Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Anesthesiology ; 115(6): 1153-61, 2011 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22037641

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Methadone is frequently administered to adults experiencing anesthesia and receiving pain treatment. Methadone pharmacokinetics in adults are well characterized, including the perioperative period. Methadone is also used in children. There is, however, no information on methadone pharmacokinetics in children of any age. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the pharmacokinetics of intravenous methadone in children undergoing surgery. Perioperative opioid-sparing effects were also assessed. METHODS: Eligible subjects were children 5-18 yr undergoing general anesthesia and surgery, with an anticipated postoperative inpatient stay exceeding 3 days. Three groups of 10 to 11 patients each received intravenous methadone hydrochloride after anesthetic induction in ascending dose groups of 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 mg/kg (up to 20 mg). Anesthetic care was not otherwise changed. Venous blood was obtained for 4 days, for stereoselective determination of methadone and metabolites. Pain assessments were made each morning. Daily and total opioid consumption was determined. Perioperative opioid consumption and pain was determined in a second cohort, which was matched to age, sex, race, ethnicity, surgical procedure, and length of stay, but not receiving methadone. RESULTS: The final methadone study cohort was 31 adolescents (14 ± 2 yr, range 10-18) undergoing major spine surgery for a diagnosis of scoliosis. Methadone pharmacokinetics were linear over the dose range 0.1-0.3 mg/kg. Disposition was stereoselective. Methadone administration did not dose-dependently affect postoperative pain scores, and did not dose-dependently decrease daily or total postoperative opioid consumption in spinal fusion patients. CONCLUSIONS: Methadone enantiomer disposition in adolescents undergoing surgery was similar to that in healthy adults.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/farmacocinética , Metadona/farmacocinética , Periodo Perioperatorio/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Analgésicos Opioides/sangre , Análisis de Varianza , Anestesia General , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Masculino , Metadona/sangre , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor Postoperatorio/sangre , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Escoliosis/cirugía
2.
Anesth Analg ; 113(4): 843-8, 2011 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21680854

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Nitrous oxide inactivates vitamin B(12), inhibits methionine synthase, and consequently increases plasma total homocysteine (tHcy). Prolonged exposure to nitrous oxide can lead to neuropathy, spinal cord degeneration, and even death in children. We tested the hypothesis that nitrous oxide anesthesia causes a significant increase in plasma tHcy in children. METHODS: Twenty-seven children (aged 10-18 years) undergoing elective major spine surgery were enrolled, and serial plasma samples from 0 to 96 hours after induction were obtained. The anesthetic regimen, including the use of nitrous oxide, was at the discretion of the anesthesiologist. Plasma tHcy was measured using standard enzymatic assays. RESULTS: The median baseline plasma tHcy concentration was 5.1 µmol/L (3.9-8.0 µmol/L, interquartile range) and increased in all patients exposed to nitrous oxide (n = 26) by an average of +9.4 µmol/L (geometric mean; 95% confidence interval, 7.1-12.5 µmol/L) or +228% (mean; 95% confidence interval, 178%-279%). Plasma tHcy peaked between 6 and 8 hours after induction of anesthesia. One patient who did not receive nitrous oxide had no increase in plasma tHcy. Several patients experienced a severalfold increase in plasma tHcy (maximum +567%). The increase in plasma tHcy was strongly correlated with the duration and average concentration of nitrous oxide anesthesia (r = 0.80; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric patients undergoing nitrous oxide anesthesia develop significantly increased plasma tHcy concentrations. The magnitude of this effect seems to be greater compared with adults; however, the clinical relevance is unknown.


Asunto(s)
Anestésicos por Inhalación/administración & dosificación , Homocisteína/sangre , Hiperhomocisteinemia/inducido químicamente , Óxido Nitroso/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , Niño , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Femenino , Humanos , Hiperhomocisteinemia/sangre , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Missouri , Procedimientos Ortopédicos , Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Factores de Tiempo , Regulación hacia Arriba
3.
Clin J Pain ; 38(2): 65-76, 2021 11 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34723864

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Intravenous lidocaine can alleviate painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) in some patients. Whether quantitative sensory testing (QST) can identify treatment responders has not been prospectively tested. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled trial comparing intravenous lidocaine to normal saline (placebo) for painful DPN. Thirty-four participants with painful DPN were enrolled and administered intravenous lidocaine (5 mg/kg ideal body weight) or placebo as a 40-minute infusion, after a battery of QST parameters were tested on the dorsal foot, with a 3-week washout period between infusions. RESULTS: Thirty-one participants completed both study sessions and were included in the final analysis. Lidocaine resulted in a 51% pain reduction 60 to 120 minutes after infusion initiation, as assessed on a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale, while placebo resulted in a 33.5% pain reduction (difference=17.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9%-33.3%, P=0.03). Neither mechanical pain threshold, heat pain threshold, or any of the other measured QST parameters predicted the response to treatment. Lidocaine administration reduced mean Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory paresthesia/dysesthesia scores when compared with placebo by 1.29 points (95% CI, -2.03 to -0.55, P=0.001), and paroxysmal pain scores by 0.84 points (95% CI, -1.62 to -0.56, P=0.04), without significant changes in burning, pressing or evoked pain subscores. DISCUSSION: While some participants reported therapeutic benefit from lidocaine administration, QST measures alone were not predictive of response to treatment. Further studies, powered to test more complex phenotypic interactions, are required to identify reliable predictors of response to pharmacotherapy in patients with DPN.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Neuropatías Diabéticas , Neuralgia , Analgésicos , Anestésicos Locales , Estudios Cruzados , Neuropatías Diabéticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Método Doble Ciego , Humanos , Lidocaína , Neuralgia/tratamiento farmacológico , Dimensión del Dolor , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA