Lower extremity arterial disease vs. coronary artery disease: mortality differences after revascularization.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patients undergoing revascularization for lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD) may face a higher risk of mortality than those with coronary artery disease (CAD). This study aimed to characterize the difference in mortality risk between patients undergoing revascularization for LEAD and CAD and identify associated factors. METHODS: The 1-year database of 10 754 patients undergoing revascularization for CAD (n = 6349) and LEAD (n = 4405) was analysed. Poisson regression models were used to characterize interpopulation differences in mortality, adjusting for baseline clinical features, including age, sex, polyvascular disease, comorbidities, medications, and vulnerabilities. RESULTS: Individuals with LEAD were older, were more likely to have polyvascular disease, had more comorbidities, and received fewer cardioprotective drugs than those with CAD. Vulnerabilities remained more common in the LEAD group even after adjusting for these clinical features. The crude risk ratio of mortality incidence for LEAD vs. CAD was 2.91 (95% confidence interval, 2.54-3.34), attenuated to 2.14 (1.83-2.50) after controlling for age, sex, and polyvascular disease. The percentage attenuation in the excessive mortality associated with LEAD was 29%. The stepwise addition of comorbidities, medications, and vulnerabilities as adjusting factors attenuated the incidence risk ratio to 1.48 (1.26-1.72), 1.33 (1.12-1.58), and 1.17 (0.98-1.39), respectively, and increased the percentage attenuation to 64%, 73%, and 86%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality risk was almost three-fold higher in patients undergoing revascularization for LEAD than in those with CAD. The excessive mortality was considerably attributable to inter-group differences in baseline characteristics, including potentially clinically or socially modifiable factors.

Impact of intravascular ultrasound-guided endovascular therapy on periprocedural outcomes in patients with lower-extremity artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Although technological improvements in intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) may reduce technical failures in endovascular therapy (EVT), perioperative complications (POCs) associated with IVUS use may increase. AIMS: This study investigated the impact of IVUS on periprocedural outcomes in symptomatic lower-extremity artery disease (LEAD) patients undergoing EVT. METHODS: This study evaluated 28,088 symptomatic LEAD patients who underwent EVT between January 2021 and December 2021 using a prospective nationwide registry in Japan. Outcome measures included periprocedural outcomes, including technical failure and POCs. To compare outcomes with and without IVUS use, propensity score matching analysis was performed for overall and for each arterial region (aortoiliac [AI], femoropopliteal [FP], and infrapopliteal [IP] arteries) using a binary logistic regression model. RESULTS: IVUS was used in 75%, 72%, and 37% of AI, FP, and IP lesions, respectively. After propensity matching extraction, the IVUS group had a tendency of lower technical failure rate than the non-IVUS group, although not statistically different (3.9% vs. 5.4%, p = 0.054), without an increase in the POC rate (1.8% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.54). Regarding the per-regional analysis, the technical failure rate of FP-EVT was significantly lower in the IVUS group (3.1% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.006), whereas those of AI-EVT (2.2% vs. 3.1%, p = 0.12) and IP-EVT (6.8% vs. 6.1%, p = 0.37) were not significantly different between the two groups. Furthermore, IVUS did not increase the POC rate for any region (AI-EVT: 1.3% vs. 1.3%, p = 1.00; FP-EVT: 1.8% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.75; and IP-EVT: 2.0% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.56). CONCLUSION: The current study revealed that IVUS did not increase the POCs and technical failure for overall lesions but reduced the incidence of FP-EVT technical failure.

Evaluating the Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair-First Approach for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Japan.

PURPOSE: To verify the validity of an endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR)-first strategy for treating patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) in Japan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted on 2 groups of patients with rAAA who underwent surgical treatment at 3 hospitals in the Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan, between January 2007 and September 2016. The open surgical treatment group comprised patients with rAAA who underwent open surgical treatment before January 2012; their data were retrospectively collected from their medical records. The EVAR-first strategy group comprised patients with rAAA who underwent treatment based on the Shonan rAAA protocol (SRAP; the standard protocol-based EVAR-first strategy) in or after February 2012; their data were collected prospectively. The short- and long-term treatment outcomes of both groups were compared. In addition, a risk score-based sensitivity analysis (one-to-one matching) was conducted on both groups using a caliper with 0.2 standard deviations of the score. RESULTS: Of the 163 patients with rAAA, the open surgical and EVAR-first strategy groups comprised 53 and 110 patients, respectively (EVAR: 91.8%, open repair: 8.2%). The 30-day postoperative mortality rate differed significantly, being 42% for the open surgery group and 25% for the EVAR-first strategy group (odds ratio: 0.44, 95% confidence interval: 0.20-0.97). The postoperative survival rates at 6 months, 1 year, and 3 years were 66%, 48%, and 58% for the EVAR-first group, respectively, and 51%, 66%, and 48% for the open surgery group, respectively (p=0.072). In a matched cohort analysis (n=50), the 30-day postoperative mortality rate was 22% for the EVAR-first group and 44% for the open surgery group (odds ratio: 0.35, 95% confidence interval: 0.14-0.90). The postoperative survival rates at 6 months, 1 year, and 3 years were 76%, 76%, and 63% for the EVAR-first group, respectively, and 48%, 45%, and 45% for the open surgery group, respectively (p=0.003). CONCLUSION: The SRAP-based EVAR-first strategy for rAAA yielded significantly better treatment outcomes than the open surgical strategy. These findings suggest that EVAR should be considered the primary treatment option for rAAA, given its potential to reduce early mortality rates. CLINICAL IMPACT: Multicenter retrospective analysis of prospectively collected registry data was done to compare treatment outcomes of two groups of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm patients open surgery and endovascular-aneurysm-repair (EVAR)-first strategy (Shonan ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm protocol). EVAR-first group showed better outcomes: lower 30-day mortality (25% vs. 42%), higher survival rates at 6 months, 1 year, and 3 years. Take home Message: The study supports the use of the EVAR-first strategy with the Shonan Protocol for treating ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms in Japan, showing improved outcomes, reduced 30-day postoperative mortality, and better long-term survival rates compared to the conventional approach.

Multicenter Registry of Common Femoral Artery Disease Treated With Endovascular Revascularization Using Interwoven Nitinol Stents: An Observational Retrospective Study.

PURPOSE: Surgical thromboendarterectomy has been the gold standard treatment for common femoral artery (CFA) disease. However, endovascular therapy (EVT) is conducted in certain patients with CFA lesions because of multiple comorbidities. The interwoven nitinol stent (IWS) has been developed to prevent stent fracture. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of EVT using IWS for CFA lesions in clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective multicenter registry analyzed patients who had symptomatic lower-extremity artery disease due to CFA lesions and underwent EVT using IWS between 2019 and 2021. The primary endpoint was restenosis 2 years after EVT. RESULTS: This study enrolled a total of 177 patients with 196 CFA lesions. The 2-year estimate of freedom from restenosis was 88.0%. The 2-year freedom rates from the target-lesion revascularization, major amputation, and all-cause death were 92.9%, 99.0%, and 75.2%, respectively. The clinical features significantly associated with restenosis risk were the reference vessel diameter (RVD, per 1.0 mm, hazard ratio [HR], 0.24 [0.08-0.70]; p=0.009), external iliac artery (EIA) involvement (HR=4.03 [1.56-10.4]; p=0.004), superficial femoral artery (SFA) involvement (HR=3.05 [1.00-9.25]; p=0.049), body mass index (BMI; per 1.0, HR=0.85 [0.73-0.99]; p=0.032), occlusion of deep femoral arteries (DFAs) at baseline (HR=7.89 [2.04-30.5]; p=0.003), and chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI, HR=2.63 [1.02-6.78]; p=0.045). Their significant association was also confirmed by the random survival forest analysis. During a median follow-up of 12.0 months, guiding sheaths were inserted via CFAs implanted IWSs in 73 cases (37.2%), and no patients had cannulation-related complications, such as failed hemostasis, fracture of IWS, and stent occlusion. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular therapy using IWS in CFA lesions showed acceptable 2-year patency rates at 88.0% and might preserve the arterial access via the ipsilateral CFAs. Small RVD, involving EIA and SFA lesions, emaciation, occluded DFA, and CLTI are associated with poor 2-year patency rates following EVT, thus, IWS implantation in CFA lesions may be an option for patients unsuitable for surgical revascularization. CLINICAL IMPACT: This retrospective multicenter registry enrolled 177 patients with 199 CFA lesions treated with EVT using interwoven nitinol stents, because surgical thromboendarterectomy was difficult due to their multiple comorbidities. The 2-year estimate of freedom from restenosis was acceptable at 88.0%. The 2-year freedom rate from major amputation was also high at 99.0%. Moreover, during a median follow-up of 12.0 months, guiding sheaths were inserted via CFAs implanted IWSs in 73 cases, and no patients had cannulation-related complications such as failed hemostasis, fracture of IWS, and stent occlusion.

Impact of Procedural Techniques on Midterm Patency of Fluoropolymer-Based Drug-Eluting Stent Placed in the Femoropopliteal Artery.

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of compliance with recommended procedural techniques on the midterm patency of a fluoropolymer-based drug-eluting stent (FP-DES) in the femoropopliteal artery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 200 femoropopliteal lesions (chronic limb-threatening ischemia, 59%; chronic total occlusion, 41%) in 173 patients (male, 66%; diabetes mellitus, 62%; hemodialysis, 40%) with lower extremity arterial disease who underwent intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided endovascular therapy with FP-DES between January 2016 and July 2021. The primary outcome measure was restenosis, defined as a peak systolic velocity ratio of >2.4 based on the duplex US findings. The association between procedural techniques and incidence of restenosis was investigated using Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS: The 2-year cumulative incidence of restenosis was 19.5% (SD ± 3.3). Multivariate analysis revealed that noncompliance with recommended procedural techniques, such as plaque burden at the stent edge of <50%, a minimum stent area (MSA) of >12 mm2, and stent placement within the P1 segment, was independently associated with an increased risk of restenosis (hazard ratios [HRs], 3.22, 4.71, and 4.67 and P = .004, P < .001, and P < .001, respectively). The 2-year restenosis risk for procedures performed in compliance with all 3-technical criteria was 8.4% (SD ± 3.4), whereas the risks for those in compliance with 2-technical criteria or 0- or 1-technical criteria were 25.0% (SD ± 6.2) and 48.6% (SD ± 10.4), respectively. HRs relative to 3-technical criteria compliance were 3.79 (P = .007) and 11.85 (P < .001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Noncompliance with recommended procedural techniques, including plaque burden at the stent edge of <50%, MSA of >12 mm2, and stent placement within the P1 segment, was significantly associated with an increased risk of 2-year restenosis after FP-DES implantation in the femoropopliteal artery.

One-Year Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors Following Revascularization in Patients With Acute Limb Ischemia　- Results From the RESCUE ALI Study.

BACKGROUND: Acute limb ischemia (ALI) is a limb- and life-threatening condition and urgent treatment including revascularization should be offered to patients unless the limb is irreversibly ischemic. The aim of this study was to investigate 1-year clinical outcomes and prognostic factors following revascularization in patients with ALI.Methods and Results: A retrospective, multicenter, nonrandomized study examined 185 consecutive patients with ALI treated by surgical revascularization (SR), endovascular revascularization (ER), or hybrid revascularization (HR) in 6 Japanese medical centers from January 2015 to August 2021. The 1-year amputation-free survival (AFS) rate was estimated to be 69.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 62.8-76.2%). There were no significant differences among SR, ER, and HR regarding both technical success and perioperative complications. Multivariate analysis revealed that Rutherford category IIb and III ischemia (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.86; 95% CI: 1.06-3.25), supra- to infrapopliteal lesion (HR: 2.06; 95% CI: 1.08-3.95), and technical failure (HR: 2.58; 95% CI: 1.49-4.46) were independent risk factors for 1-year AFS. CONCLUSIONS: Rutherford category IIb and III ischemia, supra- to infrapopliteal lesions, and technical failures were identified as independent risk factors for 1-year AFS. Furthermore, patients with multiple risk factors had a lower AFS rate.

Three-year clinical course after fluoropolymer-based drug-eluting stent implantation for femoropopliteal lesions.

BACKGROUND: Although the 1-year clinical outcomes of fluoropolymer-based drug-eluting stents (FP-DES) were favorable for the treatment of real-world femoropopliteal lesions in symptomatic peripheral artery disease (PAD), their performance beyond 1 year remained unknown. The current study determined the 3-year clinical course of FP-DES implantation for real-world femoropopliteal lesions. METHODS: This multicenter, prospective, observational study evaluated 1204 limbs (chronic limb-threatening ischemia, 34.8%; mean lesion length, 18.6 ± 9.9 cm, chronic total occlusion: 53.2%) of 1097 patients with PAD (age, 75 ± 9 years; diabetes mellitus, 60.8%) undergoing FP-DES implantation for femoropopliteal lesions. The primary outcome measure was 3-year restenosis. The secondary outcome measures included 3-year occlusive restenosis, stent thrombosis, target lesion revascularization (TLR), and aneurysmal degeneration. RESULTS: The 3-year cumulative occurrence of restenosis was 27.3%, whereas that of occlusive restenosis, stent thrombosis, and TLR was 16.1%, 7.3%, and 19.6%, respectively. The annual occurrence of restenosis decreased by 12.0%, 9.5%, and 5.8% in the first, second, and third year, respectively (p < 0.001). Similarly, the rates of occlusive restenosis and stent thrombosis decreased (p < 0.001 and p = 0.007, respectively), whereas the rate of TLR remained unchanged for 3 years (p = 0.15). The incidence of aneurysmal degeneration at 3 years (15.7%) did not significantly differ from that at 1 and 2 years (p = 0.69 and 0.20, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the favorable long-term clinical course of FP-DES in real-world practice, emphasizing the importance of monitoring for occlusive restenosis and stent thrombosis while considering the potential onset of aneurysmal degeneration.

Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor use in patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing endovascular therapy for symptomatic peripheral artery disease.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to reveal the prevalence of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor treatment and its association with restenosis risk in patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing endovascular therapy for symptomatic peripheral artery disease. METHODS: We used the database of a multicenter prospective study registering patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease undergoing femoropopliteal drug-coated balloon treatment in Japan. The current analysis included 1058 patients with diabetes mellitus free from end-stage renal disease. The association of clinical characteristics with SGLT2 inhibitor use was investigated using the logistic regression model. The propensity score matching was adopted to compare the primary patency, i.e., freedom from restenosis, after endovascular therapy between patients treated with and without a SGLT2 inhibitor. RESULTS: The proportion of SGLT2 inhibitor treatment at revascularization was 14.8% (95% confidence interval, 12.8-17.1%). Younger age, increased body mass index, and increased hemoglobin A1c levels were independently associated with SGLT2 inhibitor use (all P < 0.05). The proportion of SGLT2 inhibitor reached 38.2% (95% confidence interval, 25.4-52.3%) in patients with the three associated factors. The propensity score-matching analysis demonstrated that primary patency was not different between patients treated with a SGLT2 inhibitor and those without it (72.0% [95% confidence interval, 64.1-80.9%] versus 67.8% [62.7-73.3%] at 2 years; P = 0.45). CONCLUSIONS: SGLT2 inhibitors were not rarely used in patients with diabetes mellitus who underwent femoropopliteal endovascular therapy using a drug coated balloon for symptomatic peripheral artery disease in real-world settings. SGLT2 inhibitor treatment was not associated with an increased risk of restenosis.

