Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Surgeon ; 18(6): e72-e77, 2020 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32690463

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Throughout the United Kingdom, there have been sweeping changes to the practice of medicine due to the COVID-19 pandemic. For the surgical speciality, there have been changes to both elective and emergency practice. Concern regarding potential aerosolisation during invasive procedures have been raised - including the use of pneumoperitoneum to facilitate laparoscopy. The aim of this study is to systematically review the data available to date regarding the potential risk posed to theatre staff by laparoscopy. METHOD: A systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Only publications in peer-reviewed journals were considered. PubMed, Ovid Embase, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Library were searched. The search period was between 1st January 1980 and 27th April 2020. Bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. RESULTS: 4209 records were identified, resulting in 9 unique studies being selected. The included studies examined viral DNA aerosoliation generated by electrosurgery and CO2 laser ablation, with one study examining viral DNA aerosolisation following laparoscopy. Each of these demonstrated that viral DNA (Hepatitis B Virus and Human Papilloma Virus) was detectable in the surgical smoke plume. CONCLUSION: The data and analysis reported in this study reflect the most up-to-date evidence available for the surgeon to assess risk towards healthcare staff. It was constrained by heterogeneity of reporting for several outcomes and lack of comparable studies. There is currently insufficient data to recommend open or a minimally invasive surgical approach with regard to theatre team safety in the COVID-19 era.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus/transmisión , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Paciente a Profesional , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Neumonía Viral/transmisión , COVID-19 , Humanos , Control de Infecciones , Pandemias , Medición de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2
2.
Dis Esophagus ; 25(8): 709-15, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22243663

RESUMEN

Detection of bone marrow micrometastases (BMMs) in patients with esophageal carcinoma may indicate a metastatic phenotype. We assessed if the presence of BMMs had adverse prognostic significance in a 10-year follow-up study. Patients undergoing surgery for esophageal cancer were prospectively recruited between February 1999 and August 2000. Bone marrow aspirates were obtained from the iliac crest of patients under general anesthesia at the time of surgery. Immunocytochemical analysis using anticytokeratin antibodies CAM 5.2 and AE1/AE3 was undertaken to determine the presence of BMMs. Union International Contre le Cancer staging was recorded for all patients. Patient follow-up was completed over a 10-year period through analysis of the Northern Ireland Cancer Registry. Forty-two patients (male = 35) were included, with a mean age of 67.2 years (range 39-83). BMMs were detected in 19 patients (45.2%). International Contre le Cancer tumor staging was stage I = 6, stage II = 10, stage III = 24, and stage IV = 2. BMMs were associated with lymphovascular invasion (P= 0.02) and advanced T stage (P= 0.02). Overall, 10-year survival was 21.4% (n= 9), with a median follow-up of 877.5 days (interquartile range 391.5-2546.3). There was no statistically significant difference between the survival of patients with or without BMMs (1451.4 vs. 1431.6 days, P= 0.99). Univariate analysis demonstrated a trend toward decreased survival for patients with positive lymph nodes (P= 0.07), an increased T stage (P= 0.06), and lymphovascular invasion (P= 0.07). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that none of the variables were significant predictors of mortality. Although the presence of BMMs correlates with recognized adverse tumor characteristics in patients with esophageal cancer, micrometastases detected in the bone marrow at time of surgery does not influence long-term survival.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Médula Ósea/secundario , Carcinoma/secundario , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Micrometástasis de Neoplasia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Vasos Sanguíneos/patología , Carcinoma/patología , Carcinoma/terapia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Metástasis Linfática , Vasos Linfáticos/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Invasividad Neoplásica , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Tasa de Supervivencia
3.
Br J Biomed Sci ; 69(2): 71-5, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22872931

RESUMEN

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is an angiogenic cytokine that regulates tumour angiogenesis. The prognostic significance of VEGF expression remains incompletely investigated for patients with oesophagogastric cancer. This study assesses the significance of tumour VEGF (T-VEGF) and circulating VEGF (C-VEGF) expression in a 10-year follow-up of patients with oesophagogastric cancer. Patients undergoing surgical resection were prospectively recruited between February 1999 and August 2000. Circulating VEGF, derived both from plasma (P-VEGF) and serum (S-VEGF), and T-VEGF were assessed using a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). As platelet count may contribute to C-VEGF, pre-operative platelet levels were also recorded to exclude a confounding effect. Patients were followed up over a 10-year period using the Northern Ireland Cancer Registry. Sixty-one patients were recruited (men=45) with a mean age of 65.7 years. The 10-year survival was 19.7% (n=12) with a median follow-up of 808 days (inter-quartile range [IQR]: 349.5-2358.5). Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) tumour staging was Stage I=9 (14.8%), Stage II=15 (24.6%), Stage III=33 (54.1%) and Stage IV=4 (6.6%). The only significant relationship between clinicopathological features and the study variables was for S-VEGF, which was elevated in patients with advanced T-stage (P = 0.05). Circulating VEGF did not correlate with platelet count. Although a trend towards decreased survival was observed for patients who had positive lymph nodes (P = 0.08) and advanced UICC stage (P = 0.09) on univariate analysis, only lymphovascular invasion significantly predicted poor prognosis in this cohort (P = 0.05). Therefore, ELISA quantification of circulatory or tumour VEGF does not appear to be a significant predictor of mortality in patients with oesophagogastric cancer.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/sangre , Neoplasias Esofágicas/sangre , Neoplasias Gástricas/genética , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/biosíntesis , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática/métodos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Metástasis Linfática , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neovascularización Patológica , Recuento de Plaquetas , Pronóstico
4.
Int J Biol Markers ; 17(2): 119-24, 2002.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12113578

RESUMEN

In patients with cancer circulating vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) may be tumor-derived and have prognostic significance. Activated platelets may also be a source of VEGF, releasing it in serum formation. Debate exists as to whether serum or plasma VEGF (S-VEGF, P-VEGF) is the most appropriate surrogate marker of tumor angiogenesis. As healing wounds produce VEGF that can spill over into the circulation, we aimed to investigate the potential confounding effects of cancer surgery on both perioperative S-VEGF and P-VEGF levels and to evaluate their relationship with platelet count. S-VEGF, P-VEGF and platelet counts were measured in 23 patients undergoing esophageal cancer resection. Samples were taken preoperatively and six weeks following surgery. Seven patients were also sampled on postoperative days 1, 5 and 10. VEGF was assayed using a commercial enzyme linked immunosorbent assay. S-VEGF and P-VEGF both rose after surgery (S-VEGF; day 5: 1017 [446-1224] pg/mL and day 10: 1231 [626-2046] pg/mL versus pre-op: 329 [189-599] pg/mL. P-VEGF; day 1: 55 [46-104] pg/mL and day 10: 58 [20-154] pg/mL versus pre-op: 23 [13-46] pg/mL), falling towards preoperative levels by six weeks. Platelet count correlated with S-VEGF (rho=0.281; p<0.05, Spearman's rank) and P-VEGF (rho=0.330; p<0.01, Spearman's rank). Platelets may contribute to VEGF levels in plasma as well as in serum. The effects of surgery on S-VEGF or P-VEGF levels are mainly transient. Care must be exercised when interpreting circulating VEGF levels in the early postoperative period.


Asunto(s)
Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial/sangre , Neoplasias Esofágicas/sangre , Esofagectomía , Péptidos y Proteínas de Señalización Intercelular/sangre , Linfocinas/sangre , Recuento de Plaquetas , Anciano , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular , Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA