Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Sex Med ; 17(7): 1395-1399, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32389586

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Penile prosthesis implantation in cases of severe Peyronie's disease may require plaque excision/incision and grafting, which may require mobilization of the neurovascular bundle or urethra, posing the risks of penile hyposensitivity or urethral injury, and is time-consuming, possibly increasing infection risk. AIM: Evaluating transcorporeal debulking of Peyronie's plaques by "Shaeer's punch technique." METHODS: Penile prosthesis implantation and punch technique (PPI-Punch) was performed for 26 patients. After corporotomy and dilatation, Peyronie's plaques were punched out from within the corpora cavernosa using the punch forceps, and then a penile prosthesis was implanted. Comparison to a matching retrospective group of 18 patients operated upon by plaque excision-grafting and penile prosthesis implantation was performed. OUTCOMES: The study outcomes were straightness of the erect penis, complication, satisfaction with length on a 5-point scale, the International Index of Erectile Function-5, and the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction questionnaire. RESULTS: Average preoperative curvature angle was 58.1 ± 11.7 in the Punch group and 58 ± 14.8 in the excision-grafting group, p=0.99. After surgery, all patients had a straight penis. No tunical perforations, urethral injuries, or extrusions were noted. Average additional operative time for Punch technique ranged from 5 to 10 minutes (7.3 ± 1.7), in contrast to the excision-grafting group where plaque surgery duration was 50.8 minutes ± 11.1, an 85% difference, p < 0.0001. Septal plaques in the latter group could not be removed. In the PPI-Punch group, penile sensitivity was preserved in all patients, compared with the excision/grafting group, with 7 of 18 patients reporting hyposthesia of the glans. Infection occurred in 1 of 26 patients in the PPI-Punch group, compared with 2 of 18 patients in the excision/grafting group. Satisfaction with length on a 5-point scale was 3.8 ± 0.9 in the punch group, versus 3.1 ± 1.1 in the excision-grafting group, p=0.009. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The proposed technique is minimally invasive and prompt, possibly decreasing the known complications of plaque surgery and PPI including sensory loss. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: One limitation is the inability to accurately measure preoperative erect length in patients with erectile dysfunction with poor response to intracavernous injections. CONCLUSION: Shaeer's punch technique is a minimally invasive procedure for transcorporeal excavation of Peyronie's plaques before penile prosthesis implantation, omitting the need for mobilization of the neurovascular bundle or spongiosum, and hence, there is low or no risk for nerve or urethral injury and brief plaque surgery time. Shaeer O, Soliman Abdelrahman IF, Mansour M, et al. Shaeer's Punch Technique: Transcorporeal Peyronie's Plaque Surgery and Penile Prosthesis Implantation. J Sex Med 2020;17:1395-1399.


Asunto(s)
Disfunción Eréctil , Implantación de Pene , Induración Peniana , Prótesis de Pene , Disfunción Eréctil/etiología , Disfunción Eréctil/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Satisfacción del Paciente , Implantación de Pene/efectos adversos , Induración Peniana/cirugía , Pene/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
J Sex Med ; 16(5): 755-759, 2019 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30898492

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: When a penile prosthesis is implanted, a fibrous tissue capsule gradually forms around it. In case of penile prosthesis infection, salvage and immediate reimplantation into the same capsule that envelops the infected prosthesis is a trial to avoid the difficulty and shortening encountered with explantation and delayed reimplantation. AIM: We propose that, on salvage, the infected prosthesis be explanted, the capsule washed out and then abandoned, and the replacement prosthesis implanted in the extracapsular sinusoidal space, between the capsule and tunica albuginea. This aims at decreasing contact between the replacement implant and the pyogenic membrane in the capsule. METHODS: This study was performed in a tertiary implantation center, involving 20 prospective cases referred with either an infected implant or pump erosion. Through a penoscrotal incision, lateral corporotomies were performed by superficial cuts, in a trial to identify the extracapsular sinusoidal space before opening the capsule. The capsule was then opened. All components of the implant were explanted, and the capsules were washed out. The extracapsular space within the corpora cavernosa was developed between the capsule and the tunica albuginea by sharp dissection initially, then bluntly dilated with a Hegar dilator. A malleable penile prosthesis was implanted in the extracapsular space bilaterally. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The reinfection rate was evaluated though 7-38 months after surgery. RESULTS: We were able to identify and dilate the extracapsular space in 18 of 20 cases. Reinfection occurred in 1 case (1 of 18, 5.6%). Development of the extracapsular space added approximately 10 minutes to the operative time. CLINICAL IMPLICATION: If salvage of an infected penile implant can be delayed until capsule maturation, extracapsular implantation may decrease the reinfection rate. STRENGTH & LIMITATIONS: The limitations are the lack of a control group of intra-capsular classic salvage and the relatively limited sample number. CONCLUSION: On penile prosthesis salvage surgery, whether for infection or extrusion, implantation of the replacement prosthesis in the extracapsular sinusoidal tissue is associated with low infection rates, because it bypasses the capsule, which may still harbor bacterial contamination despite the wash-out. Shaeer O, Shaeer K, AbdelRahman IFS. Salvage and Extracapsular Implantation for Penile Prosthesis Infection or Extrusion. J Sex Med 2019;16:755-759.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Pene/cirugía , Implantación de Pene/efectos adversos , Prótesis de Pene/efectos adversos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiología , Remoción de Dispositivos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Pene/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Reoperación , Terapia Recuperativa
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA