RESUMEN
Numerous studies suggest that blood-brain barrier (BBB) dysfunction may contribute to the progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Clinically available neuroimaging methods are needed for quantitative "scoring" of BBB permeability in AD patients. [18F]2-fluoro-2-deoxy-sorbitol ([18F]FDS), which can be easily obtained from simple chemical reduction of commercial [18F]2-fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose ([18F]FDG), was investigated as a small-molecule marker of BBB permeability, in a pre-clinical model of AD using in vivo PET imaging. Chemical reduction of [18F]FDG to [18F]FDS was obtained with a 100% conversion yield. Dynamic PET acquisitions were performed in the APP/PS1 rat model of AD (TgF344-AD, n=3) compared with age-matched littermates (WT, n=4). The brain uptake of [18F]FDS was determined in selected brain regions, delineated from a coregistered rat brain template. The brain uptake of [18F]FDS in the brain regions of AD rats versus WT rats was compared using a 2-way ANOVA. The uptake of [18F]FDS was significantly higher in the whole brain of AD rats, as compared with WT rats (P<0.001), suggesting increased BBB permeability. Enhanced brain uptake of [18F]FDS in AD rats was significantly different across brain regions (P<0.001). Minimum difference was observed in the amygdala (+89.0±7.6%, P<0.001) and maximum difference was observed in the midbrain (+177.8±29.2%, P<0.001). [18F]FDS, initially proposed as radio-pharmaceutical to estimate renal filtration using PET imaging, can be repurposed for non-invasive and quantitative determination of BBB permeability in vivo. Making the best with the quantitative properties of PET imaging, it was possible to estimate the extent of enhanced BBB permeability in a rat model of AD.
RESUMEN
Among opioids, buprenorphine presents a favorable safety profile with a limited risk of respiratory depression. However, fatalities have been reported when buprenorphine is combined to a benzodiazepine. Potentiation of buprenorphine interaction with opioid receptors (ORs) with benzodiazepines, and/or vice versa, is hypothesized to explain this drug-drug interaction (DDI). The mutual DDI between buprenorphine and benzodiazepines was investigated at the neuroreceptor level in nonhuman primates (n = 4 individuals) using brain PET imaging and kinetic modelling. The binding potential (BPND) of benzodiazepine receptor (BzR) was assessed using 11C-flumazenil PET imaging before and after administration of buprenorphine (0.2 mg, i.v.). Moreover, the brain kinetics and receptor binding of buprenorphine were investigated in the same individuals using 11C-buprenorphine PET imaging before and after administration of diazepam (10 mg, i.v.). Outcome parameters were compared using a two-way ANOVA. Buprenorphine did not impact the plasma nor brain kinetics of 11C-flumazenil. 11C-flumazenil BPND was unchanged following buprenorphine exposure, in any brain region (p > 0.05). Similarly, diazepam did not impact the plasma or brain kinetics of 11C-buprenorphine. 11C-buprenorphine volume of distribution (VT) was unchanged following diazepam exposure, in any brain region (p > 0.05). To conclude, our PET imaging findings do not support a neuropharmacokinetic or neuroreceptor-related mechanism of the buprenorphine/benzodiazepine interaction.