Alteration of γδ T cell subsets in non-human primates transplanted with GGTA1 gene-deficient porcine blood vessels.

BACKGROUND: αGal-deficient xenografts are protected from hyperacute rejection during xenotransplantation but are still rejected more rapidly than allografts. Despite studies showing the roles of non-Gal antibodies and αß T cells in xenograft rejection, the involvement of γδ T cells in xenograft rejection has been limitedly investigated. METHODS: Six male cynomolgus monkeys were transplanted with porcine vessel xenografts from wild-type (n = 3) or GGTA1 knockout (n = 3) pigs. We measured the proportions and T cell receptor (TCR) repertoires of blood γδ T cells before and after xenotransplant. Grafted porcine vessel-infiltrating immune cells were visualized at the end of experiments. RESULTS: Blood γδ T cells expanded and infiltrated into the graft vessel adventitia following xenotransplantation of α-Gal-deficient pig blood vessels. Pre- and post-transplant analysis of γδ TCR repertoire revealed a transition in δ chain usage post-transplantation, with the expansion of several clonotypes of δ1, δ3, or δ7 chains. Furthermore, the distinctions between pre- and post-transplant δ chain usages were more prominent than those observed for γ chain usages. CONCLUSION: γδ TCR repertoire was significantly altered by xenotransplantation, suggesting the role of γδ T cells in sustained xenoreactive immune responses.

Monitoring Porcine Cytomegalovirus in Both Donors and Recipients is Crucial for Recipient's Survival in Pig-to-Cynomolgus Xenotransplantation.

BACKGROUND: Xenotransplantation, particularly when involving pig donors, presents challenges related to the transmission of porcine cytomegalovirus (pCMV) and its potential impact on recipient outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between pCMV positivity in both donors and recipients and the survival time of cynomolgus monkey recipients after xenogeneic kidney transplantation. METHODS: We conducted 20 cynomolgus xenotransplants using 18 transgenic pigs. On the surgery day, donor pig blood was sampled, and DNA was extracted from serum and peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Recipient DNA extraction followed the same protocol from pre-transplantation to post-transplantation. Porcine cytomegalovirus detection used real-time polymerase chain reaction (real-time PCR) with the ViroReal kit, achieving a sensitivity of 50 copies/reaction. A Ct value of 37.0 was the pCMV positivity threshold. RESULTS: Of 20 cynomolgus recipients, when donors tested negative for pCMV, recipients also showed negative results in 9 cases. In 4 cases where donors were negative, recipients tested positive. All 5 cases with pCMV-positive donors resulted in positive assessments for recipients. Detection of donor pCMV correlated with shorter recipient survival. Continuous recipient positivity during observation correlated with shorter survival, whereas transient detection showed no significant change in survival rates. However, donor pig phenotypes and transplantation protocols did not significantly impact survival. CONCLUSION: The detection of pCMV in both donors and recipients plays a crucial role in xenotransplantation outcomes. These findings suggest the importance of monitoring and managing pCMV in xenotransplantation to enhance long-term outcomes.