Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 55
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Audiol Neurootol ; 29(3): 224-227, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38219718

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Mild therapeutic hypothermia (MTH) is an exciting nonpharmaceutical otoprotection strategy. In this study, we applied simple irrigation of the tympanic and mastoid cavities to understand the timing of both achieving MTH and recovery back to euthermic temperatures for application in the clinical setting. METHODS: Three human temporal bones were used in this study in the temporal bone laboratory. A standard mastoidectomy was performed on each followed by the insertion of temperature probes into the basal turn of the cochlea via a middle cranial fossa approach. The temporal bones were warmed in heated bead baths to 37°C. The tympanic and mastoid cavities were then irrigated with room temperature water, and intracochlear temperature readings were recorded every minute. After 15 min, irrigation was stopped, and temperature readings were collected until temporal bones returned to euthermic levels. RESULTS: Intracochlear MTH was achieved within the first minute of irrigating the tympanic and mastoid cavities. Intracochlear temperatures plateaued after 5 min around 30°C. Discontinuation of irrigation resulted in the temperature rising logarithmically above the MTH levels after 9-10 min. CONCLUSION: Intracochlear MTH can be achieved via irrigation of the tympanic and mastoid cavities with room temperature irrigation within 60 s. After irrigation for 5 min, hypothermic temperatures will remain therapeutic for 10 min following cessation of irrigation.


Asunto(s)
Cóclea , Oído Medio , Hipotermia Inducida , Apófisis Mastoides , Irrigación Terapéutica , Humanos , Irrigación Terapéutica/métodos , Hipotermia Inducida/métodos , Hueso Temporal , Temperatura Corporal
2.
Int J Audiol ; : 1-7, 2024 Jul 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39030727

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and characteristics of problematic tinnitus in a representative United States (US) sample. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of the NHANES database from 2011-2012 and 2015-2016. STUDY SAMPLE: 8029 records were included for analysis. RESULTS: The prevalence of any tinnitus was 16.32%. Only 1.38% reported tinnitus as a big problem or worse. Univariate analysis revealed a statistically significant relationship between tinnitus constancy and duration with severity, where more constant perception and longer duration was related to increased severity (p < 0.0001). Multivariable models showed a clear relationship of increased odds ratio (OR) of problematic tinnitus with constancy of tinnitus but not duration. Furthermore, multivariable models showed higher Body Mass Index (OR= 1.013, 95% CI: 0.99-1.03), sleep trouble (OR = 2.016, 95% CI: 1.52-2.66) and comorbidities (OR = 1.43, 95%CI: 1.06-1.94) were all associated with increased problematic tinnitus, but not non-problematic tinnitus. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that the prevalence of problematic tinnitus is much lower than the prevalence of any tinnitus. There was also a relationship between BMI, sleep trouble, other comorbidities and increased odds of problematic tinnitus. Tinnitus severity was significantly related to constancy of perception but had a less clear relationship to duration.

3.
Age Ageing ; 52(2)2023 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36821645

RESUMEN

Over the course of a lifetime, the risk of experiencing multiple chronic conditions (multimorbidity) increases, necessitating complex healthcare regimens. Healthcare that manages these requirements in an integrated way has been shown to be more effective than services that address specific diseases individually. One such chronic condition that often accompanies ageing is hearing loss and related symptoms, such as tinnitus. Hearing loss is not only highly prevalent in older adults but is also a leading cause of disability. Accumulating evidence demonstrates an interplay between auditory function and other aspects of health. For example, poorer cardiometabolic health profiles have been shown to increase the risk of hearing loss, which has been attributed to microvascular disruptions and neural degeneration. Additionally, hearing loss itself is associated with significantly increased odds of falling and is a potentially modifiable risk factor for cognitive decline and dementia. Such evidence warrants consideration of new possibilities-a new horizon-for hearing care to develop a holistic, person-centred approach that promotes the overall health and wellbeing of the individual, as well as for audiology to be part of an interdisciplinary healthcare service. To achieve this holistic goal, audiologists and other hearing healthcare professionals should be aware of the range of conditions associated with hearing loss and be ready to make health promoting recommendations and referrals to the appropriate health practitioners. Likewise, healthcare professionals not trained in audiology should be mindful of their patients' hearing status, screening for hearing loss or referring them to a hearing specialist as required.


Asunto(s)
Pérdida Auditiva , Audición , Humanos , Anciano , Pérdida Auditiva/diagnóstico , Pérdida Auditiva/epidemiología , Pérdida Auditiva/terapia , Atención a la Salud , Envejecimiento , Promoción de la Salud
4.
Ear Hear ; 43(5): 1582-1592, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35383601

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: A relationship between tobacco smoking and hearing loss has been reported; associations with cannabis smoking are unknown. In this cross-sectional population-based study, we examined relationships between hearing loss and smoking (tobacco, cannabis, or co-drug use). METHODS: We explored the relationship between hearing loss and smoking among 2705 participants [mean age = 39.41 (SE: 0.36) years] in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2011 to 12; 2015 to 16). Smoking status was obtained via questionnaire; four mutually exclusive groups were defined: nonsmokers, current regular cannabis smokers, current regular tobacco smokers, and co-drug users. Hearing sensitivity (0.5 to 8 kHz) was assessed, and two puretone averages (PTAs) computed: low- (PTA 0.5,1,2 ) and high-frequency (PTA 3,4,6,8 ). We defined hearing loss as threshold >15 dB HL. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine sex-specific associations between smoking and hearing loss in the poorer ear (selected based on PTA 0.5,1,2 ) adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, hypertension, diabetes, education, and noise exposure with sample weights applied. RESULTS: In the age-sex adjusted model, tobacco smokers had increased odds of low- and high-frequency hearing loss compared with non-smokers [odds ratio (OR) = 1.58, 95% confidence ratio (CI): 1.05 to 2.37 and OR = 1.97, 95% CI: 1.58 to 2.45, respectively]. Co-drug users also had greater odds of low- and high-frequency hearing loss [OR = 2.07, 95% CI: 1.10 to 3.91 and OR = 2.24, 95% CI: 1.27 to 3.96, respectively]. In the fully adjusted multivariable model, compared with non-smokers, tobacco smokers had greater odds of high-frequency hearing loss [multivariable adjusted odds ratio = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.28-2.09]. However, in the fully adjusted model, there were no statistically significant relationships between hearing loss (PTA 0.5,1,2 or PTA 3,4,6,8 ) and cannabis smoking or co-drug use. DISCUSSION: Cannabis smoking without concomitant tobacco consumption is not associated with hearing loss. However, sole use of cannabis was relatively rare and the prevalence of hearing loss in this population was low, limiting generalizability of the results. This study suggests that tobacco smoking may be a risk factor for hearing loss but does not support an association between hearing loss and cannabis smoking. More definitive evidence could be derived using physiological measures of auditory function in smokers and from longitudinal studies.


Asunto(s)
Sordera , Fumar Marihuana , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Pérdida Auditiva de Alta Frecuencia , Humanos , Masculino , Fumar Marihuana/epidemiología , Encuestas Nutricionales , Nicotiana , Uso de Tabaco
5.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 43(6): 103580, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36055060

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess for differences in postoperative otorrhea rates after tympanostomy with tube placement surgery comparing use of oxymetazoline, ofloxacin, or ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone drops prescribed in the postoperative period. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of 516 pediatric patients who had either bilateral or unilateral myringotomy with tube placement performed during the year 2018. Information collected from each surgery included whether there was effusion at time of surgery, type of effusion, whether an adenoidectomy was performed the same time or prior, prior history of tube placement, style of tube placed, type of drop given or prescribed on the day of surgery. Demographic information including age, sex, race, weight was recorded as well. Finally, the postoperative visit was analyzed for presence of otorrhea in the ears that had surgery. Univariate analysis was conducted to see if there was any association between the three different drops and presence of otorrhea postoperatively. RESULTS: Postoperative otorrhea was present in 50 of the 516 patients (9.7 %). We observed no significant difference between the type of drop used and postoperative otorrhea being present (p = 0.179), but prior placement of tubes was significantly correlated to postoperative otorrhea (p < 0.001). There was no relationship between type of tube used, prior tube placement, or history of adenoidectomy with type of ear drop used. CONCLUSION: Overall, there is no significant difference in the rate of postoperative otorrhea when choosing between oxymetazoline, ofloxacin, or ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone drops for use in the postoperative period after tympanostomy tube placement.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Oído , Otitis Media con Derrame , Humanos , Niño , Ventilación del Oído Medio/efectos adversos , Ofloxacino , Oximetazolina/efectos adversos , Administración Tópica , Resultado del Tratamiento , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Ciprofloxacina , Dexametasona , Periodo Posoperatorio , Enfermedades del Oído/cirugía , Otitis Media con Derrame/cirugía
6.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 43(2): 103332, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34953248

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to estimate the prevalence of conductive pathologies based on tympanometric and otoscopic findings in adults in the U.S. and examine relationships between abnormal findings and audiometrically defined or reported perceived hearing loss and tinnitus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 3409 individuals aged 20-69 years from the 1999-2000 and 2000-2002 cycles of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) were analyzed. Outcomes included report of ear tubes, self-perceived hearing loss, and tinnitus (yes or no). Otoscopy involved screening for presence of cerumen (ear wax) and physical abnormality for each ear. Ear-specific tympanometry included measures of middle ear pressure, external ear volume, tympanometric width, and admittance/compliance for each ear. Mean and prevalence estimates are provided applying sample weights. A multivariate ordinal regression model adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, and education was used to examine relationships between otoscopy or tympanometry measures with hearing loss and tinnitus. RESULTS: Approximately 12% of the sample showed evidence of abnormal tympanometry and 12% showed evidence of abnormal otoscopy in at least one ear. Measured hearing loss was consistently related to tympanometry outcomes, in both univariate and adjusted models, but perceived hearing loss and tinnitus were not related to abnormal tympanometry or otoscopy. The most common reason for abnormal otoscopy was presence of excessive or impacted cerumen, representing an estimated 10% of the population. CONCLUSIONS: With 1 out of 10 adults having excessive cerumen, adults considering over-the-counter (OTC) hearings aids may benefit from an ear examination prior to purchase.


Asunto(s)
Pruebas de Impedancia Acústica , Pérdida Auditiva , Adulto , Anciano , Cerumen , Pérdida Auditiva/diagnóstico , Pérdida Auditiva/epidemiología , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas Nutricionales , Otoscopía , Adulto Joven
7.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 41(4): 102553, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32485298

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to determine whether bradycardia associated with the oculocardiac reflex is a significant source of morbidity in the post injury period following orbital floor fractures in children. MATERIALS/METHODS: A retrospective review of all pediatric patients who presented to our emergency department with an orbital floor fracture from May 1, 2016 to June 1, 2018 were included. Basic demographic data was collected as well as mechanism of injury, presence of bradycardia, and time to operating room. Morbidity was based on the need for medications to treat bradycardia. RESULTS: Thirty-five pediatric patients with orbital floor fractures were reviewed. 6 (17.1%) patients had post injury bradycardia, with one patient requiring medication to stabilize their heart rate. There was no statistically significant difference in sex, race/ethnicity, or age in patients with or without bradycardia (p > 0.05) however there was a significant relationship between bradycardia and need for operative repair (X2 = 7.88, df = 1, p = 0.005). The most common mechanism of injury was motor vehicle collision (45.7%). The average time to the operating room was 145 h (6.04 days). CONCLUSIONS: While activation of the oculocardiac reflex is a legitimate concern in the post injury period, there is unlikely to be significant morbidity due to bradycardia, and the greater concern should be for the ischemic muscle injury incurred from the fracture.


Asunto(s)
Bradicardia/etiología , Fracturas Orbitales/complicaciones , Fracturas Orbitales/cirugía , Reflejo Oculocardíaco , Accidentes de Tránsito , Adolescente , Bradicardia/epidemiología , Bradicardia/fisiopatología , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Morbilidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo
8.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 41(3): 102393, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31932026

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to analyze the basic demographics of patients who underwent frenulectomy at our institution as well as additional considerations regarding age, location of procedure, and possible effects on aspiration. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed based on CPT codes for frenulectomy and basic demographic data was collected. Other information such as presenting symptoms, type of ankyloglossia, location of the procedure, and modified barium swallow study (MBSS) information were also obtained. RESULTS: A total of 226 (66.4% male) patients underwent frenulectomy in the study time frame. Younger patients underwent frenulectomy for feeding symptoms (average age 6.5 months) and older children typically presented with speech related symptoms (average age 3.8 years). Of patients who had MBSS before and after the procedure, 5/11 (43%) had improvement of their aspiration after frenulectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Symptomatic ankyloglossia is more common in boys. Two age groups typically present for frenulectomy, infants for feeding difficulties and toddlers/preschoolers for speech related difficulties. Children with aspiration may benefit from frenulectomy, though aspiration is unlikely to resolve if other comorbidities are present. Proper evaluation and documentation of anatomy and functional tongue movement is important for future studies and decision-making regarding frenulectomy.


Asunto(s)
Anquiloglosia/complicaciones , Anquiloglosia/cirugía , Trastornos de Deglución/etiología , Frenillo Lingual/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Orales/métodos , Aspiración Respiratoria/etiología , Factores de Edad , Anquiloglosia/patología , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Sexuales , Trastornos del Habla/etiología , Lengua/patología , Lengua/fisiopatología , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
Int J Audiol ; 59(10): 737-744, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32250182

RESUMEN

Objective: Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) are sensitive to early indices of cochlear pathology. Pathology to the cochlea is in part mediated by ischaemic related mechanisms. We propose that DPOAEs may provide an objective measure of cardiovascular risk.Design: Cross-sectional.Study sample: The relationships between stroke risk and DPOAEs of 1,107 individuals from the Jackson Heart Study (JHS), an all-African-American cohort, were assessed. Linear regression models were used for analysis among all participants and delimited to normal hearing, defined as either a pure-tone threshold average of 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz (PTA4) ≤ 25 dBHL or pure-tone thresholds for all individual tested frequencies for each ear (500, 1000, 2000, 4000, and 8000 Hz) ≤ 25 dBHL.Results: We observed a significant inverse relationship between DPOAE amplitudes and stroke risk scores in the pooled cohort and in the subgroups with normal hearing defined by pure tone thresholds. Participants in the high-risk group had significantly lower DPOAE amplitudes than those in the low stroke risk group.Conclusions: Our results indicate that auditory dysfunction as measured by DPOAEs are related to stroke risk. Further prospective studies are needed to determine if DPOAEs could be used as a predictive tool for cardiovascular disease.


Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Audiometría de Tonos Puros , Umbral Auditivo , Cóclea , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Emisiones Otoacústicas Espontáneas , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico
10.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 146(5): 4033, 2019 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31795697

RESUMEN

The influence of dietary nutrient intake on the onset and trajectory of hearing loss during aging and in mediating protection from challenges such as noise is an important relationship yet to be fully appreciated. Dietary intake provides essential nutrients that support basic cellular processes related to influencing cellular stress response, immune response, cardiometabolic status, neural status, and psychological well-being. Dietary quality has been shown to alter risk for essentially all chronic health conditions including hearing loss and tinnitus. Evidence of nutrients with antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-ischemic properties, and overall healthy diet quality as otoprotective strategies are slowly accumulating, but many questions remain unanswered. In this article, the authors will discuss (1) animal models in nutritional research, (2) evidence of dietary nutrient-based otoprotection, and (3) consideration of confounds and limitations to nutrient and dietary study in hearing sciences. Given that there are some 60 physiologically essential nutrients, unraveling the intricate biochemistry and multitude of interactions among nutrients may ultimately prove infeasible; however, the wealth of available data suggesting healthy nutrient intake to be associated with improved hearing outcomes suggests the development of evidence-based guidance regarding diets that support healthy hearing may not require precise understanding of all possible interactions among variables. Clinical trials evaluating otoprotective benefits of nutrients should account for dietary quality, noise exposure history, and exercise habits as potential covariates that may influence the efficacy and effectiveness of test agents; pharmacokinetic measures are also encouraged.


Asunto(s)
Cóclea/metabolismo , Enfermedades Carenciales/epidemiología , Dieta , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/epidemiología , Animales , Cóclea/patología , Enfermedades Carenciales/complicaciones , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/dietoterapia , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/etiología , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/metabolismo , Humanos
11.
Lancet ; 390(10098): 969-979, 2017 Sep 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28716314

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Noise-induced hearing loss is a leading cause of occupational and recreational injury and disease, and a major determinant of age-related hearing loss. No therapeutic agent has been approved for the prevention or treatment of this disorder. In animal models, glutathione peroxidase 1 (GPx1) activity is reduced after acute noise exposure. Ebselen, a novel GPx1 mimic, has been shown to reduce both temporary and permanent noise-induced hearing loss in preclinical studies. We assessed the safety and efficacy of ebselen for the prevention of noise-induced hearing loss in young adults in a phase 2 clinical trial. METHODS: In this single-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial, healthy adults aged 18-31 years were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) at the University of Florida (Gainsville, FL, USA) to receive ebselen 200 mg, 400 mg, or 600 mg, or placebo orally twice daily for 4 days, beginning 2 days before a calibrated sound challenge (4 h of pre-recorded music delivered by insert earphones). Randomisation was done with an allocation sequence generated by an independent third party. The primary outcome was mean temporary threshold shift (TTS) at 4 kHz measured 15 min after the calibrated sound challenge by pure tone audiometry; a reduction of 50% in an ebselen dose group compared with the placebo group was judged to be clinically relevant. All participants who received the calibrated sound challenge and at least one dose of study drug were included in the efficacy analysis. All randomly assigned patients were included in the safety analysis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01444846. FINDINGS: Between Jan 11, 2013, and March 24, 2014, 83 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive ebselen 200 mg (n=22), 400 mg (n=20), or 600 mg (n=21), or placebo (n=20). Two participants in the 200 mg ebselen group were discontinued from the study before the calibrated sound challenge because they no longer met the inclusion criteria; these participants were excluded from the efficacy analysis. Mean TTS at 4 kHz was 1·32 dB (SE 0·91) in the 400 mg ebselen group compared with 4·07 dB (0·90) in the placebo group, representing a significant reduction of 68% (difference -2·75 dB, 95% CI -4·54 to -0·97; p=0·0025). Compared with placebo, TTS at 4 kHz was non-significantly reduced by 21% in the 200 mg ebselen group (3·23 dB [SE 0·91] vs 4·07 dB [0·90] in the placebo group; difference -0·84 dB, 95% CI -2·63 to 0·94; p=0·3542) and by 7% in the 600 mg ebselen group (3·81 dB [0·90] vs 4·07 dB [0·90] in the placebo group; difference -0·27, 95% CI -2·03 to 1·50; p=0·7659). Ebselen treatment was well tolerated across all doses and no significant differences were seen in any haematological, serum chemistry, or radiological assessments between the ebselen groups and the placebo group. INTERPRETATION: Treatment with ebselen was safe and effective at a dose of 400 mg twice daily in preventing a noise-induced TTS. These data lend support to a role of GPx1 activity in acute noise-induced hearing loss. FUNDING: Sound Pharmaceuticals.


Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Azoles/administración & dosificación , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/prevención & control , Compuestos de Organoselenio/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Adulto , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Isoindoles , Masculino , Música , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
12.
Ear Hear ; 39(6): 1057-1074, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29543608

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between recreational sound exposure and potentially undiagnosed or subclinical hearing loss by assessing sound exposure history, threshold sensitivity, distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) amplitudes, and performance on the words-in-noise (WIN) test. DESIGN: Survey data were collected from 74 adult participants (14 male and 60 female), 18 to 27 years of age, recruited via advertisements posted throughout the University of Florida campus. Of these participants, 70 completed both the survey and the additional functional test battery, and their preferred listening level was measured in a laboratory setting. RESULTS: There were statistically significant relationships between hearing thresholds and DPOAE amplitude. In contrast, performance on the WIN was not reliably related to threshold sensitivity within this cohort with largely normal hearing. The two most common exposures included bars or dance clubs, followed by music player use. There were no statistically significant relationships between individual or composite measures of recreational sound exposure, including preferred listening level, years of music player use, number of reported sound exposures, previous impulse noise exposure, or previous noise-induced change in hearing, and functional measures including threshold, DPOAE amplitude, and WIN measures. Some subjects were highly consistent in listening level preferences, while others were more variable from song to song. CONCLUSIONS: No reliable relationships between common recreational sound exposure or previous noise-induced changes in hearing were found during analysis of threshold sensitivity, DPOAE amplitude, or WIN performance in this cohort. However, the study sample was predominantly female and Caucasian, which limits generalizability of the results.


Asunto(s)
Umbral Auditivo , Audición , Reproductor MP3 , Música , Ruido/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Audiometría de Tonos Puros , Femenino , Audición/fisiología , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido , Humanos , Masculino , Emisiones Otoacústicas Espontáneas , Riesgo , Estudiantes , Universidades , Adulto Joven
13.
Ear Hear ; 38(6): 724-735, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28678080

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between noise exposure history, type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM), and suprathreshold measures of auditory function. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study was conducted; 20 normal-hearing participants without type 1 DM were matched on age and sex to 20 normal-hearing participants with type 1 DM (n=40). Participants, all having normal audiometric thresholds, completed noise history questionnaires and a battery of auditory physiological tests including transient evoked otoacoustic emissions, distortion product otoacoustic emissions, and auditory brainstem responses (ABR) at 80 dB nHL and at 2 different stimulus rates in both ears. Amplitude and latency for waves I and V are presented. Statistical analysis included analysis of variance and multivariate linear regression. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference for noise exposure history, otoacoustic emissions (OAE), or ABR findings were found between type 1 DM and matched controls. Males and females showed statistically significant differences for OAE amplitudes and ABR amplitude and latencies. However, no statistically significant relationship was found between noise outcomes and OAE or ABR findings. CONCLUSIONS: No statistically significant relationship between noise history and our suprathreshold ABR or OAE findings was indicated for individuals with type 1 DM or matched controls. The lack of evidence of noise related neuropathology might be due to inadequate noise exposure or lack of comorbidities in our DM group. Implications of these findings are discussed.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiología , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/estadística & datos numéricos , Potenciales Evocados Auditivos del Tronco Encefálico/fisiología , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/epidemiología , Ruido , Emisiones Otoacústicas Espontáneas/fisiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Audiometría de Tonos Puros , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Comorbilidad , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/diagnóstico , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/fisiopatología , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Análisis Multivariante , Factores Sexuales , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
14.
Int J Audiol ; 56(10): 716-722, 2017 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28553744

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between the healthy eating index (HEI), a measure of dietary quality based on United States Department of Agriculture recommendations and report of tinnitus. DESIGN: This cross-sectional analysis was based on HEI data and report of tinnitus. STUDY SAMPLE: Data for adults between 20 and 69 years of age were drawn from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 1999-2002. The NHANES is a programme of studies, to assess the health and nutritional status of adults and children in the United States. Two thousand one hundred and seventy-six participants were included in the analytic sample. RESULTS: Of the sample, 21.1% reported tinnitus within the past year and 11.7% reported persistent tinnitus, defined as tinnitus experienced at least monthly or greater. Controlling for age, sex, race/ethnicity, diabetes, noise exposure and smoking status, we found that with healthier diet (poorer vs. better HEI) there was decreased odds of reported persistent tinnitus [odds ratio (OR); 0.67; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45-0.98; p = 0.03]. CONCLUSIONS: The current findings support a possible relationship between healthier diet quality and reported persistent tinnitus.


Asunto(s)
Dieta Saludable , Audición , Estado Nutricional , Acúfeno/fisiopatología , Pruebas de Impedancia Acústica , Adulto , Anciano , Audiometría de Tonos Puros , Umbral Auditivo , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Encuestas Nutricionales , Valor Nutritivo , Oportunidad Relativa , Factores Protectores , Ingesta Diaria Recomendada , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Conducta de Reducción del Riesgo , Acúfeno/diagnóstico , Acúfeno/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
15.
Int J Audiol ; 55 Suppl 1: S59-71, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26821935

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Firearm discharges produce hazardous levels of impulse noise that can lead to permanent hearing loss. In the present study, we evaluated the effects of suppression, ammunition, and barrel length on AR-15 rifles. DESIGN: Sound levels were measured left/right of a user's head, and 1-m left of the muzzle, per MIL-STD-1474-D, under both unsuppressed and suppressed conditions. STUDY SAMPLE: Nine commercially available AR-15 rifles and 14 suppressors were used. RESULTS: Suppressors significantly decreased peak dB SPL at the 1-m location and the left ear location. However, under most rifle/ammunition conditions, levels remained above 140 dB peak SPL near a user's right ear. In a subset of conditions, subsonic ammunition produced values near or below 140 dB peak SPL. Overall suppression ranged from 7-32 dB across conditions. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that (1) suppressors reduce discharge levels to 140 dB peak SPL or below in only a subset of AR-15 conditions, (2) shorter barrel length and use of muzzle brake devices can substantially increase exposure level for the user, and (3) there are significant left/right ear sound pressure differences under suppressed conditions as a function of the AR-15 direct impingement design that must be considered during sound measurements to fully evaluate overall efficacy.


Asunto(s)
Armas de Fuego , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/etiología , Ruido/efectos adversos , Sonido , Diseño de Equipo , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/prevención & control , Humanos , Personal Militar , Ruido/prevención & control , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/prevención & control , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Policia , Recreación , Espectrografía del Sonido
16.
J Am Acad Audiol ; 24(8): 725-39, 2013 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24131608

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Human hearing is sensitive to sounds from as low as 20 Hz to as high as 20,000 Hz in normal ears. However, clinical tests of human hearing rarely include extended high-frequency (EHF) threshold assessments, at frequencies extending beyond 8000 Hz. EHF thresholds have been suggested for use monitoring the earliest effects of noise on the inner ear, although the clinical usefulness of EHF threshold testing is not well established for this purpose. PURPOSE: The primary objective of this study was to determine if EHF thresholds in healthy, young adult college students vary as a function of recreational noise exposure. RESEARCH DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of a laboratory database was conducted; all participants with both EHF threshold testing and noise history data were included. The potential for "preclinical" EHF deficits was assessed based on the measured thresholds, with the noise surveys used to estimate recreational noise exposure. STUDY SAMPLE: EHF thresholds measured during participation in other ongoing studies were available from 87 participants (34 male and 53 female); all participants had hearing within normal clinical limits (≤25 HL) at conventional frequencies (0.25-8 kHz). RESULTS: EHF thresholds closely matched standard reference thresholds [ANSI S3.6 (1996) Annex C]. There were statistically reliable threshold differences in participants who used music players, with 3-6 dB worse thresholds at the highest test frequencies (10-16 kHz) in participants who reported long-term use of music player devices (>5 yr), or higher listening levels during music player use. CONCLUSIONS: It should be possible to detect small changes in high-frequency hearing for patients or participants who undergo repeated testing at periodic intervals. However, the increased population-level variability in thresholds at the highest frequencies will make it difficult to identify the presence of small but potentially important deficits in otherwise normal-hearing individuals who do not have previously established baseline data.


Asunto(s)
Umbral Auditivo/fisiología , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/fisiopatología , Pruebas Auditivas/instrumentación , Música , Ruido , Estudiantes , Adolescente , Adulto , Audiometría de Tonos Puros , Femenino , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Valores de Referencia , Adulto Joven
17.
J Cancer Surviv ; 17(1): 17-26, 2023 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36637631

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Ototoxicity is considered a dose-limiting side effect of some chemotherapies. Hearing loss, in particular, can have significant implications for the quality of life for cancer survivors. Here, we review therapeutic approaches to mitigating ototoxicity related to chemotherapy. METHODS: Literature review. CONCLUSIONS: Numerous otoprotection strategies are undergoing active investigation. However, numerous challenges exist to confer adequate protection while retaining the anti-cancer efficacy of the chemotherapy. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Ototoxicity can have significant implications for cancer survivors, notably those receiving cisplatin. Clinical translation of multiple otoprotection approaches will aid in limiting these consequences.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Supervivientes de Cáncer , Ototoxicidad , Humanos , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Ototoxicidad/etiología , Calidad de Vida , Cisplatino/efectos adversos
18.
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol ; 8(2): 495-504, 2023 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37090882

RESUMEN

Objectives: Evaluate the relationship between cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors and cochlear function in African Americans. Methods: Relationships between hearing loss, cochlear function, and CVD risk factors were assessed in a cross-sectional analysis of 1106 Jackson Heart Study participants. Hearing loss was defined as puretone average (PTA0.5,1,2,4) > 15 dB HL. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) were collected for f 2 = 1.0-8.0 kHz. Two amplitude averages were computed: DPOAElow (f 2 ≤ 4 kHz) and DPOAEhigh (f 2 ≥ 6 kHz). Based on major CVD risk factors (diabetes, current smoking, total cholesterol ≥240 mg/dL or treatment, and systolic blood pressure [BP]/diastolic BP ≥ 140/≥90 mmHg or treatment), four risk groups were created: 0, 1, 2, and ≥3 risk factors. Logistic regression estimated the odds of hearing loss and absent/reduced DPOAElow and DPOAEhigh by CVD risk status adjusting for age, sex, education, BMI, vertigo, and noise exposure. Results: With multivariable adjustment, diabetes was associated with hearing loss (OR = 1.48 [95% CI: 1.04-2.10]). However, there was not a statistically significant relationship between CVD risk factors (individually or for overall risk) and DPOAEs. Conclusion: Diabetes was associated with hearing loss. Neither individual CVD risk factors nor overall risk showed a relationship to cochlear dysfunction. Level of Evidence: 2b.

19.
J Am Acad Audiol ; 2023 May 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37196669

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is a well-known metric to describe average/normal vision, 20/20, but the same agreed upon standard does not exist for hearing. The pure tone average has been advocated for such a metric. PURPOSE: We aimed to use a data driven approach to inform a universal metric for hearing status based on pure tone audiometry and perceived hearing difficulty (PHD). RESEARCH DESIGN: Cross-sectional national representative survey of the civilian non-institutionalized population in the United States. STUDY SAMPLE: Data from the 2011-2012 and 2015-2016 cycles of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) was used in our analysis. Of 9,444 participants aged 20-69 years old from the 2011-2012 and 2015-2016 cycles, we excluded those with missing self-reported hearing difficulty (n=8) and pure tone audiometry data (n=1,361). The main analysis sample, therefore, included 8,075 participants. We completed a sub-analysis limited to participants with "normal" hearing based on the WHO standard (pure tone average, PTA of 500, 1000, 2000, 4000 Hz < 20 dBHL). ANALYSIS: Descriptive analyses to calculate means and proportions were used to describe characteristics of the analysis sample across PHD levels relative to PTA. Four PTAs were compared, low frequency (LF-PTA, 500, 1000, 2000 Hz), four frequency PTA (PTA4, 500, 1000, 2000, 4000 Hz), high frequency (HF-PTA, 4000, 6000, 8000 Hz) and all frequency (AF-PTA, 500, 1000, 2000, 4000, 6000, 8000 Hz). Differences between groups were tested using Rao-Scott χ2 tests for categorical variables and F tests for continuous variables. Logistic regression was used to plot receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves with PHD as a function of PTA. The sensitivity and specificity for each PTA and PHD was also calculated. RESULTS: We found that 19.61% of adults aged 20-69 years reported PHD, with only 1.41% reporting greater than moderate PHD. The prevalence of reported PHD increased with higher decibel hearing levels (dBHL) categories reaching statistical significance (p < 0.05 with Bonferroni correction) at 6-10 dBHL for PTAs limited to lower frequencies (LF-PTA and PTA4) and 16-20 dBHL when limited to higher frequencies (HF-PTA). The prevalence of greater than moderate PHD reached statistical significance at 21-30 dBHL when limited to lower frequencies (LF-PTA) and 41-55 dBHL when limited to higher frequencies (HF-PTA). Forty percent of the sample had high frequency loss with normal low frequency hearing, representing nearly 70% of hearing loss configurations. The diagnostic accuracy of the PTAs for reported PHD was poor to sufficient (< 0.70), however the HF-PTA had the highest sensitivity (0.81). CONCLUSIONS: We provide three basic recommendations for clinical application based on our analysis. 1). A PTA based metric for hearing ability should include frequencies above 4000 Hz. 2). The data driven cutoff for any PHD/normal hearing is 15 dBHL. When considering greater than moderate PHD, the data driven cutoffs were more variable but estimated at 20-30 dBHL for LF-PTA, 30-35 for PTA4, 25-50 for AF-PTA, and 40-65 for HF-PTA. 3). Clinical recommendations and legislative agendas should include consideration beyond pure tone audiometry such as functional assessment of hearing and PHD.

20.
Otol Neurotol ; 44(5): e338-e342, 2023 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36893180

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine temperature and duration of cooling necessary for achieving cochlear mild therapeutic hypothermia (MTH) via ear canal cooling using cool water and earmold attached to a Peltier device. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Human temporal bone lab study performed at the University of Mississippi Medical Center. INTERVENTIONS: Cochlear cooling via the ear canal using water irrigation and an earmold attached to a Peltier device. Temperature analysis through implanted thermal probes within the cochlea. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Temperature changes in the cochlea. RESULTS: Irrigation of the ear canal with water resulted in achieving MTH in approximately 4 minutes using cool water (30°C) and in approximately 2 minutes using ice-chilled water. After 20 minutes, irrigation of the ear canal using cool water plateaued at a ∆2°C while cooling with ice-chilled water results in an average ∆4.5°C. We observed MTH using a medium-length earmold attached to a Peltier device after approximately 22 minutes of cooling and achieved a maximal average ∆ of 2.3°C after 60 minutes of cooling. Finally, we observed that a longer earmold (C2L) with greater proximity to the eardrum resulted in more efficient intracochlear temperature change, achieving MTH in approximately 16 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: MTH of the cochlea can be achieved with water-based ear canal irrigation and via a Peltier device connected to an aluminum earmold.


Asunto(s)
Hipotermia Inducida , Hielo , Humanos , Hipotermia Inducida/métodos , Cóclea , Hueso Temporal
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA