RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To compare the effect of thermal cycling and erosive challenge on color change, surface roughness, surface loss and biofilm deposition of three resin-based composites. METHODS: Three resin-based composites that reproduce the color of gingival tissues [two nanohybrid composites (A and B) and a giomer (C) ] were tested before and after distinct challenges [ thermal cycling (TC) and erosive challenge (EC) ] in regard to its color stability, surface roughness, surface loss and biofilm deposition. Surface roughness and surface loss specimens (n=10) were measured with an optical profilometer and, color stability (n=10) was measured with a spectrophotometer. Biofilm deposition (n=5) was measured after 3 and 24 hours by safranin staining. RESULTS: Two-way ANOVA test was performed to analyze color change, roughness and surface loss. A significant color change was detected for resin-based composites (P< 0.05) and its interaction with tested challenges (P< 0.05). The highest color variation was observed on the giomer after erosive challenge. Surface loss was not different between tested groups (P= 0.708). The roughness was significantly higher in specimens submitted to thermal cycling (P> 0.05). For biofilm quantification, after 3 and 24 hours, ANOVA (3-way) detected significance for the interaction of challenges and resin-based composites (P< 0.05 and P< 0.05, respectively). All resin-based composites presented color changes after challenges; higher roughness was observed after thermal cycling for all resin-based composites tested, without significant surface loss; and higher biofilm deposition was observed on the giomer samples when submitted to erosive challenge after 3 and 24 hours. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Pink esthetic is as important as dental esthetics and some restorative materials can mimic gingival tissue. However, the tested giomer must be indicated with caution, since it presented significant changes after thermal and acid challenges.