Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System for Multiparametric MRI to Predict the Presence of Muscle Invasion for Bladder Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) is a newly developed system of bladder cancer staging with multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), which can be used to predict the presence of muscle invasion for bladder cancer. PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of three mpMRI series (T2 WI, diffusion-weighted imaging [DWI], and dynamic contrast-enhanced image [DCEI]) and VI-RADS for diagnosing the muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. POPULATION: In all, 66 pathologically proven bladder cancers in 32 patients. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: Before the diagnostic MRI with an intramuscular antispasmodic agent, optimal bladder distension was confirmed. 3.0T MRI with T2 WI, DWI, and DCEI. ASSESSMENT: Three reviewers independently assessed and scored the bladder cancers in T2 WI, DWI, and DCEI using a five-point score system. Based on the scores in the three sequences, reviewers scored each bladder cancer with reference to VI-RADS categories. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of each of three mpMRI sequences and the final VI-RADS categorization for diagnosing MIBC. STATISTICAL TESTS: Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and the area under the curve (AUC) of each of three sequences separately and VI-RADS categorization for diagnosing the MIBC. RESULTS: The diagnostic performances of each of the three mpMRI series and VI-RADS for diagnosing MIBC were excellent. Especially using the optimal cutoff score >3 for predicting MIBC on DWI, DCEI, and VI-RADS, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC values were 90% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.56, 1.00), 100% (95% CI: 0.94, 1.00), 100% (95% CI: 0.66. 1.00), 98.3% (95% CI: 0.91, 1.00), and 0.95, respectively. DATA CONCLUSION: mpMRI based on VI-RADS can stratify patients with bladder cancer according to the presence of muscle invasion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3. TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;52:1249-1256.

Puncture needle with a hard plastic sheath and plastic wings minimizes repuncture attempts in ultrasound-guided paracentesis: a retrospective case-control study.

BACKGRUOUND: This study was performed to evaluate periprocedural factors, complications, and repuncture rate of the newly developed puncture needle and compare it with the routinely used puncture needle for ultrasound (US)-guided paracentesis. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 137 patients who underwent US-guided paracentesis between July 2018 and March 2019. Among them, 82 patients underwent US-guided paracentesis with a newly developed puncture needle. The other 55 patients underwent US-guided paracentesis with a routinely used puncture needle. The periprocedural factors, complications, and repuncture rate were compared between the two groups using the Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher exact test. The repuncture-associated factors were assessed using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: There were no major or minor complications in either group. The rate of repuncture was significantly lower in the group using the newly developed puncture needle compared with the group using the routinely used puncture needle (p=0.01). The duration of the procedure was significantly shorter with the newly developed puncture needle compared with the routinely used puncture needle (p=0.01). In univariate analysis, the thickness of the abdominal wall (p=0.04) and the use of the newly developed puncture needle (p=0.01) were significantly associated with the rate of repuncture. In multivariate analysis, only the use of the newly developed puncture needle was significantly associated with the rate of repuncture. CONCLUSION: Using this novel puncture needle with a hard plastic sheath and plastic wings, the rate of repuncture and the duration of the procedure were decreased without complications of US-guided paracentesis.

Structured reporting of CT or MRI for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: usefulness for clinical planning and interdisciplinary communication.

PURPOSE: To compare the content and communication between the radiologist and the clinicians for treatment planning of structured reports (SRs) and narrative reports (NRs) for reporting CT/MRI findings in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHOD: This retrospective study included 54 patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma who underwent CT/MRI before ERCP or surgery. For all patients, we generated both NRs and SRs for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and compared the number of key features between NRs and SRs. In addition, three clinicians performed a questionnaire evaluation that included three questions regarding assessment of the sufficiency of information for surgical or procedural planning, the effort required for information extraction, and the report quality rated on a Likert scale. RESULTS: SRs included significantly more predefined key features (6.89 ± 0.31) than NRs (5.87 ± 0.70) (p < 0.001). SRs provided greater sufficiency of information for clinical planning than NRs (89.9% vs. 18.5% of the cases, respectively; p < 0.001). Extraction of information was easier from SRs than NRs (94.4% vs. 9.3%, respectively) (p < 0.001). SRs received a higher overall report quality rating (5.96 ± 0.19) than NRs (4.31 ± 0.77) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: SRs of CT/MRI findings for hilar cholangiocarcinoma can reveal more predefined key features, provide more sufficiency of information, and yield higher satisfaction levels, in comparison with NRs.