Performance of the 2016 ACR-EULAR Myositis Response Criteria in adult dermatomyositis/polymyositis therapeutic trials and consensus profiles.

OBJECTIVE: The ACR-EULAR Myositis Response Criteria (MRC) were developed as a composite measure using absolute percentage change in six core set measures (CSMs). We aimed to further validate the MRC by assessing the contribution of each CSM, frequency of strength vs extramuscular activity improvement, representation of patient-reported outcome measures (PROM), and frequency of CSM worsening. METHODS: Data from adult dermatomyositis/polymyositis patients in the rituximab (n = 147), etanercept (n = 14), and abatacept (n = 19) trials, and consensus patient profiles (n = 232) were evaluated. The Total Improvement Score (TIS), number of improving vs worsening CSMs, frequency of improvement with and without muscle-related CSMs, and contribution of PROM were evaluated by MRC category. Regression analysis was performed to assess contribution of each CSM to the MRC. RESULTS: Of 412 adults with dermatomyositis/polymyositis, there were 37%, 24%, 25%, and 14% with no, minimal, moderate, and major MRC improvement, respectively. The number of improving CSMs and absolute percentage change in all CSMs increased by improvement category. In minimal-moderate improvement, only physician-reported disease activity contributed significantly more than expected by MRC. Of patients with at least minimal improvement, 95% had improvement in muscle-related measures and a majority (84%) had improvement in PROM. Patients with minimal improvement had worsening in a median of 1 CSM, and most patients with moderate-major improvement had no worsening CSMs. Physician assessment of change generally agreed with MRC improvement categories. CONCLUSION: The ACR-EULAR MRC performs consistently across multiple studies, further supporting its use as an efficacy end point in future myositis therapeutic trials.

Performance of cut-offs adjusted with positive control band intensity in line-blot assays for myositis-specific antibodies.

The diagnostic performance of band intensity (BI) cut-offs, adjusted by a positive control band (PCB) in a line-blot assay (LBA) for myositis-related autoantibodies (MRAs) is investigated. Sera from 153 idiopathic inflammatory myositis (IIM) patients with available immunoprecipitation assay (IPA) data and 79 healthy controls were tested using the EUROLINE panel. Strips were evaluated for BI using the EUROLineScan software, and the coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated. Sensitivity and specificity, area under the curve (AUC), and the Youden's index (YI) were estimated at non-adjusted or PCB-adjusted cut-off values. Kappa statistics were calculated for IPA and LBA. Although inter-assay CV for PCB BI was 3.9%, CV was 12.9% in all samples, and a significant correlation was found between BIs of PCB and seven MRAs (all P < 0.05). At adjusted BI (aBI) > 10, the negative conversion rate of myositis-specific autoantibody (MSA)-positivity at BI > 10 was 11.5% in controls and 1.3% in patients. The specificity, AUC, and YI for MSAs at aBI > 10 or > 20 were higher than those at non-adjusted cut-off values. Additionally, AUC (0.720), YI (0.440), and the prevalence of MRAs with kappa > 0.60 (58.3%) were the highest at aBI > 20. The overall sensitivity and specificity for MSAs were 50.3% and 93.7% at aBI > 20, respectively, and 59.5% and 65.8% with BI > 10, respectively. The diagnostic performance of LBA can be improved using PCB-adjusted BIs. aBI > 20 is the optimal cut-off for IIM diagnosis using the EUROLINE LBA panel.

Trial of Apremilast for Oral Ulcers in Behçet's Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The small-molecule phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor apremilast modulates cytokines that are up-regulated in Behçet's syndrome. In a phase 2 trial involving patients with Behçet's syndrome, apremilast reduced the incidence and severity of oral ulcers. Data on the efficacy and safety of apremilast in patients with Behçet's syndrome who had active oral ulcers and had not previously received biologic agents are limited. METHODS: In a phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, patients who had Behçet's syndrome with active oral ulcers but no major organ involvement to receive either apremilast at a dose of 30 mg or placebo, administered orally, twice daily for 12 weeks, followed by a 52-week extension phase. The primary end point was the area under the curve (AUC) for the total number of oral ulcers during the 12-week placebo-controlled period (with lower values indicating fewer ulcers). There were 13 secondary end points, including complete response of oral ulcers, change from baseline in pain associated with oral ulcers, disease activity, and change from baseline in the Behçet's Disease Quality of Life score (range, 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater impairment in quality of life). Safety was also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 207 patients underwent randomization (104 patients to the apremilast group and 103 to the placebo group). The AUC for the number of oral ulcers was 129.5 for apremilast, as compared with 222.1 for placebo (least-squares mean difference, -92.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], -130.6 to -54.6; P<0.001). The change from baseline in the Behçet's Disease Quality of Life score was -4.3 points in the apremilast group, as compared with -1.2 points in the placebo group (least-squares mean difference, -3.1 points; 95% CI, -4.9 to -1.3). Adverse events with apremilast included diarrhea, nausea, and headache. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with oral ulcers associated with Behçet's syndrome, apremilast resulted in a greater reduction in the number of oral ulcers than placebo but was associated with adverse events, including diarrhea, nausea, and headache. (Funded by Celgene; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02307513.).

Sex-specific analysis in Behçet's disease reveals higher genetic risk in male patients.

OBJECTIVES: Behçet's disease tends to be more severe in men than women. This study was undertaken to investigate sex-specific genetic effects in Behçet's disease. METHODS: A total of 1762 male and 1216 female patients with Behçet's disease from six diverse populations were studied, with the majority of patients of Turkish origin. Genotyping was performed using an Infinium ImmunoArray-24 BeadChip, or extracted from available genotyping data. Following imputation and extensive quality control measures, genome-wide association analysis was performed comparing male to female patients in the Turkish cohort, followed by a meta-analysis of significant results in all six populations. In addition, a weighted genetic risk score for Behçet's disease was calculated and compared between male and female patients. RESULTS: Genetic association analysis comparing male to female patients with Behçet's disease from Turkey revealed an association with male sex in HLA-B/MICA within the HLA region with a GWAS level of significance (rs2848712, OR = 1.46, P = 1.22 × 10-8). Meta-analysis of the effect in rs2848712 across six populations confirmed these results. Genetic risk score for Behçet's disease was significantly higher in male compared to female patients from Turkey. Higher genetic risk for Behçet's disease was observed in male patients in HLA-B/MICA (rs116799036, OR = 1.45, P = 1.95 × 10-8), HLA-C (rs12525170, OR = 1.46, P = 5.66 × 10-7), and KLRC4 (rs2617170, OR = 1.20, P = 0.019). In contrast, IFNGR1 (rs4896243, OR = 0.86, P = 0.011) was shown to confer higher genetic risk in female patients. CONCLUSIONS: Male patients with Behçet's disease are characterized by higher genetic risk compared to female patients. This genetic difference, primarily derived from our Turkish cohort, is largely explained by risk within the HLA region. These data suggest that genetic factors might contribute to differences in disease presentation between men and women with Behçet's disease.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of LBAL, a candidate adalimumab biosimilar, and adalimumab reference product in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis inadequately responding to methotrexate: a 52-week phase III randomised study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the similarities between LBAL (adalimumab biosimilar candidate) and the adalimumab reference product (ADL) in terms of efficacy and safety, including immunogenicity, in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate treatment. METHODS: This phase III, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, 56-week study was conducted in Japan and Korea. During the first 24 weeks, patients subcutaneously received 40 mg of LBAL or ADL every two weeks (LBAL and ADL groups). During the subsequent 28 weeks, the LBAL group patients and half of the ADL group patients received LBAL (L-L and A-L arms). The remaining ADL group patients continued to receive ADL (A-A arm). The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline in disease activity score 28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) at Week 24. American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response rates, adverse events (AEs), and anti-drug antibody (ADA) were also assessed. RESULTS: In total, 383 patients were randomised. The least squares (LS) mean changes from baseline in DAS28-ESR at Week 24 were -2.45 and -2.53 in the LBAL (n=191) and ADL (n=190) groups, respectively. The 95% confidence interval (CI; -0.139, 0.304) of the difference (0.08) was within the pre-specified equivalence margin (-0.6, 0.6). Up to Week 52, the decreases in DAS28-ESR were maintained in all three arms. No notable differences in ACR20/50/70 were observed. The AE and ADA incidences were comparable between the arms. CONCLUSIONS: LBAL was equivalent in efficacy and comparable in safety, including immunogenicity, to ADL. Switching from ADL to LBAL did not impact on efficacy and safety.

