Facial recognition, laterality judgement, alexithymia and resulting central nervous system adaptations in chronic primary headache and facial pain-A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with chronic headaches and chronic oro-facial pain commonly present psychosocial issues that can affect social interactions. A possible reason could be that patients with these disorders might present impairments in facial recognition, laterality judgement and also alexithymia. However, a systematic review summarizing the effects of facial emotion recognition, laterality judgement and alexithymia in individuals with headaches and oro-facial pain is still not available. AIM: The main objective of this systematic review (SR) and meta-analysis (MA) was to compile and synthesize the evidence on the occurrence of alexithymia, deficits in laterality or left-right (LR) recognition and/or facial emotion recognition (FER) in patients with chronic headache and facial pain. METHODS: Electronic searches were conducted in five databases (up to September 2023) and a manual search to identify relevant studies. The outcomes of interest were alexithymia scores, speed and accuracy in LR and/or FER, or any other quantitative data assessing body image distortions. The screening process, data extraction, risk of bias and data analysis were performed by two independent assessors following standards for systematic reviews. RESULTS: From 1395 manuscripts found, only 34 studies met the criteria. The overall quality/certainty of the evidence was very low. Although the results should be interpreted carefully, individuals with chronic headaches showed significantly higher levels of alexithymia when compared to healthy individuals. No conclusive results were found for the other variables of interest. CONCLUSION: Although the overall evidence from this review is very low, people with chronic primary headaches and oro-facial pain could be regularly screened for alexithymia to guarantee appropriate management.

[Physiotherapeutic differential diagnosis of back pain associated with endometriosis]. / Physiotherapeutische Differenzialdiagnose von Rückenschmerzen im Zusammenhang mit Endometriose.

BACKGROUND: Endometriosis (EM) is one of the most common gynecologic conditions in our society. The diagnosis takes an average of 7 to 10 years. To shorten this period, this syndrome needs more attention. The aim of this article is to show overlaps between EM and low back pain (LBP) and to describe their relevance for physiotherapeutic screening. OBJECTIVES: What clinical signs do the syndromes EM and LBP have in common and to what extent can physiotherapeutic screening take gynecological aspects into account and be adapted accordingly? RESULTS: To answer this question, the two syndromes were screened for overlaps. These overlaps were then related to the existing literature and case studies. The current research situation shows overlaps of the two syndromes with regard to the etiology, the pain mechanism as well as a psychosocial aspect. The literature shows that more women than men are affected by LBP and other chronic pain syndromes. EM occurs almost exclusively in women and, like LBP, is considered a chronic pain syndrome. Thus, a common pain mechanism of the two syndromes is discussed in the literature. The most frequent overlap of the two syndromes is shown by the occurrence of LBP as a frequent symptom of EM. This connection can be justified by structural causes as well as by a reflex pain presentation. CONCLUSION: In a physiotherapeutic setting, evidence of EM can be observed in the history and physical examination. Considering these factors may help shorten the diagnosis time of endometriosis by referring for further evaluation if gynecologic involvement is suspected in LBP. A comprehensive history is important and should cover urologic, gynecologic, as well as sexual history. In this article, the term woman is used to refer to the biological female sex and is not related to individual gender identity. The clinical picture mainly affects women, which is why in the following work, as far as it concerns the people suffering from the disease, it is not used in the opposite sense.