Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo de estudio
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Porto Biomed J ; 9(4): 263, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39132513

RESUMEN

Background: Small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) is an essential tool for evaluation of small bowel (SB) Crohn disease (CD). Fecal calprotectin (FC) represents an important biomarker of intestinal inflammation, widely used in ulcerative colitis and CD. Our aim was to evaluate the role of FC for diagnosing inflammatory activity in patients with isolated SB CD and how it correlates with SBCE findings. Methods: This is a retrospective study conducted in a tertiary inflammatory bowel disease referral center that included patients with SB CD who underwent SBCE between January 2017 and February 2023. FC value was obtained from the closest stool examination to SBCE. Results: One hundred ninety-six patients were included: 123 were women (63%) with a mean age of 44.2 years. In the SBCE, 127 (65%) patients had a Lewis Score ≥135 and, among the 94 patients with FC >200 µg/g, 23 had LS <135, 36 had LS between 135 and 790, and 35 had LS ≥790. FC levels were predictive of endoscopic lesions in SBCE, with significant correlation between FC level and total LS (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.43, P<.001). The sensitivity and specificity were calculated for each cut-off value being respectively 78% and 45% for FC = 100 µg/g, 69% and 59% for FC = 150 µg/g and 67% and 67% for FC = 200 µg/g. Conclusion: FC showed moderate correlation with endoscopic findings in SBCE in SB CD. It is, therefore, a reasonable marker for predicting significant inflammatory lesions in SBCE; however, none of the cut-off had a high sensitivity or specificity.

2.
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis ; 35(5): 286-292, 2024 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38973519

RESUMEN

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is most common in women during their reproductive years. When a low platelet count occurs for the first time during pregnancy, the differential diagnosis includes pregnancy-specific conditions. Although ITP is the most common cause of thrombocytopenia early in pregnancy, pregnancy-related thrombocytopenia develops mainly in late gestation. As maternal and neonatal outcomes are usually favourable, ITP per se is not a contraindication for pregnancy. We report the case with a literature review of patient with ITP, whose diagnosis was established in early pregnancy. This condition was refractory to first-line treatments, such as high-dose steroids and intravenous immunoglobulin and other splenectomy-sparing approaches, as rituximab, having the control been reached on the third trimester after splenectomy. Although not effective in this case, we still believe that rituximab should be considered before surgery during pregnancy.


Asunto(s)
Complicaciones Hematológicas del Embarazo , Púrpura Trombocitopénica Idiopática , Rituximab , Humanos , Rituximab/uso terapéutico , Embarazo , Femenino , Púrpura Trombocitopénica Idiopática/tratamiento farmacológico , Púrpura Trombocitopénica Idiopática/sangre , Adulto , Complicaciones Hematológicas del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Complicaciones Hematológicas del Embarazo/sangre , Esplenectomía , Inmunoglobulinas Intravenosas/uso terapéutico , Factores Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico
3.
Cureus ; 16(1): e51603, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38313957

RESUMEN

Anaphylactic shock is a life-threatening medical emergency, and its successful approach depends on early recognition and treatment. We present a case report of a 54-year-old female, with the American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) Physical Status Classification III, admitted for cervical conization. She presented with known allergies to paracetamol, diclofenac, and nimesulide, and a history of nickel contact dermatitis, with no reports of complicated anesthesia. During conization, adrenaline was infiltrated in the cervix, and hemostasis was performed with packing soaked in Monsel's solution. The immediate postoperative period in the post-anesthesia care unit was uneventful, and no drugs were administered during this period. Three hours after discharge to the ward, the patient had progressive dyspnea with desaturation and maculopapular exanthema. Anesthesia medical emergency was activated. Upon arrival of the emergency team, the patient presented: marked edema of the lips and tongue, respiratory distress, SpO2 82% (under non-rebreathing high concentration oxygen mask), audible vesicular murmur but diminished in all lung fields (without bronchospasm), blood pressure of 60/40 mmHg, increased capillary refill time (4-5 seconds), Glasgow Coma Scale score of 14, as well as generalized maculopapular exanthema and eyelid edema. Gas analysis revealed the following: pH 7.36, pO2 150, pCO2 33, HCO3 22, and lactate 2.2 mmol/L. Anaphylactic shock was immediately diagnosed without an identified causative agent. Intramuscular adrenaline (0.5mg), endovenous hydrocortisone (200 mg), clemastine (2 mg), and profuse fluid therapy were administered. There was an initial slight improvement followed by subsequent worsening. Additional administration of 0.5 mg intramuscular adrenaline and endovenous methylprednisolone (125 mg) provided similar results. Considering that no other drugs were administered in the ward, the emergency team and the attending gynecologist assumed an association between nickel allergy and the chemical composition of Monsel's solute. Thus, it was decided to remove the packing soaked in Monsel's solute from the vaginal cavity and wash it with saline solution. After removing the packing and further administration of 0.5 mg intramuscular adrenaline, there was progressive improvement in the blood pressure and SpO2. Tryptase samples collected one hour later were increased (23.9 ug/L; normal: <11.4 ug/L). The patient was shifted to the intensive care unit for surveillance, from which she was discharged after 2 days, with scheduled immunoallergology consultation, which is waiting. This case highlights the importance of causative agent identification as a key point for anaphylactic shock resolution, as well as a multidisciplinary discussion among professionals.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA