Comparison of normocalcemic versus hypercalcemic primary hyperparathyroidism in a hypercalciuric renal stone population.

CONTEXT: Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) is commonly diagnosed in the setting of hypercalcemia, whereas normocalcemic primary hyperparathyroidism (NHPT) may be misdiagnosed. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to compare hypercalcemic hyperparathyroidism (HPHPT) versus NHPT hypercalciuric renal stone patients. DESIGN AND SETTING: We took advantage of a routine calcium load test performed in hypercalciuric renal stone patients to assess retrospectively among PHPT patients, prevalence and characteristics of NHPT and HPHPT under a calcium restricted diet. RESULTS: Among 1671 hypercalciuric patients included, 91 patients have a final diagnosis of PHPT(post load ionized calcium (iCa)>1.31 mmol/L and PTH>30 pg/ml). Prevalence of NHPT is 40% of all PHPT, however according to total serum calcium 4/35 NHPT and 7/56 HPHPT would have been misclassified in the other group. 18/35 NHPT and 40/56 HPHPT underwent parathyroidectomy. No significant characteristics related to parathyroid weight, stone composition or bone remodeling biomarkers is detected between groups. Whereas iCa is higher in HPHPT in fasting state and after calcium load, we found no difference for calcium diet, 24-hour calciuria, or calcitriol. Of notice, renal calcium excretion (FECa) post load increases by 303% in NHPT but only 176% in HPHPT (p=0.01) likely explained by a lesser PTH decrease (p=0.02). However, a strong negative association (p<0.0001) detected between pooled pre and post load iCa and PTH only in NHPT group suggests a persistent efficient PTH-CaSR control within parathyroid glands in this group. CONCLUSION: Our data show the relevance of dynamic tests to unmask NHPT in hypercalciuric renal stone patients.

Current evaluation of the clinical utility of Fluoromethylcholine-(18F) PET/CT in Prostate Cancer

This short review is dedicated to the current status of the assessment of a new PET radiopharmaceutical, fluoromethylcholine-(18F) or FCH, which is taken-up by prostate cancer tissue, in contrary to fluorodeoxyglucose-(18F) or FDG. It seems that FCH could become "the FDG of prostate cancer", with the same type of achievements (detection of distant metastases and of occult recurrences, restaging prior to invasive treatments), and the same drawbacks (false negative results in case of small lesions, in particular lymph nodes metastases, and false positive results in case of infection/inflammation, in particular prostatitis). Current evidence is summarised and discussed for each of the potential settings of FCH PET/CT imaging in prostate cancer. The perspectives for granting a marketing authorisation to a FCH preparation are briefly analysed.

Esta breve revisão é dedicada ao estado atual da avaliação de um novo radiofármaco PET, a fluormetilcolina-(18F) ou FCH, que é captada pelo tecido do câncer de próstata, ao contrário da fluordesoxiglicose-(18F) ou FDG. Parece que a FCH poderia se tornar "a FDG do câncer de próstata", com o mesmo tipo de funções (detecção de metástases distantes e de recorrências ocultas, antes de tratamentos invasivos), e os mesmos inconvenientes (falso resultado negativo no caso de pequenas lesões, em especial das metástase de nodos linfáticos, e de falsos resultados positivos em caso de infecção/inflamação, em particular prostatite). Evidência atual é resumida e discutida para cada uma das definições potenciais da imagem FCH PET/CT em câncer de próstata. As perspectivas para a concessão de uma autorização de comercialização para uma preparação de FCH são analisadas brevemente.

FDOPA-(18F): a PET radiopharmaceutical recently registered for diagnostic use in countries of the European Union

Positron emission tomography (PET) and its recent update PET/CT are very effective diagnostic tools for non-invasive imaging of metabolic or functional disorders in target tissues. The clinical usefulness of fluorodeoxyglucose-(18F) (FDG) has been now widely accepted. Recently, the clinical usefulness of fluoroDOPA-(18F) or FDOPA, an aminoacid labelled with the same positron emitter fluorine-18, has been evaluated and recognised in France and subsequently in several EU countries. FDOPA is diagnostic PET agent, which has been used for decades in imaging the loss of dopaminergic neurons in Parkinson's disease, and more recently to detect, stage and restage neuroendocrine tumours and to search for recurrence of viable glioma tissue. The present article summarises the body of evidence that led the French Medicines Agency (AFSSAPS) to grant a marketing authorisation to IASOdopa, a commercial preparation of FDOPA. Brief case reports and figures illustrate the diagnostic performance of FDOPA PET or PET/CT in the different settings that are currently approved in oncology.

Tomografia por emissão de positrons (PET) e sua recente atualização PET/CT são ferramentas de diagnóstico muito eficientes para imagens não invasivas de desordens metabólicas ou funcionais em tecido alvo. A utilidade clínica da fluordesoxiglicose-(18F)(FDG) tem sido agora largamente aceita. Recentemente, a utilidade clinica de fluoroDOPA-(18F) ou FDOPA, um aminoácido marcado com o mesmo emissor de pósitron, flúor-18, tem sido avaliado e reconhecido na França e subsequentemente em alguns países da União Européia. FDOPA é o radiofármaco para diagnóstico em PET, o qual tem sido usado por décadas para obtenção de imagens da perda de neurônios dopaminérgicos na doença de Parkinson e, mais recentemente, para identificar inicialmente o estágio e a reavaliação de tumores neuroendócrinos e para a pesquisa da recorrência de glioma viável. O presente artigo resume o conjunto de evidências que levarão a Agência Médica Francesa (AFSSAPS) garantir uma autorização de divulgação da IASOdopa, uma preparação comercial da FDOPA. O relato breve de caso e figuras que ilustram um padrão de imagem de diagnóstico usando FDOPA em PET ou PET/CT em diferentes configurações que são aceitas em oncologia.

The clinical impact of [18F]-FDG Pet during the opening year of a Pet centre

We have evaluated the clinical impact of FDG-PET on patient staging and management during the opening year of our PET centre in France. A questionnaire, translation in French of the questionnaire used recently in California, was sent to the referring physician of each of the 476 patients who had at least one routine FDG-PET examination during the year 2000. Of 348 responses (response rate = 73 percent), the disease was upstaged in 26 percent of the cases and downstaged in 9 percent. Inter-modality management changes (change from a scheduled therapeutic modality for a different one) were reported in 37 percent of the cases and intra-modality changes in 9 percent. Those modification rates were respectively 38 percent and 7 percent in recurrence of colorectal cancer (153 patients), 47 percent and 7 percent in lung cancer (118 patients), 16 percent and 23 percent in lymphoma (43 patients), 25 percent and 6 percent in the staging of head and neck cancers (32 patients).When comparing with the similar studies performed in California, there were no significant differences between the rates of inter-modality management changes. In contrast, intra-modality management changes were less frequent in our survey, except for lymphoma. Globally, the clinical impact of FDG PET was similar, with a higher response rate to our survey (73 percent versus 35 percent); it was above the mean 31 percent rate of therapeutic modification derived from a recent tabulated summary in over 3400 patients