, with significantly fewer hemorrhagic events, in patients with prior ischemic stroke, excluding cardioembolic stroke. However, whether the benefit of cilostazol is sustained in patients with a high risk of bleeding has not been examined. METHODS: We conducted a subanalysis of CSPS 2 to examine whether known risk factors for hemorrhagic stroke, such as stroke subtype and systolic blood pressure (SBP), influence the efficacy of the study drugs on hemorrhagic stroke. The relative risk reduction of hemorrhagic stroke was determined from the incidences calculated by the person-year method. The cumulative incidence rates of ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke were estimated and plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method. Incidences of serious hemorrhage and hemorrhage requiring hospital admission were also evaluated in the two treatment groups. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) calculated by the Cox proportion hazard model for cilostazol versus aspirin were assessed, and a log-rank test was used for the comparison between treatments. RESULTS: The incidence of hemorrhagic stroke was significantly lower in the cilostazol group than in the aspirin group among patients with prior lacunar stroke (0.36 vs. 1.20% in person-year, HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.18-0.70, p < 0.01), but not among those with prior atherothrombotic stroke (0.31 vs. 0.59% in person-year, HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.14-2.0, p = 0.34). The incidence of hemorrhagic stroke was significantly lower in the cilostazol group than in the aspirin group throughout all SBP categories (Poisson regression model including time-dependent covariates, p < 0.01) including SBP above 140 mm Hg (cilostazol 0.45% vs. aspirin 1.44% in person-year; Poisson regression model including time-dependent covariates, p = 0.02). Cilostazol, compared with aspirin, significantly reduced the incidence of cerebral hemorrhage (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.19-0.70, p < 0.01), overall hemorrhage requiring hospital admission (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.29-0.97, p = 0.04), and gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding requiring hospital admission (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.21-0.90, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Hemorrhagic stroke was less frequent in the cilostazol group than in the aspirin group among patients with lacunar stroke as well as those with increased blood pressure levels. As for extracranial hemorrhage requiring hospitalization, GI bleeding was also less frequent in the cilostazol than in the aspirin group. Cilostazol is supposed to be a therapeutic option to replace aspirin for secondary stroke prevention, especially in these subgroups with high risks for hemorrhagic events.

Comparison of the European and Japanese guidelines for the management of ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND: Different aspects of acute stroke management and strategies for stroke prevention derive from two viewpoints: specific traditional and historical backgrounds and evidence-based medicine from modern randomized controlled trials (RCTs), meta-analysis and authorized clinical practice guidelines (GLs). Regarding stroke, GLs have been published by national and international organizations in different languages, most frequently in English. Cerebrovascular Diseases published the European GLs for the management of ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attacks in 2003, with an update in 2008. At about the same time (in 2004), the first Japanese GLs for the management of stroke appeared in Japanese. The first English version of the updated Japanese GLs was published only in 2011 and included differently approved drugs and drug dosages as compared with other American or European countries. METHODS: Since 2011, the authors have met repeatedly and have compared the latest versions of published European and Japanese GLs for ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes. Many aspects have only been addressed in one but left out in the other GLs, which consequently founded the basis for the comparison. Classification of evidence levels and recommendation grades defined by the individual committees differed between both original GLs. RESULTS: Aspects of major importance were surprisingly similar and hence did not need extensive interpretation. Other aspects of ischemic stroke management differed significantly, e.g. the dosage of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator approved in Japan is lower (0.6 mg/kg) than in Europe (0.9 mg/kg), which derived from different practices in cardiovascular treatment prior to the design of acute ischemic stroke RCTs. Furthermore, comedication with neuroprotective agents (edaravone), intravenous anticoagulants (argatroban) or antiplatelet agents within 1-2 days after stroke onset is recommended in Japan but not in Europe. For cardioembolic stroke prevention, a major difference consists in a higher international normalized ratio target (2.0-3.0) in younger subjects versus in those >70 years (1.6-2.6), without age restrictions in Europe. CONCLUSION: This brief survey - when compared with the lengthy original recommendations - provides a stimulating basis for an extended interest among Japanese and European stroke clinicians to learn from their individual experiences and to strengthen efforts for joint cooperation in treating and preventing stroke all around the globe.

Comparison of the European and Japanese guidelines for the acute management of intracerebral hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Different aspects of acute stroke management and strategies for stroke prevention derive from two viewpoints: specific traditional and historical backgrounds and evidence-based medicine from modern randomized controlled trials (RCTs), meta-analysis and authorized clinical practice guidelines (GLs). Regarding intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), Cerebrovascular Diseases published the 2006 European stroke initiative recommendations for the management of ICH. In 2009, the revised Japanese GLs for the management of stroke, including that of ICH, appeared in Japanese. Whereas GLs for the prevention and treatment of ischemic stroke were presented in detail, recommendations with regard to ICH are relatively rare both in Japan and Europe. METHODS: Since 2011, the authors have met repeatedly and have compared the latest versions of published European and Japanese GLs for ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes. Many aspects have only been addressed in one but left out in the other GLs, which consequently founded the basis for the comparison. Classification of evidence levels and recommendation grades defined by the individual committees differed between both original GLs. RESULTS: Aspects of major importance were similar and hence did not need extensive interpretation, mostly due to a lack of evidence from appropriate RCTs worldwide. The target level to which systolic blood pressure should be lowered is quite high; <170 mm Hg for patients with known hypertension in Europe and <180 mm Hg in Japan. The results of ongoing clinical trials are awaited for the optimal target level and optimal medications. Concerning ICH associated with oral anticoagulant therapy, both guidelines give similar recommendations, namely that anticoagulation should be discontinued and the international normalized ratio of prothrombin time should be normalized with prothrombin complex concentrate or fresh-frozen plasma and additional vitamin K. Patients with ICH were treated surgically, often based on individual decisions - more frequently in Japan, depending on the association with hypertension. Patients with large or intraventricular bleedings were only treated if a life-saving performance was considered, irrespective of the neurological outcome. Infra- and supratentorial differences were similarly addressed in both GLs. CONCLUSION: This brief survey - when compared with the lengthy original recommendations - provides a stimulating basis for an extended interest among Japanese and European stroke clinicians to learn from their individual experiences and to strengthen efforts for joint cooperation in treating and preventing stroke all around the globe.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of the neuroprotective agent edaravone for noncardioembolic cerebral infarction.

BACKGROUND: The free radical scavenger edaravone has been reported useful for improvement in activities of daily living and for prevention of recurrent stroke in the edaravone versus sodium ozagrel in acute noncardioembolic ischemic stroke (EDO) trial. The aim of this report was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of edaravone compared to the intravenous antiplatelet drug ozagrel sodium (ozagrel) for noncardioembolic stroke (non-CES) based on the EDO trial data. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed using the Markov model, which also incorporated the long-term course after the acute stage of non-CES. From the perspective of a health care payer, direct medical costs and nursing care costs were taken into account in the cost analysis. The quality-adjusted life year (QALY) served as an indicator of effectiveness. Simulation at 5 and 10 years after the onset of non-CES was carried out. The study involved 68-year-old patients with non-CES, selected against the EDO trial subject selection criteria. A 14-day treatment with edaravone 60 mg/day or ozagrel 160 mg/day was assumed as acute treatment for non-CES. RESULTS: The use of edaravone was associated with a reduction in total costs (0.51 million yen [$6,374] at 5 years and 0.64 million yen [$8,039]) at 10 years after the onset of non-CES) and improvement in QALYs (0.23 at 5 years and 0.38 at 10 years). Compared to ozagrel therapy, edaravone therapy was a cost-saving strategy for treating non-CES. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to ozagrel therapy, edaravone therapy for non-CES is not only useful from a clinical viewpoint, but also valuable from a socioeconomic perspective.

