Implementation, results and face validity of the Consultation and Relational Empathy measure in a Canadian department of surgery.

BACKGROUND: The Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure, a validated questionnaire designed to assess patients' perceptions of their physician's communication skills and empathy, has been used to assess empathy in medical specialties but has seldom been applied to surgery. We assessed empathy and communication skills among a group of surgeons within a single academic institution. METHODS: All surgeons within our department of surgery were invited to participate. Patients seen in clinics of participating surgeons were recruited prospectively from July 2018 to February 2019. At the end of each clinical encounter, they were asked to complete a CARE survey. Surveys were analyzed according to previously validated inclusion and exclusion criteria. We calculated mean scores for each surgeon and surgical division. About 6 months after study completion, surgeons were provided with their individual score and de-identified division scores, and were asked to complete a follow-up survey assessing their attitudes toward the CARE Measure. RESULTS: Of the 82 surgeons invited, 51 (62%) agreed to participate; 7 had fewer than 25 completed surveys and were excluded from analysis. A total of 1801 surveys for 44 surgeons (33 male and 11 female) were included in the final analysis. The average CARE score across the department was 46.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] 46.6-47.1). Female surgeons received significantly higher scores than male surgeons (mean 47.6 [95% CI 47.1-48.0] v. 46.7 [95% CI 46.4-48.0]). Of the 35 surgeons who responded to the follow-up survey, 31 (89%) felt that the questions in the CARE Measure applied to their practice, and half of these reported that they intended to make changes in response to the feedback. CONCLUSION: We found high communication and empathy scores among surgeons in the outpatient setting, with enough variability to encourage continued improvement. The CARE Measure appears to have face validity among surgeons, and the vast majority found it relevant to their practice. Further study is needed to formally assess the relevance, performance, reliability and construct validity of this measure.

Effect of vasopressor use on digit survival after replantation and revascularization-A large retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Despite the common use of intraoperative vasopressors in hand microsurgery, the association between intraoperative vasopressor use and digital replant failure has not yet been examined. Our study aims to examine the association between intraoperative vasopressor use (phenylephrine and/or ephedrine) and postoperative digital failure of replanted or revascularized digits. METHODS: All patients from a single tertiary hand center who underwent unilateral digital replantation or revascularization procedures between 2005 and 2016 were included in this retrospective cohort study. The relationship between intraoperative vasopressors used to maintain hemodynamic stability and digit failure was then evaluated using logistic regression. Specifically, phenylephrine (total dose 10-3,600 mcg) and ephedrine (5-110 mg) use were evaluated. RESULTS: During the study period, 281 patients underwent digital replantation or revascularization. Of those, 86 (31%) were given an intraoperative vasopressor. Digit failure was more likely in patients with crush or avulsion injuries compared to clean-cut mechanism (odds ratio [OR] 2.02, p = .02), and in patients with replantation (OR 7.85, p < .0001) as compared to revascularization procedures. Using multivariate logistic regression adjusting for age, sex, smoking status, comorbidities, number of digits injured, injury type, and procedure type, the odds of digital failure with vasopressor use were not increased (p = .84). When evaluating vasopressors used after tourniquet deflation, failure increased with ephedrine use (OR = 2.42, p = .0496) and phenylephrine use (OR = 2.21, p = .31). CONCLUSIONS: The use of vasopressors was not associated with failure if administration of vasopressors was before tourniquet deflation. The administration of vasopressors after tourniquet deflation should be cautioned.

Intradiploic Hematoma Associated With Synostosis in an Infant.

Intradiploic hematomas are extremely rare, particularly in newborns. Caused by bleeding between the inner and outer tables of the calvarium, they manifest with bony swelling of the skull. The authors present the first case of an intraosseous hematoma associated with synostosis, and the first report in a female patient. The clinical, radiological, surgical, and pathological characteristics of this lesion are discussed.

Role of Postoperative Anticoagulation in Predicting Digit Replantation and Revascularization Failure: A Propensity-matched Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: The use of intravenous heparin after digit replantation or revascularization (DRR) varies greatly. The insufficient evidence presents a lack of clinical equipoise needed for a randomized trial; as such, a matched propensity score analysis was performed to evaluate the role of postoperative anticoagulation after DRR. The purpose of this study was to determine if the use of postoperative therapeutic anticoagulation reduced the risk of digit failure. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of patients who underwent DRR from 2005 to 2016 was identified. A propensity score was calculated based on age, smoking, injury mechanism, procedure type, vein graft, and number of digits injured. Patients were matched 1:2 by propensity score to create 2 groups with similar risks of receiving anticoagulation postoperatively. Generalized estimating equation logistic model was used to determine differences in digit failure between groups. RESULTS: Digit replantation or revascularization was performed on 282 patients (92% male; median age, 43 years). Postoperative anticoagulation was administered in 69 (24%) patients, with continuous IV heparin in 34 patients and intravenous heparin with dextran in 35 patients. Digit failure occurred in 88 patients overall, representing 38% of patients receiving anticoagulation and 29% of those not. Major complications were higher among the anticoagulated patients (13% vs 3.3%). After propensity score matching, use of anticoagulation was not associated with digit failure (odds ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.47-1.32). CONCLUSIONS: Among DRR patients with similar predisposing characteristics for postoperative therapeutic heparin or dextran, the use of therapeutic anticoagulation does not have a protective effect against digit failure. Studies are needed to define the role of postoperative IV anticoagulation in DRR and to justify the risk of its administration.

Clinical Outcomes of Upper Extremity Nerve Transfers in Neuralgic Amyotrophy.

SUMMARY: Neuralgic amyotrophy (NA) is a disease affecting peripheral nerves. Treatment has historically been conservative, as the natural course of the disease was thought to be self-limiting. Recent work has demonstrated that as many as two-thirds of people with NA have persistent pain, fatigue, or weakness. At the authors' center, supercharged end-to-side (SETS) nerve transfers are commonly performed in patients with NA to optimize motor recovery while allowing for native axonal regrowth. The authors describe the technique and clinical outcomes of patients with NA affecting the anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) who were treated with SETS nerve transfer from extensor carpi radialis brevis to AIN. Ten patients (90% male; mean age, 51.3 ± 9.7 years) underwent extensor carpi radialis brevis-to-AIN transfer at a mean period of 6.4 ± 1.4 months after onset of symptoms. Mean postoperative follow-up duration was 14.8 ± 3.2 months. Before surgery, all patients demonstrated clinically significant weakness in the flexor pollicis longus (FPL), flexor digitorum profundus muscle to the index finger (FDP2), or both. FPL strength improved from a median Medical Research Council (MRC) grade of 1.5 to 4 ( P = 0.011) and FDP2 strength improved from a median MRC grade of 1 to 5 ( P = 0.016). A postoperative MRC grade of 4 or greater was achieved in nine of 10 (90%) FPL and 10 of 10 (100%) FDP muscles. This is the first report of SETS nerve transfer for the treatment of NA. The outcomes of this work suggest that SETS nerve transfers may be an option to optimize motor outcomes in patients with NA. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Factors associated with early and late digital revascularization and replantation failure: a retrospective cohort study.

Factors associated with failure of digital revascularization and replantation procedures have been well characterized, but studies have not investigated failures occurring beyond the early postoperative period. A single-centre retrospective chart review included 284 patients (434 digits) who underwent digital revascularization or replantation. Patient-, injury- and surgery-related characteristics were compared among successful procedures, digits that failed while in hospital (early failure), and initially viable digits that failed after hospital discharge (late failure). Overall, 202 patients had successful procedures (71%). There were 51 early failures (18%) and 31 late failures (11%). Crush injuries and vein grafting were associated with early failure only. Complete amputations and leeching were strongly associated with both early and late failure. This study revealed that a substantial proportion of initially viable digits fail after discharge from hospital. Patients with signs of venous congestion may benefit from longer observation periods in hospital to avoid late failure.Level of evidence: IV.

Trends in Digital Replantation: 10 Years of Experience at a Large Canadian Tertiary Care Center: Les tendances de la replantation digitale : dix ans d'expérience d'un grand centre canadien de soins tertiaires.

BACKGROUND: Since 1965, the practice of digital replantation has seen great technical strides and become commonplace worldwide. However, some American authors have recently reported declining rates of replantation. We set out to characterize the patient population and describe treatment patterns from 2005 to 2016 at a large Canadian regional replantation center. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of all patients undergoing digital replantation and revascularization from 2005 to 2016 was identified. Data were collected on demographics, injuries, procedures, and outcomes. Descriptive statistics were performed, followed by a comparison of two 5-year periods to evaluate temporal trends. RESULTS: A total of 234 patients were treated with 146 replantation and 204 revascularization procedures. Patients were largely male, healthy, and worked as manual labourers. Overall, the failure rate of individual repairs was 28.7%. Over time, there was a trend toward more crush or avulsion and multidigit injuries, and surgeries performed after 2011 were significantly longer. There was a significant downward trend in the number of patients treated at our center each year. Additionally, there was a statistically significant decrease in the proportion of replanted to revised digits in multidigit cases. DISCUSSION: Our observation of declining replantation rates is in line with recent American observations. The reason for this is not obvious but may represent a change in injury characteristics or surgeon attitudes. CONCLUSION: We suspect that these changes represent a change in workplace safety and injury characteristics, but further studies are needed to assess patient and surgeon treatment decisions.

HISTORIQUE: Depuis 1965, la replantation digitale a beaucoup progressé sur le plan technique et s'est généralisée dans le monde. Cependant, certains auteurs américains ont récemment signalé une baisse du taux de replantations. Les chercheurs se sont attachés à caractériser la population et à décrire les modes de traitement dans un grand centre de replantation canadien entre 2005 et 2016. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Les chercheurs ont extrait une cohorte rétrospective de tous les patients qui ont subi une replantation digitale et une revascularisation entre 2005 et 2016. Ils ont colligé les données en matière de démographie, de blessures, d'interventions et de résultats cliniques et procédé à des statistiques descriptives, puis à une comparaison de deux périodes de cinq ans pour évaluer les tendances temporelles. RÉSULTATS: Au total, 234 patients ont reçu un traitement, pour 146 replantations et 204 revascularisations. Ces patients étaient majoritairement des hommes en bonne santé qui exerçaient un travail manuel. Le taux d'échec des réparations individuelles s'élevait à 28,7 %. Au fil du temps, les chercheurs ont observé une tendance vers un plus grand nombre d'écrasements ou d'avulsions et de blessures de plusieurs doigts, et les opérations exécutées après 2011 étaient significativement plus longues. Les chercheurs ont constaté une tendance significative à la baisse du nombre de patients traités à leur centre chaque année. Ils ont également constaté une diminution statistiquement significative de la proportion de doigts replantés ou de réinterventions dans les cas de blessures de plusieurs doigts. EXPOSÉ: Les observations des chercheurs à l'égard de la diminution du taux de replantations correspondent aux récentes constatations américaines. La raison de cette constatation n'est pas manifeste, mais pourrait représenter une modification aux caractéristiques des blessures ou aux attitudes des chirurgiens. Conclusion : Les auteurs postulent que ces changements découlent d'une modification aux pratiques de sécurité et aux caractéristiques des blessures en milieu de travail, mais d'autres études s'imposent pour évaluer les décisions thérapeutiques des patients et des chirurgiens.

The Effect of Increasing Age on Outcomes of Digital Revascularization or Replantation.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of increasing age on rates of digital failure. METHOD: A retrospective cohort study of digital replantation or revascularization patients was undertaken from 2005 to 2016. Data collected consisted of patient demographics, smoking status, injury mechanisms, procedure types, and postoperative morbidity and mortality. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were performed to assess outcomes. All comparisons were made between patients older than and younger than 60 years. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-three patients underwent replantation or revascularization; 11 percent were older than 60 years. The majority of patients had multiple devascularized digits (70 percent), most commonly inflicted by a blade mechanism (77 percent). Approximately half of the patients underwent revascularization alone (54.4 percent). American Society of Anesthesiologists score and number of comorbidities were significantly greater in the older adult group. Overall, 88 patients (31 percent) experienced digital replantation or revascularization failure, with 12 failures in patients aged 60 years or older. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that age did not have an impact on failure rate. Older patients did not experience more major complications, but had significantly higher rates of minor complications (p = 0.0485). CONCLUSIONS: Older patients presented with significantly higher American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status and number of comorbidities, but did not experience higher rates of digital failure, major perioperative complications, or 30-day mortality. Adults aged 60 years or older should be offered digital replantation or revascularization if medically or surgically indicated. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, II.

Barriers of Access to Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this systematic review was to comprehensively summarize barriers of access to breast reconstruction and evaluate access using the Penchansky and Thomas conceptual framework based on the six dimensions of access to care. METHODS: The authors performed a systematic review that focused on (1) breast reconstruction, (2) barriers, and (3) breast cancer. Eight databases (i.e., EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINHAL, ePub MEDLINE, ProQuest, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were searched. English peer-reviewed articles published between 1996 and 2016 were included. RESULTS: The authors' search retrieved 4282 unique articles. Two independent reviewers screened texts, selecting 99 articles for inclusion. All studies were observational and qualitative in nature. The availability of breast reconstruction was highest in teaching hospitals, private hospitals, and national cancer institutions. Accessibility affected access, with lower likelihood of breast reconstruction in rural geographic locations. Affordability also impacted access; high costs of the procedure or poor reimbursement by insurance companies negatively influenced access to breast reconstruction. Acceptability of the procedure was not universal, with unfavorable physician attitudes toward breast reconstruction and specific patient and tumor characteristics correlating with lower rates of breast reconstruction. Lastly, lack of patient awareness of breast reconstruction reduced the receipt of breast reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Using the access-to-care framework by Penchansky and Thomas, the authors found that barriers to breast reconstruction existed in all six domains and interplayed at many levels. The authors' systematic review analyzed this complex relationship and suggested multiprong interventions aimed at targeting breast reconstruction barriers, with the goal of promoting equitable access to breast reconstruction for all breast cancer patients.

CanMEDS scholars: A national survey on urology residents' attitudes towards research during training.

INTRODUCTION: Participation in scholarly activity is an important tenet of residency training and is firmly entrenched in Canada since the introduction of CanMEDS roles by the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons. As Canadian residency programs transition to competency-based training, it will remain important to understand how to best implement and encourage scholarly pursuits among resident trainees. The objective of this study was to understand the experiences, attitudes, and barriers that surgical residents face when pursuing research during their training. METHODS: An anonymous, cross-sectional, self-report questionnaire was administered to chief residents of all English-speaking urology programs in Canada in 2015. Questions were open- and close-ended, including an agreement score based on a five-point Likert scale. Questions addressed residents' involvement in and attitudes towards research, as well as their perceptions of the utility of research involvement during training. The residents were also asked about the support they received and potential areas to improve the attainment of this competency. Descriptive and correlative statistics were used to analyze the responses. RESULTS: There was a 100% overall response rate to the questionnaire. This study revealed that Canadian urology residents have a high rate of participation in scholarly work, with the vast majority (94%) publishing at least one manuscript with a mean of four papers. Despite this, there appeared to be significant variation in the respondent's experiences, including protected time for research. Furthermore, many residents appeared unconvinced of the importance of research involvement, with only 51% agreement that participation was important to their overall training. As well, a significant number of residents reported largely external, rather than internal, motivations for research participation, such as attaining a preferred fellowship (66% agreement). While the majority of respondents felt (66% agreement) that the scholar role was important in residency training, it would appear that significant barriers, including time and mentorship, limited the effectiveness of research participation to gain those competencies. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this self-report survey outline the significant differences in attitudes and experience towards mandatory research as a component of scholarship in Canadian urology training programs. As postgraduate medical education evolves, particularly with the uptake of competency-based medical education, programs and residents will need to address the motives and barriers to better foster academic pursuits during urology training.