Targeting MDM2 in malignancies is a promising strategy for overcoming resistance to anticancer immunotherapy.

MDM2 has been established as a biomarker indicating poor prognosis for individuals undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment for different malignancies by various pancancer studies. Specifically, patients who have MDM2 amplification are vulnerable to the development of hyperprogressive disease (HPD) following anticancer immunotherapy, resulting in marked deleterious effects on survival rates. The mechanism of MDM2 involves its role as an oncogene during the development of malignancy, and MDM2 can promote both metastasis and tumor cell proliferation, which indirectly leads to disease progression. Moreover, MDM2 is vitally involved in modifying the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) as well as in influencing immune cells, eventually facilitating immune evasion and tolerance. Encouragingly, various MDM2 inhibitors have exhibited efficacy in relieving the TIME suppression caused by MDM2. These results demonstrate the prospects for breakthroughs in combination therapy using MDM2 inhibitors and anticancer immunotherapy.

MET fusions are targetable genomic variants in the treatment of advanced malignancies.

Targeted therapy for malignancies has developed rapidly in recent years, benefiting patients harboring genetic mutations sensitive to relevant tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). With the development of targeted sequencing techniques, an increasing number of detectable genomic alterations in malignancies, including MET fusions, have been revealed. MET fusions, although rare among malignancies, might be functional driver genes that participate in activating downstream signaling pathways and promoting cell proliferation. Therefore, it is believed that MET fusions could be targetable genomic variants of MET, and inhibition of MET is considered an optionable therapeutic choice for patients harboring MET fusions. According to the summary presented in this review, we recommend MET-TKIs as suitable treatment agents for patients harboring primary MET fusions. For patients harboring acquired MET fusions after the development of resistance to TKIs targeting primary genomic alterations, such as sensitive EGFR mutations, treatment with a MET-TKI alone or in combination with TKIs targeting primary genomic alterations, such as EGFR-TKIs, is hypothesized to be a reasonable option for salvage treatment. In summary, MET fusions, despite their low incidence, should be taken into consideration when developing treatment strategies for cancer patients.

Identification of MET fusions as novel therapeutic targets sensitive to MET inhibitors in lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Alterations in the MET gene, including amplifications and exon 14 skipping mutations, have been identified as actionable oncogenic alterations. However, MET fusions are rarely detected in lung cancer, and their sensitivity to therapeutics has not been systematically analyzed. METHODS: The data from 30876 lung cancer patients from the LAVA database and 7966 patients from cBioPortal database were screened. Basic demographic and clinical information for the patients harboring MET fusions were collected. A lung squamous cell cancer patient harboring a novel EML4-MET fusion was treated with crizotinib. Additionally, a literature review was performed to summarize the cases of patients harboring MET fusions and their treatment information. RESULTS: MET fusions were found in only 0.2% to 0.3% of lung cancer patients and appeared in almost all exons of the MET gene. Intragenic MET fusions were found in 52.6% (41/78) of the included patients. Crizotinib was effective for MET fusions, including a novel identified EML4-MET fusion, even after the failure of multiple lines of treatment. This result suggested that acquired MET fusions become more regionally selective, as they usually occurred in exons encoding the extracellular region. Interestingly, the MET-fused genes in primary MET fusions or acquired MET fusions were very different, which indicated the different functions and influences of the disease. CONCLUSION: MET fusions are rare, and half of the fusion types were intragenic fusions. Lung cancer patients harboring primary or acquired MET fusions could benefit from crizotinib. In addition, EML4-MET was first reported in this study as a novel MET fusion type.

Neoadjuvant toripalimab plus platinum-paclitaxel chemotherapy in stage II-III non-small cell lung cancer: a single-center, single-arm, phase I study in China.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant and adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor treatments for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with resectable disease have presented promising results. This is a phase I study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant toripalimab in combination with chemotherapy for NSCLC. METHODS: Treatment-naive patients with resectable NSCLC (stage II-IIIB) received two to four cycles of toripalimab (240 mg, intravenously, q3w) combined with platinum-paclitaxel chemotherapy. Surgical operation was performed approximately 4 weeks after the last cycle. The primary end point was safety. The efficacy endpoints included radiographic and pathological response rates, expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and molecular targets. RESULTS: A total of 11 patients were enrolled, consisting of 2 patients (18%) with adenocarcinoma and 9 patients (82%) with squamous cell carcinoma. All patients received two to four cycles of toripalimab plus chemotherapy and underwent radical resection. Regarding safety, 5 of 11 patients (45%) had neoadjuvant treatment-related adverse events, and 1 patient (9%) experienced grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events. Radiographic partial response was achieved in 10 patients, with an objective response rate of 91%. Among 11 patients, 6 (55%) achieved pathological complete response, including 1 PD-L1-negative patient. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant toripalimab plus platinum-paclitaxel chemotherapy was tolerable and induced a pathological complete response in 55% of resectable NSCLC patients.

Multiomics analysis revealed the mechanisms related to the enhancement of proliferation, metastasis and EGFR-TKI resistance in EGFR-mutant LUAD with ARID1A deficiency.

INTRODUCTION: Dysregulated ARID1A expression is frequently detected in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and mediates significant changes in cancer behaviors and a poor prognosis. ARID1A deficiency in LUAD enhances proliferation and metastasis, which could be induced by activation of the Akt signaling pathway. However, no further exploration of the mechanisms has been performed. METHODS: Lentivirus was used for the establishment of the ARID1A knockdown (ARID1A-KD) cell line. MTS and migration/invasion assays were used to examine changes in cell behaviors. RNA-seq and proteomics methods were applied. ARID1A expression in tissue samples was determined by IHC. R software was used to construct a nomogram. RESULTS: ARID1A KD significantly promoted the cell cycle and accelerated cell division. In addition, ARID1A KD increased the phosphorylation level of a series of oncogenic proteins, such as EGFR, ErbB2 and RAF1, activated the corresponding pathways and resulted in disease progression. In addition, the bypass activation of the ErbB pathway, the activation of the VEGF pathway and the expression level changes in epithelial-mesenchymal transformation biomarkers induced by ARID1A KD contributed to the insensitivity to EGFR-TKIs. The relationship between ARID1A and the sensitivity to EGFR-TKIs was also determined using tissue samples from LUAD patients. CONCLUSION: Loss of ARID1A expression influences the cell cycle, accelerates cell division, and promotes metastasis. EGFR-mutant LUAD patients with low ARID1A expression had poor overall survival. In addition, low ARID1A expression was associated with a poor prognosis in EGFR-mutant LUAD patients who received first-generation EGFR-TKI treatment. Video abstract.

ARID1A deficiency reverses the response to anti-PD(L)1 therapy in EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma by enhancing autophagy-inhibited type I interferon production.

INTRODUCTION: EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are associated with a poor response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and only 20% of NSCLC patients harboring EGFR mutations benefit from immunotherapy. Novel biomarkers or therapeutics are needed to predict NSCLC prognosis and enhance the efficacy of ICIs in NSCLC patients harboring EGFR mutations, especially lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients, who account for approximately 40-50% of all NSCLC cases. METHODS: An ARID1A-knockdown (ARID1A-KD) EGFR-mutant LUAD cell line was constructed using lentivirus. RNA-seq and mass spectrometry were performed. Western blotting and IHC were used for protein expression evaluation. Effects of 3-MA and rapamycin on cells were explored. Immunofluorescence assays were used for immune cell infiltration examination. RESULTS: ARID1A expression was negatively associated with immune cell infiltration and immune scores for ICIs in LUAD with EGFR mutations. In vitro experiments suggested that ARID1A-KD activates the EGFR/PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway and inhibits autophagy, which attenuates the inhibition of Rig-I-like receptor pathway activity and type I interferon production in EGFR-mutant LUAD cells. In addition, 3-MA upregulated production of type I interferon in EGFR-mutant LUAD cells, with an similar effect to ARID1A-KD. On the other hand, rapamycin attenuated the enhanced production of type I interferon in ARID1A-KD EGFR-mutant LUAD cells. ARID1A function appears to influence the tumor immune microenvironment and response to ICIs. CONCLUSION: ARID1A deficiency reverses response to ICIs in EGFR-mutant LUAD by enhancing autophagy-inhibited type I interferon production. Video Abstract.

ARID1A serves as a receivable biomarker for the resistance to EGFR-TKIs in non-small cell lung cancer.

ARID1A is a key component of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complexes which is important for the maintaining of biological processes of cells. Recent studies had uncovered the potential role of ARID1A alterations or expression loss in the therapeutic sensitivity of cancers, but the studies in this field requires to be further summarized and discussed. Therefore, we proposed a series of mechanisms related to the resistance to EGFR-TKIs induced by ARID1A alterations or expression loss and the potential therapeutic strategies to overcome the resistance based on published studies. It suggested that ARID1A alterations or expression loss might be the regulators in PI3K/Akt, JAK/STAT and NF-κB signaling pathways which are strongly associated with the resistance to EGFR-TKIs in NSCLC patients harboring sensitive EGFR mutations. Besides, ARID1A alterations or expression loss could lead to the resistance to EGFR-TKIs via a variety of processes during the tumorigenesis and development of cancers, including epithelial to mesenchymal transition, angiogenesis and the inhibition of apoptosis. Based on the potential mechanisms related to ARID1A, we summarized that the small molecular inhibitors targeting ARID1A or PI3K/Akt pathway, the anti-angiogenic therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors could be used for the supplementary treatment for EGFR-TKIs among NSCLC patients harboring the concomitant alterations of sensitive EGFR mutations and ARID1A.

Subunits of ARID1 serve as novel biomarkers for the sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibitors and prognosis of advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) benefit from treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Biomarkers such as programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), the tumor mutational burden (TMB) and the mismatch repair (MMR) status are used to predict the prognosis of ICIs therapy. Nevertheless, novel biomarkers need to be further investigated, and a systematic prognostic model is needed for the evaluation of the survival risks of ICIs treatment. METHODS: A cohort of 240 patients who received ICIs from the cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics was evaluated in this research. Clinical information and targeted sequencing data were acquired for analyses. The Kaplan-Meier plot method was used to perform survival analyses, and selected variables were then confirmed by a novel nomogram constructed by the "rms" package of R software. RESULTS: Seven percent of the NSCLC patients harbored ARID1A mutations, while 4% of the NSCLC patients harbored ARID1B mutations. Mutations in ARID1A and ARID1B were confirmed to be associated with sensitivity to ICIs. Patients harboring these mutations were found to have a better response to treatment (ARID1A: P = 0.045; ARID1B: P = 0.034) and prolonged progression-free survival (ARID1B: P = 0.032). Here, a novel nomogram was constructed to predict the prognosis of ICIs treatment. Elevation of the TMB, enhanced expression of PD-L1 and activation of the antigen presentation process and cellular immunity were found to be correlated with ARID1A and ARID1B mutations. CONCLUSION: ARID1A and ARID1B could serve as novel biomarkers for the prognosis and sensitivity to ICIs of advanced NSCLC.

Primary resistance to first-generation EGFR-TKIs induced by MDM2 amplification in NSCLC.

INTRODUCTION: Targeted therapy for NSCLC is rapidly evolving. EGFR-TKIs benefit NSCLC patients with sensitive EGFR mutations and significantly prolong survival. However, 20-30% of patients demonstrate primary resistance to EGFR-TKIs, which leads to the failure of EGFR-TKI treatment. The mechanisms of primary resistance to EGFR-TKIs require further study. METHODS: Targeted sequencing was used for the detection of genomic alterations among patients in our center. Regular cell culture and transfection with plasmids were used to establish NSCLC cell lines over-expressing MDM2 and vector control. We used the MTT assays to calculate the inhibition rate after exposure to erlotinib. Available datasets were used to determine the role of MDM2 in the prognosis of NSCLC. RESULTS: Four patients harboring concurrent sensitive EGFR mutations and MDM2 amplifications demonstrated insensitivity to EGFR-TKIs in our center. In vitro experiments suggested that MDM2 amplification induces primary resistance to erlotinib. Over-expressed MDM2 elevated the IC50 value of erlotinib in HCC2279 line and reduced the inhibition rate. In addition, MDM2 amplification predicted a poor prognosis in NSCLC patients and was associated with a short PFS in those treated with EGFR-TKIs. The ERBB2 pathway was identified as a potential pathway activated by MDM2 amplification could be the focus of further research. CONCLUSION: MDM2 amplification induces the primary resistance to EGFR-TKIs and predicts poor prognosis in NSCLC patients. MDM2 may serve as a novel biomarker and treatment target for NSCLC. Further studies are needed to confirm the mechanism by which amplified MDM2 leads to primary resistance to EGFR-TKIs.

Advancement in research and therapy of NF1 mutant malignant tumors.

The NF1 gene encodes neurofibromin, which is one of the primary negative regulatory factors of the Ras protein. Neurofibromin stimulates the GTPase activity of Ras to convert it from an active GTP-bound form to its inactive GDP-bound form through its GTPase activating protein-related domain (GRD). Therefore, neurofibromin serves as a shutdown signal for all vertebrate RAS GTPases. NF1 mutations cause a resultant decrease in neurofibromin expression, which has been detected in many human malignancies, including NSCLC, breast cancer and so on. NF1 mutations are associated with the underlying mechanisms of treatment resistance discovered in multiple malignancies. This paper reviews the possible mechanisms of NF1 mutation-induced therapeutic resistance to chemotherapy, endocrine therapy and targeted therapy in malignancies. Then, we further discuss advancements in targeted therapy for NF1-mutated malignant tumors. In addition, therapies targeting the downstream molecules of NF1 might be potential novel strategies for the treatment of advanced malignancies.

The role of CD28 in the prognosis of young lung adenocarcinoma patients.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of lung cancer was found to be associated with a series of biomarkers related to the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME), which can modulate the biological behaviors and consequent outcomes of lung cancer. Therefore, establishing a prognostic model based on the TIME for lung cancer patients, especially young patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), is urgently needed. METHODS: In all, 809 lung cancer patients from the TCGA database and 71 young patients with LUAD in our center were involved in this study. Univariate and multivariate analysis based on clinical characteristics and TIME-related expression patterns (as evaluated by IHC) were performed to estimate prognosis and were verified by prognostic nomograms. RESULTS: Both LUAD and lung cancer patients with high CD28 expression had shorter disease-free survival (DFS) (P = 0.0011; P = 0.0001) but longer overall survival (OS) (P = 0.0001; P = 0.0282). TIME-related molecules combined with clinical information and genomic signatures could predict the prognosis of young patients with LUAD with robust efficiency and could be verified by the established nomogram based on the Cox regression model. In addition, CD28 expression was correlated with an abundance of lymphocytes and could modulate the TIME. Higher CD28 levels were observed in primary tumors than in metastatic tissues. CONCLUSION: TIME-related molecules were identified as compelling biomarkers for predicting the prognosis of lung cancer, especially in a cohort of young patients. Furthermore, CD28, which is associated with poor DFS but long OS, might participate in the modulation of the TIME and has a different role in the prognosis of young patients with LUAD.

The role of MDM2 amplification and overexpression in therapeutic resistance of malignant tumors.

The MDM2 protein encoded by the mouse double minute 2 (MDM2) gene is the primary negative regulatory factor of the p53 protein. MDM2 can ligate the p53 protein via its E3 ubiquitin ligase, and the ubiquitinated p53 can be transferred to the cytoplasm and degraded by proteasomes. Therefore, MDM2 can maintain the stability of p53 signaling pathway. MDM2 amplification has been detected in many human malignancies, including lung cancer, colon cancer and other malignancies. MDM2 overexpression is associated with chemotherapeutic resistance in human malignancies. The mechanisms of chemotherapeutic resistance by MDM2 overexpression mainly include the p53-MDM2 loop-dependent and p53-MDM2 loop-independent pathways. But the role of MDM2 overexpression in tyrosine kinase inhibitors resistance remains to be further study. This paper reviews the possible mechanisms of therapeutic resistance of malignancies induced by MDM2 amplification and overexpression, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted agents and hyperprogressive disease of immunotherapy. Besides, MDM2-targeted therapy may be a potential new strategy for treating advanced malignancies.

Efficacy of immunotherapy in ARID1A-mutant solid tumors: a single-center retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), especially those targeting programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1), have introduced a new treatment landscape for many types of tumors. However, they only achieve a limited therapeutic response. Hence, identifying patients who may benefit from ICIs is currently a challenge. METHODS: 47 tumor patients harboring ARID1A mutations were retrospectively studied. The genomic profiling data through next-generation sequencing (NGS) and relevant clinical information were collected and analyzed. Additionally, bioinformatics analysis of the expression of immune checkpoints and immune cell infiltration levels was conducted in ARID1A-mutant gastric cancer (GC). RESULTS: ARID1A mutations frequently co-occur with mutations in DNA damage repair (DDR)-associated genes. Among the 35 ARID1A-mutant patients who received immunotherapy, 27 were evaluable., with the objective response rate (ORR) was 48.15% (13/27), and the disease control rate (DCR) was 92.59% (25/27). Moreover, survival assays revealed that ARID1A-mutant patients had longer median overall survival (mOS) after immunotherapy. In ARID1A-mutated GC patients, receiving ICIs treatment indicated longer progressive-free survival (PFS). Additionally, the incidence of microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H), high tumor mutation burden (TMB-H) and Epstein‒Barr virus (EBV) infection was elevated. Bioinformatic analysis showed significant enrichment of immune response and T cell activation pathway within differentially expressed genes in ARID1A-mutant GC group. Finally, ARID1A mutations status was considered to be highly correlated with the level of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and high expression of immune checkpoints. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with tumors harboring ARID1A mutations may achieve better clinical outcomes from immunotherapy, especially in GC. ARID1A mutations can lead to genomic instability and reshape the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME), which can be used as a biomarker for immunotherapy.

Role of YES1 signaling in tumor therapy resistance.

YES proto-oncogene 1 (YES1) is an SRC family kinase (SFK) that plays a key role in cancer cell proliferation, adhesion, invasion, survival, and angiogenesis during tumorigenesis and tumor development. Reports suggest that YES1 amplification is associated with resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in human malignancies. However, the mechanisms of drug resistance have not been fully elucidated. In this article, we review the literature on YES1 and discuss the implications of YES1 signaling for targeted therapy and chemotherapy resistance in malignancies. Moreover, recent advances in targeted therapy for YES1-amplified malignancies are summarized. Finally, we conclude that targeting YES1 may reverse drug resistance and serve as a valuable tumor treatment strategy.

ARID1A deficiency associated with MMR deficiency and a high abundance of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes predicts a good prognosis of endometrial carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: ARID1A alterations have been detected in 40% of endometrial carcinomas (ECs) and are associated with loss of its expression. The role of ARID1A in tumorigenesis and development is complex, and the prognostic role in EC remains controversial. Hence, it is of great significance to confirm the role of ARID1A in EC. METHODS: A total of 549 EC patients (cohort A) from TCGA were evaluated to explore the prognostic role of ARID1A. NGS was performed for 13 EC patients (cohort B), and expression of ARID1A, CD3, CD8 and mismatch repair (MMR) proteins in 52 patients (cohort C) from our center was determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to perform survival analyses. RESULTS: ARID1A alterations were detected in 32% of EC patients and correlated with good disease-free survival (DFS, P = 0.004) and overall survival (OS, P = 0.0353). ARID1A alterations were found to co-occur with MMR-related gene mutations and correlated with higher PD-L1 expression. Patients concomitantly harboring ARID1A alterations and MMR-related gene mutations had the best prognosis (DFS: P = 0.0488; OS: P = 0.0024). A cohort from our center showed that ARID1A deficiency was an independent prognostic factor and predicted longer recurrence-free survival (P = 0.0476). ARID1A loss was associated with a tendency toward MSI-H (P = 0.0060). ARID1A alterations and expression loss were associated with a higher abundance of CD3+ (P = 0.0406) and CD8+ (P = 0.0387) T cells. CONCLUSION: ARID1A alterations and expression loss are tightly associated with MMR deficiency and a high abundance of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, which might contribute to the good prognosis of EC.

The stage-dependent prognostic role of ARID1A in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common causes of cancer-related death. Although novel treatment currently achieves a better response, the majority of HCC patients develop resistance and cannot benefit. Hence, novel biomarkers for guiding therapy and predicting the prognosis are needed. Methods: Tissue microarrays of 206 HCC patients were used, and ARID1A expression was determined by immunohistochemistry. Databases were used for the verification and expansion of our results. The "rms" package of R software was used for the construction of the nomogram. Results: ARID family alterations were associated with disease-free survival (P=0.0325) and overall survival (OS) (P=0.0076). Subgroup analysis confirmed the prognostic effect of ARID1A, ARID1B, and ARID2 alterations. In addition, ARID family genomic alterations, especially ARID1A, were closely related to poor progression-free survival (ARID: P=0.0011; ARID1A: P=0.0082) and OS (ARID: P=0.0161; ARID1A: P=0.0220) after sorafenib treatment. ARID1A expression was found to display a stage-dependent effect on the prognosis, serving as a risk factor in stage I-II patients (P<0.0001) and a protective factor in stage III-IV patients (P=0.0180). Conclusions: ARID1A has dual roles in HCC in a tumor stage-dependent manner, and further study is required to uncover the complex function of ARID1A in HCC development, disease progression, and therapy.

PD-L1 blockade by immune checkpoint inhibitors impairs sensitivity to osimertinib in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer cells.

In the previous studies, it was shown that osimertinib plus durvalumab did not achieve satisfactory efficacy, even inferior to osimertinib alone. We found that PD-L1 blockade impaired the efficacy of osimertinib in EGFR-mutant NSCLC cells despite the presence of the tumor microenvironment. Therefore, durvalumab has no synergistic effect on osimertinib, and combination therapy will not enhance the efficacy of osimertinib.

Next-generation sequencing identifies potential novel therapeutic targets in Chinese HGSOC patients.

BACKGROUND: Targeted therapy, especially the use of poly (adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPis), has improved the outcome of patients with ovarian cancer. However, most high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) patients have wild-type BRCA1/2, and it is necessary to disclose more potential novel targets for other available targeted drugs. So, detection of genetic alterations beyond BRCA1/2 is critical to screen HGSOC patients for personalized therapy. In this study, a broad, hybrid capture-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay was used to identify actionable genetic alterations from HGSOC cancer tissues. METHODS: Sixty-eight patients with HGSOC were enrolled, including 6 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I, 15 stage II, 37 stage III and 10 stage IV patients. All patients signed informed consent forms. Potentially actionable genetic alterations, including base substitutions, indels, copy number alterations, and gene fusions, were identified using targeted NGS. RESULTS: In our study, 14.7% (10/68) of the tumors harbored actionable genetic alterations in patients with BRCA1. A total of 25.0% (17/68) of patients without BRCA1 mutations harbored other actionable genetic alterations, such as homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway-related genes (ATM, CDK12, FANCA, and FANCD2), PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway genes (NF1, FBXW7, PIK3CA, PTEN, TSC1, and TSC2), and some other genes (ARID1A, FGFR1, KRAS, and NRAS). Furthermore, some patients harboring ARID1A or NF1 actionable genetic alterations showed good clinical efficacy to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and everolimus, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our research indicates that 39.7% (27/68) of patients with HGSOC harbored at least one actionable genetic alteration. 25.0% (17/68) of patients had somatic mutations or copy number variations beyond BRCA1 mutations and might be treated with off-label therapy or to be allocated into clinical trial. NGS assays of HGSOC patients are necessary to screen actionable genetic alterations to guide personalized and precise treatment.

Optimal Treatments for NSCLC Patients Harboring Primary or Acquired MET Amplification.

Background: In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring MET mutations, MET-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been proven to achieve a good response. However, the relative efficacy of different therapeutics in primary NSCLC patients with MET amplification and the treatment options for patients harboring acquired MET amplification after the failure of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-TKIs remain unclear. Methods: In total, 33 patients harboring primary MET amplification and 9 patients harboring acquired MET alterations identified by next-generation sequencing were enrolled. A retrospective analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy of different therapeutics. In addition, studies reporting various treatments for patients harboring MET alterations were included in the meta-analysis. Results: In our cohort of patients harboring primary MET amplification, crizotinib displayed better efficacy than immunotherapy and chemotherapy, as demonstrated both in first-line (P = .0378) and second-line treatment regimens (P = .0181). The disease control rates for crizotinib, immunotherapy, and chemotherapy were 81.8%, 72.7%, and 63.6%, respectively. In particular, the median progression-free survival (PFS) time after immunotherapy in patients harboring MET amplification and high programed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (>50%) was only 77.5 days. The meta-analysis revealed that the median PFS times after crizotinib and immunotherapy were 4.57 and 2.94 months, respectively. In patients harboring acquired MET amplification, chemotherapy plus bevacizumab had superior efficacy (310.0 days vs 73.5 days, P = .0360) compared with MET-TKIs ± EGFR-TKIs. Conclusions: Immunotherapy showed a low response in patients harboring MET alterations, even those with concurrent high PD-L1 expression. MET-TKIs might be an optional treatment with worth-expecting efficacy. However, chemotherapy plus bevacizumab could benefit the subpopulation of patients harboring acquired MET amplification after the failure of EGFR-TKIs.

ALK rearrangements as mechanisms of acquired resistance to osimertinib in EGFR mutant non-small cell lung cancer.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring EGFR sensitive mutations may benefit from treatment with EGFR TKIs. Osimertinib, which is an irreversible third-generation EGFR TKI, has demonstrated a convincing efficacy, irrespective of whether it is used in first- or second-line treatment. The acquired resistance mechanisms to osimertinib are highly complicated, and a variety of potential molecular mechanisms have been discovered, including C797S. Here, we determined that ALK rearrangement might be an underlying mechanism contributing to acquired resistance to osimertinib. In our report, a 60-year-old female patient with lung adenocarcinoma with an EGFR mutation was administered multiple treatments, including first-line gefitinib and second-line osimertinib. According to the next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay after osimertinib failure, the emergence of an ALK rearrangement was considered to be a potentially acquired resistance mechanism to osimertinib. The combination of osimertinib and crizotinib then maintained a six-month stable disease. VEGFA amplification was identified after osimertinib plus crizotinib treatment, and chemotherapy plus bevacizumab achieved a continuous stable disease over 21 months. In this study, we also summarized previously reported cases and concluded that ALK rearrangement is a rare but critical resistance mechanism to osimertinib. After failure of combined treatment with osimertinib plus crizotinib, comprehensive molecular profiling should be performed, and chemotherapy plus bevacizumab might be an optimal treatment especially for patients harboring VEGFA amplification.