Safety of the novel protease-activated receptor-1 antagonist vorapaxar in Japanese patients with a history of ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND: Vorapaxar, formerly SCH 530348, is a novel, orally active, potent thrombin receptor inhibitor selective for the protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR-1). Previous phase II studies of patients undergoing urgent or scheduled percutaneous coronary intervention treated with vorapaxar plus aspirin and clopidogrel or ticlopidine showed a trend toward reducing major adverse cardiac events, particularly myocardial infarction, without increasing bleeding risk. The present study evaluated the safety of vorapaxar in Japanese patients with a history of ischemic stroke receiving aspirin. METHODS: Ninety patients with previous ischemic stroke (≥14 days to <1 year before randomization) were randomized to receive vorapaxar (1 or 2.5 mg) or placebo once daily for 60 days. All patients received aspirin (75-150 mg/day). The primary endpoint was overall incidence of adverse events during the protocol-defined treatment phase (60 days). RESULTS: Addition of vorapaxar to aspirin did not significantly increase the overall incidence of adverse events, including serious adverse events. None of the patients treated with vorapaxar plus aspirin experienced thrombolysis in myocardial infarction major or minor bleeding versus 1 patient treated with placebo. Nonfatal stroke occurred in 1 patient allocated to placebo and 1 patient allocated to vorapaxar. CONCLUSIONS: Vorapaxar used in combination with standard doses of aspirin was safe and well tolerated in Japanese subjects with a history of ischemic stroke.

Safety and efficacy of the oral direct factor xa inhibitor apixaban in Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. -The ARISTOTLE-J study-.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend warfarin as the standard of care for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) at moderate or high risk for stroke. This phase II study assessed the effects of 2 doses of the factor Xa inhibitor apixaban vs. warfarin in Japanese patients with non-valvular AF. The composite primary endpoint was major and clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-two patients with AF and 1 or more additional risk factors for stroke were randomized (1:1:1) to double-blind apixaban 2.5 or 5mg b.i.d. or open-label warfarin (target international normalized ratio 2.0-3.0; 2.0-2.6 if age ≥ 70 years) for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint occurred in 1 patient (1.4%) in each apixaban group and 4 (5.3%) warfarin patients. There were no strokes, systemic emboli, myocardial infarctions, or deaths in either apixaban group. The warfarin group had 2 ischemic strokes and 1 subarachnoid hemorrhage, but there were no deaths. Major and CRNM bleeds each occurred with higher frequency in the warfarin group vs. either apixaban group. Most adverse events were mild or moderate. No patients had hepatic aminotransferase elevations greater than 3 times the upper limit of normal. CONCLUSIONS: In Japanese patients with AF, apixaban 2.5 and 5mg b.i.d. were well tolerated over 12 weeks. A global phase III trial, which includes Japanese patients, is ongoing (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT00787150).

Platelet aggregates detected by a conventional hematology analyzer method is a risk factor for stroke or a predictive factor in patients with chronic-stage cerebral infarction.

Assessment of platelet activation and/or function is important for primary and secondary prevention of vascular events. To test the hypothesis that determination of platelet aggregation in patients with chronic-stage cerebral infarction (CI) provides a simple measure of risk for ischemic stroke, we used a conventional hematology analyzer to detect aggregates and to assess the efficacy of antiplatelet agents in preventing spontaneous aggregate formation. Platelet aggregates were measured in citrated blood from 142 magnetic resonance imaging confirmed CI patients and 97 controls without CI (nonstroke). Aggregates were detected in 1 of 36 (2.8%) nonstroke subjects without risk factors, but in 24 of 52 (46.2%) nonstroke subjects with risk factors (odds ratio [OR], 3.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-10.00), in 21 of 35 (60.0%) nonstroke subjects with a predictive factor (carotid artery intima-media thickness [IMT] >1.1 mm) (OR, 9.13; 95% CI, 2.70-30.48), and in 31 of 63 (49.2%) CI patients who had not received antiplatelet therapy (OR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.12-4.17). After adjusting for other risk factors, the appearance of platelet aggregates was correlated only with IMT ≥1.1 mm. The rate of appearance of platelet aggregates was 0.33-fold lower in patients on antiplatelet therapy compared with those not on antiplatelet therapy (24.1%; 19 of 79 CI patients). Patients with platelet aggregates in the blood are considered at high risk for ischemic stroke, because the appearance of aggregates is associated with increased IMT. Our method is suitable for screening platelet function in high-risk patients and for examining the efficacy of antiplatelet agents.

Thrombolysis with 0.6 mg/kg intravenous alteplase for acute ischemic stroke in routine clinical practice: the Japan post-Marketing Alteplase Registration Study (J-MARS).

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In Japan, alteplase at 0.6 mg/kg was approved in October 2005 for use within 3 hours of stroke onset by the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (MHLW). The aim of the Japan post-Marketing Alteplase Registration Study (J-MARS), which was requested by MHLW at the time of approval, was to assess the safety and efficacy of 0.6 mg/kg alteplase in routine clinical practice for the Japanese. METHODS: A total of 7492 patients from 942 centers were enrolled in the J-MARS, an open-label, nonrandomized, observational study, from October 2005 to October 2007. Primary outcome measures were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (a deterioration in NIHSS score >or=4 from baseline) and favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale score, 0-1) at 3 months after stroke onset. RESULTS: The proportion of patients with symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in 7492 patients (safety analysis) was 3.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.1%-3.9%) within 36 hours and 4.4% (95% CI, 3.9%-4.9%) at 3 months. The overall mortality rate was 13.1% (95% CI, 12.4%-13.9%) and the proportion of patients with fatal symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was 0.9% (95% CI, 0.7%-1.2%). The outcomes at 3 months were available for 4944 patients and the proportion of favorable outcome (efficacy analysis) was 33.1% (95% CI, 31.8%-34.4%). The subgroup analysis in patients between 18 and 80 years with a baseline NIHSS score <25 demonstrated that favorable outcome at 3 months was 39.0% (95% CI, 37.4%-40.6%). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that 0.6 mg/kg intravenous alteplase within 3 hours of stroke onset could be safe and effective in routine clinical practice for the Japanese.

Stroke: working toward a prioritized world agenda.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim of the Synergium was to devise and prioritize new ways of accelerating progress in reducing the risks, effects, and consequences of stroke. METHODS: Preliminary work was performed by 7 working groups of stroke leaders followed by a synergium (a forum for working synergistically together) with approximately 100 additional participants. The resulting draft document had further input from contributors outside the synergium. RESULTS: Recommendations of the Synergium are: Basic Science, Drug Development and Technology: There is a need to develop: (1) New systems of working together to break down the prevalent "silo" mentality; (2) New models of vertically integrated basic, clinical, and epidemiological disciplines; and (3) Efficient methods of identifying other relevant areas of science. Stroke Prevention: (1) Establish a global chronic disease prevention initiative with stroke as a major focus. (2) Recognize not only abrupt clinical stroke, but subtle subclinical stroke, the commonest type of cerebrovascular disease, leading to impairments of executive function. (3) Develop, implement and evaluate a population approach for stroke prevention. (4) Develop public health communication strategies using traditional and novel (eg, social media/marketing) techniques. Acute Stroke Management: Continue the establishment of stroke centers, stroke units, regional systems of emergency stroke care and telestroke networks. Brain Recovery and Rehabilitation: (1) Translate best neuroscience, including animal and human studies, into poststroke recovery research and clinical care. (2) Standardize poststroke rehabilitation based on best evidence. (3) Develop consensus on, then implementation of, standardized clinical and surrogate assessments. (4) Carry out rigorous clinical research to advance stroke recovery. Into the 21st Century: Web, Technology and Communications: (1) Work toward global unrestricted access to stroke-related information. (2) Build centralized electronic archives and registries. Foster Cooperation Among Stakeholders (large stroke organizations, nongovernmental organizations, governments, patient organizations and industry) to enhance stroke care. Educate and energize professionals, patients, the public and policy makers by using a "Brain Health" concept that enables promotion of preventive measures. CONCLUSIONS: To accelerate progress in stroke, we must reach beyond the current status scientifically, conceptually, and pragmatically. Advances can be made not only by doing, but ceasing to do. Significant savings in time, money, and effort could result from discontinuing practices driven by unsubstantiated opinion, unproven approaches, and financial gain. Systematic integration of knowledge into programs coupled with careful evaluation can speed the pace of progress.

Factors affecting health-related quality of life assessed with the SF-36v2 health survey in outpatients with chronic-stage ischemic stroke in Japan--cross-sectional analysis of the OASIS study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The number of chronic-stage ischemic stroke patients in Japan continues to increase, because of decreasing mortality. This study was designed to ascertain health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in ischemic stroke patients and to analyze in detail factors affecting HRQOL. METHODS: 2,069 outpatients (1,226 males, 843 females; mean age: 71 years; median duration after onset: 20.5 months) with chronic-stage ischemic stroke visiting 150 institutions in Japan were enrolled. HRQOL was evaluated using the second version of the patient self-administered Medical Outcome Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36v2) questionnaire. RESULTS: All 8 domain scores and the physical component summary (PCS) score of SF-36v2 in stroke patients were significantly lower than those of Japanese national norms (JNN). The PCS score (36.6 +/- 16.1) and mental component summary (MCS) score (50.0 +/- 10.2) were lower than those of age-matched JNN (p < 0.001). Age, modified Rankin Scale (mRS), duration after onset and Japan Stroke Scale Depression score (JSS-D) were significantly correlated with PCS, as were role limitation because of physical problem, bodily pain, vitality and role limitation because of emotional problem scores; duration after onset and JSS-D were significantly correlated with MCS. Negative factors for PCS were older age, higher mRS, presence of subjective symptoms, neurological signs, rehabilitation and concomitant antidepressants. Negative factors for MCS were presence of subjective symptoms, psychiatric signs and concomitant antidepressants. CONCLUSIONS: HRQOL scores in ischemic stroke patients (chronic stage) are significantly correlated with not only age, mRS, duration after onset and JSS-D, but also presence of subjective symptoms and neurological/psychiatric signs, which could be targets for treatment.

Stroke: working toward a prioritized world agenda.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim of the Synergium was to devise and prioritize new ways of accelerating progress in reducing the risks, effects, and consequences of stroke. METHODS: Preliminary work was performed by 7 working groups of stroke leaders followed by a synergium (a forum for working synergistically together) with approximately 100 additional participants. The resulting draft document had further input from contributors outside the synergium. RESULTS: Recommendations of the Synergium are: Basic Science, Drug Development and Technology: There is a need to develop: (1) New systems of working together to break down the prevalent 'silo' mentality; (2) New models of vertically integrated basic, clinical, and epidemiological disciplines; and (3) Efficient methods of identifying other relevant areas of science. Stroke Prevention: (1) Establish a global chronic disease prevention initiative with stroke as a major focus. (2) Recognize not only abrupt clinical stroke, but subtle subclinical stroke, the commonest type of cerebrovascular disease, leading to impairments of executive function. (3) Develop, implement and evaluate a population approach for stroke prevention. (4) Develop public health communication strategies using traditional and novel (e.g., social media/marketing) techniques. Acute Stroke Management: Continue the establishment of stroke centers, stroke units, regional systems of emergency stroke care and telestroke networks. Brain Recovery and Rehabilitation: (1) Translate best neuroscience, including animal and human studies, into poststroke recovery research and clinical care. (2) Standardize poststroke rehabilitation based on best evidence. (3) Develop consensus on, then implementation of, standardized clinical and surrogate assessments. (4) Carry out rigorous clinical research to advance stroke recovery. Into the 21st Century: Web, Technology and Communications: (1) Work toward global unrestricted access to stroke-related information. (2) Build centralized electronic archives and registries. Foster Cooperation Among Stakeholders (large stroke organizations, nongovernmental organizations, governments, patient organizations and industry) to enhance stroke care. Educate and energize professionals, patients, the public and policy makers by using a 'Brain Health' concept that enables promotion of preventive measures. CONCLUSIONS: To accelerate progress in stroke, we must reach beyond the current status scientifically, conceptually, and pragmatically. Advances can be made not only by doing, but ceasing to do. Significant savings in time, money, and effort could result from discontinuing practices driven by unsubstantiated opinion, unproven approaches, and financial gain. Systematic integration of knowledge into programs coupled with careful evaluation can speed the pace of progress.

Sarpogrelate versus aspirin in secondary prevention of cerebral infarction: differential efficacy in diabetes? Subgroup analysis from S-ACCESS.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The results of the Sarpogrelate-Aspirin Comparative Clinical Study for Efficacy and Safety in Secondary Prevention of Cerebral Infarction (S-ACCESS), a randomized double-blind study of sarpogrelate (selective 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonist) versus aspirin in 1510 Japanese patients, have been reported. But S-ACCESS failed to demonstrate noninferiority of sarpogrelate to aspirin for preventing the recurrence of cerebral infarction. Here we compare the characteristics of sarpogrelate and aspirin in various subgroups. METHODS: Subgroups were predefined from patients' baseline characteristics. Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for sarpogrelate versus aspirin were calculated for primary (cerebral infarction) and secondary (serious vascular events) end points. Interactions between treatment effects and subgroup variables were examined by post hoc analysis. RESULTS: No significant difference in outcome between sarpogrelate and aspirin was found across multiple predefined subgroups. In post hoc analysis, a qualitative treatment interaction with diabetes mellitus was detected (P=0.166 for recurrence of cerebral infarction; P=0.098 for serious vascular events). HR for the recurrence of cerebral infarction with sarpogrelate versus that with aspirin was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.48 to 1.60) in diabetic patients and 1.51 (95% CI: 0.98 to 2.31) in nondiabetic patients. For serious vascular events, the corresponding HRs were 0.73 (95% CI: 0.42 to 1.25) and 1.28 (95% CI: 0.89 to 1.83). CONCLUSIONS: No specific baseline characteristic resulting in a significant difference between the effects of sarpogrelate and aspirin was identified. Aspirin was superior in most subgroups, except diabetics. Sarpogrelate may be a useful treatment option for Japanese patients with diabetes.

Postpublication external review of the Japanese guidelines for the management of stroke 2004.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Many guidelines for management of stroke have been published throughout the world, but no postpublication external review of any set of stroke guidelines by users, using standard checklists, has been reported. The purpose of this article is to present the results of an external review of the Japanese Guidelines for the Management of Stroke 2004, conducted several months postpublication. METHODS: Forty-one evaluators, who had not been involved in developing the guidelines, were selected from representative stroke centers and institutions in Japan. They consisted of 30 physicians including 22 stroke specialists, and 11 nurse practitioners. Three standard checklists, ie, Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) instrument, checklist by Shaneyfelt et al, and the Conference on Guideline Standardization (COGS) checklist, were used. RESULTS: Confidence ratios according to the AGREE checklist were 75%, 77%, and 86% for stroke specialists, physicians other than stroke specialists, and nurse practitioners, respectively. The average scores were 2.98, 3.13, and 3.29, [corrected] respectively. The confidence ratios according to the checklist by Shaneyfelt et al were 72%, 73% and 86% respectively, and those for the COGS checklist were 66%, 74%, and 91%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although it is impossible to compare our results with those for other stroke guidelines, because none of them has been externally reviewed by users postpublication, our results seem better than those for published guidelines for treatment of other diseases in Japan. These results should be helpful in the process of updating stroke guidelines in Japan and elsewhere.

Edaravone (radical scavenger) versus sodium ozagrel (antiplatelet agent) in acute noncardioembolic ischemic stroke (EDO trial).

BACKGROUND: Edaravone, a free radical scavenger approved by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare in 2001 for treating acute ischemic stroke, was recommended by the Japanese Guidelines for the Management of Stroke 2004. While edaravone also has a neuroprotective profile, there is no other recognized drug that can verify its effect in clinical trials despite the need for neuroprotection. We performed a postmarketing clinical trial to provide further reliable evidence concerning edaravone in patients with acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter randomized parallel-group open-label trial of edaravone intravenously and a control drug, sodium ozagrel (ozagrel), a thromboxane A(2) synthase inhibitor, intravenously in acute noncardioembolic ischemic stroke. The primary endpoint was the modified Rankin Scale at 3 months after treatment initiation. RESULTS: In total, 401 patients were initially enrolled. The rate of 'grade 0-1' on the modified Rankin Scale, as assessed at 3 months, was 57.1 and 50.3% in the edaravone and ozagrel groups, respectively. The intergroup difference was 6.8% (95% confidence interval = -3.1 to 16.7), indicating noninferiority of edaravone to ozagrel, since the lower limit of the confidence interval did not exceed -11.4%. There were no particular concerns over the safety of edaravone. CONCLUSION: This trial verified that edaravone was not inferior to ozagrel. Edaravone was at least as effective as ozagrel for the treatment of acute noncardioembolic ischemic stroke.

Stroke prevention by cilostazol in patients with atherothrombosis: meta-analysis of placebo-controlled randomized trials.

BACKGROUND: Cilostazol is an antiplatelet agent that inhibits phosphodiesterase III in platelets and vascular endothelium. Previous randomized controlled trials of cilostazol for prevention of cerebrovascular events have garnered mixed results. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the randomized clinical trials in patients with atherothrombotic diseases to determine the effects of cilostazol on cerebrovascular, cardiac, and all vascular events, and on all major hemorrhagic events. METHODS: Relevant trials were identified by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trial Registry for titles and abstracts. Data from 12 randomized controlled trials, involving 5674 patients, were analyzed for end points of cerebrovascular, cardiac, and major bleeding events. Searching, determination of eligibility, data extraction, and meta-analyses were conducted by multiple independent investigators. RESULTS: Data were available in 3782, 1187, and 705 patients with peripheral arterial disease, cerebrovascular disease, and coronary stenting, respectively. Incidence of total vascular events was significantly lower in the cilostazol group compared with the placebo group (relative risk [RR], 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74-0.99; P=.038). This was particularly influenced by a significant decrease of incidence of cerebrovascular events in the cilostazol group (RR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.43-0.78; P < .001). There was no significant intergroup difference in incidence of cardiac events (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.83-1.17; P=.908) and serious bleeding complications (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.66-1.51; P=.996). CONCLUSIONS: This first meta-analysis of cilostazol in patients with atherothrombosis demonstrated a significant risk reduction for cerebrovascular events, with no associated increase of bleeding risk.

Sarpogrelate-Aspirin Comparative Clinical Study for Efficacy and Safety in Secondary Prevention of Cerebral Infarction (S-ACCESS): A randomized, double-blind, aspirin-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The antiplatelet agent sarpogrelate is a selective inhibitor of 5-hydroxytryptamine receptors. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of sarpogrelate with those of aspirin in Japanese ischemic stroke patients. METHODS: In total, 1510 patients with recent cerebral infarction (1 week to 6 months after onset) were randomly assigned to receive either sarpogrelate (100 mg TID) or aspirin (81 mg/d). Mean follow-up period was 1.59 years. The primary efficacy end point was recurrence of cerebral infarction. Clusters of serious vascular events (stroke, acute coronary syndrome, or vascular event-related death) were selected as secondary end points. The aim of the primary efficacy analysis was to demonstrate the noninferiority of sarpogrelate with respect to aspirin, with the criterion that the upper limit of the 95% CI of the hazard ratio (sarpogrelate vs aspirin) for recurrence of cerebral infarction should not exceed 1.33. RESULTS: Cerebral infarction recurred in 72 patients (6.09%/y) in the sarpogrelate group and in 58 (4.86%/y) in the aspirin group (hazard ratio=1.25; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.77; P=0.19). A serious vascular event occurred in 90 (7.61%/y) and in 85 (7.12%/y) patients, respectively (hazard ratio=1.07; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.44; P=0.65). The overall incidences of bleeding events were 89 (11.9%) and 131 (17.3%), respectively (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Sarpogrelate was not noninferior to aspirin for prevention of recurrence of cerebral infarction. Bleeding events were significantly fewer with sarpogrelate than aspirin. The effect of aspirin in Japanese patients was similar to that in Western studies.