Enhanced recovery program versus conventional care after colorectal surgery in the geriatric population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs for patients undergoing colorectal surgery has yielded promising results. However, there remains controversy regarding the application of ERAS protocols in an elderly population. The aim of this review is to compare the clinical outcomes between ERAS versus conventional peri-operative care (Non-ERAS) for colorectal surgery in patients aged ≥ 65 years old. METHODS: The PRISMA guidelines were adhered to. A comprehensive search was performed using Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library electronic databases and relevant articles were identified. Indications for the colorectal resections included both benign and malignant diseases, while emergency surgeries were excluded. Primary outcomes include post-operative morbidity, length of stay and re-admission rates. Data analysis was performed using Revman 5.3. RESULTS: A total of six studies were included, which involved a total of 1174 patients. ERAS was associated with a lower incidence of post-operative morbidity compared to Non-ERAS (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.25-0.59), p < 0.001). Similarly, ERAS was also associated with a significantly shorter hospital length of stay (MD - 2.49, 95% CI - 4.11 to 0.88, p = 0.002). Return of bowel function as measured by time to flatus was significantly faster in the ERAS group (MD - 20.01 95% CI - 36.23 to 3.79, p = 0.02), but post-operative ileus rates (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.50-1.47, p = 0.58) were comparable. Re-admission, re-operation and post-operative mortality rates were also similar between both groups. CONCLUSION: The application of ERAS protocols in an elderly population provides the advantages of lower post-operative morbidity and shorter hospital length of stay. Future studies should aim to evaluate factors that can improve ERAS compliance rates in this group of patients.

Age is an independent risk factor for increased morbidity in elective colorectal cancer surgery despite an ERAS protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Elderly patients with colorectal cancer are high-risk surgical candidates. ERAS protocols have been developed to mitigate against these risks. We performed this study to quantify the risks which elderly patients face and then to determine independent risk factors for short-term ERAS-specific outcomes. METHODS: An analysis of a prospectively collected audit database of all patients who underwent elective colorectal cancer resection within an ERAS framework from January 2018 to December 2018 was performed. Elderly was defined in our study as age ≥ 65 years. RESULTS: There were 172 elective colorectal cancer resections performed. Ninety-seven (56.4%) were elderly. Elderly patients were at increased risk of developing post-operative complications (33.0% vs 16.0%, p = 0.011), longer time to diet (3.4 vs 2.2 days, p = 0.001), and longer hospital stay (10.9 vs 6.7 days, p = 0.007). Independent risk factors were determined for the abovementioned three outcomes. Elderly status was the only risk factor for increased complications (OR 2.61 95% CI (1.05-6.51), p = 0.040). For delayed time to soft diet, male gender (OR 6.67(1.92-20.0), p = 0.002), open approach (OR 9.06(2.26-36.30), p = 0.002), and increased operative time (OR 1.01(1.00-1.01) p = 0.014) were risk factors. Finally, elderly age (OR 5.53(1.82-16.84), p = 0.003), leucocyte count (OR 1.39(0.76-2.57), p = 0.038), open approach (OR 5.26(1.41-19.62), p = 0.013), operative time (OR 1.01(1.00-1.01), p = 0.021), and Clavien-Dindo classification (OR 7.97(1.27-49.88), p = 0.027) were risk factors for prolonged length of stay. CONCLUSION: Elderly patients are intrinsically at risk for increased complications, longer time to soft diet and longer hospital stay. ERAS protocols may need to be specifically tailored for elderly patients.

Does persistent anti-HBc positivity influence the prognosis of HBsAg-negative hepatocellular carcinoma? comparative outcomes of anti-Hbc positive versus anti-Hbc negative non-B non-C HCC.

BACKGROUND: To compare the presentations and outcomes of anti-HBc seropositive Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HBc-HCC) with anti-HBc seronegative (NHBc-HCC) patients in HBsAg negative Non-HBV Non-HCV (NBNC-HCC) HCC population. METHODS: 515 newly diagnosed HCC patients from January 2011 to September 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. 145 (66.5%) NHBc-HCC and 73 (33.5%) HBc-HCC patients were identified. Patient demographics, disease characteristics, details of treatments, recurrence and survival outcomes were analysed. RESULTS: A significantly lower proportion of HBc-HCC patients were diagnosed through surveillence (6.8% vs 26.2%, p = 0.001). HBc-HCC patients were less likely cirrhotic (p < 0.001), portal hypertensive (p < 0.001), ascitic (p = 0.008) and thrombocytopenic (p = 0.003). A higher proportion of HBc-HCC patients had treatment with curative intent (46.6% vs 30.3%, p = 0.018) and surgery (39.7% vs 16.6%, p < 0.001). Although HBc-HCC patients had larger median tumor size (74.0 mm vs 55.0 mm, p = 0.016) with a greater proportion of patients having tumors ≥5 cm, there was no difference in the overall median survival (19.0 months vs 22.0 months, p = 0.919) and recurrence rates (38.2% vs 40.9%). CONCLUSION: Isolated anti-HBc seropositivity in HbsAg negative patients tend to present incidentally with delayed diagnoses resulting in larger tumors, but their long-term survival remain comparable.

Multiple pregnancy is the leading contributor to cesarean sections in in vitro fertilization pregnancies: An analysis using the Robson 10-group classification system.

AIM: In vitro fertilization (IVF) pregnancy is an important contributor to rising cesarean section (CS) rates. The profile of CS in this group is not well documented. This study sought to identify leading patient categories of the Robson 10-Group Classification System (TGCS) contributing to the high IVF CS rate. METHODS: We carried out a prospective study of IVF patients who delivered in the Singapore General Hospital from January 2010 to July 2012. Parity, singleton/multiple pregnancy, previous CS, mode of labor onset and gestational age at delivery were collected based on the TGCS. All other deliveries during the study period served as control. RESULTS: There were a total of 215 IVF deliveries, of which 114 (54.4%) were CS. Group 8 (all multiple pregnancies) was the greatest contributor to the overall CS rate (43.0%). Group 2 (term nulliparous singleton cephalic pregnancies with induction of labor or planned CS) was the second largest contributor to overall CS rate (12.3%). The third and fourth leading contributors were Group 10 (preterm singleton pregnancies) and Group 5 (pregnancies with previous CS), respectively. In contrast, these two groups were top contributors to the overall CS rate for the control group. CONCLUSION: Multiple pregnancy is the principal contributor to CS in our IVF population, and reducing its incidence may reduce its CS rate. Among singleton pregnancies, planned CS and failed induction for cephalic term pregnancies and preterm singleton pregnancies were the next largest contributors, suggesting a higher prevalence of maternal request and high-risk obstetric indications requiring interventions at preterm gestations.

Comparison of Caesarean sections and instrumental deliveries at full cervical dilatation: a retrospective review.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to compare instrumental vaginal deliveries (IDs) and Caesarean sections (CSs) performed at full cervical dilatation, including factors influencing delivery and differences in maternal and neonatal outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of patients who experienced a prolonged second stage of labour at Singapore General Hospital from 2010 to 2012. A comparison between CS and ID was made through analysis of maternal/neonatal characteristics and peripartum outcomes. RESULTS: Of 253 patients who required intervention for a prolonged second stage of labour, 71 (28.1%) underwent CS and 182 (71.9%) underwent ID. 5 (2.0%) of the patients who underwent CS had failed ID. Of the maternal characteristics considered, ethnicity was significantly different. Induction of labour and intrapartum epidural did not influence delivery type. 70.4% of CSs occurred outside office hours, compared with 52.7% of IDs (p = 0.011). CS patients experienced a longer second stage of labour (p < 0.001). Babies born via CS were heavier (p < 0.001), while the ID group had a higher proportion of occipitoanterior presentations (p < 0.001). Estimated maternal blood loss was higher with CSs (p < 0.001), but neonatal outcomes were similar. CONCLUSION: More than one in four parturients requiring intervention for a prolonged second stage of labour underwent emergency CS. Low failed instrumentation rates and larger babies in the CS group suggest accurate diagnoses of cephalopelvic disproportion. The higher incidence of CS after hours suggests trainee reluctance to attempt ID. There were no clinically significant differences in maternal and neonatal morbidity.

Multiple pregnancy in a primigravida with uncorrected Pentalogy of Fallot.

Pentalogy of Fallot is a cyanotic congenital heart disease that has guarded prognosis without surgical intervention in infancy. Women with uncorrected defects rarely survive into childbearing age and pregnancy in this group is associated with a high rate of perinatal loss. Physiological cardiovascular changes in pregnancy can lead to maternal haemodynamic instability with subsequent adverse cardiac sequelae with or without fetal decompensation. Optimum management and pregnancy outcomes in mother with uncorrected Pentalogy of Fallot and twin pregnancy have not been described in the literature. We describe a successful case of monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy in an affected woman who has not undergone surgical repair. Her pregnancy progressed without any adverse cardiopulmonary complications. Her caesarean delivery and postpartum recovery were favourable, with successful birth of two healthy babies at 35.7 weeks. This case emphasises the importance of a multidisciplinary team, especially of obstetricians with expertise in high-risk pregnancies, adult congenital heart disease cardiologists and anaesthesiologist.