Hospital Variation in Epinephrine Administration Before Defibrillation for Cardiac Arrest Due to Shockable Rhythm.

OBJECTIVES: Contrary to advanced cardiac life support guidelines that recommend immediate defibrillation for shockable in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA), epinephrine administration before first defibrillation is common and associated with lower survival at a "patient-level." Whether this practice varies across hospitals and its association with "hospital-level" IHCA survival remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine hospital variation in rates of epinephrine administration before defibrillation for shockable IHCA and its association with IHCA survival. DESIGN: Observational cohort study. SETTING: Five hundred thirteen hospitals participating in the Get With The Guidelines Resuscitation Registry. PATIENTS: A total of 37,668 adult patients with IHCA due to an initial shockable rhythm from 2000 to 2019. INTERVENTIONS: Epinephrine before first defibrillation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Using multivariable hierarchical regression, we examined hospital variation in epinephrine administration before first defibrillation and its association with hospital-level rates of risk-adjusted survival. The median hospital rate of epinephrine administration before defibrillation was 18.8%, with large variation across sites (range, 0-68.8%; median odds ratio: 1.54; 95% CI, 1.47-1.61). Major teaching status and annual IHCA volume were associated with hospital rate of epinephrine administration before defibrillation. Compared with hospitals with the lowest rate of epinephrine administration before defibrillation (Q1), there was a stepwise decline in risk-adjusted survival at hospitals with higher rates of epinephrine administration before defibrillation (Q1: 44.3%, Q2: 43.4%; Q3: 41.9%; Q4: 40.3%; p for trend < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Administration of epinephrine before defibrillation in shockable IHCA is common and varies markedly across U.S. hospitals. Hospital rates of epinephrine administration before defibrillation were associated with a significant stepwise decrease in hospital rates of risk-adjusted survival. Efforts to prioritize immediate defibrillation for patients with shockable IHCA and avoid early epinephrine administration are urgently needed.

Documented Use of Emergency Medical Dispatch Protocols is Associated with Improved Survival in Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

OBJECTIVE: There are over 300,000 out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA) annually in the United States (US) and despite many scientific advances in the field, the survival rate remains low. We seek to determine if return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) is higher when use of emergency medical dispatch (EMD) protocols is documented for OHCA calls compared to when no EMD protocol use is documented. We also seek identify care-related processes that differ in calls that use EMD protocols. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of U.S. adults with OHCA prior to emergency medical services (EMS) arrival using 2019 National EMS Information System data. The primary exposure was EMD usage during EMS call. The primary outcome was prehospital ROSC, and secondary outcomes included automated external defibrillator (AED) use before EMS arrival, bystander CPR, and end-of-event EMS survival (survival to the end of the EMS care at transport destination). Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, primary insurance, rurality, initial rhythm, arrest etiology, and witnessed arrest. RESULTS: Of the 96,269 OHCA cases included, EMD use was documented in 73%. Overall, 26% of subjects achieved ROSC in EMS care. EMD subjects were more likely to achieve ROSC (27.2% vs. 23.5%, uOR 1.22, 95%CI 1.18 - 1.26) even after adjusting for subject and arrest characteristics (aOR 1.13, 95%CI 1.08 - 1.17). EMD subjects also had higher end-of-event survival (19.1% vs. 16.4%, aOR 1.20, 95%CI 1.15 - 1.25). AED use before EMS arrival was more common in the EMD group (28.3% vs. 26.3% %diff 2.0, 95%CI 1.4 to 2.6), as was CPR before EMS arrival (63.8% vs. 55.1%, difference 8.6%, 95%CI 7.9 to 9.3%). CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective analysis, the rate of ROSC was higher in adult OHCA patients when EMD protocol use was reported compared to when it was not reported. The group with documented EMD use also experienced higher rates of bystander AED use, bystander CPR, and end-of-event survival.

Outcomes Associated With Rural Emergency Department Provider-to-Provider Telehealth for Sepsis Care: A Multicenter Cohort Study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that provider-to-provider tele-emergency department care is associated with more 28-day hospital-free days and improved Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) guideline adherence in rural emergency departments (EDs). METHODS: Multicenter (n=23), propensity-matched, cohort study using medical records of patients with sepsis from rural hospitals in an established, on-demand, rural video tele-ED network in the upper Midwest between August 2016 and June 2019. The primary outcome was 28-day hospital-free days, with secondary outcomes of 28-day inhospital mortality and SSC guideline adherence. RESULTS: A total of 1,191 patients were included in the analysis, with tele-ED used for 326 (27%). Tele-ED cases were more likely to be transferred to another hospital (88% versus 8%, difference 79%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 75% to 83%). After matching and regression adjustment, tele-ED cases did not have more 28-day hospital-free days (difference 0.07 days more for tele-ED, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.17) or 28-day inhospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.51, 95% CI 0.16 to 1.60). Adherence with both the SSC 3-hour bundle (aOR 0.59, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.22) and complete bundle (aOR 0.45, 95% CI 0.02 to 11.60) were similar. An a priori-defined subgroup of patients treated by advanced practice providers suggested that the mortality was lower in the cohort with tele-ED use (aOR 0.11, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.73) despite no significant difference in complete SSC bundle adherence (aOR 2.88, 95% CI 0.52 to 15.86). CONCLUSION: Rural emergency department patients treated with provider-to-provider tele-ED care in a mature network appear to have similar clinical outcomes to those treated without.

Emergency Department Pediatric Readiness and Potentially Avoidable Transfers.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between potentially avoidable transfers (PATs) and emergency department (ED) pediatric readiness scores and the score's associated components. STUDY DESIGN: This cross-sectional study linked the 2012 National Pediatric Readiness Project assessment with individual encounter data from California's statewide ED and inpatient databases during the years 2011-2013. A probabilistic linkage, followed by deterministic heuristics, linked pretransfer, and post-transfer encounters. Applying previously published definitions, a transferred child was considered a PAT if they were discharged within 1 day from the ED or inpatient care and had no specialized procedures. Analyses were stratified by injured and noninjured children. We compared PATs with necessary transfers using mixed-effects logistic regression models with random intercepts for hospital and adjustment for patient and hospital covariates. RESULTS: After linkage, there were 6765 injured children (27% PATs) and 18 836 noninjured children (14% PATs) who presented to 283 hospitals. In unadjusted analyses, a 10-point increase in pediatric readiness was associated with lower odds of PATs in both injured (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.90-0.96) and noninjured children (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.88-0.93). In adjusted analyses, a similar association was detected in injured patients (aOR 0.92, 95% CI 0.86-0.98) and was not detected in noninjured patients (aOR 0.94, 95% CI 0.88-1.00). Components associated with decreased PATs included having a nurse pediatric emergency care coordinator and a quality improvement plan. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital ED pediatric readiness is associated with lower odds of a PAT. Certain pediatric readiness components are modifiable risk factors that EDs could target to reduce PATs.

The Iowa less aggressive protocol: A mixed-methods study on the novel treatment protocol of atrial fibrillation.

OBJECTIVES: Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac dysrhythmia in the United States. Our aim was to determine if a novel protocol for management of atrial fibrillation was feasible to implement in an emergency department (ED). Interviews were conducted with ED physicians and physician assistants to identify themes in relation to the clinical use and impleon of the protocol. METHODS: A novel protocol was developed by a multi-disciplinary team and implemented in an academic ED. The protocol used cardiac computed tomography (CT) to rule out left atrial thrombus in patients with greater than 12 h of symptoms and high risk of thromboembolism, or any patient with greater than 48 h of symptoms. Patients who underwent cardiac CT or electrical cardioversion were followed up at 30 days via telephone to monitor for recurrence or adverse thromboembolic events. Providers were interviewed to identify themes regarding protocol usage, barriers to its use, and future changes to increase utilization. RESULTS: Patients with atrial fibrillation in the ED were eligible for inclusion. Twenty-nine patients were treated using the protocol. Seven patients (24%) underwent cardiac CT prior to electrical cardioversion. Cardioversion success rate was 83%, with 69% of patients discharged home. Thirty-day follow-up was completed on 25 patients (86%). Six patients (24%) had reoccurrence of atrial fibrillation requiring subsequent cardioversion. No patients experienced stroke or thromboembolic event. Interviews were conducted with 14 providers. Usage barriers included time, availability, and additional work-up. Six subthemes were identified for future changes including EMR order set, frequent reminders, increased education, increased awareness, activation energy, and EMR pop-ups. CONCLUSION: The Iowa Less Aggressive Protocol is a novel treatment protocol for the ED management of atrial fibrillation that was feasible to implement and use. Providers viewed the protocol favorably and identified areas of improvement for future use.

Perceptions and Perceived Utility of Rural Emergency Department Telemedicine Services: A Needs Assessment.

Background: Access to specialized medical care is often limited in rural emergency departments (EDs). Specialist consultation through telemedicine services could help increase access in low-resource areas. Introduction: The objective of this study was to better understand providers' perceptions of the anticipated impact of telemedicine in rural Midwestern EDs. The secondary objective was to understand differences in the perception of rural and academic providers in their views of the utility of telemedicine. Materials and Methods: We conducted a survey of medical providers including physicians, physician assistants, and nurse practitioners at five rural Midwestern critical access hospitals and within six departments at a university medical center in the same region. The survey addressed opinions on telemedicine, including how often it would be used and the potential to improve patient care and reduce transfers. Results: Specialties of high perceived utility to rural providers include psychiatry, cardiology, and neurology; whereas academic providers viewed services in psychiatry, pediatric critical care, and neurology to be of the most potential value. Academic and rural providers have differing opinions on the anticipated frequency of telemedicine use (p < 0.001) and prevention of inter-hospital transfers (p = 0.023). There were significant differences in perceived value by specialty.Conclusion: There is a high demand for telemedicine consultation services in rural Midwestern hospitals, particularly in psychiatry, cardiology, and neurology. Overall, academic providers view telemedicine services as more valuable within their specialty than do rural providers. Further research should be done to investigate individualization of telehealth services based on regional needs and how disparate opinions predict telemedicine utilization.

Emergency Department Telemedicine Consults are Associated with Faster Time-to-Electrocardiogram and Time-to-Fibrinolysis for Myocardial Infarction Patients.

Introduction: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a time-sensitive condition. Meeting guideline-recommended time metrics for these patients can be challenging in rural emergency departments (EDs). Telemedicine has been shown to improve the quality and timeliness of emergency care in rural areas. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of telemedicine on the timeliness of emergency AMI care for patients presenting to rural EDs with chest pain. Methods: A prospective cohort study, conducted in six telemedicine networks, identified ED patients presenting with chest pain from November 2015 through December 2017. Primary exposure was telemedicine consultation during the ED visit. The primary outcome was time-to-electrocardiogram (ECG). For eligible AMI patients, secondary outcomes included: (1) fibrinolysis administered and (2) time-to-fibrinolysis. Analyses for multivariable models were conducted by using logistic regression, clustered at the hospital level. Results: Overall, 1,220 patients presenting with chest pain were included in the study cohort (27.1% received telemedicine). Time-to-ECG was, on average, 0.39 times (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.26 to -0.52) faster for telemedicine cases. Among eligible patients, telemedicine was associated with higher odds of fibrinolysis administration (adjusted odds ratio 7.17, 95% CI 2.48-20.49). In a sensitivity analysis excluding patients with cardiac arrest, time-to-fibrinolysis administration did not differ when telemedicine was used. Discussion: In telemedicine networks, telemedicine consultation during the ED visit was associated with improved timeliness of ECG evaluation and increased use of fibrinolytic reperfusion therapy for rural AMI patients. Future work should focus on the impact of telemedicine consultation on patient-centered outcomes.

Normal Saline Solution and Lactated Ringer's Solution Have a Similar Effect on Quality of Recovery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to test the hypothesis that balanced crystalloids improve quality of recovery more than normal saline solution (0.9% sodium chloride) in stable emergency department (ED) patients. Secondary outcomes measured differences in health care use. METHODS: A single-site, participant- and evaluator-blinded, 2-arm parallel allocation (1:1), comparative effectiveness, randomized controlled trial allocated adults receiving intravenous fluids in the ED before discharge to receive 2 L of lactated Ringer's solution or normal saline solution. The primary outcome was symptom scores measured by the validated Quality of Recovery-40 instrument (scores 40 to 200) 24 hours after enrollment. Secondary outcomes included subsequent health care use and medication compliance. RESULTS: Participants (N=157) were enrolled and follow-up was analyzed for 94 (follow-up rate of 60%) with intention-to-treat methodology. There was no difference in postenrollment Quality of Recovery-40 scores between normal saline solution and lactated Ringer's solution groups (mean difference 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] -6.8 to 11.6). Although preenrollment scores were higher in the lactated Ringer's solution group (mean difference 10.5; 95% CI 1.9 to 19.0), adjusting for presurvey imbalances did not change the primary outcome (adjusted difference -3.9; 95% CI -12.9 to 5.2). There were no differences in return to ED (mean difference 7.5%; 95% CI -8.7% to 23.8%), prescriptions filled (mean difference 22.2%; 95% CI -3.3% to 47.6%), or seeking care from another provider (mean difference -2.0%; 95% CI -19.9% to 15.9%) at 7 days. CONCLUSION: Normal saline solution and lactated Ringer's solution were associated with similar 24-hour recovery scores and 7-day health care use in stable ED patients. These results supplement those of recent trials by informing fluid choice for stable ED patients.

Provider-to-provider telemedicine for sepsis is used less frequently in communities with high social vulnerability.

PURPOSE: Sepsis disproportionately affects patients in rural and socially vulnerable communities. A promising strategy to address this disparity is provider-to-provider emergency department (ED)-based telehealth consultation (tele-ED). The objective of this study was to determine if county-level social vulnerability index (SVI) was associated with tele-ED use for sepsis and, if so, which SVI elements were most strongly associated. METHODS: We used data from the TELEmedicine as a Virtual Intervention for Sepsis in Rural Emergency Department study. The primary exposures were SVI aggregate and component scores. We used multivariable generalized estimating equations to model the association between SVI and tele-ED use. FINDINGS: Our study cohort included 1191 patients treated in 23 Midwestern rural EDs between August 2016 and June 2019, of whom 326 (27.4%) were treated with tele-ED. Providers in counties with a high SVI were less likely to use tele-ED (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31‒0.87), an effect principally attributable to the housing type and transportation component of SVI (aOR = 0.44, 95% CI 0.22-0.89). Providers who treated fewer sepsis patients (1‒10 vs. 31+ over study period) and therefore may have been less experienced in sepsis care, were more likely to activate tele-ED (aOR = 3.91, 95% CI 2.08‒7.38). CONCLUSIONS: Tele-ED use for sepsis was lower in socially vulnerable counties and higher among providers who treated fewer sepsis patients. These findings suggest that while tele-ED increases access to specialized care, it may not completely ameliorate sepsis disparities due to its less frequent use in socially vulnerable communities.

Rural Stroke Patients Have Higher Mortality: An Improvement Opportunity for Rural Emergency Medical Services Systems.

PURPOSE: Early recognition and prompt prehospital care is a cornerstone of acute stroke treatment. Residents of rural areas have worse access to stroke services than urban residents. The purpose of this study was to (1) describe US trends in rural-urban stroke mortality and (2) identify possible factors associated with rural-urban stroke case-fatality disparities. METHODS: This study was a nationwide retrospective cohort study of stroke admissions. The primary exposure was rurality of patient's residence. The primary outcome was death during hospital encounter. The secondary outcome was discharge to a care facility or home healthcare. Univariable and multivariable logistic regressions estimated the odds of mortality by subject rurality among stroke subjects. FINDINGS: Rural stroke subjects had higher mortality than nonrural counterparts (18.6% rural vs 16.9% nonrural). After adjustment for patient and hospital factors, patient rurality was associated with increased odds of mortality (aOR = 1.11; 95% CI: 1.06-1.15; P < .001). For the secondary outcome of discharge to home, rural stroke subjects were less likely to be discharged to a care facility than nonrural stroke visits (aOR 0.94; 95% CI: 0.91-0.97; P < .001). Results were similar after adjusting for thrombolytics administration and transfer status. CONCLUSIONS: Rural stroke patients have higher mortality than their urban counterparts likely due to their increased burden of chronic disease, lower health literacy, and reduced access to prompt prehospital care. There may be an opportunity for emergency medical services systems to assist in increasing stroke awareness for both patients and clinicians and to establish response patterns to expedite emergency care.

Hospitals That Report Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Bundle Compliance Have More Structured Sepsis Performance Improvement.

PURPOSE: Sepsis is a common cause of death. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services severe sepsis/septic shock (SEP-1) bundle is focused on improving sepsis outcomes, but it is unknown which quality improvement (QI) practices are associated with SEP-1 compliance and reduced sepsis mortality. The objectives of this study were to compare sepsis QI practices in SEP-1 reporting and nonreporting hospitals and to measure the association between sepsis QI processes, SEP-1 performance, and sepsis mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study linked survey data on QI practices from Iowa hospitals to SEP-1 performance data and mortality. Characteristics of hospitals and sepsis QI practices were compared by SEP-1 reporting status. Univariable and multivariable logistic and linear regression estimated the association of QI practices with SEP-1 performance and observed-to-expected sepsis mortality ratios. RESULTS: One hundred percent of Iowa's 118 hospitals completed the survey. SEP-1 reporting hospitals were more likely to have sepsis QI practices, including reporting sepsis quality to providers (64% versus 38%, P = 0.026) and using the case review process to develop sepsis care plans (87% versus 64%, P = 0.013). Sepsis QI practices were not associated with increased SEP-1 scores. A sepsis registry was associated with decreased odds of being in the bottom quartile of sepsis mortality (odds ratio, 0.37; 95% confidence interval, 0.14 to 0.96, P = 0.041), and presence of a sepsis committee was associated with lower hospital-specific mortality (observed-to-expected ratio, -0.11; 95% confidence interval, -0.20 to 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Hospitals reporting SEP-1 compliance conduct more sepsis QI practices. Most QI practices are not associated with increased SEP-1 performance or decreased sepsis mortality. Future work could explore how to implement these performance improvement practices in hospitals not reporting SEP-1 compliance.

Is the Emergency Department an Inappropriate Venue for Code Status Discussions?

BACKGROUND: Historically, it has been assumed that the Emergency Department (ED) is a place for maximally aggressive care and that Emergency Medicine Providers (EMPs) are biased towards life-prolonging care. However, emphasis on early recognition of code status preferences is increasingly making the ED a venue for code status discussions (CSDs). In 2018, our hospital implemented a policy requiring EMPs to place a code status order (CSO) for all patients admitted through the ED. We hypothesized that if EMPs enter CSDs with a bias toward life-prolonging care, or if the venue of the ED biases CSDs towards life-prolonging care, then we would observe a decrease in the percentage of patients selecting DNR status following our institution's aforementioned CSO mandate. METHODS: We present a retrospective analysis of rates of DNR orders placed for patients admitted through our ED comparing six-month periods before and after the implementation of the above policy. RESULTS: Using quality improvement data, we identified patients admitted through the ED during pre (n=7,858) and post (n=8,069) study periods. We observed the following: after implementation DNR preference identified prior to hospital admission from the ED increased from 0.4% to 5.3% (relative risk (RR) 12.5; 95% CI: 5.2-29.9), defining CS in the ED setting at the time of admission increased from 2.4% to 98.6% (p <0.001), and DNR orders placed during inpatient admission was unchanged (RR=0.97 (95% CI = 0.88-1.07)). DISCUSSION: Our results suggest that the ED can be an appropriate venue for CSDs.

Epinephrine before defibrillation in patients with shockable in-hospital cardiac arrest: propensity matched analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the use of epinephrine (adrenaline) before defibrillation for treatment of in-hospital cardiac arrest due to a ventricular arrhythmia and examine its association with patient survival. DESIGN: Propensity matched analysis. SETTING: 2000-18 data from 497 hospitals participating in the American Heart Association's Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry. PARTICIPANTS: Adults aged 18 and older with an index in-hospital cardiac arrest due to an initial shockable rhythm treated with defibrillation. INTERVENTIONS: Administration of epinephrine before first defibrillation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Survival to discharge; favorable neurological survival, defined as survival to discharge with none, mild, or moderate neurological disability measured using cerebral performance category scores; and survival after acute resuscitation (that is, return of spontaneous circulation for >20 minutes). A time dependent, propensity matched analysis was performed to adjust for confounding due to indication and evaluate the independent association of epinephrine before defibrillation with study outcomes. RESULTS: Among 34 820 patients with an initial shockable rhythm, 7054 (20.3%) were treated with epinephrine before defibrillation, contrary to current guidelines. In comparison with participants treated with defibrillation first, participants receiving epinephrine first were less likely to have a history of myocardial infarction or heart failure, but more likely to have renal failure, sepsis, respiratory insufficiency, and receive mechanical ventilation before in-hospital cardiac arrest (standardized differences >10% for all). Treatment with epinephrine before defibrillation was strongly associated with delayed defibrillation (median 4 minutes v 0 minutes). In propensity matched analysis (6569 matched pairs), epinephrine before defibrillation was associated with lower odds of survival to discharge (22.4% v 29.7%; adjusted odds ratio 0.69; 95% confidence interval 0.64 to 0.74; P<0.001), favorable neurological survival (15.8% v 21.6%; 0.68; 0.61 to 0.76; P<0.001) and survival after acute resuscitation (61.7% v 69.5%; 0.73; 0.67 to 0.79; P<0.001). The above findings were consistent in a range of sensitivity analyses, including matching according to defibrillation time. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to current guidelines that prioritize immediate defibrillation for in-hospital cardiac arrest due to a shockable rhythm, one in five patients are treated with epinephrine before defibrillation. Use of epinephrine before defibrillation was associated with worse survival outcomes.

Provider-to-provider telemedicine improves adherence to sepsis bundle care in community emergency departments.

INTRODUCTION: Sepsis is a life-threatening emergency. Together, early recognition and intervention decreases mortality. Protocol-based resuscitation in the emergency department (ED) has improved survival in sepsis patients, but guideline-adherent care is less common in low-volume EDs. This study examined the association between provider-to-provider telemedicine and adherence with sepsis bundle components in rural community hospitals. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study of adults presenting with sepsis or septic shock in community EDs participating in rural telemedicine networks. The primary outcome was adherence to four sepsis bundle requirements: lactate measurement within 3 hours, blood culture before antibiotics, broad-spectrum antibiotics, and adequate fluid resuscitation. Multivariable generalized estimating equations estimated the association between telemedicine and adherence. RESULTS: In this cohort (n = 655), 5.6% of subjects received ED telemedicine consults. The telemedicine group was more likely to be male and have a higher severity of illness. After adjusting for severity and chief complaint, total sepsis bundle adherence was higher in the telemedicine group compared with the non-telemedicine group (aOR 17.27 [95%CI 6.64-44.90], p < 0.001). Telemedicine consultation was associated with higher adherence with three of the individual bundle components: lactate, antibiotics, and fluid resuscitation. DISCUSSION: Telemedicine patients were more likely to receive initial blood lactate measurement, timely broad-spectrum antibiotics, and adequate fluid resuscitation. In rural, community EDs, telemedicine may improve sepsis care and potentially reduce disparities in sepsis outcomes at low-volume facilities. Future work should identify specific components of telemedicine-augmented care that improve performance with sepsis quality indicators.

Emergency department telemedicine consults decrease time to interpret computed tomography of the head in a multi-network cohort.

INTRODUCTION: Telemedicine can improve access to emergency stroke care in rural areas, but the benefit of telemedicine across different types and models of telemedicine networks is unknown. The objectives of this study were to (a) identify the impact of telemedicine on emergency department (ED) stroke care, (b) identify if telemedicine impact varied by network and (c) describe the variation in process outcomes by telemedicine across EDs. METHODS: A prospective cohort study identified stroke patients in four telemedicine networks between November 2015 and December 2017. Primary exposure was telemedicine consultation during ED evaluation. Outcomes included: (a) interpretation of computed tomography (CT) of the head within 45 minutes and (b) time to administer tissue plasminogen activator (tPA). An interaction term tested for differences in telemedicine effect on stroke care by network and hospital. RESULTS: Of the 932 stroke subjects, 36% received telemedicine consults. For subjects with a last known well time within two hours of ED arrival (27.9%), recommended CT interpretation within 45 minutes was met for 66.8%. Telemedicine was associated with higher odds of timely head CT interpretation (adjusted odds ratio = 3.03; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.69-5.46). The magnitude of the association between telemedicine and time to interpret a CT of the head differed between telemedicine networks (interaction term p = 0.033). Among eligible patients, telemedicine was associated with faster time to administer tPA (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.81; 95% CI 1.31-2.50). DISCUSSION: Telemedicine consultation during the ED encounter decreased the time to interpret at CT of the head among stroke patients, with differing magnitudes of benefit across telemedicine networks. The effect of heterogeneity of telestroke affects across different networks should be explored in future analyses.

High-efficiency Practices of Residents in an Academic Emergency Department: A Mixed-methods Study.

BACKGROUND: Emergency department utilization and crowding is increasing, putting additional pressure on emergency medicine (EM) residency programs to train efficient residents who can meet these demands. Specific practices associated with resident efficiency have yet to be identified. The objective of this study was to identify practices associated with enhanced efficiency in EM residents. METHODS: A mixed-methods study design was utilized to identify behaviors associated with resident efficiency. In Stage 1, eight EM faculty provided 61 efficiency behaviors during semistructured interviews, which were prioritized into eight behaviors by independent ranking. A total of 31 behaviors were tested, including additions from previous literature and the study team. In Stage 2, two 4-hour observations during separate shifts of 27 EM residents were performed to record minute-by-minute timing and frequency of each behavior. In Stage 3, the association between resident efficiency and each of the behaviors was estimated using multivariable regression models adjusted for training year and clustered on resident. The primary efficiency outcome was 6-month average relative value units/hour. A sensitivity analysis was performed using patients/hour. RESULTS: Seven practices were positively associated with efficiency: average patient load, taking initial patient history with nurse present (number/hour, number/new patient), running the board (number/hour), conversations with other care team members (number/hour, % time), dictation use (number/hour, % time), smartphone text communication (number/hour, % time), and nonwork tasks (number/hour). Three practices were negatively associated with efficiency: visits to patient room (number/patient), conversations with attending physicians (% time), and reviewing electronic medical record (number/hour). CONCLUSION: Several discrete behaviors were found to be associated with enhanced resident efficiency. These results can be utilized by EM residency programs to improve resident education and inform evaluations by providing specific, evidence-based practices for residents to develop and improve upon throughout training.

TELEmedicine as an intervention for sepsis in emergency departments: a multicenter, comparative effectiveness study (TELEvISED Study).

Sepsis is a life-threatening infection that affects over 1.7 million Americans annually. Low-volume rural hospitals have worse sepsis outcomes, and emergency department (ED)-based telemedicine (tele-ED) has been one promising strategy for improving rural sepsis care. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of tele-ED consultation on sepsis care and outcomes in rural ED patients. The TELEvISED study is a multicenter (n = 25) retrospective propensity-matched comparative effectiveness study of tele-ED care for rural sepsis patients in a mature tele-ED network. Telemedicine-exposed patients will be matched with non telemedicine patients using a propensity score to predict tele-ED use. The primary outcome is 28-day hospital free days, and secondary outcomes include adherence with guidelines, mortality and organ failure. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04441944.

Double inter-hospital transfer in Sepsis patients presenting to the ED does not worsen mortality compared to single inter-hospital transfer.

PURPOSE: Sepsis is a leading cause of hospital deaths. Inter-hospital transfer is frequent in sepsis and is associated with increased mortality. Some sepsis patients undergo two inter-hospital transfers (double transfer). This study assessed the (1) prevalence, (2) associated risk factors, (3) associated mortality, and (4) hospital length-of-stay and costs of double-transfer of sepsis patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study using 2005-2014 administrative claims data in Iowa. Multivariable generalized estimating equations adjusted for potential confounding variables, with a primary outcome of mortality. Secondary outcomes included hospital length-of-stay and costs. Hospital-specific cost-to-charge ratios estimated hospital costs. Hospitals were categorized into quintiles based on sepsis-volume. RESULTS: Of 15,182 sepsis subjects, there were 45.2% non-transfers and 2.1% double-transfers. Double-transfers had worse mortality than non-transfers but not single-transfers. Of the non-transfers, 44.9% presented to a top sepsis-volume hospital compared to 22.8% of double-transfers and 25.1% of single-transfers. After transfer from first to second hospital, 93.4% of the single-transfers and 92.2% of the double-transfers were at a top sepsis-volume hospital. Double-transfers had longer length-of-stay and more in total hospital costs than single-transfers. CONCLUSIONS: Double-transfer occurs in 2.1% of Iowa sepsis patients. Double-transfers had similar mortality and increased length of stay and costs compared to single-transfers.

Preferences for emergency medical service transport after childhood injury: An emergency department-based multi-methods study.

BACKGROUND: Pre-hospital emergency medical services (EMS) transport can be associated with benefits following pediatric injury. However, many pediatric trauma patients do not use EMS. The objective of this study was to elucidate guardians' decision factors for pre-hospital transport for children after injury. METHODS: This is a multi-methods study of pediatric trauma patients (≤14 years) and their guardians presenting to the ED of a Level I Pediatric Trauma Center via both EMS and non-EMS modalities. Demographic information and injury characteristics were collected. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, and qualitative codes were identified and assigned into themes. RESULTS: (Quantitative): Of the 29 child-guardian pairs, five participants initially presented by EMS, 18 were admitted, and the majority (66%) sustained mild injuries. Guardians' assessment of their child's injury severity did not correlate with Injury Severity Score (ISS). Neither EMS status (did or did not use EMS to transport to first hospital) nor rurality status of participants' place of residence were associated with disparate management in any of the three scenarios. (QUALITATIVE): Five themes emerged, which informed guardians' transport decisions: Factors Related to the Nature of the Patient's Injury, Guardian Attributes and Prior Experiences, Access and Availability of EMS, Perceived Risks and Benefits of EMS and Hospital, and Collaborative Decision-Making. Injury characteristics and contextual factors, like perceived EMS response times and advice from family or medical providers, were considered in choices about EMS utilization and hospital selection. Despite the view that EMS response times were important in determining what to do following injury, both EMS and non-EMS users were largely unfamiliar with the capabilities of EMS in their area. Finally, guardians described cost to be a theoretical risk of EMS use, and a few cited this as a factor contributing to their decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: Guardians used a variety of considerations to make transport decisions, including the five themes identified above. Future studies could explore modalities to disseminate information about pre-hospital decision-making for guardians and determine the relationship between EMS utilization and patient outcomes.