Comparing the impact of the loss of patency between treatment with drug-coated balloon angioplasty and drug-eluting stent placement.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the results of endovascular treatment with drug-eluting stents (DES) and drug-coated balloons (DCB) in atherosclerotic lesions in the femoropopliteal artery, as well as to assess restenotic patterns. METHODS: Clinical data from 617 cases treated with DES or DCB for femoropopliteal diseases were analyzed in this multicenter, retrospective cohort study. From these, 290 DES and 145 DCB cases were extracted by propensity score matching. Outcomes investigated were 1- and 2-year primary patency, reintervention, and restenotic pattern and its impact on symptoms in each group. RESULTS: The primary patency rates at 1 and 2 years in the DES group were superior to those in the DCB group (84.8% and 71.1% vs 81.3% and 66.6%, P = .043), whereas there was no significant difference in freedom from target lesion revascularization (91.6% and 82.6% vs 88.3% and 78.8%, P = .13). Compared with what was measured before the index procedures, exacerbated symptoms, rate of occlusion, and an increase in the occluded length at loss of patency were more frequent in the DES group than in the DCB group. The odds ratios were 3.53 (95% confidence interval, 1.31-9.49; P = .012), 3.61 (1.09-11.9; P = .036), and 3.82 (1.15-12.7; P = .029), respectively. On the other hand, the frequency of an increase in lesion length and requirement of target lesion revascularization were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Primary patency was significantly higher at 1 and 2 years in the DES than in the DCB group. However, DES were associated with exacerbated clinical symptoms and complicated lesion characteristics at the point of loss of patency.

Impact of calcification on clinical outcomes after drug-coated balloon angioplasty for superficial femoral artery disease: Assessment using the peripheral artery calcification scoring system.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether the severity of calcification assessed by the peripheral artery calcification scoring system (PACSS) was associated with clinical outcomes of drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty for femoropopliteal lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 733 limbs with intermittent claudication of 626 patients, who underwent DCB angioplasty for de novo femoropopliteal lesions between January 2017 and February 2021 at seven cardiovascular centers in Japan. The patients were categorized using the PACSS classification (grades 0-4: no visible calcification of the target lesion, unilateral wall calcification < 5 cm, unilateral calcification ≥ 5 cm, bilateral wall calcification < 5 cm, and bilateral calcification ≥ 5 cm, respectively). The main outcome was primary patency at 1 year. The Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to explore whether the PACSS classification was an independent predictor of clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The distribution of PACSS was grade 0 in 38%, grade 1 in 17%, grade 2 in 7%, grade 3 in 16%, and grade 4 in 23%. The 1-year primary patency rates in these grades, respectively, were 88.2%, 89.3%, 71.9%, 96.5%, and 82.6%, respectively (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis disclosed that PACSS grade 4 (hazard ratio: 1.82, 95% confidence interval 1.15-2.87, p = 0.010) was associated with restenosis. CONCLUSION: The PACSS grade 4 calcification was independently associated with poor clinical outcomes after DCB angioplasty for de novo femoropopliteal lesions.

Effect of High-Dose Drug-Coated Balloon Repetition After Drug-Coated Balloon Failure.

PURPOSE: Although the optimal treatment for femoropopliteal (FP) drug-coated balloon (DCB) restenosis lesions remains debatable, the effectiveness of DCB repetition for DCB restenosis has been reported. However, the optimal DCB repetition strategy is not yet established. Thus, this study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of high-dose DCB repetition with those of low-dose DCB repetition for FP DCB restenosis lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-center, observational study used a clinical database of 677 consecutive patients undergoing FP endovascular intervention for symptomatic peripheral artery disease between December 2018 and December 2021. Of these patients, 89 cases treated with DCB repetition for FP DCB restenosis lesions were analyzed. The primary endpoint was recurrent restenosis (re-restenosis) and the secondary endpoints were recurrent target-lesion revascularization (TLR), re-occlusion, and major adverse limb events (MALE) obtained using propensity score matching. Interaction analysis was also performed to explore the effects of the baseline characteristics on the association between high- and low-dose DCB with restenosis risk. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, high-dose DCB demonstrated a significantly higher freedom from re-restenosis compared with low-dose DCB repetition at 1 year (90.4% vs 40.9%, p=0.034). In addition, freedom from re-TLR and MALE at 1 year was significantly higher in the high-dose DCB group (95.0% vs 53.3%, p=0.025; 95.0% vs 54.7%, p=0.025, respectively). Conversely, freedom rates from re-occlusion were not significantly different between the 2 groups (100.0% vs 84.0%, p=0.99). No baseline characteristics or perioperative outcomes had any significant interaction effect on the association of high-dose DCB versus low-dose DCB with restenosis risk. CONCLUSION: For FP DCB restenosis lesions, high-dose DCB repetition offered more favorable outcomes than low-dose DCB repetition. CLINICAL IMPACT: This study revealed that for femoropopliteal drug-coated balloon (DCB) restenosis lesions, high-dose DCB repetition obtained more favorable outcomes than low-dose DCB repetition. In addition, there was no significant interaction effect on the association of high- versus low-dose DCB with re-restenosis risk for the baseline characteristics and perioperative outcomes. This finding might be also a reason for choosing high-dose DCB repetition for FP DCB restenosis lesions in daily clinical practice.

Stent Implantation and Thromboendarterectomy for the Common Femoral Artery in Real-World Practice.

PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of thromboendarterectomy (TEA) and endovascular therapy (EVT) with stenting for patients with atherosclerotic common femoral artery (CFA) occlusive disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From a retrospective registry of 1193 consecutive patients with CFA treatment performed between 2018 and 2020 at 66 institutions in Japan, we identified patients who underwent TEA (n=432) or stent implantation (n=157). The primary outcome measures were the 1-year primary patency of TEA versus stenting with propensity score matching. The secondary outcome measures were perioperative complications, length of hospital stay, any reintervention, limb salvage, and overall survival. Interaction analysis for primary patency was performed with propensity score stratification to determine the appropriate target population for CFA stenting. RESULTS: Propensity score matching extracted 101 pairs (101 patients in the EVT group and 253 patients in the TEA group). The 1-year primary patency rate was significantly higher in the TEA cohort (92.8% vs 84.6%, p=0.006). The freedom from reintervention rate was also significantly higher in the TEA cohort (94.0% vs 89.9%, p=0.030). However, the 1-year limb salvage (98.7% vs 100.0%, p=0.32), 1-year overall survival (90.8% vs 85.0%, p=0.14), and frequency of perioperative complications were not significantly different between the cohorts (6.9% vs 14.2%, p=0.10). Based on interaction analysis, the superiority of TEA over EVT in terms of patency was less apparent in patients with advanced age and chronic heart failure. CONCLUSIONS: Thromboendarterectomy was superior to stenting in terms of primary patency and freedom from revascularization at 1 year. There was no significant difference in the incidence of perioperative complications between both groups. Thromboendarterectomy may be recommended as the standard treatment strategy for patients with atherosclerotic CFA disease, whereas stenting may be considered for patients with advanced age and chronic heart failure. CLINICAL IMPACT: Thromboendarterectomy compared to stenting was the preferred revascularization strategy for patients with CFA disease in terms of primary patency and freedom from target lesion revascularization during the 1st year. The difference was attenuated in subgroups with advanced age (85 years or older) or chronic heart failure, thus stenting may be considered in patients with these backgrounds.

Impact of Cardiac Function on Loss of Patency in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease Presenting the Femoropopliteal Lesions Endovascularly Treated With New-Generation Devices.

PURPOSE: The current study sought to investigate the impact of cardiac condition on loss of patency after endovascular therapy (EVT) using new-generation devices for femoropopliteal (FP) lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied 547 lesions (chronic limb-threatening ischemia: 44%, TASC II C/D lesion: 61%, chronic total occlusion: 37%, in-stent restenosis: 13%, involving popliteal arterial lesion: 45%) belonging to 416 patients (average age: 75±9 years, male: 69%, diabetes mellitus: 62%, hemodialysis: 33%) who underwent EVT with new-generation FP-specific devices (polymer-free paclitaxel-eluting stent, n=186; stent graft, n=119; fluoropolymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent, n=29; interwoven stent, n=17; drug-coated balloon, n=196) from June 2012 to May 2019. Cardiac function was evaluated using echocardiography. The primary outcome measure was primary patency, which was defined as free from peak systolic velocity ratio (PSVR) >2.5 assessed by duplex ultrasound. Predictors for loss of patency were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. RESULTS: Overall 12 primary patency were 80.0±1.8%. After the multivariate analysis, reduced stroke volume evaluated by echocardiography (hazard ratio [HR]=0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.97-0.99, p=0.03), chronic heart failure (HR=1.76, 95% CI=1.05-2.97, p=0.03), and a smaller distal reference vessel diameter (HR=0.73, 95% CI=0.55-0.97, p=0.03) were significantly associated with loss of 12-month primary patency, whereas lesion length (HR=1.01, 95% CI=0.99-1.03, p=0.33) and presence of chronic total occlusion (CTO; HR=0.92, 95% CI=0.61-1.40, p=0.70) were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The current study revealed that cardiac function represented by reduced stroke volume and presence of chronic heart failure as well as a smaller distal reference vessel diameter were significantly associated with loss of 12-month primary patency in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) presenting FP lesions endovascularly treated with new-generation devices.

Comparing the Safety and Feasibility of Endovascular Therapy via Transradial and Transfemoral Approaches in Patients with Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of the Nationwide Registry.

PURPOSE: Our objective was to evaluate the feasibility of performing endovascular therapy (EVT) for aortoiliac artery disease using transradial approach (TRA) as compared to transfemoral approach (TFA). METHODS: We analyzed 9671 cases with symptomatic lower extremity artery disease due to aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) treated using EVT from a Japanese Nationwide EVT Registry between January and December 2021. We compared the baseline characteristics, procedural information, and 30-day outcomes of patients who received EVT only via TRA (n=863 [16.9%]) and those only via TFA (n=4255 [83.1%]) by using propensity score (PS) matching, after excluding those who required regular dialysis, those who underwent hybrid surgeries, and those who received EVT through 2 or more approach sites. RESULTS: After matching, the final study population consisted of 862 matched patients with similar baseline characteristics in each group. Technical success rate was comparable between the 2 groups (99.3% vs. 99.3%, p>0.99). No significant differences were observed with respect to the composite of all-cause death within 48 hours after EVT and post-procedural complications within 30 days, including severe bleeding that required transfusion, revascularization procedures, urgent surgeries, cerebral infarction, and major limb amputation (0.2% vs. 0.7%, p=0.29). Transradial approach was associated with shorter operation time (85 vs. 90 minutes, p=0.016), but longer fluoroscopy time (26 vs. 20 minutes, p<0.001) and higher contrast agent volume (80 vs. 75 mL, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: After PS matching, TRA showed the comparable rates of successful EVT and 30-day complications in patients with AIOD compared to TFA. Transradial approach was found to be safe and be a viable alternative of TFA for the treatment of AIOD. CLINICAL IMPACT: The efficacy of transradial approach (TRA) is established in percutaneous coronary intervention; however, its safety and feasibility are unclear in endovascular therapy (EVT). We analyzed 9,671 cases with symptomatic aortoiliac occlusive disease treated using EVT from a Nationwide Registry to compare the 30-day outcomes of those who received EVT only via TRA (n = 863 [16.9%]and those only via TFA (n=4,255 [83.1%]) by using propensity score matching. Technical success rate (99.3% vs. 99.3%, p > 0.99) and 30-day complications (0.2% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.29) were comparable between the two groups. EVT via TRA could be performed safely.

Institutional Volume and Initial Results for Endovascular Treatment for Chronic Occlusive Lower-Extremity Artery Disease: A Report From the Japanese Nationwide Registry.

PURPOSE: Chronic total occlusion (CTO) remains as a major target for endovascular treatment (EVT) in improving symptomatic lower-extremity artery disease (LEAD). However, despite the technical demand and learning curve for the procedure, volume-outcome relationship of EVT targeted for CTO in symptomatic LEAD remains unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were obtained from a nationwide registry for EVT procedures limited to the Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics between January 2018 and December 2020 from 660 cardiovascular centers in Japan. In total, 96 099 patients underwent EVT for symptomatic LEAD, and 41 900 (43.6%) underwent CTO-targeted EVTs during the study period. Institutional volume was classified into quartiles. The association of institutional volumes with short-term outcomes was explored using the generalized linear mixed model using a logit link function, in which, interinstitution variability was used as a random effect. RESULTS: The median institutional volume for all EVT cases per quartile was 29, 68, 125, and 299 cases/year for the first, second, third, and fourth quartiles, respectively. With each model analysis, the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for technical success were significantly lower in patients who underwent EVT in institutions within the first quartile (<52 cases/year) than in the other quartiles (P < .01, respectively). On the contrary, the adjusted ORs for procedural complications were significantly higher in the first and second quartiles than in the third and fourth quartiles (P < .01, respectively). CONCLUSION: In contemporary Japanese EVT practice, a higher institutional volume but not operator volume was associated with a higher technical success rate and a lower procedural complication rate in patients with symptomatic LEAD involving CTO lesions. CLINICAL IMPACT: EVT for CTO lesions is still challenging for clinicians because of difficulties of wire/devise crossing or high procedural complications rate. Our study demonstrated that a higher institutional volume but not operator volume was associated with a higher technical success rate and a lower procedural complication rate in patients with symptomatic LEAD involving CTO lesions. In contemporary Japanese practice, a higher institutional experience has better impacts on short-term clinical outcomes. Future research should determine the relationship between institutional volume and long-term clinical outcomes.

Clinical Outcomes and Factors Associated With Aortic Shrinkage After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Aneurysmal Chronic Aortic Dissection.

PURPOSE: The effectiveness of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for chronic aortic dissection (AD) with aneurysmal degeneration remains controversial. We retrospectively investigated clinical outcomes and assessed predictors of aortic shrinkage after TEVAR for chronic aneurysmal AD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2010 and December 2021, 70 patients with double-barrel-type chronic AD were enrolled. Major intimal tears in thoracic aorta were covered by stent graft. Early and late clinical outcomes, and diameter change of downstream aorta during follow-up period were reviewed. Subsequently, factors associated with aortic shrinkage were assessed by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Mean age was 63 (interquartile range [IQR]: 54-68) years, 54 (80%) men, median duration from AD onset was 4 (IQR: 1-10) years, and maximum aortic diameter was 53 (IQR: 49-58) mm. Supra-aortic debranching procedure was required in 57 (81%) patients. Early aorta-related death occurred in 2 (3%) patients. Both stroke and spinal cord ischemia occurred in 1 (2%) patient. Five-year freedom rates from aorta-related death and reintervention were 96% and 51%, respectively. Sixty-four patients underwent follow-up computed tomography (84%) 1 year after TEVAR, with 33 (52%) achieving aortic shrinkage. In multivariable analysis, duration from AD onset (per year) (odds ratio [OR]: 0.82, 0.70-0.97; p=0.017) and maximum aortic-diameter ratio between aortic arch and descending aorta (per 0.1) (morphologic index; OR: 1.34, 1.04-1.74; p=0.023) were independent aortic shrinkage predictors. CONCLUSIONS: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair for chronic AD with aneurysmal degeneration achieved satisfactory survival outcomes, but with a considerable reintervention rate. Duration from AD onset and preoperative aortic morphology could affect post-TEVAR aortic shrinkage. Earlier intervention could lead to better aortic shrinkage. CLINICAL IMPACT: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair for chronic aortic dissection with aneurysmal degeneration showed low incidence of early and late aorta-related death. By contrast, aortic shrinkage rate was low with high incidence of reintervention to the residual downstream aorta. According to the assessment of preoperative variables, chronicity and aortic morphology could predict postoperative aortic shrinkage.

Factors Associated With Early and Late Restenosis Following Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment for Patients With Femoropopliteal Lesions.

PURPOSE: Clinical trials have demonstrated the superiority of drug-coated balloon (DCB) to noncoated balloon angioplasty for the treatment of femoropopliteal (FP) lesions. In those trials, the difference of primary patency between DCB and noncoated angioplasty widens especially after 6 months, speculating that the antirestenosis effect of paclitaxel is manifested after 6 months. Factors associated with restenosis after 6 months differ from those associated with restenosis within 6 months. This study aimed to elucidate the prognostic factors associated with early (within 6 months) and late (after 6 months) restenosis following DCB treatment in real-world FP practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective study analyzed 486 FP lesions (mean lesion length, 11.9±10.1 cm; chronic total occlusion, 21.0%) in 423 patients (diabetes mellitus, 59.3%; hemodialysis, 37.1%; chronic limb-threatening ischemia, 41.6%) who underwent successful DCB treatment between January 2018 and December 2019. The outcome measure was restenosis which is defined as a peak systolic velocity ratio >2.4 based on duplex ultrasound findings. Early and late restenosis were classified by the cutoff period of 6 months after the procedure. The associations of baseline and procedural characteristics with early and late restenosis were explored using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 25.3±12.1 months. The 6, 12, 18, and 24 month cumulative incidences of restenosis were 7.4%±2.4%, 20.9%±3.9%, 29.9%±4.5%, and 38.4%±5.1%, respectively. During the follow-up period, early and late restenosis was evident in a total of 31 lesions and 138 lesions, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that chronic total occlusion (hazard ratio [HR], 2.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-4.92; p=0.033) and superficial femoral artery ostial lesion (HR, 2.73; 95% CI, 1.28-5.80; p=0.009) were significantly associated with early restenosis. On the other hand, calcification circumference over 270° (HR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.17-2.37; p=0.004), distal external elastic membrane diameter under 5 mm assessed by intravascular ultrasound (HR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.29-2.79; p=0.001), and involving popliteal arterial lesion (HR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.08-2.21; p=0.017) were significantly associated with late restenosis. CONCLUSION: The prognostic factors associated with late restenosis differed from those associated with early restenosis in the real-world FP-DCB practice. CLINICAL IMPACT: The current multicenter, retrospective study revealed that factors associated with early restenosis differed from those with late restenosis in the real-world FP-DCB practice. CTO and SFA ostial lesion were associated with early restenosis, while severe calcification, smaller vessel, and involving popliteal arterial lesions were associated with late restenosis.Early restenosis indicates "balloon failure" and would potentially result from recoil, which primary stent implantation might be required. On the other hand, late restenosis after 6 months would be attributed to "DCB failure", with inadequate drug uptake into the arterial wall, which might be minimized by the use of atherectomy devices.

Quantitative Techniques of Ultrasonography in the Assessment of Femoropopliteal Atherosclerotic Lesions Using Peak Systolic Velocity Ratio: Results From the TURN-UP Study.

PURPOSE: Duplex ultrasound (DUS)-measured peak systolic velocity ratios (PSVRs) are commonly used to evaluate arterial stenosis in lower extremity artery disease (LEAD). However, these measurement methods have not yet been standardized. This study aimed to reveal the influence of measuring methods on PSVR values. METHODS: A 132 femoropopliteal lesions with PSVR ranging from 1.5 to 3.5 evaluated using method A (angle correction 60°, the direction of blood flow, the no or few atherosclerotic changes closest to the lesion proximal side was defined as the nonstenotic area) were included. The following 4 different methods were then compared with method A: method B, angle correction 45°; method C, angle correction 60° measured along the vessel wall; D, angle correction 60°, with the nonstenotic area the lowest peak systolic velocity area; and E, angle correction 60°, with the reference point fixed at 2 cm proximal to the target lesion area. The difference in PSVR values was analyzed using the Bland-Altman method. RESULTS: The mean PSVR value measured by method A was 2.27±0.51, those measured by methods B, C, D, and E were 2.21±0.55, 2.31±0.66, 2.34±0.63, and 2.11±0.63, respectively. The 95% prediction intervals of the differences in PSVR measurements versus A were -0.64 to +0.53 for method B, -0.59 to +0.68 for method C, -0.77 to +0.91 for method D, and -1.12 to +0.79 for method E. CONCLUSION: PSVR values considerably differed between measuring methods. PSVR values by DUS are largely dependent on the measurement methods, which could considerably affect the judgment of LEAD. CLINICAL IMPACT: Due to differences in several DUS measurement methods, the PSVR results could be changed. Therefore, to need further investigations and unification of measurement method.

Comparison of Aortobifemoral Bypass and Endovascular Treatment for Chronic Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Occlusion From the CHAOS (CHronic Abdominal Aortic Occlusion, ASian Multicenter) Registry.

PURPOSE: To directly compare the clinical outcomes of aortobifemoral bypass surgery (ABF) and endovascular treatment (EVT) for chronic total occlusion (CTO) of the infrarenal abdominal aorta (IAA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective, multicenter study, we used an international database of 436 patients who underwent revascularization for CTO of the IAA between 2007 and 2017 at 30 Asian cardiovascular centers. After excluding 52 patients who underwent axillobifemoral bypass surgery, 384 patients (139 ABFs and 245 EVTs) were included in the analysis. Propensity score-matched analysis was performed to compare clinical results in the periprocedural period and the long-term. RESULTS: Propensity score matching extracted 88 pairs. Procedure time (ABF; 288 [240-345] minutes vs EVT; 159 [100-205] minutes, p<0.001) and length of hospital stay (17 [12-23] days vs 5 [4-13] days, p<0.001) were significantly shorter in the EVT group than in the ABF group, while the proportions of procedural success (98.9% versus 96.6%, p=0.620), complications (9.1% versus 12.3%, p=0.550), and mortality (2.3% versus 3.8%, p=1.000) were not different between the groups. At 1 months, ABI significantly increased more in the ABF group for both in a limb with the lower (0.56 versus 0.50, p=0.018) and the higher (0.49 versus 0.34, p=0.001) baseline ABI, while the change of the Rutherford category was not significantly different between the groups (p=0.590). At 5 years, compared with the EVT group, the ABF group had significantly better primary patency (89.4±4.3% versus 74.8±4.3%, p=0.035) and survival rates (86.9±4.5% versus 66.2±7.5%, p=0.007). However, there was no significant difference between the groups for secondary patency (100.0%±0.0% versus 93.5%±3.9%, p=0.160) and freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR) (89.3±4.3% vs 77.3±7.3%, p=0.096). CONCLUSION: Even with recent advancements in EVT, primary patency was still significantly better for ABF in CTO of the IAA. However, there was no difference between the groups in terms of secondary patency and freedom from TLR at 5 years. Furthermore, there was no difference in procedural success, complications, mortality, and improvement in the Rutherford classification during the periprocedural period, with significantly shorter procedure time and hospital stay in the EVT group.

Assessment of 3-Year Patency after Endoluminal versus Surgical Bypass Therapy for Complex Femoropopliteal Artery Disease.

PURPOSE: To compare the 3-year clinical outcomes of endoluminal bypass with those of surgical bypass for complex femoropopliteal (FP) arterial lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective multicenter study, 530 patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease (Rutherford classification 1-3, 66.0%; 4-6, 34.0%) who underwent either endoluminal bypass with Viabahn stent grafts (n = 276) or surgical bypass (n = 254) (with saphenous vein grafts, 74.4%; prosthetic grafts, 25.6%) for FP arterial lesions between 2010 and 2018 were analyzed. The propensity score-matched analysis was performed to compare the 3-year clinical outcomes of endoluminal bypass with those of surgical bypass. The primary end point was primary patency (freedom from restenosis). The secondary end points were secondary patency, freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR), limb salvage, and overall survival. The interaction effect of baseline characteristics on the association of the revascularization strategy with the risk of restenosis was analyzed using the Poisson mixed-effect model. RESULTS: The propensity score-matched analysis extracted 107 pairs. After propensity score matching, the primary patency rate at 1, 2, and 3 years was 84.5%, 75.1%, and 70.9%, respectively, for the endoluminal bypass group versus 78.6%, 73.3%, and 72.0%, respectively, for the surgical bypass group (P = .65). There was no significant difference in secondary patency, freedom from TLR, limb salvage, and overall survival (all P > .05). The subsequent interaction analysis revealed that the involvement of popliteal lesions, small distal reference vessel diameters, and long lesions favored surgical bypass over endoluminal bypass because of improved primary patency (all P for interaction < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The 3-year clinical outcomes after endoluminal bypass or surgical bypass for FP arterial lesions were similar.