RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Our study (part of multicentric "MindCOVID") investigates risk factors for anxiety and depression among pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Czech Republic. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study used a prospective cross-sectional design. Data was collected using an online self-administered questionnaire. Standardized scales, general anxiety disorder (GAD)-7 and patient health questionnaire (PHQ)-9 were administered online. Multivariate regression analysis was employed to evaluate the relationship between sociodemographic, medical and psychological variables. RESULTS: The Czech sample included 1830 pregnant women. An increase of depressive and anxiety symptoms measured by PHQ-9 and GAD-7 in pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with unfavorable financial situation, low social and family support, psychological and medical problems before and during pregnancy and infertility treatment. Fear of being infected and adverse effect of COVID-19, feeling of burden related to restrictions during delivery and organization of delivery and feeling of burden related to finances were associated with worse anxiety and depressive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Social and emotional support and lack of financial worries are protective factors against mood disorders in pregnant women in relation to COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, adequate information about organization of delivery and additional support from healthcare professionals during the delivery are needed. Our findings can be used for preventive interventions, given that repeated pandemics in the future are anticipated.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/psicología , Mujeres Embarazadas/psicología , Depresión/diagnóstico , Pandemias/prevención & control , República Checa/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Estudios Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Ansiedad/diagnósticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Poland has one of the highest cesarean birth (CB) rates in Europe. For this study, we used the Robson Ten-Group Classification System (TGCS) to analyze trends in the induction and CB rates in one hospital in Poland over a period of 11 years. We compare these trends with changes in National Legislative and Medical Guidelines introduced during this time that were aimed at lowering rates of unnecessary medical interventions. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study including all births after 24 weeks' gestation between 2010 and 2020 from one tertiary hospital (n = 66,716 births). After the deletion of records with missing data, 66,678 births were included in the analysis. All births were classified according to the Robson TGCS. The size, CB rate, and contribution of each group for every year were calculated. Linear regression analyses were used to analyze trends over time. RESULTS: The total CB rate varied from 29.6% to 33.0% during the study period, with a linear increase of 0.045 percentage points annually (R2 = 0.021; F(1) = 0.189; p = 0.674). This study was considerably lower than the total CB rate for Poland, which rose from 33.9% in 2010 to 45.1% in 2020, increasing at a rate of 1.13 percentage points per year (R2 = 0.93; F(1) = 61.88; p < 0.001). Induction rates among both nulliparous (R1 + R2) and multiparous (R3 + R4) women at term also increased. Study groups R5 (previous cesarean birth), R2 (nulliparous in induced or prelabor cesarean delivery), and R1 (nulliparous women at term with single cephalic pregnancy in spontaneous labor) were the highest contributors to the overall CB rate. The greatest decrease in the CB rate was detected in group R5b (more than one previous CB). None of the groups showed statistically significant increases in CB rates over the study period. CONCLUSIONS: The CB rate in the hospital where the study was conducted was considerably lower than the total CB rate in Poland. When compared with countries with similar CB rates, group R2b (women with nulliparous, prelabor cesarean birth) in our study was considerably larger. More comparisons across different hospital settings in Poland are needed. However, as hospitals are not encouraged to routinely collect the data needed to construct TGCS, such comparisons are very difficult to conduct.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIM: With the worldwide outbreak of coronavirus, a significant impact has been observed on the functioning of healthcare systems and the process of childbirth. Women probably did not even have a choice to adjust their plans accordingly to the current situation. The aim of the study was to examine how the outbreak of the SARS CoV-2 pandemic state affected the decisions of pregnant women about their childbirth plan. DESIGN: This cross-sectional study was performed using a web-based survey published on social media in Poland. METHODS: The cross-sectional study was performed using web-based questionnaires. The study group included Polish women who changed their childbirth plans, compared to a group of women not sure about delivery plan change and those whose plans had not changed. The data were collected from 4 March 2020 to 2 May 2020, when the first rising count of new infections was observed in Poland and worldwide. Statistical analysis was performed using STATISTICA Software, Inc., 13.3 (2020). RESULTS: Of 969 women who completed the questionnaire and were enrolled into the study, 57.2% had not changed their childbirth plans (group I), 28.4% had changed their plans (group II), and 14.4% of respondents answered "not sure" to this question (group III). The majority of women changed their birth plans during the pandemic because of the potential absence of their partner during labour (56% of women who had changed their plans and 48% of those whose answer was "I am not sure", p < .001). Another reason was the fear of separation from the child after delivery (33% of women who had changed their plans and 30% of those whose answer was "I am not sure", p < .001). CONCLUSION: Restrictions due to the COVID-19 outbreak have influenced the childbirth plans of pregnant women. The changes were independent of women's vision of birth before the pandemic. IMPACT: The restriction on births with accompanying person and the risk of separation from their infant after childbirth significantly influenced the decision-making process. As a result, some women were more likely to opt for a home birth with or even without medical assistance. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The study participants were women who were pregnant at the time of completing the questionnaire, were over 18 years old and spoke Polish.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Mujeres Embarazadas , Niño , Femenino , Embarazo , Humanos , Adolescente , Masculino , Estudios Transversales , Pandemias , Polonia/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Parto , Internet , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Lethal fetal diagnosis defines severe developmental disorders that lead to the death of a fetus or newborn. Using semi-structured interviews, we explored the experiences of women in Poland who actively decided to continue with the pregnancy after diagnosis. We thematically analyzed data collected from 10 women. We identified four themes: pregnancy as an experience of prenatal motherhood; the child as person; birth as encounter and farewell; and the mother experience in retrospect. This study was conducted while the termination of pregnancy due to the irreversible fetal abnormality was legal in Poland. Since October 2021, it is no longer legal.
Asunto(s)
Madres , Diagnóstico Prenatal , Embarazo , Recién Nacido , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , PoloniaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pelvic girdle pain (PGP) is a type of pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain. This study aimed to examine the prevalence, severity, and factors associated with postpartum PGP in a selected group of postpartum women in Poland. METHODS: This was a prospective, observational study. In phase 1, 411 women were recruited 24-72 h postpartum. The prevalence of PGP was assessed by a physiotherapist using a series of dedicated tests. Pelvic floor muscle function and presence of diastasis recti were assessed via palpation examination. Age, education, parity, mode of delivery, infant body mass, body mass gain during pregnancy, the use of anesthesia during delivery and were recorded. In a phase 2, 6 weeks postpartum, the prevalence of PGP and its severity were assessed via a self-report. RESULTS: In phase 1 (shortly postpartum), PGP was diagnosed in 9% (n = 37) of women. In phase 2 (6 weeks postpartum), PGP was reported by 15.70% of women (n = 42). The univariable analyses showed a higher likelihood of PGP shortly postpartum in women who declared PGP during pregnancy (OR 14.67, 95% CI 4.43-48.61) and among women with abdominal midline doming (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.04-4.06). The multivariable regression analysis showed significant associations in women with increased age (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.01-1.21) and declaring PGP during pregnancy (OR 14.83, 95% CI 4.34-48.72). CONCLUSION: Although the prevalence of postpartum PGP among women in Poland is lower than reported in other countries, it is experienced by almost every tenth women shortly postpartum and every sixth can report similar symptoms 6 weeks later. Age, PGP during pregnancy and abdominal midline doming were associated with experiencing PGP shortly postpartum.
Asunto(s)
Dolor de Cintura Pélvica , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Humanos , Embarazo , Femenino , Dolor de Cintura Pélvica/diagnóstico , Dolor de Cintura Pélvica/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Polonia/epidemiología , Periodo Posparto , Complicaciones del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Congenital heart defects (CHD) are the most common inherited abnormalities. Intrapartum cardiotocography (CTG) is still considered a "gold standard" during labor. However, there is a lack of evidence regarding the interpretation of intrapartum CTG in fetuses with CHD. Therefore, the study aimed to compare intrapartum CTG in normal fetuses and fetuses with CHD and describe the association between CTG and neonatal outcomes. METHODS: The present study is a retrospective analysis of the CTG of 395 fetuses. There were three study groups: Group 1: 185 pregnancies with a prenatal diagnosis of CHD, Group 2: 132 high-risk pregnancies without CHD, and Group 3: 78 low-risk pregnancies without CHD. RESULTS: Abnormal CTG was present statistically OR=3.4 (95%CI: 1.61-6.95) more often in Group 1. The rate of the emergency CS was higher in this group OR=3 (95%CI: 1.3-3.1). Fetuses with CHD and abnormal CTG were more often scored ≤7 Apgar, with no difference in acidemia. The multivariate regression model for Group 1 does not show clinical differences between Apgar scores or CTG assessment in neonatal acidemia prediction. CONCLUSIONS: CTG in fetuses with CHD should be interpreted individually according to the type of CHD and conduction abnormalities. Observed abnormalities in CTG are associated with the fetal heart defect itself. Preterm delivery and rapid cesarean delivery lead to a higher rate of neonatal complications. Health practitioners should consider this fact during decision-making regarding delivery in cases complicated with fetal cardiac problems.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Fetales , Cardiopatías Congénitas , Trabajo de Parto , Cardiotocografía , Femenino , Cardiopatías Congénitas/diagnóstico , Frecuencia Cardíaca Fetal , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is not enough data regarding practices and protocols on the dose of oxytocin administrated to women during labour. Empirical evidence indicates that compliance with the guidelines improves the quality of healthcare and reduces adverse effects. The study aimed to evaluate practices of oxytocin provision for labour induction and augmentation in two maternity units in Poland. METHODS: The article presents a prospective observational study. Data from 545 (n = 545) labours was collected in two maternity units. First, the total dose (the total amount of oxytocin provided from the beginning in the labour ward until delivery including the III and IV stage of labour) and cumulative dose of oxytocin (the amount of oxytocin given until the birth of the neonate) administered to women during labour was calculated. Then, the relationship between the cumulative dose of oxytocin and short term perinatal outcomes (mode of delivery, use of epidural anaesthesia, Apgar scores, birth weight and postpartum blood loss) was analysed. Finally, the compliance of oxytocin supply during labour with national guidelines in the following five criteria: medium, start dose, escalation rate, interval, the continuation of infusion after established labour was examined. RESULTS: The average cumulative dose of oxytocin administrated to women before birth was 4402 mU following labour induction and 2366 mU following labour augmentation. The actual administration of oxytocin deviated both from the unit and national guidelines in 93.6% of all observed labours (mainly because of continuation of infusion after established labour). We found no statistically significant correlation between the cumulative dose of oxytocin administered and mode of delivery, immediate postpartum blood loss or Apgar scores. There was no observed effect of cumulative dose oxytocin on short-term perinatal outcomes. The two units participating in the study had similar protocols and did not differ significantly in terms of total oxytocin dose, rates of induction and augmentation - the only observed difference was the mode of delivery. CONCLUSIONS: The study showed no effect of the mean cumulative oxytocin dose on short-term perinatal outcomes and high rate of non-compliance of the practice of oxytocin administration for labour induction and augmentation with the national recommendations. Cooperation between different professional groups of maternity care providers should be considered in building national guidelines for maternity care.. Further studies investigating possible long-term effects of the meant cumulative dose of oxytocin and the reasons for non-compliance of practice with guidelines should be carried out.
Asunto(s)
Trabajo de Parto , Oxitócicos/administración & dosificación , Oxitocina/administración & dosificación , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Polonia , Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Centros de Atención TerciariaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Vaginal birth is a safe mode of childbirth for the majority of women after cesarean section (CS). However, data show that women who have undergone a CS are more likely to have an elective CS (ECS) than a vaginal birth after CS (VBAC) in many areas of the world. AIM: This study aimed to review the literature about women's mode of birth preferences and attitudes and the underlying reasons for, and factors associated with, their preferences. METHODS: This is narrative literature review. PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus databases were searched, limiting the results to non-interventional studies published between 1990 and 2020. Twenty-one articles were included in the analysis. RESULTS: The review found 34 different factors that influence women's preferences. Five factors influenced both VBAC and ECS preference, depending on the study. The most common factors having a dualistic effect on preference were: medical staff recommendation, doctor's opinion, and fear of pain. The most common factors were: desire to experience natural childbirth, faster/easier recovery, support from doctor's, and midwife's opinion. Among the factors influencing the preference for ECS, two were particularly prominent: predictability, controllability and comfortability of CS and the belief that CS is safer for the baby and/or mother. CONCLUSIONS: Our review showed that there are a variety of factors that influence women's preference for the mode of delivery after CS. Some of these have a dualistic effect according to the study. The key to making an informed decision regarding the mode of delivery is communication with medical professionals.
Asunto(s)
Cesárea , Parto Vaginal Después de Cesárea , Miedo , Femenino , Humanos , Parto , EmbarazoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: This paper aimed to assess the knowledge of healthcare professionals (obstetric and gynecology residents, specialists, and midwives) in the field of perinatal medicine regarding fetal growth diagnosis and management. METHODS: A questionnaire was created consisting of a set of questions regarding demographic data, methods of growth assessment, and management. It was a handout survey. The results were analyzed with the use of descriptive statistics and χ2 analysis using the program Statistica. RESULTS: 190 medical professionals have participated in the questionnaire. 86.3% of respondents agreed that pregnancy dating should be modified based on first-trimester ultrasound. 90.9% agreed that III trimester ultrasound has a ±15% margin of error. When asked which growth charts are best fit for assessing growth in a studied population, 10.7% marked standard, 37.4% reference, 26.2% customized, and 26.2% did not know the difference between the three choices. 60.3% stated that they use a growth chart to assess growth and qualify fetuses for monitoring. 70.2% used the 10th centile as a cutoff, 20.1% 5th centile, and 9.7% 3rd centile. Only 40.9% would diagnose fetal growth restriction based on fetal weight only. 28.7% using the 10th centile cutoff, 16.1% 5th centile, and 54.0% 3rd centile. Only a quarter of the respondents were able to name the growth chart or tool that they use for assessment. The most common responses were Yudkin, Hadlock, and online calculators of Fetal Medicina Barcelona and the Fetal Medicine Foundation. DISCUSSION: A lot of confusion is observed primarily in the aspect of cutoff values for identification, subsequent monitoring, and management of fetal growth restriction. There is a need for extensive training and education in this field and uniform national recommendations.
Asunto(s)
Desarrollo Fetal , Peso Fetal , Femenino , Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal/diagnóstico por imagen , Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal/terapia , Edad Gestacional , Gráficos de Crecimiento , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Recién Nacido Pequeño para la Edad Gestacional , Embarazo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Ultrasonografía PrenatalRESUMEN
Background and Objectives: Fetal overgrowth is related to many perinatal complications, including stillbirth, cesarean section, maternal and neonatal injuries, and shoulder dystocia. It is related to maternal diabetes, obesity, and gestational weight gain but also happens in low-risk pregnancies. There is ongoing discussion regarding definitions, methods of detection, and classification. The method used for detection is crucial as it draws a line between those at risk and low-risk popula-tions. Materials and Methods: For this narrative review, relevant evidence was identified through PubMed search with one of the general terms (macrosomia, large-for-gestational-age) combined with the outcome of interest. Results: This review summarizes evidence on the relation of fetal overgrowth with stillbirth, cesarean sections, shoulder dystocia, anal sphincter injury, and hem-orrhage. Customized growth charts help to detect mothers and fetuses at risk of those complica-tions. Relations between fetal overgrowth and diabetes, maternal weight, and gestational weight gain were investigated. Conclusions: a substantial proportion of complications are an effect of the fetus growing above its potential and should be recognized as a new dangerous condition of Fetal Growth Acceleration.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Gestacional , Distocia , Aceleración , Cesárea , Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiología , Distocia/epidemiología , Femenino , Macrosomía Fetal/epidemiología , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , EmbarazoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Abuse against women in labor starts with subtle forms of discrimination that can turn into overt violence. Therefore it is crucial to work towards prevention and elimination of disrespect and ill-treatment in medical facility perinatal care in which staff allows such abuse. The aim of the study was to analyze the experiences of women related to perinatal care. Special emphasis was put on experiences that had traits indicating disrespectful and offensive care during childbirth in medical facilities providing perinatal care. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional survey. A questionnaire was prepared for respondents who gave birth in medical facilities. Information about the study was posted on the website of a non-governmental foundation dealing with projects aimed at improving perinatal care. The respondents gave online consent for processing the submitted data. 8378 questionnaires were submitted. The study was carried out between February 06 and March 20, 2018. The results were analyzed using the Chi-square independence test. The analysis was carried out at the significance level of 0.05 in Excel, R and SPSS. RESULTS: During their hospital stay, 81% of women in the study experienced violence or abuse from medical staff on at least one occasion. The most common abuse was having medical procedures without prior consent. Inappropriate comments made by staff related to their own or a woman's situation were reported in 25% of situations, whilst 20% of women experienced nonchalant treatment. In the study 19.3% of women reported that the staff did not properly care for their intimacy and 1.7% of the respondents said that the worst treatment was related to feeling anonymous in the hospital. CONCLUSIONS: The study shows that during Polish perinatal care women experience disrespectful and abusive care. Most abuse and disrespect involved violation of the right to privacy, the right to information, the right to equal treatment, and the right to freedom from violence. The low awareness of abuses and complaints reported in the study may result from women's ignorance about relevant laws related to human rights.
Asunto(s)
Acceso a la Información , Trabajo de Parto , Servicios de Salud Materna , Parto , Derechos del Paciente , Privacidad , Violencia , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Personal de Salud , Violaciones de los Derechos Humanos , Humanos , Consentimiento Informado , Abuso Físico , Polonia , Atención Posnatal , Embarazo , Atención Prenatal , Respeto , Discriminación Social , Estereotipo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Many studies have shown the negative influence of the foetus's occiput posterior position during birth on the final perinatal outcome. This study aims to add to the discussion on the impact of foetus positioning on the course of labour and subjective assessment of the level of labour difficulty. METHODS: The cross-sectional study took place from February 2020 to September 2021, and consisted of filling out observation forms and the assessment by the midwives and women of the level of labour difficulty. This study is based on the observation of 152 labours in low-risk women. FINDINGS: When compared to left foetal positioning, labours in which the foetus was in the right position were longer and more frequently failed to progress (in 11.3% vs. 37.5%), and epidural was more frequently administrated (in 30.4% vs. 52.7%). Both women and midwives subjectively evaluated deliveries with a foetus in the right position as more difficult. CONCLUSIONS: The right positioning of the foetus was related to greater labour difficulty and worse perinatal outcomes. The position of the foetus' head in relation to the pelvis should be considered as an indicator of the difficulty of labour and a support plan for the woman should be offered accordingly.
RESUMEN
Natural childbirth after a previous cesarean section is a debated issue despite scientific research and international recommendations. This study aimed to examine the experiences of women giving birth after a previous cesarean section, their preferences, and changes in attitudes towards childbirth after labor. This longitudinal study involved 288 pregnant women who had a previous cesarean section and completed a web-based questionnaire before and after labor, including information about their obstetric history, birth beliefs, and preferred mode of delivery. Among women who preferred a vaginal birth, nearly 80% tried it and 49.78% finished delivery by this mode. Among women declaring a preference for an elective cesarean section, 30% attempted a vaginal birth. Choosing a hospital where staff supported their decision (regardless of the decision) was the most helpful factor in preparing for labor after a cesarean section (63.19%). Women's birth preferences changed after labor, with women who had a vaginal birth after a cesarean section preferring this mode of delivery in their next pregnancy (89.34%). The mode of birth did not always follow the women's preferences, with some women who preferred a natural childbirth undergoing an elective cesarean section for medical reasons. A variety of changes were noticeable among women giving birth after a cesarean section, with a large proportion preferring natural birth in their next pregnancy. Hospitals should support women's birth preferences after a cesarean section (if medically appropriate), providing comprehensive counseling, resources, and emotional support to ensure informed decisions and positive birth experiences.
RESUMEN
Providing care to a woman after a Life-Limiting Fetal Conditions (LLFC) diagnosis is a difficult experience for midwives. This study's aim is to describe the experience of midwives assisting in births following an LLFC diagnosis. It is a qualitative study using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA). Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with 15 midwives with experience in caring for women giving birth following an LLFC diagnosis. The data was analyzed through coding using the MAXQDA tool. The main theme emerging from the experience of midwives concerned difficulty in interacting with the woman giving birth. The analysis singled out four subthemes containing the most significant issues arising from the experience of midwives in caring for a woman giving birth to a lethally ill child: in relation with the woman giving birth; in relation with the child and the family; in relation with oneself; and in relation with the workplace. Midwives should have access not only to solid knowledge about this question, but also to courses developing skills in dealing with difficult situations, in coping with stress, in expressing compassion and, most importantly, in communicating with women and their families in such difficult circumstances.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Parturients in labor experiencing severe pain may develop several complications, which could be avoided using various forms of labor analgesia. Researchers hold divergent opinions about the effect of epidural analgesia (EA) on labor duration and delivery mode. This paper aims to establish if EA affects the duration of the 1st and the 2nd phase of labor and the percentage of emergency Cesarean sections (CS) and instrumental delivery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The patients in this cohort study were recruited at St. Sophia's Specialist Hospital in Warsaw, between 1/1/2020 and 6/1/2020. We used following inclusion criteria: patients aged 18-40 with singleton pregnancies and cephalic presentation of the fetus who gave live birth at a gestational age of 37-42 weeks to neonates with birthweight 2500-4250 g and received EA at the cervical dilation between three and six centimeters. The control group didn't receive anesthesia. We excluded planned CS and vaginal births after CS. Data analysis was performed for all parturients and separately for multiparas and nulliparas. Results Out of 2550 deliveries, we included 1052 patients - 443 participants with EA and 609 in the control group. Patients with epidural analgesia experienced longer labor 415 vs 255 min (p < 0.01), longer 1st and 2nd stage (p < 0.01). They had a lower risk of emergency CS (OR = 0.56) (p < 0.01) but were more likely to have instrumental delivery. CONCLUSIONS: EA prolongs the first and the second stage of labor yet doesn't affect neonatal outcomes. Moreover, the risk of emergency CS in nulliparas with EA is three times lower.
RESUMEN
During pregnancy, the placenta undergoes a natural aging process, which is considered normal. However, it has been hypothesized that an abnormally accelerated and premature aging of the placenta may contribute to placenta-related health issues. Placental senescence has been linked to several obstetric complications, including abnormal fetal growth, preeclampsia, preterm birth, and stillbirth, with stillbirth being the most challenging. A systematic search was conducted on Pubmed, Embase, and Scopus databases. Twenty-two full-text articles were identified for the final synthesis. Of these, 15 presented original research and 7 presented narrative reviews. There is a paucity of evidence in the literature on the role of placental aging in late small for gestational age (SGA), fetal growth restriction (FGR), and stillbirth. For future research, guidelines for both planning and reporting research must be implemented. The inclusion criteria should include clear differentiation between early and late SGA and FGR. As for stillbirths, only those with no other known cause of stillbirth should be included in the studies. This means excluding stillbirths due to congenital defects, infections, placental abruption, and maternal conditions affecting feto-maternal hemodynamics.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The Polish criteria for "intrauterine death" include fetal demise after 22 weeks of gestation, weighing > 500 g and body length at least 25 cm, when the gestational age is unknown. The rate of fetal death in Poland in 2015 is 3:10,000. In 2020, 1,231 stillbirths were registered. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An analysis using 142,662 births in the period between 2015-2020 in 11 living in Poland. The first subgroup was admitted as patients > 22 to the beginning of the 30th week of pregnancy (n = 229), and the second from the 30th week of pregnancy inclusively (n = 179). In the case of women from both subgroups, there was a risk of preterm delivery close to hospitalization. RESULTS: It was found that stillbirth in 41% of women in the first pregnancy. For the patient, stillbirth was also the first in his life. The average stillbirth weight was 1487 g, the average body length was 40 cm. Among fetuses up to 30 weeks, male fetuses are born more often, in subgroup II, the sex of the child was usually female. Most fetal deaths occur in mothers < 15 and > 45 years of age. CONCLUSIONS: According to the Polish results of the origin of full-term fetuses > 30 weeks of gestation for death in the concomitant antenatal, such as placental-umbilical and fetal hypoxia, acute intrapartum effects rarely, and moreover < 30 Hbd fetal growth restriction (FGR), occurring placental-umbilical, acute intrapartum often.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess risk factors for anxiety and depression among pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic using Mind-COVID, a prospective cross-sectional study that compares outcomes in middle-income economies and high-income economies. METHODS: A total of 7102 pregnant women from 12 high-income economies and nine middle-income economies were included. The web-based survey used two standardized instruments, General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). RESULT: Pregnant women in high-income economies reported higher PHQ-9 (0.18 standard deviation [SD], P < 0.001) and GAD-7 (0.08 SD, P = 0.005) scores than those living in middle-income economies. Multivariate regression analysis showed that increasing PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scales were associated with mental health problems during pregnancy and the need for psychiatric treatment before pregnancy. PHQ-9 was associated with a feeling of burden related to restrictions in social distancing, and access to leisure activities. GAD-7 scores were associated with a pregnancy-related complication, fear of adverse outcomes in children related to COVID-19, and feeling of burden related to finances. CONCLUSIONS: According to this study, the imposed public health measures and hospital restrictions have left pregnant women more vulnerable during these difficult times. Adequate partner and family support during pregnancy and childbirth can be one of the most important protective factors against anxiety and depression, regardless of national economic status.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Niño , Femenino , Embarazo , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/psicología , Mujeres Embarazadas/psicología , Pandemias , Estudios Transversales , Depresión/etiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudios Prospectivos , Ansiedad/etiología , Trastornos de Ansiedad/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/psicología , InternetRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: In Poland, in accordance with applicable regulations, every woman should have access to epidural anesthesia. The advantage of this type of analgesia is primarily analgesic effectiveness. The aim of the study is to identify variables related to epidural anesthesia and to verify the relationship between them and the occurrence of perinatal complications in the mother and the child. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study. Electronic documentation of patients of the Hospital of St. Sofia in Warsaw was used to create an anonymous retrospective database of all births in the years 2015-2020. 27,340 cases were qualified for the analysis. RESULTS: The logistic regression model showed that the risk of episiotomy (OR = 5.539; CI = 5.169-5.935) increases more than fivefold and perineal laceration (OR = 2.190; CI= 2.036-2.356) increases twice in the case of epidural anesthesia application. There is also an increased risk of operative delivery (OR = 2.668; CI = 2.255-3.156), at the same time the risk of performing a cesarean section decreases more than fivefold (OR = 0.043; CI = 0.036-0.052). CONCLUSIONS: Epidural anesthesia affects the delivery mechanism leading to an increase in the number and intensity of additional medical procedures - episiotomy, perineal laceration, operative delivery. The rationale for the routine use of this method of anesthesia should be considered in the context of the implications for the woman's reproductive health and research on the effectiveness of other methods of birth anesthesia should be conducted.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia Epidural , Cesárea , Embarazo , Niño , Recién Nacido , Humanos , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Madres , Anestesia Epidural/efectos adversos , PoloniaRESUMEN
The WHO (World Health Organization) recommends that the percentage of perineal incisions should not exceed 10%, indicating that this is a good goal to achieve, despite the fact that it is still a frequently used medical intervention in Poland. The risk factors for perineal incision that have been analyzed so far in the literature allow, among others, to limit the frequency of performing this procedure. Are they still valid? Have there been new risk factors that we should take into account? We have conducted this study to find the risk factors for performing perineal incision that would reduce the frequency of this procedure. The aim of the study was to check whether the risk factors that were analyzed in the literature are still valid, to find new risk factors for perineal incisions and to compare them among Polish women. This was a single-center retrospective case-control study. The electronic patient records of Saint Sophia's Hospital in Warsaw, Poland, a tertiary hospital was used to create an anonymous retrospective database of all deliveries from 2015 to 2020. The study included the analysis of two groups, the study group of patients who had had an episiotomy, and the control group-patients without an episiotomy in cases where an episiotomy was indicated. A logistic regression model was developed to assess the risk factors for perineal laceration. Independent risk factors for episiotomy in labor include oxytocin use in the second stage of labor (OR (Odds Ratio) = 6.00; 95% CI (Confidence Interval): 4.76-7.58), the supply of oxytocin in the first and the second stage of labor (OR = 3.18; 95% CI: 2.90-3.49), oxytocin use in the first stage of labor (OR = 2.72; 95% CI: 2.52-3.51), state after cesarean section (OR = 2.97; 95% CI: 2.52-3.51), epidural anesthesia use (OR = 1.77; 95% CI: 1.62-1.93), male gender (OR = 1.10; 95% CI: 1.02-1.19), and prolonged second stage of labor (OR = 1.01; 95% CI: 1.01-1.01). A protective factor against the use of an episiotomy was delivery in the Birth Centre (OR = 0.43; 95% CI: 0.37-0.51) and mulitpara (OR = 0.31; 95% CI: 0.27-0.35). To reduce the frequency of an episiotomy, it is necessary consider the risk factors of performing this procedure in everyday practice, e.g., limiting the use of oxytocin or promoting alternative places of delivery.