Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Acta Neurochir (Wien) ; 157(6): 905-10; discussion 910-1, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25845550

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Microsurgical circumferential stripping of intracerebral metastases is often insufficient in achieving local tumor control. Supramarginal resection may improve local tumor control. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed for patients who underwent supramarginal resection of a cerebral metastasis by awake surgery with intraoperative cortical and subcortical stimulation, MEPs, and SSEPs. Supramarginal resection was achieved by circumferential stripping of the metastasis and additional removal of approximately 3 mm of the surrounding tissue. Pre- and postsurgical neurological status was assessed by the NIH Stroke Scale. Permanent deficits were defined by persistence after 3-month observation time. RESULTS: Supramarginal resection of cerebral metastases in eloquent brain areas was performed in 34 patients with a mean age of 60 years (range, 33-83 years). Five out of 34 patients (14.7%) had a new transient postoperative neurological deficit, which improved within a few days due to supplementary motor area (SMA) syndrome. Five out of 34 patients (14.7%) developed a local in-brain progression and nine patients (26.4%) a distant in-brain progression. CONCLUSIONS: Supramarginal resection of cerebral metastases in eloquent locations is feasible and safe. Safety might be increased by intraoperative neuromonitoring. The better outcome in the present series may be entirely based on other predictors than extend of surgical resection and not necessarily on the surgical technique applied. However, supramarginal resection was safe and apparently did not lead to worse results than regular surgical techniques. Prospective, controlled, and randomized studies are mandatory to determine the possible benefit of supramarginal resection on local tumor control and overall outcome.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/secundario , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirugía , Encéfalo/patología , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Monitorización Neurofisiológica Intraoperatoria , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/epidemiología , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Radioterapia Adyuvante , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vigilia
2.
World Neurosurg ; 119: e855-e863, 2018 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30099190

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a new surgical tool combining suction and monopolar neurostimulation (stimulation sucker) for cerebellopontine angle (CPA) tumors. The usefulness for continuous (time) and dynamic (space) facial nerve mapping was studied. METHODS: Patients operated on with the stimulation sucker for a CPA tumor between April 2016 and May 2017 in a tertiary care center were identified. Clinical charts were retrospectively evaluated. The minimum follow-up time of patients was 12 months. RESULTS: The study population included 17 patients with tumor (6 women and 11 men). The age range was from 2 to 77 years (mean age, 45.7 years; standard error of the mean, 22.7 years). Most CPA tumors were large (Koos grade 4) vestibular schwannomas (n = 10); other pathologies included petrous meningioma (n = 1), metastasis (n = 1), medulloblastoma (n = 2), ependymoma (n = 2), and pilocytic astrocytoma (n = 1). One patient with trigeminal neuralgia served as the normal control subject. No complications because of the stimulation sucker were encountered. Clinical and radiologic outcomes compared favorably with institutional experience and literature. The stimulation sucker allowed for continuous (time) mapping of the facial nerve at the site of resection (space). This real-time feedback allowed early identification of the facial nerve. Handling and ergonomy were excellent and workflow improved. The shortcomings compared with a bayonet-shaped bipolar probe were decreased visibility of neurovascular structures and lower spatial discrimination. The new device did not simplify delicate at the brainstem and on the nerve. We think it should be considered as a complementary tool in the surgeon's armamentarium. CONCLUSIONS: Until now, nerve damage as assessed by neuromonitoring (e.g., facial nerve electromyography, motor evoked potential) served as surrogate for nerve function. This concept should be challenged. The studied stimulation sucker detected the facial nerve earlier than conventional techniques, preventing harm by surgical trauma. A larger, prospective study is warranted to better define its role in CPA surgery.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Cerebelosas/cirugía , Ángulo Pontocerebeloso/cirugía , Nervio Facial/patología , Neoplasias Cerebelosas/patología , Neoplasias Cerebelosas/fisiopatología , Ángulo Pontocerebeloso/patología , Ángulo Pontocerebeloso/fisiopatología , Estimulación Eléctrica/métodos , Potenciales Evocados Auditivos del Tronco Encefálico/fisiología , Potenciales Evocados Motores/fisiología , Femenino , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neuroimagen/métodos , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA