CVOT Summit Report 2023: new cardiovascular, kidney, and metabolic outcomes.

The 9th Cardiovascular Outcome Trial (CVOT) Summit: Congress on Cardiovascular, Kidney, and Metabolic Outcomes was held virtually on November 30-December 1, 2023. This reference congress served as a platform for in-depth discussions and exchange on recently completed outcomes trials including dapagliflozin (DAPA-MI), semaglutide (SELECT and STEP-HFpEF) and bempedoic acid (CLEAR Outcomes), and the advances they represent in reducing the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), improving metabolic outcomes, and treating obesity-related heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). A broad audience of endocrinologists, diabetologists, cardiologists, nephrologists and primary care physicians participated in online discussions on guideline updates for the management of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in diabetes, heart failure (HF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD); advances in the management of type 1 diabetes (T1D) and its comorbidities; advances in the management of CKD with SGLT2 inhibitors and non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (nsMRAs); and advances in the treatment of obesity with GLP-1 and dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonists. The association of diabetes and obesity with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH; metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis, MASH) and cancer and possible treatments for these complications were also explored. It is generally assumed that treatment of chronic diseases is equally effective for all patients. However, as discussed at the Summit, this assumption may not be true. Therefore, it is important to enroll patients from diverse racial and ethnic groups in clinical trials and to analyze patient-reported outcomes to assess treatment efficacy, and to develop innovative approaches to tailor medications to those who benefit most with minimal side effects. Other keys to a successful management of diabetes and comorbidities, including dementia, entail the use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) technology and the implementation of appropriate patient-physician communication strategies. The 10th Cardiovascular Outcome Trial Summit will be held virtually on December 5-6, 2024 ( http://www.cvot.org ).

CVOT Summit 2022 Report: new cardiovascular, kidney, and glycemic outcomes.

The 8th Cardiovascular Outcome Trial (CVOT) Summit on Cardiovascular, Kidney, and Glycemic Outcomes was held virtually on November 10-12, 2022. Following the tradition of previous summits, this reference congress served as a platform for in-depth discussion and exchange on recently completed outcomes trials as well as key trials important to the cardiovascular (CV) field. This year's focus was on the results of the DELIVER, EMPA-KIDNEY and SURMOUNT-1 trials and their implications for the treatment of heart failure (HF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and obesity with glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists. A broad audience of primary care physicians, diabetologists, endocrinologists, cardiologists, and nephrologists participated online in discussions on new consensus recommendations and guideline updates on type 2 diabetes (T2D) and CKD management, overcoming clinical inertia, glycemic markers, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), novel insulin preparations, combination therapy, and reclassification of T2D. The impact of cardiovascular outcomes on the design of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) trials, as well as the impact of real-world evidence (RWE) studies on the confirmation of CVOT outcomes and clinical trial design, were also intensively discussed. The 9th Cardiovascular Outcome Trial Summit will be held virtually on November 23-24, 2023 ( http://www.cvot.org ).

Association of Low Serum Bilirubin Concentrations and Promoter Variations in the UGT1A1 and HMOX1 Genes with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in the Czech Population.

Bilirubin has potent biological beneficial effects, protecting against atherosclerosis, obesity, and metabolic syndrome. The aim of this study was to assess serum bilirubin concentrations and (TA)n and (GT)n microsatellite variations in the promoter regions of the UGT1A1 and HMOX1 genes, respectively, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The study was carried out in 220 patients with T2DM and 231 healthy control subjects, in whom standard biochemical tests were performed. The (TA)n and (GT)n dinucleotide variations were determined by means of fragment (size-based) analysis using an automated capillary DNA sequencer. Compared to controls, both male and female patients with T2DM had lower serum bilirubin concentrations (9.9 vs. 12.9 µmol/L, and 9.0 vs. 10.6 µmol/L, in men and women, respectively, p < 0.001). Phenotypic Gilbert syndrome was much less prevalent in T2DM patients, as was the frequency of the (TA)7/7UGT1A1 genotype in male T2DM patients. (GT)nHMOX1 genetic variations did not differ between diabetic patients and controls. Our results demonstrate that the manifestation of T2DM is associated with lower serum bilirubin concentrations. Consumption of bilirubin due to increased oxidative stress associated with T2DM seems to be the main explanation, although (TA)n repeat variations in UGT1A1 partially contribute to this phenomenon.

Diagnosis and Surgical Management of Insulinomas-A 23-Year Single-Center Experience.

Background and Objectives: Insulinoma is a rare tumor of the Langerhans islets of the pancreas. It produces insulin and causes severe hypoglycemia with neuroglycopenic symptoms. The incidence is low, at about 1-2 per 1 million inhabitants per year. The diagnosis is based on the presence of Whipple's triad and the result of a fasting test. Surgery is the treatment of choice. Objectives: A retrospective observational study of patients operated on for insulinoma in our hospital focused on the diagnosis, the type of surgery, and complications. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients operated on due to insulinoma. There were 116 surgeries between 2000 and 2022. There were 79 females and 37 males in this group. A fasting test and a CT examination were performed on all the patients. Results: The average duration of the fasting test was 18 h. Insulinoma was found in the body and tail of the pancreas in more than half of the patients. Enucleation was the most frequent type of surgery. Complications that were Clavien Dindo grade III or more occurred in 18% of the patients. The most frequent complications were abscesses and pancreatic fistula. Five patients had malignant insulinoma. Conclusions: Surgery is the treatment of choice in the case of insulinomas. The enucleation of the tumor is a sufficient treatment for benign insulinomas, which are not in contact with the main pancreatic duct. Due to the low incidence of the condition, the centralization of patients is recommended.

ADA Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes 2022 - whats new?

A selection of the most important changes in recent ADA guidelines on diabetes screening, diagnosis, pharmacotherapy, or technologies in 2022.

Any expectations from the more powerful dulaglutide?

Dulaglutide is a frequently used GLP-1 analogue and one of the most potent antidiabetic drugs. Practical aspects of treatment with dulaglutide are presented in this article, together with new data from AWARD-11 study with higher concentrations of dulaglutide, especially the effects on diabetes control, body weight and side effects.

Diabetes, Lipids, and CV Risk.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Diabetes is often associated with diabetic dyslipidemia. Both hyperglycemia and disorders of lipid metabolism strongly contribute to development of atherosclerosis, the crucial factor of cardiovascular disease. The aim of the manuscript is to summarize possible treatment to reduce cardiovascular risk. RECENT FINDINGS: Maximal cardiovascular risk reduction is maintained by targeting more pathologic disturbances together. While antihypertensive treatment has not changed much recently, novel PCSK9 inhibitors have significantly improved management of dyslipidemia. Similarly, modern antihyperglycemic agents (SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists) show both significant metabolic effects and cardiovascular benefits. Diabetes treatment is no longer glucocentric. Apart from glucose management, there are effective pharmacologic tools for significant reduction of cardiovascular risk.

Expert consensus on the practical aspects of the cooperation of cardiologist and diabetologist in the management of the patients with chronic heart failure and reduced ejection fraction.

Diabetes mellitus is an important risk factor for the development of heart failure and presence of diabetes significantly worsens heart failure outcome. Introduction of gliflozins to the therapy of heart failure is one of the most important novelty. Gliflozins reduce glucose level by the sodium-glucose contransporter 2 inhibition in proximal tubulus in the kidney. Gliflozins are used as effective antidiabetic drugs with improvement of glycemic control without risk of hypoglycemia, gliflozins decrease blood pressure and patients weight. Recent studies have shown that gliflozins significantly reduce risk of cardiovascular complications and heart failure hospitalizations in diabetic patients. Clinical trials with dapagliflozin and empagliflozin have shown reduction of the risk of cardiovascular death and heart failure hospitalization in the patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction both in the patients with diabetes and in the patients without diabetes. The aim of the expert consenzus is to summarize practical aspects in the cooperation of cardiologist and diabetologist in the management of the patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction in the context of the current guidelines and other treatment options.

Issues for the management of people with diabetes and COVID-19 in ICU.

In the pandemic "Corona Virus Disease 2019" (COVID-19) people with diabetes have a high risk to require ICU admission. The management of diabetes in Intensive Care Unit is always challenging, however, when diabetes is present in COVID-19 the situation seems even more complicated. An optimal glycemic control, avoiding acute hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia and glycemic variability may significantly improve the outcome. In this case, intravenous insulin infusion with continuous glucose monitoring should be the choice. No evidence suggests stopping angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin-renin-blockers or statins, even it has been suggested that they may increase the expression of Angiotensin-Converting-Enzyme-2 (ACE2) receptor, which is used by "Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) to penetrate into the cells. A real issue is the usefulness of several biomarkers, which have been suggested to be measured during the COVID-19. N-Terminal-pro-Brain Natriuretic-Peptide, D-dimer and hs-Troponin are often increased in diabetes. Their meaning in the case of diabetes and COVID-19 should be therefore very carefully evaluated. Even though we understand that in such a critical situation some of these requests are not so easy to implement, we believe that the best possible action to prevent a worse outcome is essential in any medical act.

Worldwide inertia to the use of cardiorenal protective glucose-lowering drugs (SGLT2i and GLP-1 RA) in high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes.

The disclosure of proven cardiorenal benefits with certain antidiabetic agents was supposed to herald a new era in the management of type 2 diabetes (T2D), especially for the many patients with T2D who are at high risk for cardiovascular and renal events. However, as the evidence in favour of various sodium-glucose transporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) accumulates, prescriptions of these agents continue to stagnate, even among eligible, at-risk patients. By contrast, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) DPP-4i remain more widely used than SGLT2i and GLP-1 RA in these patients, despite a similar cost to SGLT2i and a large body of evidence showing no clear benefit on cardiorenal outcomes. We are a group of diabetologists united by a shared concern that clinical inertia is preventing these patients from receiving life-saving treatments, as well as placing them at greater risk of hospitalisation for heart failure and progression of renal disease. We propose a manifesto for change, in order to increase uptake of SGLT2i and GLP-1 RA in appropriate patients as a matter of urgency, especially those who could be readily switched from an agent without proven cardiorenal benefit. Central to our manifesto is a shift from linear treatment algorithms based on HbA1c target setting to parallel, independent considerations of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, heart failure and renal risks, in accordance with newly updated guidelines. Finally, we call upon all colleagues to play their part in implementing our manifesto at a local level, ensuring that patients do not pay a heavy price for continued clinical inertia in T2D.

What is new for internists in ESC guidelines on diabetes?

A brief summarization of European Society of Cardiology 2019 Guidelines on diabete{s, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases.

Hypoglycemia in non -diabetic patients.

Hypoglycemia is a rather frequent complication of diabetes treatment, however it can occur also in non-diabetic patients. The article presents a brief differential diagnosis of hypoglycemia in non-diabetic patients.

Diabetes management in hospital.

Patients with diabetes represent around 25 % of hospitalized persons. Treatment of diabetes patient is more complicated. Modification or initiation of antidiabetic treatment is often a significant problem during hospitalization on standard medical ward. The aim of this article is to present basic recommendations for in-patient diabetes treatment.

Report from the 4th Cardiovascular Outcome Trial (CVOT) Summit of the Diabetes & Cardiovascular Disease (D&CVD) EASD Study Group.

The 4th Cardiovascular Outcome Trial (CVOT) Summit of the Diabetes & Cardiovascular Disease (D&CVD) EASD Study Group was held in Munich on 25-26 October 2018. As in previous years, this summit served as a reference meeting for in-depth discussions on the topic of recently completed and presented CVOTs. This year, focus was placed on the CVOTs CARMELINA, DECLARE-TIMI 58 and Harmony Outcomes. Trial implications for diabetes management and the impact of the new ADA/EASD consensus statement treatment algorithm were highlighted for diabetologists, cardiologists, endocrinologists, nephrologists and general practitioners. Discussions evolved from CVOTs to additional therapy options for heart failure (ARNI), knowledge gained for adjunct therapy of type 1 diabetes and, on the occasion of the 10 year anniversary of the FDA's "Guidance for Industry: "should CVOTs be continued and/or modified?" The 5th Cardiovascular Outcome Trial Summit will be held in Munich on 24-25 October 2019 ( http://www.cvot.org ).

Report from the 3rd Cardiovascular Outcome Trial (CVOT) Summit of the Diabetes & Cardiovascular Disease (D&CVD) EASD Study Group.

The 3rd Cardiovascular Outcome Trial Summit of the Diabetes & Cardiovascular Disease EASD Study Group was held on the 26-27 October 2017 in Munich. As in 2015 and 2016, this summit was organised in light of recently completed and published CVOTs on diabetes, aiming to serve as a reference meeting for in-depth discussions on the topic. Amongst others, the CVOTs EXSCEL, DEVOTE, the CANVAS program and the ACE-trial, which released primary outcome results in 2017, were discussed. Trial implications for diabetes management and recent perspectives of diabetologists, cardiologists, endocrinologists, nephrologists and general practitioners were highlighted. The clinical relevance of cardiovascular outcome trials and its implications regarding reimbursement were compared with real-world studies. The 4th Cardiovascular Outcome Trial Summit will be held in Munich 25-26 October 2018 ( http://www.dcvd.org ).

Lower plasma levels of glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) and pancreatic polypeptide (PP) in patients with ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas and their relation to the presence of impaired glucoregulation and weight loss.

BACKGROUND: The changes in gastrointestinal hormones associated with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in patients with impaired glucoregulation have yet to be evaluated. The aim of this study was to determine plasma concentrations of selected gastrointestinal hormones in PDAC patients with and without diabetes and to compare them with levels found in Type 2 diabetic patients without cancer. METHODS: In this study we examined plasma concentrations of glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP), glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), pancreatic polypeptide (PP), peptide YY (PYY) and neuropeptide Y (NPY), and cytokines leptin and adiponectin in 94 patients with histologically confirmed PDAC. Thirty-nine patients with Type 2 diabetes without PDAC and 29 healthy individuals with no evidence of acute or chronic diseases were examined as controls. RESULTS: Significantly lower plasma concentrations of GIP were found in PDAC patients with new-onset diabetes/prediabetes (n = 76), or in those with normal glucose regulation (n = 18), compared to patients with Type 2 diabetes without PDAC and controls (15.5 (3.7-64.5) or 6.5 (1.7-24.5) vs. 39.8 (15.1-104.7) and 28.8 (7.4-112.2) ng/L, p < 0.001); the same relationship was observed for PP (38.9 (10.2-147.9) or 28.1 (7.9-100.0) vs 89.1 (38.0-208.9) and 75.8 (30.1-190.6) ng/L, p < 0.01), respectively. The lowest levels of GIP and PP concentrations were found in PDAC patients with new-onset diabetes/prediabetes and weight loss > 2 kg (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that GIP and PP plasma concentrations are lower in pancreatic cancer irrespective of the degree of glucose intolerance as compared to Type 2 diabetic patients and healthy controls. In new onset diabetes especially if associated with weight loss, these changes may represent a new clue for the diagnosis of PDAC.

Prevalence and Risk Factors of Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) are at increased risk of fractures. The aim of this study is to analyze the prevalence and risk factors of osteoporosis and osteoporosis related fractures in postmenopausal women with T2DM. METHODS: A total of 112 postmenopausal women with T2DM and 171 control nondiabetic women received a standardized questionnaire on osteoporosis risk factors, and were evaluated for bone mineral density (BMD, by using a dual energy X-ray absorptiometry), biochemical markers of bone and glucose metabolism, soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products (sRAGE) and its gene polymorphisms (rs1800625 or rs2070600). RESULTS: In T2DM patients the prevalence of osteoporosis was 25% and low trauma vertebral (Vfx) and non-vertebral fractures were found in 8% and 19% women, respectively. When compared between subjects with and without fractures, there were no significant differences in BMD at any site between the groups, except for distal radius, which was significantly lower in T2DM women with Vfx (p<0.05 vs.non-fractured without osteoporosis). We found no associations between bone and glucose metabolism variables, sRAGE and BMD. No significant differences were observed in sRAGE levels according to their rs1800625, rs 2070600 genotype or fracture prevalence. Serum osteocalcin was significantly lower in T2DM women (p<0.01 vs. controls) and in T2DM women with Vfx (p<0.05) vs. non-fractured without osteoporosis. T2DM women with low daily walking activity (< 2 h daily) had significantly higher serum sclerostin levels (p<0.05 vs. those who were walking > 2 h daily). CONCLUSION: Diabetes-specific parameters as well as RAGE polymorphisms did not associate with BMD or fractures in T2DM postmenopausal women. Lower levels of osteocalcin, namely in those with Vfx and higher sclerostin levels in those with low daily walking activity suggest lower bone remodeling and/or decreased bone quality in T2DM.

[Glycemic variability and microvascular complications of diabetes]. / Glykemická variabilita a mikrovaskulární komplikace diabetu.

Vascular complications of diabetes result from long lasting unsatisfactory glycemic control. We usually assess glycemic control based on the value of glycated hemoglobin HbA1c. The glycated hemoglobin test, however, says nothing about short-term glycemic fluctuations. Recently, continuous monitoring of glycemia has enabled us an in-depth assessment of changes in glucose concentrations, called glycemic variability. Together with the research of short-term glycemic variability, also the study of long-term fluctuations in glycemic control based on HbA1c variability has now intensified. Glycemic variability may be related to oxidation stress, endothelial dysfunction and inflammation, the factors traditionally associated with vascular damage. This overview summarizes the recent findings in the field of glycemic variability and its possible association with microvascular complications in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.Key words: glycemic variability, HbA1c variability, microvascular complications, type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Glucose variability, HbA1c and microvascular complications.

Microvascular complications in diabetes are associated with poor long-term diabetes control as measured by HbA1c levels. Glucose fluctuations are related to oxidative stress, endothelial dysfunction, and inflammation, factors traditionally associated with the pathogenesis of vascular damage. Glucose variability has been associated with macrovascular disease in some studies but any association with microvascular disease remains controversial. This overview summarizes recent findings in the field of glucose variability and its possible relationship with retinopathy, nephropathy and neuropathy. It is concluded that randomized prospective follow-up trials could possibly help estimate whether short-term glucose variability should be considered as an independent risk factor for microvascular complications in diabetes.

Serum microRNA-196 and microRNA-200 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma of patients with diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to compare expressions of 6 microRNAs (miRNAs) in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PAC) and non-cancer patients, moreover according to the presence or absence of diabetes mellitus. METHODS: Expressions of miRNA-192, -196, -200, -21, -30 and -423 were measured in 77 patients with PAC and 64 non-cancer patients (34 patients with type 2 DM and 30 control persons). 60 patients with PAC (78%) had DM or prediabetes and it was of new-onset (less than 2 years before the cancer diagnosis) in 44 out of them. RESULTS: The expressions of all microRNAs were 1.4-3.7 times higher (significantly) in the PAC group compared to non-cancer patients. No difference was found between PAC diabetic and PAC non-diabetic patients. MicroRNA-200 was significantly higher in PAC patients with significant body weight loss against those without weight loss. Adding miRNA-196 and -200 to the current marker CA 19-9 improved the discriminative ability of the test (compared to CA 19-9 alone). CONCLUSION: MicroRNA-196 and -200 could be used as additional markers in PAC diagnosis.