An Online Educational Program for Individuals With Dissociative Disorders and Their Clinicians: 1-Year and 2-Year Follow-Up.

Individuals with dissociative disorders (DDs) are underrecognized, underserved, and often severely psychiatrically ill, characterized by marked dissociative and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms with significant disability. Patients with DD have high rates of nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) and suicide attempts. Despite this, there is a dearth of training about DDs. We report the outcome of a web-based psychoeducational intervention for an international sample of 111 patients diagnosed with dissociative identity disorder (DID) or other complex DDs. The Treatment of Patients with Dissociative Disorders Network (TOP DD Network) program was designed to investigate whether, over the course of a web-based psychoeducational program, DD patients would exhibit improved functioning and decreased symptoms, including among patients typically excluded from treatment studies for safety reasons. Using video, written, and behavioral practice exercises, the TOP DD Network program provided therapists and patients with education about DDs as well as skills for improving emotion regulation, managing safety issues, and decreasing symptoms. Participation was associated with reductions in dissociation and PTSD symptoms, improved emotion regulation, and higher adaptive capacities, with overall sample |d|s = 0.44-0.90, as well as reduced NSSI. The improvements in NSSI among the most self-injurious patients were particularly striking. Although all patient groups showed significant improvements, individuals with higher levels of dissociation demonstrated greater and faster improvement compared to those lower in dissociation |d|s = 0.54-1.04 vs. |d|s  = 0.24-0.75, respectively. These findings support dissemination of DD treatment training and initiation of treatment studies with randomized controlled designs.

Spanish Abstracts by Asociación Chilena de Estrés Traumático (ACET) Un programa educativo online para personas con trastornos disociativos y sus médicos: Seguimiento de uno y dos años INTERVENCIÓN ONLINE PARA TRASTORNOS DISOCIATIVOS Las personas con trastornos disociativos (TDs) se encuentran sub-reconocidas, con pocos servicios y, a menudo, con enfermedades psiquiátricas graves, caracterizadas por marcados síntomas disociativos y de trastorno de estrés postraumático (TEPT) con discapacidad significativa. Los pacientes con TD tienen altas tasas de autolesión no suicida (ALNS) e intentos de suicidio. A pesar de esto, hay una escasez de entrenamiento sobre los TDs. Reportamos el resultado de una intervención psicoeducativa basado en la web para una muestra internacional de 111 pacientes diagnosticados con trastorno de identidad disociativa (TID) u otros TDs complejos. El programa de la Red de Tratamiento de Pacientes con Trastornos Disociativos (TOP DD Network, en su denominación en inglés) se diseñó para investigar si, en el transcurso de un programa psicoeducativo basado en la web, los pacientes con TD exhibirían un mejor funcionamiento y reducción de síntomas, incluso en los pacientes que generalmente han sido excluidos de los estudios de tratamiento por razones de seguridad. Mediante el uso de videos, ejercicios de escritura y prácticas conductuales, el programa TOP DD Network brindó a los terapeutas y los pacientes educación sobre los TDs y las habilidades para mejorar la regulación de las emociones, manejar los problemas de seguridad, y disminuir los síntomas. La participación se asoció con reducciones en los síntomas de disociación y de TEPT, mejor regulación de las emociones y mayores capacidades de adaptación, muestra total ds = .44-.90, así como reducción de ALNS. Las mejoras en ALNS entre los pacientes más auto-agresivos fueron particularmente sorprendentes. Aunque todos los grupos de pacientes mostraron mejoras significativas, los individuos con niveles más altos de disociación demostraron una mejoría mayor y más rápida en comparación con los más bajos en disociación |d|s = .54-1.04 vs. |d|s = .24-.75, respectivamente. Estos hallazgos apoyan la diseminación de la capacitación en el tratamiento del TD y el inicio de estudios de tratamiento con diseños controlados aleatorios.

Relations among peritraumatic dissociation and posttraumatic stress: a critical review.

This paper critically reviews the empirical literature addressing the relationship of peritraumatic dissociation to posttraumatic stress. PSYCHLIT and MEDLINE literature searches were conducted to identify relevant studies. The list of articles generated was supplemented by a review of their bibliographies, which resulted in a total of 53 empirical studies. These studies were classified according to the type of potentially traumatizing event investigated and discussed. In the majority of studies, evidence was found for a positive association between peritraumatic dissociation and posttraumatic stress. However, research in this area is limited by several methodological differences and shortcomings with respect to study design, sample characteristics, measurement instruments, and control for moderating or mediating variables. In addition, research is also limited by conceptual problems and the lack of specific time parameters for the occurrence of peritraumatic dissociation. The literature is evaluated according to these methodological differences or shortcomings, and directions for future research are provided.

Dependency in the Treatment of Complex Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Dissociative Disorders.

Dependency is a major and ubiquitous issue in the treatment of chronically traumatized patients, such as those with complex posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), trauma-related borderline personality disorder, and dissociative disorders. Within this context, the concept of dependency is often paired with pejorative adjectives, and is dichotomized and negatively compared to a preferred state of independence. This paper explores prevailing sociocultural and theoretical beliefs regarding dependency in the psychotherapy of trauma survivors, provides a working definition of dependency, offers an analysis of its complex nature, and describes the theory of structural dissociation, which helps illuminate the often contradictory manifestations of dependency in chronically traumatized patients. A distinction is made between secure and insecure dependency. Finally, this paper outlines the collaborative therapeutic process required to manage insecure dependency productively within a phase-oriented treatment model. Countertransference responses that interfere with a patient's conflicts regarding dependency are also discussed.

Relations among peritraumatic dissociation and posttraumatic stress: a meta-analysis.

A meta-analysis was performed on the empirical literature which addressed the relationship of peritraumatic dissociation to posttraumatic stress (PTS). Extensive literature searches were conducted to identify as many relevant studies as possible, and revealed 59 independent eligible studies. All studies were coded using a detailed code sheet that included effect measures, variables that indicated the methodological quality of the studies, and substantial variables that might theoretically affect the relationship between peritraumatic dissociation and PTS. A significant positive relation between peritraumatic dissociation and PTS was found. Differences in the methodological rigor between studies - time elapsed since peritraumatic dissociation, design, sample type, and study type - significantly and sufficiently explained the variability in effect sizes between studies. Theoretical variables did not explain such variability. Although results underline earlier findings, due to designs of the reviewed studies no conclusions could be drawn as to causal relations between peritraumatic dissociation and PTS.

Dissociation: An insufficiently recognized major feature of complex posttraumatic stress disorder.

The role of dissociation in (complex) posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has been insufficiently recognized for at least two reasons: the view that dissociation is a peripheral, not a central feature of PTSD, and existing confusion regarding the nature of dissociation. In this conceptual article, the authors address both issues by postulating that traumatization essentially involves some degree of division or dissociation of psychobiological systems that constitute personality. One or more dissociative parts of the personality avoid traumatic memories and perform functions in daily life, while one or more other parts remain fixated in traumatic experiences and defensive actions. Dissociative parts manifest in negative and positive dissociative symptoms that should be distinguished from alterations of consciousness. Complex PTSD involves a more complex structural dissociation than simple PTSD.

Phase-oriented treatment of structural dissociation in complex traumatization: overcoming trauma-related phobias.

The theory of structural dissociation of the personality proposes that patients with complex trauma-related disorders are characterized by a division of their personality into different prototypical parts, each with its own psychobiological underpinnings. As one or more apparently normal parts (ANPs), patients have a propensity toward engaging in evolutionary prepared action systems for adaptation to daily living to guide their actions. Two or more emotional parts (EPs) are fixated in traumatic experience. As EPs, patients predominantly engage action systems related to physical defense and attachment cry. ANP and EP are insufficiently integrated, but interact and share a number of dispositions of the personality (e.g., speaking). All parts are stuck in maladaptive action tendencies that maintain dissociation, including a range of phobias, which is a major focus of this article. Phase-oriented treatment helps patients gradually develop adaptive mental and behavioral actions, thus overcoming their phobias and structural dissociation. Phase 1, symptom reduction and stabilization, is geared toward overcoming phobias of mental contents, dissociative parts, and attachment and attachment loss with the therapist. Phase 2, treatment of traumatic memories, is directed toward overcoming the phobia of traumatic memories, and phobias related to insecure attachment to the perpetrator(s), particularly in EPs. In Phase 3, integration and rehabilitation, treatment is focused on overcoming phobias of normal life, healthy risk-taking and change, and intimacy. To the degree that the theory of structural dissociation serves as an integrative heuristic for treatment, it should be compatible with other theories that guide effective treatment of patients with complex dissociative disorders.

Treatment of complex posttraumatic self-dysregulation.

The authors describe a three-phase sequential integrative model for the psychotherapy of complex posttraumatic self-dysregulation: Phase 1 (alliance formation and stabilization), Phase 2 (trauma processing), and Phase 3 (functional reintegration). The technical precautions designed to maximize safety, trauma processing, and reintegration regardless of the specific treatment approach are discussed. Existing and emerging treatment models that address posttraumatic dysregulation of consciousness, bodily functioning, emotion, and interpersonal attachments are also described. The authors conclude with suggestions for further clinical innovation and research evaluation of therapeutic models that can enhance the treatment of PTSD by addressing complex posttraumatic self-dysregulation.

Trauma-related dissociation: conceptual clarity lost and found.

OBJECTIVE: Imprecise conceptualizations of dissociation hinder understanding of trauma-related dissociation. An heuristic resolution for research and clinical practice is proposed. METHOD: Current conceptualizations of dissociation are critically examined. They are compared with a new theory that incorporates classical views on dissociation with other contemporary theories related to traumatization, viewing dissociation as a lack of integration among psychobiological systems that constitute personality, that is, as a structural dissociation of the personality. RESULTS: Most current views of dissociation are overinclusive and underinclusive. They embrace non-dissociative phenomena--rigid alterations in the level and field of consciousness--prevalent in non-traumatized populations, and which do not require structural dissociation. These views also largely disregard somatoform and positive symptoms of dissociation and underestimate integrative deficiencies, while emphasizing the psychological defensive function of dissociation. They do not offer a common psychobiological pathway for the spectrum of trauma-related disorders. Structural dissociation of the personality likely involves divisions among at least two psychobiological systems, each including a more or less distinct apperceptive centre, that is, a dissociative part of the personality. Three prototypical levels of structural dissociation are postulated to correlate with particular trauma-related disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Limitation of the concept of dissociation to structural dividedness of the personality sets it apart from related but non-dissociative phenomena and provides a taxonomy of dissociative symptoms. It postulates a common psychobiological pathway for all trauma-related disorders. Trauma-related dissociation is maintained by integrative deficits and phobic avoidance. This conceptualization advances diagnosis, classification, treatment and research of trauma-related disorders.

Somatoform dissociation, reported abuse and animal defence-like reactions.

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypotheses that among general psychiatric outpatients, somatoform dissociation is associated with posttraumatic stress symptoms and with reported potentially traumatizing events, especially with events that involve bodily threat from a person, also when reported age at onset, duration and subjectively rated impact of potentially traumatizing events are considered. METHOD: Administration of self-report questionnaires evaluating the severity of somatoform and psychoform dissociation, posttraumatic stress-symptoms, and reported traumatizing events, using samples of consecutive and unselected psychiatric outpatients (n = 153). RESULTS: Somatoform dissociation was strongly correlated with posttraumatic stress symptoms and with reported cumulative traumatization as assessed with two different self-report trauma questionnaires. Among a wide range of trauma types, bodily threat from a person best predicted somatoform dissociation. Emotional neglect and age further improved the prediction, but emotional neglect and abuse did not predict somatoform dissociation when interpersonal threat to the body was not reported. Somatoform dissociation was also best predicted by bodily threat when reported age at onset, duration and subjective impact of reported traumatization were included in the analyses. CONCLUSION: This retrospective study suggests that recurrent interpersonal bodily threat may evoke animal defence-like psychobiological systems manifesting as somatoform dissociation and that this type of threat is often accompanied by emotional neglect. These hypotheses should now be tested in prospective studies.