Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon vs Uncoated Balloon Angioplasty for Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in the Superficial Femoral and Popliteal Arteries: The COPA CABANA Trial.

Purpose: To investigate the efficacy and sustainability of drug-coated balloon (DCB) treatment of femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis (ISR). Materials and Methods: An investigator-initiated, prospective, multicenter, 1:1 randomized study enrolled 88 patients for treatment of ISR with DCB (n=47; mean age 68.3±9.6 years; 26 men) or uncoated balloon (n=41; mean age 67.6±10.2 years; 26 men) angioplasty (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01594684). Additionally, the protocol provided for an observational arm composed of patients from either randomized arm who experienced recurrent ISR ≥30 days after the index treatment. Redo treatment consisted of 2 DCBs sequentially inflated at the same location (double dose therapy). The majority of patients (66, 78%) had Rutherford category 3 ischemia. The mean lesion length was 140 mm; a third (27, 31%) were total occlusions. The primary endpoint was angiographic late lumen loss (LLL) at 6 months evaluated by an independent core laboratory. Results: Twenty-two patients (7 DCB +15 uncoated) were treated for recurrence with fully overlapping double DCB angioplasty. Six-month LLL was lower after DCB (0.34±1.12 mm) treatment than after angioplasty with an uncoated balloon (1.58±1.10 mm, p<0.001). At the 12-month follow-up, target lesion revascularization (TLR) was performed in 18 (49%) of 37 patients in the uncoated group, 6 (14%) of 43 patients in the single-dose DCB group (p=0.001), and no patients from the recurrent ISR group. At ~2 years after treatment, a remarkable number (14/27, 52%) of TLRs were recorded in the single-dose DCB group. Conclusion: Treatment with DCBs resulted in significantly less 6-month LLL and fewer TLRs up to 24 months than treatment with uncoated balloons. The double dose for treating recurrent ISR did not cause recognizable adverse events or require TLR up to 24 months.

A novel drug-coated scoring balloon for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis: Results from the multi-center randomized controlled PATENT-C first in human trial.

BACKGROUND: Scoring balloons produce excellent acute results in the treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR), fibro-calcific and bifurcation lesions but have not been shown to affect the restenosis rate. A novel paclitaxel-coated scoring balloon (SB) was developed and tested to overcome this limitation. METHODS AND RESULTS: SB were coated with paclitaxel admixed with a specific excipient. Patients at four clinical sites in Germany and one in Brazil with ISR of coronary bare metal stent (BMS) were randomized 1:1 to treatment with either a drug-coated or uncoated SB. Baseline and 6-month follow-up quantitative coronary angiography was performed by an independent blinded core lab and all patients will be evaluated clinically for up to one year. The primary endpoint was angiographic in-segment late lumen loss (LLL). Secondary endpoints included the rate of clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR), composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), stent thrombosis and other variables. Sixty-one patients were randomized (28 uncoated and 33 drug-coated SB); mean age 65 years, males 72%, and presence of diabetes 39%. At 6-month angiography, in-segment LLL was 0.48 ± 0.51 mm in the uncoated SB group versus 0.17 ± 0.40 mm in the drug-coated SB group (P = 0.01; ITT analysis). The rate of binary restenosis was 41% in the uncoated SB group versus 7% in the drug-coated SB group (P = 0.004). The MACE rate was 32% with the uncoated SB vs. 6% in the drug-coated SB group (P = 0.016). This difference was primarily due to the reduced need for clinically driven TLR in the coated SB group (3% vs. 32% P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: A novel paclitaxel-coated coronary SB has been developed and successfully used in a first-in-human randomized controlled trial [ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01495533]. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons: Investigation of Drug Transfer in Healthy and Atherosclerotic Arteries - First Experimental Results in Rabbits at Low Inflation Pressure.

PURPOSE: Beyond antiproliferative properties, paclitaxel exhibits anti-inflammatory activity, which might be beneficial in the local treatment of nonocclusive coronary artery disease. Paclitaxel release and tissue concentrations after paclitaxel-coated balloon treatment using different pressures have not been investigated so far. The aim of the study was to investigate in an atherosclerotic rabbit model whether drug transfer from paclitaxel-coated balloons into the vessel wall is affected by the presence of atherosclerotic lesions and to which extent it depends on the inflation pressure used. METHODS: Paclitaxel-coated balloons (3.5 µg/mm(2) paclitaxel) were inflated with pressures of 1, 2, or 6 atm (60s) in healthy (n = 39) and atherosclerotic (n = 22) arteries of New Zealand White Rabbits. Paclitaxel content in arterial walls (10 min after interventions) and paclitaxel remaining on balloons after treatment were analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: Median paclitaxel tissue concentrations were 829.3 µg/g (IQR 636.5-1487 µg/g) in healthy and 375.7 µg/g (IQR 169.8-771.6 µg/g) in atherosclerotic arteries (p = 0.0002). The paclitaxel tissue concentration was dependent on inflation pressure (1 atm vs. 2 atm vs. 6 atm) in atherosclerotic arteries (p = 0.0106) but not in healthy arteries (p ≥ 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Atherosclerotic lesions impede the transfer of paclitaxel into arterial walls. Higher inflation pressures resulted in an increased paclitaxel transfer in atherosclerotic but not in healthy arteries. However, it is assumed that the tissue concentrations achieved with an inflation pressure of 2 atm are potentially effective in this model.

Influence of a paclitaxel coated balloon in combination with a bare metal stent on restenosis and endothelial function: comparison with a drug eluting stent and a bare metal stent.

AIMS: Different approaches of local intravascular drug delivery may influence endothelial and microvascular function. The aim of this trial was to study the influence of a paclitaxel coated balloon in combination with a bare metal stent (DCB + BMS) versus a bare metal stent (BMS) or a sirolimus-eluting stent (DES) on coronary restenosis and endothelial function. METHODS AND RESULTS: This prospective trial included 77 patients with coronary de novo lesions. The patients were assigned to either one of the treatment groups. After 9 months, patients underwent angiographic follow-up including invasive measurement of coronary endothelial function. After 9 months, late lumen loss in-stent was highest in the BMS group (0.85 ± 0.73 mm), lower in DCB + BMS (0.36 ± 0.46 mm); and lowest in the DES group (0.25 ± 0.34 mm; P = 0.001 [ANOVA]). When compared to the BMS group, in-segment late lumen loss was significantly reduced in the DCB + BMS group (0.27 ± 0.43 mm vs. 0.60 ± 0.55 mm, P = 0.029) and the DES group (0.28 ± 0.40 mm, P = 0.045). Coronary flow reserve was significantly higher with the DCB + BMS treatment (3.16 ± 0.97 vs. 2.42 ± 0.99 [BMS], P = 0.036) whereas the increase in the DES group did not reach the significance level (3.06 ± 1.39, P = 0.144 vs. BMS). Parameters of endothelial function like intracoronary flow velocity and vessel diameter distal to the stented area showed similar patterns of response to adenosine, acetylcholine, and nitro in all groups. CONCLUSION: DES and the combination of DCB + BMS showed a significant reduction of late lumen loss as compared to a BMS alone. Furthermore, both types of local drug delivery were not associated with a deterioration of microvascular function at 9 months [ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00473499].

Inhibition of neo-intimal hyperplasia in porcine coronary arteries utilizing a novel paclitaxel-coated scoring balloon catheter.

OBJECTIVE: Scoring balloons are particularly useful in the acute treatment of fibro-calcific, bifurcation and in-stent restenosis lesions but have not been shown to affect the restenosis rate. Conventional balloons coated with paclitaxel have recently been shown to reduce restenosis rates in certain lesion subsets, but are associated with suboptimal acute results. A novel paclitaxel-coated scoring balloon was developed to overcome these limitations. DESIGN: AngioSculpt(®) scoring balloons (SB) were coated with paclitaxel admixed with a specific excipient. SETTING AND INTERVENTIONS: Four in vitro and in vivo studies were performed: (a) loss of the drug during passage to the lesion, (b) transfer of the drug to the vessel wall; (c) inhibition of neo-intimal proliferation in porcine coronary arteries as compared to uncoated SB and the Paccocath™, and (d) evaluation of the dose-response to 1.5-12 µg of paclitaxel/mm(2) . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTS: Drug loss during delivery to the lesion was 17% ± 8%, and transfer to the vessel wall was 9% ± 4% of dose on unused balloons. The paclitaxel-coated SB resulted in a lower late lumen loss of 0.27 ± 0.24 mm compared to 1.4 ± 0.7 mm with the uncoated SB (P = 0.001). Histomorphometry revealed larger luminal areas of 6.8 ± 1.6 mm(2) (paclitaxel-coated SB) and 5.8 ± 1.7 mm(2) (Paccocath) as compared to the uncoated SB (2.3 ± 1.5 mm(2) ; P = 0.001). No coating related adverse effects were observed on follow-up angiography or histologic examination at the treatment site or downstream myocardium. CONCLUSION: A novel paclitaxel-coated SB leads to a significant inhibition of neointimal proliferation in the porcine coronary model.

High-grade, non-flow-limiting dissections do not negatively impact long-term outcome after paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty: an additional analysis from the THUNDER study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of using paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCB) on outcome after post-angioplasty dissection in femoropopliteal arteries. METHODS: The angiograms obtained in the THUNDER study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00156624) were analyzed to compare degrees of dissection and angiographic parameters between the control (uncoated balloons, n=43) and treatment (PCBs, n=43) groups before and after the intervention and at 6-month follow-up. Furthermore, target lesion revascularizations (TLR) were documented up to 2 years. RESULTS: In each group, 24 (56%) patients had a dissection after the intervention. At the 6-month follow-up, patients with dissection of any grade after treatment with PCBs had significantly less late lumen loss (0.4 mm) than patients with dissection after treatment with uncoated balloons (1.9 mm, p=0.001) and a lower degree of stenosis (20% vs. 51%, respectively; p=0.003). Patients with severe dissection (grades C, D, or E) especially seemed to benefit from the PCBs, with late lumen loss of 0.4 mm vs. 2.4 mm for controls (p=0.05). The binary restenosis rate was also markedly lower in the PCB group (20%) than in the uncoated group (55%, p=0.02). In the 2-year follow-up, TLR was performed in 56% of patients in the control group compared to 10% of patients in the PCB group (p=0.002). CONCLUSION: The results of this subgroup analysis suggest that patients with dissection following treatment with a paclitaxel-coated balloon have a very acceptable outcome and stent implantation is not necessary as long as the dissection does not result in acute flow limitation.

Drug-Coated Balloons: Drugs Beyond Paclitaxel?

BACKGROUND: Although controversially discussed, paclitaxel is the only clinically proven drug that inhibits restenosis when released from drug-coated balloons (DCBs). Limus drugs are currently being explored as alternatives. The aim of the preclinical studies was to investigate drug candidates beyond paclitaxel considered for balloon coating. METHODS: Drugs were tested with respect to dissolution in organic solvents, coating on balloons, and drug transfer to the vessel wall. Inhibition of neointimal proliferation was tested in the porcine model of coronary in-stent stenosis. Intravascular drug treatment was achieved by DCBs at the time of stent implantation. RESULTS: Coating had to be adjusted for each drug. Doses on the balloons ranged from 1.0 to 8.6 µg/mm2 balloon surface. Satisfactory amounts of drug ranging from 5% to 29% of initial doses were transferred into the vessel wall. Angiographic parameters such as late lumen loss (LLL) at 4 weeks did not show reduction of in-stent neointimal proliferation by treatment with arsenic trioxide (0.87 ± 0.44 mm), betamethasone dipropionate (1.00 ± 0.54 mm), bortezomib (1.74 ± 0.46 mm), green tea extract (1.24 ± 0.51 mm), fantolon, an epothilone (0.86 ± 0.61 mm), methotrexate (1.09 ± 0.72 mm), and thalidomide (1.59 ± 0.55 mm) compared to treatment with uncoated balloons (1.07 ± 0.60 mm), while coatings with paclitaxel reliably reduced in-stent stenosis (LLL = 0.36 ± 0.25 mm). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the proven antiproliferative and/or anti-inflammatory effect of the drugs, none of the coatings significantly reduced LLL compared to uncoated balloons and thus, based on the results presented here, none of the tested coatings may be considered a substitute for the paclitaxel-based coatings currently in clinical use.

Improvement of Outcome for Treatment of 'Restenosis-prone' Vascular Lesions? Potential Impact of the Paclitaxel dose on Late Lumen Loss in Porcine Peripheral Arteries.

PURPOSE: Clinical data indicate that the drug density on drug-coated balloons (DCBs) might have a role on treatment effect and durability. The aim of the current study was to investigate inhibition of neointimal formation and potential adverse effects after treatment with a novel double-dose DCB in swine. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A four-week study was performed in peripheral arteries of 12 domestic pigs after vessel injury and stent implantation. The novel double-dose DCB with 6-µg paclitaxel (Ptx)/mm2 balloon surface (1 × 6) was compared to a standard DCB with 3.5 µg Ptx/mm2 (3.5) and uncoated balloons (POBA). Potential adverse effects were stimulated by using three fully overlapping DCBs with 6 µg Ptx/mm2 each (3 × 6). Quantitative angiography, histomorphometry and histopathological analyses were performed. RESULTS: Higher paclitaxel doses per square millimeter of treated arteries were associated with reduced late lumen loss (LLL) in quantitative angiography 4 weeks after treatment (POBA: 0.91 ± 0.75 mm; 3.5: 0.45 ± 0.53 mm; 1 × 6: 0.21 ± 0.41 mm; 3 × 6: - 0.38 ± 0.65 mm). In histomorphometry, maximal neointimal thickness and neointimal area were the lowest for the 1 × 6 group (0.15 ± 0.06 mm/1.5 ± 0.4 mm2), followed by 3 × 6 (0.20 ± 0.07 mm/1.8 ± 0.4 mm2), 3.5 (0.22 ± 0.12 mm/2.2 ± 1.1 mm2) and POBA (0.30 ± 0.07 mm/3.2 ± 0.7 mm2). Downstream tissue showed histopathological changes in all groups including POBA, in larger number and different quality (e.g., edema, inflammation, vessel wall necrosis, vasculitis and perivasculitis) in the 3 × 6 group, which did not cause clinical or functional abnormalities throughout the study. CONCLUSION: Treatment with the double-dose DCB (6 µg Ptx/mm2) tended to increase inhibition of in-stent neointimal formation and to diminish LLL after peripheral intervention in the porcine model compared to a market-approved DCB with 3.5 µg Ptx/mm2.

Local delivery of paclitaxel to inhibit restenosis during angioplasty of the leg.

BACKGROUND: Drug-eluting stents reduce restenosis in coronary arteries, but clinical trials have failed to prove their efficacy in peripheral arteries. We investigated the use of paclitaxel-coated angioplasty balloons and paclitaxel dissolved in the angiographic contrast medium during angioplasty of the leg. METHODS: In a small, multicenter trial, we randomly assigned 154 patients with stenosis or occlusion of a femoropopliteal artery to treatment with standard balloon catheters coated with paclitaxel, uncoated balloons with paclitaxel dissolved in the contrast medium, or uncoated balloons without paclitaxel (control). The primary end point was late lumen loss at 6 months. RESULTS: The mean (+/-SD) age of the patients was 68+/-8 years, 24% were smokers, and 49% had diabetes. Twenty-seven percent of the lesions were total occlusions, and 36% were restenotic lesions. The mean lesion length was 7.4+/-6.5 cm. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the groups. There were no adverse events attributable to the paclitaxel-coated balloons. At 6 months, the mean late lumen loss was 1.7+/-1.8 mm in the control group, as compared with 0.4+/-1.2 mm (P<0.001) in the group treated with paclitaxel-coated balloons and 2.2+/-1.6 mm (P=0.11) in the group treated with paclitaxel in the contrast medium. The rate of revascularization of target lesions at 6 months was 20 of 54 (37%) in the control group, 2 of 48 (4%) in the group treated with paclitaxel-coated balloons (P<0.001 vs. control), and 15 of 52 (29%) in the group treated with paclitaxel in the contrast medium (P=0.41 vs. control); at 24 months, the rates increased to 28 of 54 (52%), 7 of 48 (15%), and 21 of 52 (40%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Use of paclitaxel-coated angioplasty balloons during percutaneous treatment of femoropopliteal disease is associated with significant reductions in late lumen loss and target-lesion revascularization. No significant benefit is seen with the use of a paclitaxel-containing contrast medium. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00156624 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

A novel paclitaxel coated balloon with increased drug transfer for treatment of complex vascular lesions.

BACKGROUND: Drug coated balloons (DCB) with paclitaxel (Ptx) dose of 2-3.5 µg/mm2 balloon surface inhibit restenosis with different effectiveness and duration of success. A clinical dose finding study is not known for any of the currently marketed products. The aim of the present preclinical trial was to investigate a novel DCB coated with 6 µg Ptx/mm2 in a porcine model. METHODS AND RESULTS: The current study investigated a DCB with a novel, modified iopromide based matrix with 6 µg Ptx/mm2. Drug transfer to the vessel wall of peripheral arteries was compared with a dose of 3 µg Ptx/mm2 and two fully overlapping DCB with 3 µg Ptx/mm2, each. Ptx concentration in the vessel wall after drug transfer was about twice as high for balloons with 6 µg/mm2 (1957±1472 µg/g) and two overlapping DCB with 3 µg Ptx/mm2, each (1287±619 µg/g) compared to a single balloon with 3 µg Ptx/mm2, (787±738 µg/g), with statistical significant differences for 1x6 µg/mm2 vs. 1x3 µg/mm2 (p = 0.017) but not for 2x3 µg/mm2 vs. 1x3 µg/mm2 (p = 0.184) and 1x6 µg/mm2 vs. 2x3 µg/mm2 (p = 0.178). The proportion of residual Ptx on balloon after treatment was similar for all groups between 6±1% and 10±3% of dose on balloon. CONCLUSION: The dose of 6 µg Ptx/mm2 was successfully as well as reproducibly coated on conventional balloon catheters. Increased Ptx on balloons resulted in increased drug concentration in the vessel wall. A single balloon with 6 µg Ptx/mm2 seems to provide double dose compared to 3 µg Ptx/mm2, facilitates the procedure, and may reduce medico-economic cost compared to the use of two standard DCB.

Efficacy and safety of a magnesium stearate paclitaxel coated balloon catheter in the porcine coronary model.

BACKGROUND: Local administration of growth-inhibiting substances such as paclitaxel or sirolimus could reduce the risk of restenosis. In the drug coated balloon (DCB) technology the coating and the applied dose seem to play a major role. The aim of the present preclinical studies was to investigate the efficacy and safety of a specific DCB with paclitaxel as active ingredient and magnesium stearate as excipient. METHODS: Evaluation of the coating, drug release and transfer was done ex vivo and in vivo on peripheral arteries. A porcine coronary stent model was chosen to provoke intimal thickening. Conventional uncoated balloons were compared with paclitaxel urea and paclitaxel magnesium stearate coated balloons. QCA and histomorphometry was performed on treated vessels. Three areas of the heart were histologically examined for pathological changes. RESULTS: QCA and histomorphometry revealed no differences in baseline data between treatment groups. All DCB groups showed a significant reduction of angiographic and histologic parameters describing neointimal formation 4 weeks after treatment (e.g. mean angiographic late lumen loss all coated 0.31 ± 0.18 mm versus 0.91 ± 0.37 mm in the uncoated balloon group). There were no device-related animal deaths or clinical abnormalities. In spite of very slight-to-slight microscopic findings limited to small arterial vessels in downstream tissue there was no change in left ventricular ejection fraction or angiographic presentation of small side branches of treated arteries. CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel DCB using stearate as excipient show a high efficacy in reducing neointima formation after experimental coronary intervention. No evidence of myocardial damage resulting from distal embolization was found.

Paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter versus paclitaxel-coated stent for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of in-stent restenosis with paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter as compared with plain balloon angioplasty has shown surprisingly low late lumen loss at 6 months and fewer major adverse cardiac events up to 2 years. We compared the efficacy and safety of a paclitaxel-coated balloon with a paclitaxel-eluting stent as the current standard of care. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred thirty-one patients with coronary in-stent restenosis were randomly assigned to treatment by a paclitaxel-coated balloon (3 microg/mm2) or a paclitaxel-eluting stent. The main inclusion criteria encompassed diameter stenosis of > or =70% and < or =22 mm in length, with a vessel diameter of 2.5 to 3.5 mm. The primary end point was angiographic in-segment late lumen loss. Quantitative coronary angiography revealed no differences in baseline parameters. At 6 months follow-up, in-segment late lumen loss was 0.38+/-0.61 mm in the drug-eluting stent group versus 0.17+/-0.42 mm (P=0.03) in the drug-coated balloon group, resulting in a binary restenosis rate of 12 of 59 (20%) versus 4 of 57 (7%; P=0.06). At 12 months, the rate of major adverse cardiac events were 22% and 9%, respectively (P=0.08). This difference was primarily due to the need for target lesion revascularization in 4 patients (6%) in the coated-balloon group, compared with 10 patients (15%) in the stent group (P=0.15). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis with the paclitaxel-coated balloon was at least as efficacious and as well tolerated as the paclitaxel-eluting stent. For the treatment of in-stent restenosis, inhibition of re-restenosis does not require a second stent implantation.

Inhibition of restenosis in femoropopliteal arteries: paclitaxel-coated versus uncoated balloon: femoral paclitaxel randomized pilot trial.

BACKGROUND: The success of percutaneous intervention in peripheral arterial disease is limited by restenosis. The aim of the present pilot study was to evaluate a novel method of local drug delivery. METHODS AND RESULTS: This randomized multicenter study with blinded reading enrolled 87 patients in Rutherford class 1 to 4 with occlusion or hemodynamically relevant stenosis, restenosis, or in-stent restenosis of femoropopliteal arteries. Treatment was performed by either conventional uncoated or paclitaxel-coated balloon catheters. The primary end point was late lumen loss at 6 months. Secondary end points included restenosis rate, ankle brachial index, Rutherford class, target lesion revascularization, and tolerance up to >18 months. Before intervention, there were no significant differences in lesion characteristics such as reference diameter (5.3+/-1.1 versus 5.2+/-1.0 mm), degree of stenosis (84+/-11% versus 84+/-16%), proportion of restenotic lesions (36% versus 33%), and mean lesion length (5.7 cm [0.8 to 22.6 cm] versus 6.1 cm [0.9 to 19.3 cm]) between treatment groups. The 6-month follow-up angiography performed in 31 of 45 and 34 of 42 patients showed less late lumen loss in the coated balloon group (0.5+/-1.1 versus 1.0+/-1.1 mm; P=0.031). The number of target lesion revascularizations was lower in the paclitaxel-coated balloon group than in control subjects (3 of 45 versus 14 of 42 patients; P=0.002). Improvement in Rutherford class was greater in the coated balloon group (P=0.045), whereas the improvement in ankle brachial index was not different. The difference in target lesion revascularizations between treatment groups was maintained up to >18 months. No adverse events were assessed as related to balloon coating. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot trial, paclitaxel balloon coating caused no obvious adverse events and reduced restenosis in patients undergoing angioplasty of femoropopliteal arteries.

Treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis with a paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis is hampered by a high incidence of recurrent in-stent restenosis. We assessed the efficacy and safety of a paclitaxel-coated balloon in this setting. METHODS: We enrolled 52 patients with in-stent restenosis in a randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial to compare the effects of a balloon catheter coated with paclitaxel (3 microg per square millimeter of balloon surface area) with those of an uncoated balloon catheter in coronary angioplasty. The primary end point was late luminal loss as seen on angiography. Secondary end points included the rates of restenosis (a binary variable) and major adverse cardiac events. RESULTS: Multivessel disease was present in 80% of patients in both groups. Quantitative coronary angiography revealed no significant differences in baseline measures. At 6 months, angiography showed that the mean (+/-SD) in-segment late luminal loss was 0.74+/-0.86 mm in the uncoated-balloon group versus 0.03+/-0.48 mm in the coated-balloon group (P=0.002). A total of 10 of 23 patients (43%) in the uncoated-balloon group had restenosis, as compared with 1 of 22 patients (5%) in the coated-balloon group (P=0.002). At 12 months, the rate of major adverse cardiac events was 31% in the uncoated-balloon group and 4% in the coated-balloon group (P=0.01). This difference was primarily due to the need for target-lesion revascularization in six patients in the uncoated-balloon group (P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis with paclitaxel-coated balloon catheters significantly reduced the incidence of restenosis. These data suggest that the inhibition of restenosis by local drug delivery may not require stent implantation and sustained drug release at the site of injury. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00106587 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Drug-eluting balloon: very short-term exposure and overlapping.

Paclitaxel balloon coating has shown promising effects in inhibiting restenosis in initial clinical trials. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the influence of two critical features of drug-eluting balloon (DEB) application - inflation time and increased dose due to overlapping balloons. Fifty-six stainless steel stents were implanted in the left anterior descending and circumflex coronary arteries of 28 domestic pigs using a 1.2:1.0 overstretch ratio. Stents were mounted on conventional uncoated and paclitaxel-coated angioplasty balloon catheters. The animals were randomized to five different treatments with a range of short (10 seconds [s] inflation using 1 DEB) to extended (2x60 s inflation using 2 DEB) intima contact time. After 28 days, quantitative angiography and histomorphometry of the stented arteries was performed on a total of 23 pigs. Paclitaxel balloon coating led to a marked reduction of parameters characterizing in-stent stenosis: Late lumen loss was 1.37 +/- 0.49 mm for uncoated balloons, 0.23 +/- 0.42 mm for one coated balloon 60 s inflation time, 0.37 +/- 0.28 mm for 10 s inflation time and 0.30 +/- 0.19 mm for the vessel segment treated by two coated balloons with 60 s inflation each. Neointimal areas were 4.26 +/- 1.18, 1.68 +/- 0.23, 1.83 +/- 0.40 and 1.67 +/- 0.46 mm(2), respectively (p = 0.001 versus control, p > 0.05 between paclitaxel-treated groups). Despite the marked reduction of neointimal proliferation, endothelialization of stent struts was present in all samples. DEB were found to effectively reduce neointimal proliferation regardless of inflation time and dose within the tested range. No adverse reactions were seen as dose was increased to more than three times the clinically tested dose.

[Introduction of a MR-compatible system for extracorporal perfusion of vital organs for MR-guided procedures--first-experiences]. / Einsatz eines MR-kompatiblen Organperfusionssystems für physiologische Ex-vivo-Experimente im MRT--Erste Erfahrungen mit einem Tierversuchsersatzsystem.

PURPOSE: To represent a MRI-compatible perfusion-system for extracorporeal perfusion of vital organs which permits the realisation of realistic experiments in a MR scanner. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed MR examinations of explanted porcine livers and MR-guided interventions in porcine livers. Explanted organs were hemo-perfused under physiological conditions during the experiments. MR-sequences for diagnostic and interventional examinations were used. RESULTS: The evaluated system was MRI-compatible. The achieved image quality of the used sequences showed excellent anatomical resolution. Planned experiments can be carried out with relatively low expenditure. Diagnostic as well as interventional investigations can be carried out. The used organs showed a stable function within physiological parameters up to 4 hours. CONCLUSION: It is possible to perform ex vivo experiments under in vivo conditions with this system. With the used MR-compatible system MR-guided experimental interventions and thermal ablations can be carried out in explanted organs under in vivo conditions.

Correction to: Impact of Patient and Lesion Characteristics on Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty in the Femoropopliteal Artery: A Pooled Analysis of Four Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trials.

In their recently published pooled analysis of four drug-coated balloon (DCB) studies, which focused on the impact of patient and lesion characteristics on LLL at 6 months (Albrecht T et al. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2018 Dec 11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-018-2137-3 ), the authors reported slightly inaccurate 2-year mortality rates.

Impact of Patient and Lesion Characteristics on Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty in the Femoropopliteal Artery: A Pooled Analysis of Four Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trials.

OBJECTIVES: The principal objective of this pooled analysis was to investigate various patient and lesion characteristics on late lumen loss (LLL) after drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty. BACKGROUND: Four randomized controlled trials (THUNDER, FEMPAC, PACIFIER, CONSEQUENT) were pooled to investigate the influence of various patient and lesion characteristics on DCB angioplasty and on plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) in patients with femoropopliteal artery disease. METHODS: Angiographic data from 355 patients were pooled to assess the impact of patient (demographics, cardiovascular risk factors, cardiovascular co-morbidities, Rutherford stages) and lesion-/procedure-related (location, occlusion, length, restenosis, calcification, subintimal crossing, post-dilatation, dissection, stenting) characteristics on LLL. Linear regression models were utilized with LLL as the dependent variable to determine the predictive value of cardiovascular and lesion-/procedure-related factors. RESULTS: Observational statistics revealed that LLL was lower in the DCB group as compared to POBA independent of all tested patient variables. LLL after DCB was also independent of most lesion and procedural characteristics except for lesion length and bailout stenting. LLL increased with lesion length in both treatment groups. Bailout stenting did not improve LLL in the DCB group but did so in the POBA group (0.74 ± 1.07 mm vs. 1.22 ± 1.36 mm, p = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: DCB was superior to POBA for all tested patient subgroups and lesion subgroups. Our results suggest that all patients and lesions benefit to a similar degree from the use of DCB. DCB-PTA should therefore be preferred to POBA in all patients with steno-occlusive femoropopliteal lesions.

Contrast agents: X-ray contrast agents and molecular imaging--a contradiction?

It is the purpose of this article to discuss whether and how X-ray contrast media may contribute to molecular imaging. X-ray contrast media are small molecules containing heavy elements, preferentially iodine. Modern CT allows precise, fast and reliable quantification of contrast media concentrations in large volumes with excellent spatial resolution throughout the body. The main disadvantage is the low contrast sensitivity requiring iodine concentrations of > or =0.5 mg/ml. Various approaches of the past and the present to specific contrast agents reflecting physiological, cellular or molecular processes are presented and options for the future are discussed.

Drug Distribution and Basic Pharmacology of Paclitaxel/Resveratrol-Coated Balloon Catheters.

PURPOSE: To experimentally investigate a new homogenously paclitaxel/resveratrol-coated balloon catheter in terms of transport of the coating to the treated tissue and local effects including histology and functional tests. METHODS: Adherence of the coating to the balloon was explored by in vitro simulation of its passage to the lesion. Paclitaxel and resveratrol transfer to the vessel wall was investigated in porcine coronary and peripheral arteries. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) was used for direct microscopic visualization of paclitaxel in arterial tissue. Inhibition of neointimal proliferation and tolerance of complete coating and resveratrol-only coating was investigated in pigs 4 weeks after treatment, and the effect of resveratrol on inflammation and healing after 3 and 7 days. RESULTS: Drug loss on the way to the lesion was < 10% of dose, while 65 ± 13% was detected at the site of balloon inflation. After treatment similar proportions of drug were detected in coronary and peripheral arteries, i.e., 7.4 ± 4.6% of dose or 125 ± 74 ng/mg tissue. MALDI showed circumferential deposition. Inhibition of neointimal proliferation by paclitaxel/resveratrol coating was significant (p = 0.001) whereas resveratrol-only coating did not inhibit neointimal proliferation. During the first week after treatment of peripheral arteries with resveratrol-only balloons, we observed nominally less inflammation and fibrin deposition along with a significant macrophage reduction and more pronounced re-endothelialization. No safety issues emerged including left ventricular ejection fraction for detection of potential distal embolization after high-dose treatment of coronary arteries. CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel/resveratrol-coated balloons were effective and safe in animal studies. Beyond acting as excipient resveratrol may contribute to vascular healing.