Ivabradine in Cancer Treatment-Related Left Ventricular Dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Patients developing cancer treatment-related left ventricular dysfunction (CTrLVD) require a prompt therapy. Hypotension, dizziness, and fatigue often limit the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), and ß-blockers (BB) in cancer patients who may already be afflicted by these symptoms. Ivabradine is a heart rate-lowering drug that does not cause hypotension and may be used in heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this paper was to investigate the role of ivabradine to treat CTrLVD. METHODS: A retrospective analysis in a cohort of 30 patients with CTrLVD (LVEF < 50%) receiving ivabradine on top of the maximal tolerated dose of ACEi/ARB and BB was performed. We evaluated cardiovascular treatment, oncologic treatment, LVEF, functional class (New York Heart Association [NYHA]), and fatigue during the study period. RESULTS: Ivabradine was initially started at the dose of 2.5 mg/b.i.d. in most patients and then carefully titrated. Hypotension (70%) and fatigue (77%) were the main causes limiting the treatment with ACEi/ARB and BB. After a mean follow-up of 6.5 months, LVEF increased from 45.1% (SD = 6.4) to 53.2% (SD = 3.9; p < 0.001). When patients were analyzed according to the type of cancer therapy, no difference in LVEF changes across the groups was found. NYHA class ameliorated in 11 patients, while fatigue improved in 8 patients. No serious cardiovascular side effects were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The ability to improve symptoms and LVEF in unfit cancer patients makes ivabradine a reasonable pharmacological tool for treating CTrLVD.

Covid-19 and the role of smoking: the protocol of the multicentric prospective study COSMO-IT (COvid19 and SMOking in ITaly).

The emergency caused by Covid-19 pandemic raised interest in studying lifestyles and comorbidities as important determinants of poor Covid-19 prognosis. Data on tobacco smoking, alcohol consumption and obesity are still limited, while no data are available on the role of e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products (HTP). To clarify the role of tobacco smoking and other lifestyle habits on COVID-19 severity and progression, we designed a longitudinal observational study titled COvid19 and SMOking in ITaly (COSMO-IT). About 30 Italian hospitals in North, Centre and South of Italy joined the study. Its main aims are: 1) to quantify the role of tobacco smoking and smoking cessation on the severity and progression of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients; 2) to compare smoking prevalence and severity of the disease in relation to smoking in hospitalized COVID-19 patients versus patients treated at home; 3) to quantify the association between other lifestyle factors, such as e-cigarette and HTP use, alcohol and obesity and the risk of unfavourable COVID-19 outcomes. Socio-demographic, lifestyle and medical history information will be gathered for around 3000 hospitalized and 700-1000 home-isolated, laboratory-confirmed, COVID-19 patients. Given the current absence of a vaccine against SARS-COV-2 and the lack of a specific treatment for -COVID-19, prevention strategies are of extreme importance. This project, designed to highly contribute to the international scientific debate on the role of avoidable lifestyle habits on COVID-19 severity, will provide valuable epidemiological data in order to support important recommendations to prevent COVID-19 incidence, progression and mortality.

Cardiovascular adverse events complicating the administration of rituximab: report of two cases.

Rituximab is a murine/human chimeric monoclonal antibody directed against the CD20 antigen. It is widely used in combination with polychemotherapy regimens for the treatment of hematological disorders. There is no evidence of direct cardiotoxicity of the drug but a few cases of cardiovascular adverse events have been reported in the literature. We report on two patients affected by stage IV non-Hodgkin lymphoma with bone marrow infiltration and peripheral blood involvement who experienced cardiovascular accidents temporally related to rituximab infusion. In both cases the monoclonal antibody was administered in association with a polychemotherapy regimen but administration was postponed several days later in order to avoid severe cytokine release syndrome because of the high tumor burden. The first case concerns an episode of atrial fibrillation in a patient with a diagnosis of small B-cell lymphoma. The episode happened immediately after rituximab infusion. In the second case there was an episode of chest pain associated with fever and chills during rituximab infusion in a patient with a diagnosis of mantle cell lymphoma. In both cases we noticed an unusual correlation between symptom recurrence and the speed of rituximab infusion. Both patients presented several cardiovascular risk factors but preliminary cardiac function assessment excluded signs of heart dysfunction. The pathogenesis of cardiovascular events during rituximab infusion remains unclear. A key role might be played by cytokine release from B cells as a consequence of rituximab activity. Moreover, pre-existing silent cardiac damage could be co-responsible for the clinical manifestations we reported. We consider our clinical experience relevant because it raises an issue of good clinical practice: despite rituximab's good tolerability profile, patients with cardiovascular risk factors should undergo accurate cardiac assessment so that silent heart disease can be detected. If the suspicion of cardiac damage is high, more extensive cardiac assessment is recommended.