Rectal trauma injuries: outcomes from the U.S. National Trauma Data Bank.

BACKGROUND: There is a  lack of general consensus and a little published data regarding the management of trauma-related rectal injuries and outcomes. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the surgical management and corresponding outcomes for this patient cohort, using a nationwide trauma database. METHODS: Rectal injuries and procedures performed over a 2-year period (2013 and 2014) were identified through ICD-9 clinical modification codes, from the United States National Trauma Data Bank. Patient factors, management variables, and outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 1.7 million patients, 1472 (0.1%) sustained a rectal injury; 81% male, median age 30 years (range 16-89 years) and 60% due to penetrating trauma. Seven hundred and seventy-eight (52.8%) had an isolated extraperitoneal injury and 694 (47.2%) had isolated Intraperitoneal or combined intra- and extraperitoneal injuries. Overall, 726 patients (49.3%) underwent fecal diversion. Injuries following blunt trauma were associated with higher injury severity scores (ISS), lower stoma rates, longer hospital and intensive-care unit (ICU) stay, and higher mortality rates than penetrating trauma (all p ≤ 0.001). Patients with stoma formation had lower mortality than undiverted patients (8.6 vs. 4.0%, p < 0.001) despite a higher ISS and more intraperitoneal injuries, but longer hospital and ICU stay (all p ≤ 0.001). On multivariate regression analysis, older age, higher ISS, intraperitoneal injury, and return to the ICU were independently associated with higher rates of mortality, while stoma formation was associated with a lower mortality rate. For isolated extraperitoneal rectal injuries, 494 patients (63.5%) were managed by resection/repair without stoma and had significantly lower overall postoperative morbidity rates (12.7 vs. 30.2%, p = 0.009) and shorter hospital stay (14 vs. 23 days, p < 0.001), than those who underwent resection/repair + stoma (n = 284; 36.5%), despite no significant difference in ISS (29 vs. 27, p = 0.780). There was no significant difference in mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that trauma-related rectal injuries are rare and there is wide variation in their management. These data support a low threshold for stoma formation in patients with intraperitoneal or combined injuries, while suggesting that isolated extraperitoneal defects may be safely managed without fecal diversion.

Impact of preoperative steroid or immunosuppressant use on short-term outcomes following colectomy in Crohn's disease patients.

BACKGROUND: Evaluating the impact of steroid or immunosuppressants (SI) therapy prior to colectomy in Crohn's disease (CD) patients on postoperative septic and colectomy-specific outcomes using the American College of Surgeons (ACS)-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP)-targeted colectomy database. METHODS: All CD patients undergoing colectomy were retrieved from the 2012-2013 NSQIP-targeted database. Thirty-day postoperative outcomes were compared for patients who were on steroids or immunosuppressants (SI) within the 30 days prior to colectomy to the others using univariable and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: Of 2208 CD patients, 1387 (63%) were on SI. Patients in the SI group were younger, and a greater proportion underwent laparoscopic surgery (p < 0.05). SI use was associated with a higher rate of sepsis (7.6 vs. 5.2%), anastomotic leak (5.6 vs. 3.5%), and return to operating room (6.8 vs. 3.3%). On multivariable analysis, SI was associated with sepsis, septic shock, and anastomotic leak [odds ratio = 1.58, 95% confidence interval 1.09-2.27]. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that SI use within 30 days of colectomy is associated with a higher rate of sepsis and septic shock and anastomotic leak in CD patients. Withholding SI prior to surgery, or the selective use of an ostomy to mitigate the consequences of a leak and hence sepsis need due consideration prior to surgery.