Baseline disease activity influences subsequent achievement of patient acceptable symptom state in Sjögren's syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate longitudinal changes of the EULAR SS Patient-Reported Index (ESSPRI) and EULAR SS Disease Activity Index (ESSDAI), and identify factors associated with patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) in patients with primary SS (pSS). METHODS: We assessed ESSPRI, ESSDAI, clinical ESSDAI (ClinESSDAI), EULAR Sicca Score, EuroQoL 5-dimension (EQ-5D), Fatigue Severity Score, Beck Depression Inventory, and patient global assessment (PGA) for pSS, and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for glandular and extra-glandular symptoms at baseline and follow-up. The responses to the currently available standards of care were evaluated by the PASS, the minimal clinically important improvement (MCII) of ESSPRI and ESSDAI, and a modified SS Responder Index-30 (mSSRI-30) response. RESULTS: Among 115 patients enrolled, 102 (88.7%) completed a median 3-year follow-up. The ESSPRI, ClinESSDAI and EQ-5D levels remained stable, although the PGA and ESSDAI significantly improved (both P <0.05). Of the 102 patients, 52 (51.0%) patients achieved the PASS at the follow-up and tended to attain the ESSPRI-MCII and mSSRI-30 (both P < 0.001) more frequently than the non-PASS group. Multivariate analysis revealed that the PASS was significantly associated with baseline ESSPRI negatively [odds ratio (OR) 0.609] and ESSDAI positively (OR 1.224). When categorized using baseline ESSPRI and ESSDAI, a subgroup of low ESSPRI and high ESSDAI reached a PASS achievement rate of 79.3%. CONCLUSION: Although longitudinal changes in ESSPRI and ClinESSDAI are stable in pSS, baseline ESSPRI and ESSDAI could provide prognostic information on the subsequent achievement of PASS, using currently available treatments. A categorization model using ESSPRI and ESSDAI may have clinical implications.

Tuberculosis risk with biologics by screening-guided preventive strategy in rheumatoid arthritis under intermediate tuberculosis burden.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare tuberculosis (TB) risk during biologics treatment between patients with RA who did (prophylaxis) and did not (non-prophylaxis) undergo chemoprophylaxis following pre-biologic latent TB screening in Korea of an intermediate TB burden. METHODS: Using the 2002-16 Korea National Health Insurance database, we conducted a cohort study examining TB risk, defined by International Classification of Diseases Tenth Revision codes plus anti-TB drugs, among RA patients initiating a biologic drug with and without chemoprophylaxis after screening triage for latent TB. To control baseline confounding, we used propensity score-based fine stratification (PSS) and weighting. Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios and 95% CIs comparing TB risk between the prophylaxis vs non-prophylaxis groups. RESULTS: The PSS-weighted study cohort (mean age 57.0 years; 81.3% female) included 2249 and 7225 RA patients in the prophylaxis and non-prophylaxis groups, respectively. During 2.42 years of biologics treatment, 118 patients developed TB with the incidence rate per 100 person-years of 0.33 in the prophylaxis and 0.63 in the non-prophylaxis groups. The PSS-weighted hazard ratio (95% CI) for TB associated with the prophylaxis was 0.52 (0.32, 0.86). During the follow-up time, the incidence rate of TB remained consistently low in the prophylaxis group but it was highest in the first year, then time-dependently declined in the non-prophylaxis group. CONCLUSION: This population-based cohort study warns that the current screening-based preventive strategy generates a substantially higher TB risk after biologics initiation among screening-negative patients compared with screening-positive patients receiving chemoprophylaxis, when the background TB burden is not low.

Predictors of a placebo response in patients with hand osteoarthritis: post-hoc analysis of two randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Placebo can have a significant therapeutic effect in patients with hand osteoarthritis (OA). This aim of the study is to identify factors associated with a clinically meaningful placebo response in patients with hand OA. METHODS: This post-hoc analysis of two double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trials (RCTs) investigating the efficacy of GCSB-5 or diacerein as treatments for hand OA analyzed the efficacy of a placebo. Clinical and laboratory factors associated with a clinically meaningful response, defined as an improvement in the Australian/Canadian Osteoarthritis Hand Index (AUSCAN) pain score > 10 at 4 weeks relative to baseline, were identified. RESULTS: The mean improvement in the AUSCAN pain score was - 6.0 ± 20.3, with marked variation between 143 hand OA patients (range: - 76.4 to 33.2). A clinically meaningful improvement was observed in 54 (37.8%) patients. Placebo responders had worse AUSCAN pain scores (55.7 ± 19.7 vs. 43.6 ± 21.6, p = 0.001) and a worse AUSCAN stiffness (68.2 ± 20.5 vs. 57.5 ± 24.5, p = 0.008) at baseline than non-responders. Improvements in pain correlated with the baseline pain level (Pearson r = - 427, p < 0.001). Structural joint changes such as tender, swollen, enlarged, or deformed joint counts did not differ between placebo responders and non-responders. In a multivariable analysis, only baseline AUSCAN pain was associated with a clinically meaningful placebo response (OR: 1.054, 95% CI [1.019-1.089], p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: High levels of pain at baseline are predictive of a clinically meaningful placebo response in patients with hand OA. Further studies are needed to optimize and utilize the benefit of placebo responses in patients with hand OA.

Performance of the 2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus in Asian patients: a single-centre retrospective cohort study in Korea.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of the 2019 European League against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology (EULAR/ACR) classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in Asian patients. METHODS: We conducted an electronic medical chart review of patients with SLE and defined rheumatic diseases. Classification criteria of the 1997 ACR, 2012 Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC), and 2019 EULAR/ACR were examined based on sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predicted value, and accuracy using clinical diagnosis as the gold standard. RESULTS: A total of 335 SLE patients and 337 non-SLE patients were analysed. Non-SLE patients included rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (n=92), anti-phospholipid syndrome (APS) (n=57), mixed connective tissue disease (n=52), systemic sclerosis (n=43), primary Sjögren's syndrome (SS) (n=39), undifferentiated connective tissue disease (n=28), RA with secondary SS (n=24), dermatomyositis (n=1), and spondyloarthropathy (n=1). The sensitivity was 97.6% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.954-0.989) for the 2019 EULAR/ACR criteria, 98.5% (95% CI: 0.966-0.995) for the 2012 SLICC criteria and 95.5% (95% CI: 0.927-0.975) for the 1997 ACR criteria. The specificity was 91.4% (95% CI: 0.879-0.942) for the 2019 EULAR/ACR criteria, 92.6% (95% CI: 0.892-0.951) for the 2012 SLICC criteria 93.8% (95% CI: 0.906-0.961) for the 1997 ACR criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The 2019 EULAR/ACR criteria for SLE had comparable performance to the 2012 SLICC criteria regarding diagnostic sensitivity and specificity in Korean population of SLE and other rheumatic diseases. However, the new criteria could not reach higher specificity than the 2012 SLICC criteria.

Tofacitinib in combination with methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: patient-reported outcomes from the 24-month Phase 3 ORAL Scan study.

OBJECTIVES: Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Here we present data from the completed Phase 3 randomised controlled trial (RCT) ORAL Scan (NCT00847613), which evaluated the impact of tofacitinib on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) through 24 months in patients with active RA and inadequate responses to methotrexate (MTX-IR). METHODS: Patients were randomised 4:4:1:1 to receive tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily (BID), or placebo advanced to tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg, plus background MTX. Patients receiving placebo advanced to tofacitinib at month 3 (non-responders) or month 6 (remaining patients). Mean changes from baseline in PROs, assessed at months 1-24, included Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, Patient Global Assessment of disease activity (visual analogue scale [VAS]), Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain (VAS), health-related quality of life (Short Form-36 version 2), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue and Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep. RESULTS: Overall, 539/797 (67.6%) patients completed 24 months' treatment. At month 3, tofacitinib-treated patients reported signi cant (p<0.05) mean changes from baseline versus placebo across all PROs, and significantly more patients reported improvements ≥ minimum clinically important differences versus placebo. Improvements in PROs with tofacitinib were sustained to month 24. Following advancement to tofacitinib, placebo-treated patients generally reported changes of similar magnitude to tofacitinib-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with RA and MTX-IR receiving tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg BID plus MTX reported significant and clinically meaningful improvements in PROs versus placebo at month 3, which were sustained through 24 months.

Practical Utility of D-dimer Test for Venous Thromboembolism in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Depends on Disease Activity: a Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The D-dimer test is a screening tool for venous thromboembolism (VTE); however, its utility for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) remains unclear. Here, we examined the utility of the D-dimer test as a screening tool for VTE in SLE patients. METHODS: SLE patients (n = 276) and age- and sex-matched patients with non-rheumatic disease (n = 1,104), all of whom underwent D-dimer testing to screen for VTE, were enrolled. The sensitivity and specificity and receiver operating characteristics curve of the D-dimer test were compared in both groups. Then, subgroup of SLE patients in whom the D-dimer test can be useful was sought. RESULTS: The incidence of VTE was more common in SLE patients than controls (10.9% vs. 4.0%). Although the sensitivity of the D-dimer test was comparable between SLE patients and controls (93.3% vs. 90.9%), the specificity of the test was profoundly lower in SLE patients compared to controls (28.4% vs. 84.4%). The area under the curve (AUC) of the D-dimer for VTE was 0.669 in SLE patients and 0.90 in control group. Multiple linear regression analysis demonstrated that SLE disease activity index-2000 (SLEDAI-2K) was significantly associated with D-dimer levels in SLE patients (ß = 0.155; P = 0.022). Subgroup analysis showed that the AUC is moderate (0.768) with low disease activity, while it is low (0.518) with high SLEDAI-2K. CONCLUSION: The D-dimer test may not be a useful screening tool for VTE in patients with active SLE. D-dimer test for predicting VTE in SLE patients should be differentially applied according to disease activity of SLE.

Tocilizumab Increases Body Weight and Serum Adipokine Levels in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Independently of Their Treatment Response: a Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Causes of weight change after tocilizumab treatment are unclear. We aimed to investigate the effects of tocilizumab treatment on body weight and serum adipokine levels in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we evaluated weight changes in patients with RA who received methotrexate (Cohort I) or tocilizumab with methotrexate (Cohorts II and III) for 24 weeks. Adipokine concentrations at baseline and 24 weeks were analyzed in Cohorts I and III. Cohorts I and II received tocilizumab therapy for an additional 48 weeks, during which weight changes were monitored (24-72 weeks). RESULTS: No significant weight change occurred after 24 weeks of methotrexate treatment (mean difference, -0.2 kg; P = 0.630), but was observed after 24 weeks of tocilizumab treatment (mean difference, +0.9 kg; P = 0.010). Weight changed regardless of the treatment response in both treatment groups. The leptin-adiponectin ratio (P = 0.015) and levels of adiponectin (P < 0.001), leptin (P < 0.001), and resistin (P = 0.003) increased significantly after 24 weeks of tocilizumab, but not methotrexate treatment. After 24, 48 and 72 weeks of tocilizumab treatment in Cohort II, mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) weight changes from baseline were +0.7 (0.0-1.4), +1.2 (0.4-2.0) and +1.1 (0.2-2.0) kg, respectively, and mean (95% CI) percent weight changes from baseline were +1.3% (0.1%-2.6%), +2.2% (0.7%-3.6%), and +2.0% (0.4%-3.7%) at 24, 48, and 72 weeks, respectively. CONCLUSION: Weight and the leptin-adiponectin ratio increased after tocilizumab treatment. Given that cardiovascular (CV) risk factors may deteriorate in patients with RA who receive tocilizumab, further studies are required to determine the effects of weight gain on CV outcomes in these patients.

Efficacy and safety of peficitinib (ASP015K) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to conventional DMARDs: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial (RAJ3).

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy and safety of peficitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: In this double-blind phase III study, patients with RA and an inadequate response to prior disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) were randomised to peficitinib 100 mg once daily, peficitinib 150 mg once daily, placebo or open-label etanercept for 52 weeks' treatment; placebo-treated patients were switched at week 12 to peficitinib 100 or 150 mg once daily. The primary endpoint was American College of Rheumatology (ACR)20 response at week 12/early termination (ET). Secondary endpoints (assessed throughout) included ACR20, ACR50 and ACR70 response, changes from baseline in disease activity scores (DAS)28 and ACR core parameters, adverse events (AEs) and changes in clinical or laboratory measurements. RESULTS: In total, 507 patients received treatment. ACR20 response rates at week 12/ET were significantly higher in the peficitinib 100 mg (57.7%) and 150 mg (74.5%) groups versus placebo (30.7%) (p<0.001). ACR50/70 response rates were also higher for both peficitinib doses versus placebo. Improvements in ACR response were maintained until week 52. Changes from baseline in DAS28-C-reactive protein/erythrocyte sedimentation rate and the ACR core set were significantly greater for both peficitinib doses versus placebo at week 12/ET (p<0.001). AE incidence was similar across treatment arms. Incidence of serious infection and herpes zoster-related disease was higher with peficitinib versus placebo, but with no clear dose-dependent increase. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with RA and inadequate response to DMARDs, peficitinib 100 mg once daily or 150 mg once daily was efficacious in reducing RA symptoms and was well tolerated compared with placebo. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02308163.

Association between socioeconomic status and comorbidities among patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results of a nationwide cross-sectional survey.

OBJECTIVES: We examined the association between socioeconomic status (SES) and comorbidity distribution among patients with RA. METHODS: Information on comprehensive health status of 1088 RA patients (weighted n = 612 303) was obtained from the 2007-2015 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey database. SES components were household equivalence income, education and area of residence. To minimize confounding by age, patients were stratified by median age (63 years). Age-adjusted odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was estimated, comparing weighted prevalence of individual comorbidities between low and high SES groups in each age stratum. RESULTS: Among RA patients aged <63 years (mean 49 years, 70% female), we observed age-adjusted associations of depression (OR 2.13, 95% CI 1.01, 4.53), depressive mood (OR 2.68, 95% CI 1.54, 4.65), suicide ideation (OR 3.01, 95% CI 1.79, 5.07), diabetes (OR 3.09, 95%CI 1.31, 7.29), obesity (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.30, 3.20), hypertriglyceridemia (OR 2.36, 95% CI 1.28, 4.34) and osteoarthritis (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.13, 3.99) with low income, of suicide ideation with low education (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.14, 4.44), but no association of any comorbidities with area of residence. Unhealthy behavior patterns were comparable between low- and high-income groups but patients with low income reported a numerically higher rate of failed access to necessary healthcare services. We did not find any association between SES and comorbidities among those aged ⩾63 years (mean 72 years, 83% female). CONCLUSION: Among Korean RA patients aged <63 years, socioeconomic inequalities of multiple comorbidities in mental, cardiometabolic and musculoskeletal systems were found.

Comparative cardiovascular risk of allopurinol versus febuxostat in patients with gout: a nation-wide cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare cardiovascular (CV) risk among gout patients initiating allopurinol vs febuxostat. METHODS: Using 2002-2015 Korean National Health Insurance Service data for the entire Korean population, we conducted a cohort study on gout patients initiating allopurinol or febuxostat. The primary outcome was a composite CV end point of myocardial infarction, stroke/transient ischaemic attack, or coronary revascularization. Secondary outcomes were individual components of the primary outcome, and all-cause mortality. We used propensity score-matching with a 4:1 ratio for allopurinol and febuxostat initiators to control for confounding. Competing risk analyses were done for non-fatal outcomes accounting for deaths. RESULTS: We included 39 640 allopurinol initiators propensity score-matched on 9910 febuxostat initiators. The mean age was 59.1 years and 78.4% were male. The incidence rate per 100 person-years for the primary outcome was 1.89 for allopurinol and 1.84 for febuxostat initiators. The corresponding hazard ratio comparing allopurinol vs febuxostat initiators was 1.09 (95% CI: 0.90, 1.32). No significant difference was found for the secondary outcomes, including all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 0.96; 95% CI: 0.79, 1.16). Subgroup analyses limited to those at high CV risk and to equipotent-dose initiators (i.e. allopurinol ⩾300 mg/day vs febuxostat ⩾40 mg/day) showed similar results. CONCLUSION: Overall, this large Korean population-based study suggests no difference in the risk of non-fatal CV events and all-cause mortality between allopurinol and febuxostat initiators. These findings are consistent with the recent US Medicare population study, although the current study population consisted of younger Asians.

PIM-1 kinase is a novel regulator of proinflammatory cytokine-mediated responses in rheumatoid arthritis fibroblast-like synoviocytes.

Objectives: This study investigated the expression of proviral-integration site for Moloney murine leukaemia virus (PIM) -1 kinase in RA synovium and RA fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLSs) along with its impact on RA-FLS aggressiveness. Methods: The expression of PIM kinases was assessed in synovial tissues by immunohistochemistry and double IF. After PIM-1 inhibition using either small-interfering RNA or the chemical inhibitor AZD1208, we performed proliferation and migration assays and measured the levels of MMPs and IL-6 released from RA-FLSs under stimulation with proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, S100A4 and IL-6/soluble IL-6 receptor). Additionally, PIM-1-associated downstream signalling pathways were analysed by immunoblotting. Results: Three isoforms of PIM kinases were immunodetected in the synovial tissues from patients with RA or OA. Specifically, PIM-1 and PIM-3 were upregulated in RA synovium and PIM-1 was expressed in T cells, macrophages and FLSs. Additionally, upon stimulation of RA-FLSs with TNF-α, S100A4 and IL-6/sIL-6R, PIM-1 and PIM-3, but not PIM-2, were significantly inducible. Moreover, PIM-1 knockdown or AZD1208 treatment significantly suppressed basal or cytokine-induced proliferation and migration of RA-FLS and the secretion of MMPs from stimulated RA-FLSs. PIM-1 knockdown significantly affected the phosphorylation levels of extracellular signal-regulated kinase and cAMP responsive element binding protein in RA-FLSs. Conclusion: PIM-1 was upregulated in RA synovial tissues and RA-FLSs and its inhibition significantly reduced the proliferation, migration and MMP production of RA-FLSs in vitro. These findings suggest PIM-1 as a novel regulator of the aggressive and invasive behaviour of RA-FLSs and indicate its potential as a target for RA treatment.

Potential clinical utility of a novel optical tomographic imaging for the quantitative assessment of hand rheumatoid arthritis.

Optical tomographic imaging (OTI) was reported to be a novel technique for the early diagnosis and disease activity assessment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of OTI for the detection of hand synovitis of RA patients. Manu-scan was used to perform imaging targeting the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) and metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints in 12 RA patients and three controls. The enrolled RA patients also underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and bone scintigraphy (BS) to provide reference images. Of the 181 joints feasible for OTI analysis, 140 joints (111 in RA patients and 29 in controls, 77.3%) in which the difference of the OTI indices in the two measurements was within 20% were evaluated. The OTI indices in RA joints were significantly lower than those in control joints (p < 0.001). Overall, the OTI indices in RA joints decreased as the synovitis grades on MRI or BS increased. Moreover, OTI was able to discriminate between RA and control joints (AUC = 0.815, 95% CI 0.739-0.891), even if RA joints were normal on physical examination (AUC = 0.714, 95% CI 0.594-0.834). OTI was in good agreement (kappa = 0.60) with MRI for evaluating synovitis in RA patients and showed positive results in 11.4% of clinically asymptomatic joints. OTI in this study showed the potential to be a supplementary imaging modality for the quantification of synovial inflammation in PIP and MCP joints of RA patients. Further large-scale trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Performance of the 2015 American College of Rheumatology/European League against Rheumatism Classification Criteria for Gout in Korean Patients with Acute Arthritis.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to assess the performance of the 2015 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) classification criteria for gout in Korean patients with acute arthritis and to compare the performance of the ACR/EULAR criteria to that of other sets of criteria for gout classification. METHODS: Patients with acute arthritis who underwent diagnostic arthrocentesis at one of the four participating rheumatology clinics were consecutively enrolled between February and December 2017. Crystal-proven gout was diagnosed upon confirming the presence of monosodium urate (MSU) crystals in patients with a clinical impression of gout as judged by the rheumatologist. The performance of the ACR/EULAR and other gout classification criteria, including the Rome, New York, American Rheumatism Association (ARA), Mexico, and Netherlands criteria, was analyzed regardless of the presence/absence of MSU crystals. RESULTS: The study enrolled 118 gout patients (all crystal-proven) and 95 non-gout patients. According to the area under the curve, the diagnostic performance was the highest for the ACR/EULAR classification criteria (sensitivity, 80.5%; specificity, 95.8%; area under the curve, 0.966), followed by the Netherlands, Rome, ARA, New York, and Mexico criteria. All six sets of criteria demonstrated lower sensitivity in patients exhibiting the first episode of acute arthritis. CONCLUSION: In Korean patients with acute arthritis, the ACR/EULAR classification criteria outperformed other sets of gout classification criteria even in the absence of information regarding the presence of MSU crystals. However, to enhance diagnostic sensitivity, synovial fluid analysis should be considered in patients with the first episode of acute arthritis.

Nonthrombotic proliferative vasculopathy associated with antiphospholipid antibodies: A case report and literature review.

A 20-year-old man presented with recurrent hemoptysis for seven months. A small subpleural nodule in his right lower lobe was found and excised surgically. Based on the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and vascular wall hypertrophy without vasculitis or an intraluminal thrombus, nonthrombotic proliferative vasculopathy (NTPV) affecting pulmonary arteries was diagnosed. Recently, aPL have been postulated to directly induce the proliferation of vascular cells in the intima and media, leading to NTPV. We review 5 cases of NTPV-associated aPL with critical ischemia in the lower extremities and gastrointestinal infarction. NTPV-associated aPL might be distinct from classic antiphospholipid syndrome and should be considered in aPL-positive patients who present with vascular occlusions of medium-sized vessels in the absence of atherosclerotic risk factors and systemic or local inflammation.

Phase III, multicentre, double-blind, randomised, parallel-group study to evaluate the similarities between LBEC0101 and etanercept reference product in terms of efficacy and safety in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis inadequately responding to methotrexate.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the similarities between LBEC0101 (etanercept biosimilar) and the etanercept reference product (ETN-RP) in terms of efficacy and safety, including immunogenicity, in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate treatment. METHODS: This phase III, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, 54-week study was conducted in Japan and Korea. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline in the disease activity score in 28 joints based on erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) at week 24. American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response rate, adverse events (AEs), pharmacokinetics and development of antidrug antibodies (ADAs) were also evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 374 patients were randomised to LBEC0101 (n=187) or ETN-RP (n=187). The least squares mean changes from baseline in DAS28-ESR at week 24 in the per-protocol set were -3.01 (95% CI -3.198 to -2.820) in the LBEC0101 group and -2.86 (95% CI -3.051 to -2.667) in the ETN-RP group. The estimated between-group difference was -0.15 and its 95% CI was -0.377 to 0.078, which was within the prespecified equivalence margin of -0.6 to 0.6. ACR20 response rates at week 24 were similar between the groups (LBEC0101 93.3% vs ETN-RP 86.7%). The incidence of AEs up to week 54 was comparable between the groups (LBEC0101 92.0% vs ETN-RP 92.5%), although fewer patients in the LBEC0101 group (1.6%) than the ETN-RP group (9.6%) developed ADAs. CONCLUSION: The clinical efficacy of LBEC0101 was equivalent to that of ETN-RP. LBEC0101 was well tolerated and had a comparable safety profile to ETN-RP. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02357069.