Intent to stay, moral distress, and nurse practice environment among long-term care nurses: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey study.

BACKGROUND: Many long-term care facilities in the United States face significant problems with nurse retention and turnover. These challenges are attributed, at least in part, to moral distress and a negative nurse practice environment. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was divided into two parts: first, to investigate the relationships among nurse practice environment, moral distress, and intent to stay; second, to explore the potential mediating effect of the nurse practice environment on the intent to stay among those with high levels of moral distress. DESIGN: This study was a descriptive, cross-sectional survey using targeted sampling. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 215 participants completed the surveys. Participants were nationally representative of long-term care nurses by age, years of experience, employment status, and type of health setting. METHODS: This study was an online national survey of long-term care nurses' perceptions of their intent to stay, moral distress level (Moral Distress Questionnaire), and nurse practice environment (Direct Care Staff Survey). Structural equation modeling analysis explored intent to stay, moral distress, and the nurse practice environment among long-term care nurses. RESULTS: The mean moral distress score was low, while the mean nurse practice environment and intent to stay scores were high. Moral distress had a significant, moderately negative association with the nurse practice environment (ß = -0.41), while the nurse practice environment had a significant, moderately positive association with intent to stay (ß = 0.46). The moral distress had a significant, moderately negative association with intent to stay (ß = -0.20). The computed structural equation modeling suggested a partially mediated model (indirect effect = -0.19, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Since the nurse practice environment partially mediates the relationship between moral distress and intent to stay, interventions to improve the nurse practice environment are crucial to alleviating moral distress and enhancing nurses' intent to stay in their jobs, organizations, and the nursing profession. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our study demonstrated that the nurse practice environment mediates moral distress and intent to stay. Interventions to improve the nurse practice environment are crucial to alleviating moral distress and enhancing nurses' intent to stay in their jobs, organizations, and the nursing profession.

Outcomes of the Nurse-Led Interdisciplinary-Heart Failure Team Program (NLI-HFTP): A Pilot Study.

Information is lacking in long-term care regarding heart failure (HF) management, including in nursing homes. The current pilot project examined the Nurse-Led Interdisciplinary-Heart Failure Team Program (NLI-HFTP) intervention for nursing home residents with HF. This study used a pre-posttest one-group design with 46 nursing home residents who were primarily female, African American, of non-Hispanic ethnicity, and with an average age of 76 years. Post-intervention Nurse-Patient Interaction Scale scores were significantly higher than pre-intervention scores (mean pretest = 124.83, mean posttest score = 103.04; t [45] = 27.78, p < 0.001). Comparison of participants' medical records found a substantial decrease in the number of HF-exacerbated hospitalizations during the 3-month post-implementation period compared with rates during the 3-month pre-implementation period (16 vs. 7). The NLI-HFTP was feasible to implement in a nursing home, reduced referral rates to acute care hospitals, and could thus provide a better resident experience through increasing nurse-patient interactions. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 49(12), 18-23.].

Reports About Paradoxical Lucidity from Health Care Professionals: A Pilot Study.

Although clinicians caring for persons at the end of life recognize the phenomenon of paradoxical/terminal lucidity, systematic evidence is scant. The current pilot study aimed to develop a structured interview instrument for health care professionals to report lucidity. A questionnaire measuring lucidity length, degree, content, coinciding circumstances, and time from episode to death was expanded to include time of day, expressive and receptive communication, and speech during the month prior to and during the event. Thirty-three interviews were conducted; 73% of participants reported ever witnessing paradoxical lucidity. Among 29 events reported, 31% lasted several days, 20.7% lasted 1 day, and 24.1% lasted <1 day. In 78.6% of events, the person engaged in unexpected activity; 22.2% died within 3 days, and 14.8% died within 3 months of the event. The phenomenological complexity of lucidity presents challenges to eliciting reports in a systematic fashion; however, staff respondents were able to report lucidity events and detailed descriptions of person-specific characteristics. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 49(1), 18-26.].

Moral distress in long-term care questionnaire modification and psychometric evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Licensed nurses working in long-term care facilities experience ethical challenges if not resolved can lead to moral distress. There is a lack of an English-language validated tool to adequately measure moral distress in the long-term care setting. AIMS: To describe the modification and psychometric evaluation of the Moral Distress Questionnaire. METHODS: Instrument development and psychometric evaluation. Internal consistency using Cronbach's α to establish reliability was conducted using SPSS version 27.0 while SPSS Amos version 27.0 was used to perform a confirmatory factor analysis of the Moral Distress Questionnaire. PARTICIPANTS: A national sample of US-licensed nurses who provided direct resident care in long-term care settings were recruited via a targeted sampling method using Facebook from 7 December 2020 to 7 March 2021. ETHICAL CONSIDERATION: The study was approved by the university's human research protection program. Informed consent was provided to all participants. RESULTS: A total of 215 participants completed the surveys. Confirmatory analysis indicated that the 21-item scale with a 4-factor structure for the Moral Distress Questionnaire model met the established criteria and demonstrates an acceptable model fit (CMIN/DF = 2.0, CFI = 0.82, TLI = 0.77, RMSEA = 0.07). Factor loadings for each item depict a moderate to a strong relationship (range 0.36-0.70) with the given underlying construct. Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.87 for the overall scale and 0.60-0.74 for its subscales which demonstrate good reliabilities. DISCUSSION: This is the first English-language validated tool to adequately measure moral distress in the long-term care setting experienced by US long-term care nurses. This reliable and well-validated tool will help identify moral distress situations experienced by US long-term care nurses. CONCLUSION: The modified 21-item English version of the Moral Distress Questionnaire is reliable tool that demonstrates good psychometric properties to validly measure sources of moral distress among direct resident care nurses.