Association Between Mental Health Burden, Clinical Presentation, and Outcomes in Individuals With Symptomatic Peripheral Artery Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Along with the rising burden of peripheral artery disease (PAD), mental health concerns are increasingly being recognized as a comorbidity to address in the chronic disease management of symptomatic PAD. Apart from a high prevalence of comorbid mental health conditions, the role of pain and changing health behaviors and the broader impacts of illness and adaptation to living with PAD require specialized behavioral health expertise. This scientific statement builds a case that this expertise should be integrated within the multidisciplinary PAD team. Furthermore, areas such as cognitive dysfunction and palliative care are highlighted as needing psychological interventions. Although much of the evidence of the efficacy of psychological and psychotropic interventions has been extrapolated from other cardiovascular populations, evidence for the role of psychological interventions for behavior change, for example, uptake of exercise regimens, is increasingly being accrued within PAD. Areas for behavioral health needs and interactions with PAD treatment are discussed, including the use of opioids, depression management, anxiety and stress reduction interventions, the use of benzodiazepines and antidepressants, smoking cessation, rehabilitation trajectories after amputation, and the role of cognitive decline for PAD treatment and outcomes. A case summary highlights the stigma around mental health and vascular disease and the fragmentation of care. This scientific statement provides remarks for building a road map for integrated behavioral PAD care and potential solutions to overcome these barriers. Instrumental to reaching these changes are interprofessional advocacy efforts and initiatives that help break down the stigma around mental health and promote evidence-based collaborative, nonhierarchical, and multidisciplinary PAD care.

Variability in guideline-directed medical therapy across sites and operators and long-term mortality and amputation outcomes risk in patients undergoing peripheral vascular interventions.

BACKGROUND: The use of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in patients undergoing peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs) decreases the risk of death and amputation and may decrease hospital readmissions. The variability of GDMT prescription across sites and operators and the proportionality of risk is not well understood. We aimed to study the association between variability of GDMT prescription at the site and operator level and outcomes (including 90-day readmissions and 24-month all-cause mortality and major amputation). METHODS: We examined GDMT discharge rates in PVIs performed between 2017 and 2018 using Medicare-linked Vascular Quality Initiative registry. GDMT included a statin, antiplatelet therapy, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (ACE-i/ARB) if hypertensive. Quartiles (Q1-4) of GDMT rates were documented by operators and sites and variability was quantified using median odds ratios (MOR) and intraclass correlation (ICC). The association between lower GDMT rates (per 10%) by sites and operators with 90-day readmission were calculated using logistic regression, and with 24-month mortality and major amputation using parametric survival model. Models were adjusted for patient-level factors and included sites and operators nested within sites as 2 random effects. RESULTS: GDMT rates for 17,147 patients across 223 sites and 1,263 operators ranged from 0% to 38% (Q1, MOR 1.43, 95%CI 1.39-1.47, P ≤ .001) to 57%-100% (Q4, MOR 1.48, 95%CI 1.44-1.51, P ≤ .001). Four percent of variance in GDMT use was explained by sites (ICC 3.9, 95%CI 2.9-5.3) and operators (ICC 4.1, 95%CI 3.1-5.4). A dose-response relationship was noted between lower GDMT rates and increased risk of 90-day readmission risk by sites (P = .021) and operators (P < .001). Lower GDMT prescription by site was associated with higher risk of 24-month mortality (HR = 1.07, 95%CI 1.02-1.13) and major amputation (HR = 1.08, 95%CI 1.01-1.15). Similar associations were found for GDMT use by provider (mortality HR = 1.05, 95%CI 1.02-1.08 and amputation HR = 1.04, 95%CI 1.00-1.08). CONCLUSION: Both at the operator and health system level, there was significant variability in GDMT prescription following PVI, proportionally translating into risk for readmission, mortality, and major amputation. Targeted quality efforts should prioritize both operator and site levels to improve GDMT use and outcomes for patients undergoing PVI.

Variability in short-term mortality following repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms across centers and physicians.

BACKGROUND: Variation in the care management of repairs for ruptured infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms between centers and physicians, such as procedural volumes, may explain differences in mortality outcomes. First, we quantified the center and physician variability associated with 30- and 90-day mortality risk after ruptured open surgical repair (rOSR) and ruptured endovascular aneurysm repair (rEVAR). Second, we explored wheter part of this variability was attributable to procedural volume at the center and physician levels. METHODS: Two cohorts including rOSR and rEVAR procedures between 2013 and 2019 were analyzed from the Vascular Quality Initiative database. Thirty- and 90-day all-cause mortality rates were derived from linked Medicare claims data. The median odds ratio (MOR) (median mortality risk from low- to high-risk cluster) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (variability attributable to each cluster) for 30- and 90-day mortality risks associated with center and physician variability were derived using patient-level adjusted multilevel logistic regression models. Procedural volume was calculated at the center and physician levels and stratified by quartiles. The models were sequentially adjusted for volumes, and the difference in ICCs (without vs with accounting for volume) was calculated to describe the center and physician variability in mortality risk attributable to volumes. RESULTS: We included 450 rOSRs (mean age, 74.5 ± 7.6 years; 23.5% female) and 752 rEVARs (76.4 ± 8.4 years; 26.1% female). After rOSRs, the 30- and 90-day mortality rates were 32.9% and 38.7%, respectively. No variability across centers and physicians was noted (30- and 90-day MORs ≈1 and ICCs ≈0%). Neither center nor physician volume was associated with 30-day (P = .477 and P = .796) or 90-day mortality (P = .098 and P = .559). After rEVAR, the 30- and 90-day mortality rates were 21.3% and 25.5%, respectively. Significant center variability (30-day MOR, 1.82 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.33-2.22]; ICC, 11% [95% CI, 2%-36%]; and 90-day MOR, 1.76 [95% CI, 1.37-2.09]; ICC, 10% [95% CI, 3%-30%]), but negligeable variability across physicians (30- and 90-day MORs ≈1 and ICCs ≈0%) were noted. Neither center nor physician volume were associated with 30-day (P = .076 and P = .336) or 90-day mortality risk (P = .066 and P = .584). The center variability attributable to procedural volumes was negligeable (difference in ICCs, 1% for 30-day mortality; 0% for 90-day mortality). CONCLUSIONS: Variability in practice from center to center was associated with short-term mortality outcomes in rEVAR, but not for rOSR. Physician variability was not associated with short-term mortality for rOSR or rEVAR. Annualized center and physician volumes did not significantly explain these associations. Further work is needed to identify center-level factors affecting the quality of care and outcomes for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Comparison of mortality and amputation after lower extremity bypass versus peripheral vascular intervention in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia and comorbid chronic kidney disease.

OBJECTIVE: Comorbid chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with worse outcomes for patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). However, comparative effectiveness data are limited for lower extremity bypass (LEB) vs peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) in patients with CLTI and CKD. We aimed to evaluate (1) 30-day all-cause mortality and amputation and (2) 5-year all-cause mortality and amputation for LEB vs PVI in patients with comorbid CKD. METHODS: Individuals who underwent LEB and PVI were queried from the Vascular Quality Initiative with Medicare claims-linked outcomes data. Propensity scores were calculated using 13 variables, and a 1:1 matching method was used. The mortality risk at 30 days and 5 years in LEB vs PVI by CKD was assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models, with interaction terms added for CKD. For amputation, cumulative incidence functions and Fine-Gray models were used to account for the competing risk of death, with interaction terms for CKD added. RESULTS: Of 4084 patients (2042 per group), the mean age was 71.0 ± 10.8 years, and 69.0% were male. Irrespective of CKD status, 30-day mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.63-1.42, P = .78) was similar for LEB vs PVI, but LEB was associated with a lower risk of 30-day amputation (sub-HR [sHR]: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.44-0.97, P = .04). CKD status, however, did not modify these results. Similarly, LEB vs PVI was associated with a lower risk of 5-year mortality (HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.71-0.88, P < .001) but no difference in 5-year amputation (sHR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.89-1.20, P = .67). CKD status did not modify these results. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of CKD status, patients had a lower risk of 5-year all-cause mortality and 30-day amputation with LEB vs PVI. Results may help inform preference-sensitive treatment decisions on LEB vs PVI for patients with CLTI and CKD, who may commonly be deemed too high risk for surgery.

Psychosocial and socioeconomic factors are most predictive of health status in patients with claudication.

BACKGROUND: As a key treatment goal for patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease (PAD), improving health status has also become an important end point for clinical trials and performance-based care. An understanding of patient factors associated with 1-year PAD health status is lacking in patients with PAD. METHODS: The health status of 1073 consecutive patients with symptomatic PAD in the international multicenter PORTRAIT (Patient-Centered Outcomes Related to Treatment Practices in Peripheral Arterial Disease: Investigating Trajectories) registry was measured at baseline and 1 year with the Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ). The association of 47 patient characteristics with 1-year PAQ scores was assessed using a random forest algorithm. Variables of clinical significance were retained and included in a hierarchical multivariable linear regression model predicting 1-year PAQ summary scores. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 67.7 ± 9.3 years, and 37% were female. Variables with the highest importance ranking in predicting 1-year PAQ summary score were baseline PAQ summary score, Patient Health Questionnaire-8 depression score, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-2 anxiety score, new onset symptom presentation, insurance status, current or prior diagnosis of depression, low social support, initial invasive treatment, duration of symptoms, and race. The addition of 19 clinical variables in an extended model marginally improved the explained variance in 1-year health status (from R2 0.312 to 0.335). CONCLUSIONS: Patients' 1-year PAD-specific health status, as measured by the PAQ, can be predicted from 10 mostly psychosocial and socioeconomic patient characteristics including depression, anxiety, insurance status, social support, and symptoms. These characteristics should be validated and tested in other PAD cohorts so that this model can inform risk adjustment and prediction of PAD health status in comparative effectiveness research and performance-based care.

Evaluation of short-term mortality in patients with Medicare undergoing endovascular interventions for chronic limb-threatening ischemia.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) have high mortality rates after revascularization. Risk stratification for short-term outcomes is challenging. We aimed to develop machine-learning models to rank predictive variables for 30-day and 90-day all-cause mortality after peripheral vascular intervention (PVI). METHODS: Patients undergoing PVI for CLTI in the Medicare-linked Vascular Quality Initiative were included. Sixty-six preprocedural variables were included. Random survival forest (RSF) models were constructed for 30-day and 90-day all-cause mortality in the training sample and evaluated in the testing sample. Predictive variables were ranked based on the frequency that they caused branch splitting nearest the root node by importance-weighted relative importance plots. Model performance was assessed by the Brier score, continuous ranked probability score, out-of-bag error rate, and Harrell's C-index. RESULTS: A total of 10,114 patients were included. The crude mortality rate was 4.4% at 30 days and 10.6% at 90 days. RSF models commonly identified stage 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD), dementia, congestive heart failure (CHF), age, urgent procedures, and need for assisted care as the most predictive variables. For both models, eight of the top 10 variables were either medical comorbidities or functional status variables. Models showed good discrimination (C-statistic 0.72 and 0.73) and calibration (Brier score 0.03 and 0.10). CONCLUSION: RSF models for 30-day and 90-day all-cause mortality commonly identified CKD, dementia, CHF, need for assisted care at home, urgent procedures, and age as the most predictive variables as critical factors in CLTI. Results may help guide individualized risk-benefit treatment conversations regarding PVI.

Impact of comorbid opioid use disorder and major depressive disorder on healthcare utilization outcomes in patients with peripheral artery disease: A National Readmission Database analysis.

BACKGROUND: Prior research has demonstrated that individuals with peripheral artery disease (PAD) often have comorbid opioid use disorder (OUD) and major depressive disorder (MDD), with limited data regarding their impact on readmission outcomes, length of stay, and cost. This study aimed to investigate these healthcare utilization outcomes in patients with PAD who have comorbid OUD and MDD. METHODS: Data were obtained from the National Readmission Database from 2011 through 2018. The study population included all hospitalizations with PAD as the primary or secondary diagnosis, from which hospitalizations with OUD and MDD were extracted using appropriate ICD-9/10 diagnosis codes. Primary outcomes were 30-day and 90-day readmission, total cost, and total length of stay within the calendar year. We created hierarchical multivariable logistic regression models examining OUD with and without MDD, with a random effect for healthcare facility location. RESULTS: From 2011 to 2018, 13,265,817 weighted admissions with PAD were identified. These admissions were segmented into four categories: No OUD/No MDD (12,056,466), OUD/No MDD (323,762), No OUD/MDD (867,641), and OUD/MDD (17,948). The group with No OUD/No MDD was used as the reference group for all subsequent comparisons. Regarding 30-day and 90-day readmissions, patients with OUD/MDD had odds of 1.14 (95% CI 1.10, 1.18) and 1.09 (95% CI 1.06, 1.13), respectively. Patients with OUD/No MDD bore the highest median cost of $64,354 (IQR $30,797-137,074), and patients with OUD/MDD marked the lengthiest median stay of 6.01 days (IQR 2.01-13.30). CONCLUSION: This study found a significant association between these comorbidities and outcomes and therefore calls for targeted interventions and pain management strategies.

Clinician perspectives regarding CYP2C19 genotype testing in patients with critical limb ischemia: A Delphi approach.

OBJECTIVES: Antiplatelet therapy is an essential element in the management of patients with arterial vascular disease. In peripheral arterial disease (PAD), dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), primarily clopidogrel and aspirin, is routinely prescribed following intervention. There is sparse data regarding the need for DAPT, the appropriate duration, or the heterogeneity of treatment effects for antiplatelet regimens across patients, leading to potential uncertainty and heterogeneity around treatment practices. An example of heterogeneity of treatment effects is a patients' metabolizer status for the use of clopidogrel. The aim of the study was to (1) assess clinicians' knowledge of and attitudes toward managing patients with CYP2C19 mutations, (2) identify barriers to implementation of CYP2C19 testing and management policies, and (3) reach consensus for CYP2C19 testing and management strategies for patients with PAD who undergo peripheral vascular interventions (PVI). METHODS: A modified Delphi method was used to establish consensus amongst PAD interventionalists around CYP2C19 testing. All practicing Yale New Haven Hospital PAD interventionalists with backgrounds in interventional cardiology, vascular surgery, or interventional radiology were approached by email for participation. Round 1 included the collection of baseline demographic questions, knowledge questions, and three statements for consensus. Knowledge questions were rated on a 0-10 Likert scale with the following anchors: 0 ("Not at all"), 5 ("Neutral), and 10 ("Very Much"). Participants were asked to rate the importance of the three consensus statements on a 9-point Likert scale from 1 ("Strongly Disagree") to 10 ("Strongly Agree"). In Round 2, participants were shown the same consensus statements, the median response of the group from the previous round, and their previous answers. Participants were instructed to revise their rating using the results from the previous round. This process was repeated for Round 3. RESULTS: Of the 28 experts invited to participate, 13 agreed (46%). Participants were predominantly male (92.3%) and white (61.5%) with representation from interventional cardiology (46.2%) and vascular surgery (53.8%). Most participants reported more than 10+ years in practice (61.5%). PAD interventionalists felt they would benefit from more education regarding CYP2C19 mutations (median score 8.0, interquartile range 5.0-8.5). They indicated some familiarity with CYP2C19 mutations (7.0, 6.0-9.5) but did not feel strongly that CYP2C19 was important to their practice (6.0, 5.5-7.5). In each round, the median responses for the three consensus statements were 5, 6, and 9, respectively. With each successive round the interquartile range narrowed indicative of evolving consensus but did not reach the prespecified interquartile range for consensus of 1 for any of the statements. CONCLUSIONS: PAD interventionalists practicing at an academic health system recognize the heterogenous response of their patients to clopidogrel therapy but are unsure when to leverage genetic testing to improve outcomes for their patients. Our study identified gaps regarding PAD interventionalists' knowledge, perceived barriers, and attitudes toward CYP2C19 testing in PAD. This information highlights the need for randomized data on genetic testing for clopidogrel responsiveness in peripheral vascular disease following intervention to help guide antiplatelet management.

Advancing Peripheral Artery Disease Quality of Care and Outcomes Through Patient-Reported Health Status Assessment: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is chronic in nature, and individualized chronic disease management is a central focus of care. To accommodate this reality, tools to measure the impact and quality of the PAD care delivered are necessary. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and instruments to measure them, that is, PRO measures, have been well studied in the research and clinical trial context, but a shift toward integrating them into clinical practice has yet to take place. A framework to use PRO measures as indicators of the quality of PAD care delivered, that is, PRO performance measures (PRO-PMs), is provided in this scientific statement. Measurement goals to consider by PAD clinical phenotypes are provided, as well as an overview of potential benefits of adopting PRO-PMs in the clinical practice of PAD care, including reducing unwanted variability and promoting health equity. A central discussion with considerations for risk adjustment of PRO-PMs, individualized PAD care, and the need for patient engagement strategies is offered. Furthermore, necessary conditions in terms of required competencies and training to handle PRO-PM data are discussed because the interpretation and handling of these data come with great responsibility and consequences for designing care that adopts a broader framework of risk that goes beyond the inclusion of biomedical variables. To conclude, health system perspectives and an agenda to reach the next steps in the implementation of PRO-PMs in PAD care are offered.

Risk profiles, access to care, and outcomes in Hispanics hospitalized for lower extremity peripheral artery disease.

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have shown that Hispanics have worse clinical outcomes for lower extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD) than non-Hispanic White (NHWs). Using a national database, this study aimed to document the contemporary burden of PAD in Hispanics by evaluating their risk profiles, access to care, and outcomes compared with NHWs. METHODS: Hospitalizations of Hispanics and NHWs with a primary diagnosis of PAD were identified using 2011-2017 National Inpatient Sample data. Patient sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, whether the admission was through the emergency department (ED) or elective, length of stay, and costs accrued were compared by ethnicity. Temporal trends in revascularizations, amputations, and ED admissions by year were evaluated with the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test and stratified by ethnicity. Data were combined across years and multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the association of ethnicity with inpatient revascularization, amputation, and mortality, adjusting for sociodemographic and cardiovascular risk factors. RESULTS: From 2011 to 2017, there were a total of 1,018,220 PAD hospitalizations among Hispanics (13.9%) and NHWs (86.1%) between 2011 and 2017. Hispanics were more often low income and uninsured and presented with higher burden of comorbidities including diabetes, renal failure, prior amputations, and chronic limb-threatening ischemia compared with NHWs. Most Hispanics were admitted via the ED compared with NHWs (58.0% vs 36.7%; d = 0.48), and median length of stay was almost a day longer (4.5 days vs 3.7 days). Hispanic ethnicity was associated with lower odds of surgical (odds ratio [OR], 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57-0.67) and endovascular revascularization (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.89-0.996) and mortality (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.75-0.93), but higher odds of minor (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.20-1.31) and major (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.03-1.14) amputation. CONCLUSIONS: Two tiers of health care consumption for inpatient PAD care and outcomes manifested among Hispanics and NHWs. First, Hispanics with PAD had a more vulnerable socioeconomic profile and presented with more severe PAD than NHWs. Second, they sought care more disproportionately through the ED and underwent more amputations than NHWs. To eradicate these inequities in PAD care and risk, strategies that improve access to outpatient care and expand health care coverage, as well as targeted management of risk factors in these vulnerable minority groups are needed.

Association of depression and anxiety disorders with outcomes after revascularization in chronic limb-threatening ischemia hospitalizations nationwide.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), the end stage of peripheral artery disease, often present with comorbid depression and anxiety disorders. The prevalence of these comorbidities in the inpatient context over time, and their association with outcomes after revascularization and resource usage is unknown. METHODS: Using the 2011 to 2017 National Inpatient Sample, two cohorts were created-CLTI hospitalizations with endovascular revascularization and CLTI hospitalizations with surgical revascularization. Within each cohort, the annual prevalence of depression and anxiety disorder diagnoses was determined, and temporal trends were evaluated using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test. Hierarchical multivariable logistic and linear regression analyses were used to examine the association of depression and anxiety disorder diagnoses with inpatient major amputation, mortality, length of stay (LOS), and cost, adjusting for illness severity, comorbidities, and potential bias in the documentation of depression and anxiety disorder diagnoses stratified by patient sociodemographic data. RESULTS: Across the study period were a total of 245,507 CLTI-related hospitalizations with endovascular revascularization and 138,922 with surgical revascularization. Hospitalizations with a depression or anxiety disorder diagnosis increased from 10.8% in 2011 to 15.3% in 2017 in the endovascular revascularization cohort and from 11.7% in 2011 to 14.4% in 2017 in the surgical revascularization cohort (Ptrend < .001). In the endovascular revascularization cohort, depression was associated with higher odds of major amputation (odds ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.30). In addition, depression (9 vs 8 days [P < .001]; $105,754 vs $102,481 [P = .018]) and anxiety disorder (9 vs 8 days [P < .001]; $109,496 vs $102,324 [P < .001]) diagnoses were associated with a longer median LOS and higher median costs. In the surgical revascularization cohort, depression was associated with a higher odds of major amputation (odds ratio, 1.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-1.58) and a longer LOS (median, 9 vs 9 days; P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: Depression and anxiety disorder diagnoses have become increasingly prevalent among CLTI hospitalizations including revascularizations. When present, these psychiatric comorbidities are associated with an increased risk of amputation and greater resource usage.

Comparison of lower extremity bypass and peripheral vascular intervention for chronic limb-threatening ischemia in the Medicare-linked Vascular Quality Initiative.

OBJECTIVE: There is a relative lack of comparative effectiveness research on revascularization for patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). We examined the association between lower extremity bypass (LEB) vs peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) for CLTI and 30-day and 5-year all-cause mortality and 30-day and 5-year amputation. METHODS: Patients undergoing LEB and PVI of the below-the-knee popliteal and infrapopliteal arteries between 2014 and 2019 were queried from the Vascular Quality Initiative, and outcomes data were obtained from the Medicare claims-linked Vascular Implant Surveillance and Interventional Outcomes Network database. Propensity scores were calculated on 15 variables using a logistic regression model to control for imbalances between treatment groups. A 1:1 matching method was used. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and hierarchical Cox proportional hazards regression with a random intercept for site and operator nested in site to account for clustered data compared 30-day and 5-year all-cause mortality between groups. Thirty-day and 5-year amputation were subsequently compared using competing risk analysis to account for the competing risk of death. RESULTS: There was a total of 2075 patients in each group. The overall mean age was 71 ± 11 years, 69% were male, and 76% were white, 18% were black, and 6% were of Hispanic ethnicity. Baseline clinical and demographic characteristics in the matched cohort were balanced between groups. There was no association between all-cause mortality over 30 days and LEB vs PVI (cumulative incidence, 2.3% vs 2.3% by Kaplan Meier; log-rank P-value = .906; hazard ratio [HR], 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62-1.44; P-value = .80). All-cause mortality over 5 years was lower for LEB vs PVI (cumulative incidence, 55.9% vs 60.1% by Kaplan Meier; log-rank P-value < .001; HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.70-0.86; P-value < .001). Accounting for competing risk of death, amputation over 30 days was also lower in LEB vs PVI (cumulative incidence function, 1.9% vs 3.0%; Fine and Gray P-value = .025; subHR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.42-0.95; P-value = .025). There was no association between amputation over 5 years and LEB vs PVI (cumulative incidence function, 22.6% vs 23.4%; Fine and Gray P-value = .184; subHR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.79-1.05; P-value = .184). CONCLUSIONS: In the Vascular Quality Initiative-linked Medicare registry, LEB vs PVI for CLTI was associated with a lower risk of 30-day amputation and 5-year all-cause mortality. These results will serve as a foundation to validate recently published randomized controlled trial data, and to broaden the comparative effectiveness evidence base for CLTI.

Community distress and risk of adverse outcomes after peripheral vascular intervention.

INTRODUCTION: Community distress is associated with adverse outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease; however, its impact on clinical outcomes after peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) is uncertain. The Distressed Communities Index (DCI) is a composite measure of community distress measured at the zip code level. We evaluated the association between community distress, as measured by the DCI, and 24-month mortality and major amputation after PVI. METHODS: We used the Vascular Quality Initiative database, linked with Medicare claims data, to identify patients who underwent initial femoropopliteal PVI between 2017 and 2018. DCI scores were assigned using patient-level zip code data. The primary outcomes were 24-month mortality and major amputation. We used time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to determine an optimal DCI value to stratify patients into risk categories for 24-month mortality and major amputation. Mixed Cox regression models were constructed to estimate the association of DCI with 24-month mortality and major amputation. RESULTS: The final cohort consisted of 16,864 patients, of whom 4734 (28.1%) were classified as having high community distress (DCI ≥70). At 24 months, mortality was elevated in patients with high community distress (30.7% vs 29.5%, P = .02), as was major amputation (17.2% vs 13.1%, P <.001). After adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics, a 10-point higher DCI score was associated with increased risk of mortality (hazard ratio: 1.01; 95% confidence interval: 1.00-1.03) and major amputation (hazard ratio: 1.02; 95% confidence interval: 1.00-1.04). CONCLUSIONS: High community distress is associated with increased risk of mortality and major amputation after PVI.

In-home Visits and Subsequent Health Outcomes in Medicare Advantage Beneficiaries With Coronary Artery Disease, Diabetes, Hypertension, and Depression.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery disease, diabetes, hypertension, and depression are common burdensome conditions. OBJECTIVES: To examine whether multidimensional preventive in-home visits were associated with fewer emergency and inpatient care episodes and higher quality of care. RESEARCH DESIGN: An observational, retrospective data analysis. SUBJECTS: A nationwide Medicare Advantage population from the Optum Labs Data Warehouse. MEASURES: We compared beneficiaries with 1 or more of the conditions with an in-home visit in 2018 ("Exposure") with those without a visit in 2018 but with a future visit in 2019 ("Wait List Control") using a difference-in-differences analysis. Primary outcomes were 1-year all-cause inpatient care and emergency visit counts. Secondary outcomes included primary care visits, major adverse cardiovascular events, and select quality-of-care metrics. An exploratory outcome was the time-to-first primary care visit after the index date. RESULTS: Among those eligible to receive an in-home visit, a total of 48,566 patients had an in-home visit in 2018 (the "Exposure" group), and 36,549 beneficiaries constituted the "Wait List" control group. Receiving an in-home visit early was associated with a greater decrease in inpatient stays for all 4 conditions (change score range for any stay: -5.22% to -2.47%) (P<0.001, depression <0.05); decrease in emergency visits (change score range for any stay: -4.39% to -3.67%) (P<0.0.001, depression <0.05); and fewer major adverse cardiovascular events for coronary artery disease and depression (P<0.001 and <0.025, respectively) 1 year later. Minimal differences were noted for change in ambulatory and primary care visits, with no consistent increase in quality-of-care metrics. Time-to-first primary care visit was shorter for the "Exposure" versus the Wait List control group in all conditions (difference between 2.45 and 4.95 d). CONCLUSIONS: The feasibility and impact of a nationwide multidimensional preventive in-home visit were demonstrated, targeting common and high morbidity conditions. Benefits were observed against a Wait List control group, resulting in less resource-intense care.

Predictors of Revascularization in Lower-Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: Insights From the PORTRAIT Study.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) guidelines recommend revascularization only for patients with lifestyle-limiting claudication that is refractory to goal-directed medical therapy (class IIA, level of evidence A). However, real-world invasive treatment patterns and predictors of revascularization in patients with symptomatic lower-extremity PAD are still largely unknown. AIM: We aimed to examine rates, patient-level predictors, and site variability of early revascularization in patients with new or worsening PAD symptoms. METHODS: Among patients with new-onset or recent exacerbation of PAD in the 10-center Patient-centered Outcomes Related to TReatment practices in peripheral Arterial disease: Investigating Trajectories (PORTRAIT) study enrolled between June 2011 and September 2015, we classified early revascularization (endovascular or surgical) as procedures being performed within 3 months of presentation. Hierarchical logistic regression was used to identify patient characteristics associated with early revascularization. Variability across sites was estimated using the median odds ratio (OR). RESULTS: Among 797 participants, early revascularization procedures were performed in 224 (28.1%). Rutherford class 3 (vs Rutherford class 1; OR=1.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-3.33) and having lesions in both iliofemoral and below-the-knee arterial segments (vs below the knee only; OR=1.75, 95% CI: 1.15-2.67) were associated with a higher odds of revascularization. Longer PAD duration >12 months (vs 1-6 months; OR=0.50, 95% CI: 0.32-0.77), higher ankle-brachial index scores (per 0.1 unit increase; OR=0.86, 95% CI: 0.78-0.96), and higher Peripheral Artery Questionnaire Summary scores (per 10 unit increase; OR=0.89, 95% CI: 0.80-0.99) were associated with a lower odds of revascularization. The raw rates for revascularization in different sites ranged from 6.25% to 66.28%, and the median OR was 1.88, 95% CI: 1.38-3.57. CONCLUSIONS: About 1 in 3 patients with symptomatic PAD received early revascularization. A more extensive disease and symptom burden were the main predictors of receiving early revascularization in PAD. There was significant site variability in revascularization patterns, and further studies will better understand the source of this variability and optimal selection criteria for early revascularization. CLINICAL IMPACT: Real world patterns and predictors of early revascularization in peripheral artery disease are not well understood. In this retrospective analysis of the POTRAIT study, about 1 out of 3 patients with PAD symptoms received early revascularization, with significant site variability. A more extensive disease and symptom burden were the main predictors of receiving early revascularization in PAD.

Efficacy of a web-based healthcare innovation to advance the quality of life and care of patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ACQUIRE-ICD): a randomized controlled trial.

AIMS: Modern clinical management of patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) largely consists of remote device monitoring, although a subset is at risk of mental health issues post-implantation. We compared a 12-month web-based intervention consisting of goal setting, monitoring of patients' mental health-with a psychological intervention if needed-psychoeducational support from a nurse, and an online patient forum, with usual care on participants' device acceptance 12 months after implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: This national, multi-site, two-arm, non-blinded, randomized, controlled, superiority trial enrolled 478 first-time ICD recipients from all 6 implantation centres in Denmark. The primary endpoint was patient device acceptance measured by the Florida Patient Acceptance Survey (FPAS; general score range = 0-100, with higher scores indicating higher device acceptance) 12 months after implantation. Secondary endpoints included symptoms of depression and anxiety. The primary endpoint of device acceptance was not different between groups at 12 months [B = -2.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) (-5.62, 0.29), P = 0.08]. Furthermore, the secondary endpoint analyses showed no significant treatment effect on either depressive [B = -0.49, 95% CI (-1.19; 0.21), P = 0.17] or anxiety symptoms [B = -0.39, 95% CI (-0.96; 0.18), P = 0.18]. CONCLUSION: The web-based intervention as supplement to usual care did not improve patient device acceptance nor symptoms of anxiety and depression compared with usual care. This specific web-based intervention thus cannot be recommended as a standardized intervention in ICD patients.

Lower extremity symptoms and ankle-brachial index screening as predictors of cardiovascular outcomes in Black adults.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of peripheral artery disease (PAD) and leg symptoms are higher in Black than White adults. We studied the effects of self-reported lower extremity symptoms and ankle-brachial indices (ABI) groups on outcomes. METHODS: Black participants in the Jackson Heart Study with baseline ABI and PAD symptom assessments (exertional leg pain by the San Diego Claudication questionnaire) were included. Abnormal ABI was < 0.90 or > 1.40. Participants were divided into (1) normal ABI, asymptomatic, (2) normal ABI, symptomatic, (3) abnormal ABI, asymptomatic, and (4) abnormal ABI, symptomatic to examine their associations with MACE (stroke, myocardial infarction, fatal coronary heart disease) and all-cause mortality, using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and stepwise Cox proportional hazard models adjusting for Framingham risk factors. RESULTS: Of 4586 participants, mean age was 54.6 ± 12.6 years, with 63% women. Compared with participants with normal ABI who were asymptomatic, participants with abnormal ABI and leg symptoms had highest risk of MACE (adjusted HR 2.28; 95% CI 1.62, 3.22) and mortality (aHR 1.82; 95% CI 1.32, 2.56). Participants with abnormal ABI without leg symptoms had higher risk for MACE (aHR 1.49; 95% CI 1.06, 2.11) and mortality (aHR 1.44; 95% CI 1.12, 1.99). Participants with normal ABI and no leg symptoms did not have higher risks. CONCLUSION: Among Black adults, the highest risk for adverse outcomes were in symptomatic participants with abnormal ABIs, followed by asymptomatic participants with abnormal ABIs. These findings underscore the need for further studies to screen for PAD and develop preventative approaches in Black adults with asymptomatic disease.

Patient knowledge and preferences for peripheral artery disease treatment.

BACKGROUND: Shared medical decision making requires patients' understanding of their disease and its treatment options. Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a condition for which preference-sensitive treatments are available, but for which little is known about patients' knowledge and treatment preferences as it relates to specific treatment goals. METHODS: In a prospective, multicenter registry that involved patients with PAD experiencing claudication, the PORTRAIT Knowledge and Preferences Survey was administered at 1 year. It asks questions about PAD treatment choices, symptom relief options, disease management, and secondary prevention. PAD treatment preferences were also queried, and patients ranked 10 PAD treatment goals (1-10 Likert scale; 10 being most important). RESULTS: Among 281 participants completing the survey (44.8% women, mean age 69.6 ± 9.0 years), 54.1% knew that there was more than one way to treat PAD symptoms and 47.1% were offered more than one treatment option. Most (82.4%) acknowledged that they had to manage their PAD for the rest of their life. 'Avoid loss of toes or legs,' 'decreased risk of heart attack/stroke,' 'long-lasting treatment benefit,' 'living longer,' 'improved quality of life,' and 'doing what the doctor thinks I should do' had mean ratings > 9.0 (SD ranging between 1.21 and 2.00). More variability occurred for 'avoiding surgery.' 'cost of treatment,' 'timeline of pain relief,' and 'return to work' (SD ranging between 2.76 and 3.58). The single most important treatment goal was 'improving quality of life' (31.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Gaps exist in knowledge for patients with PAD who experience claudication, and there is a need for increased efforts to improve support for shared decision-making frameworks for symptomatic PAD.(ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01419080).

Variability in Antithrombotic Therapy after Infrainguinal Lower Extremity Bypass.

BACKGROUND: Antiplatelet monotherapy is recommended after infrainguinal lower extremity bypass (LEB). However, there is a paucity of high-quality data to guide therapy, and antiplatelet therapy is often prescribed in combination with anticoagulation. We therefore aimed to assess the variability in the use of antithrombotic therapy after infrainguinal LEB. METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative dataset (2015-2021) was retrospectively reviewed to determine discharge patterns of antithrombotic therapy for all patients undergoing infrainguinal LEB. Monotherapy on discharge was defined as either single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) or single anticoagulant (SAC). Combination therapy was dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), anticoagulant + antiplatelet (ACAP), or triple therapy. Hierarchical multivariable logistic regression with random effects for physician and center was used to identify predictors of combination therapy. Median odds ratios (MOR) were derived to quantify degree of variability in antithrombotic therapy. RESULTS: There were 29,507 patients undergoing infrainguinal LEB (monotherapy = 10,634 vs. combination therapy = 18,873). SAPT (90.6%) was the most common form of monotherapy, while DAPT (57.7%) and ACAP (34.6%) were the most common combination therapies. Patients undergoing LEB to popliteal targets were more likely to be prescribed monotherapy (SAC or SAPT) than to infra-popliteal targets (60.6% vs. 56.6%, P < 0.001). Combination therapy (DAPT, ACAP, or triple therapy) was more often used in patients with tibial or plantar arteries as the bypass target. Patients undergoing bypass using autogenous vein were more likely to receive monotherapy compared with those receiving other conduits (64.8% vs. 52.9%, P < 0.001), while patients with prosthetic grafts were more likely to receive combination therapy (37.9% vs. 28.2%, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in postoperative bleeding (P = 0.491) or 30-day mortality (P = 0.302) between the two groups. Prior peripheral vascular interventions (PVI) (odds ratio [OR]: 1.89, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.79-1.99), concomitant PVI (OR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.66-2.02), prosthetic graft use (OR: 1.74, 95% CI: 1.64-1.85), prior percutaneous coronary intervention (OR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.43-1.65), plantar distal target (OR: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.29-1.65), alternative conduits (OR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.25-1.53), and tibial distal targets (OR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.28-1.44) were independent predictors of combination therapy in a multivariable regression model. Upon adjusting for patient-level factors, there was significant physician-level (MOR: 1.65, 95% CI 1.61-1.67) and center-level (MOR: 1.64, 95% CI 1.57-1.69) variability in the selection of antithrombotic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Significant physician- and center-level variability in the use of antithrombotic regimens after infrainguinal bypass reflects the paucity of available evidence to guide therapy. Pragmatic trials are needed to assess antithrombotic strategies and guide recommendations aimed at optimizing cardiovascular and graft-specific outcomes after LEB.

Real-world antithrombotic treatment variability in patients undergoing peripheral vascular intervention: Insights from the VQI registry.

For those undergoing peripheral vascular interventions (PVI), guidelines indicate the use of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is reasonable (Class IIb), but recommendations have not reached the highest level of evidence. In the largest effort to date, we found that antithrombotic prescription was dominated by single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) (51.4%) before PVI, which switched to DAPT (57.7%) following PVI, with some patients still remaining on no therapy (8%). High site variability in prescription rates (median odds ratio: 1.40, 95% confidence interval: 1.32, 1.48) was not much explained by patient and provider factors, revealing a need for the creation and integration of the newest trial data and for interventions at the health system or practice level to help physicians determine the optimal medical therapy following PVI.