Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 89
Filtrar
Más filtros

Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Sex Transm Dis ; 51(3): 192-198, 2024 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38412466

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: As the incidence of syphilis continues to increase, examining benzathine penicillin G (BPG) treatment data provides valuable insight for public health strategies. This study analyzed the trends of where BPG is administered relative to the initial clinical site of syphilis diagnosis. Our findings are timely in the context of recent national BPG shortages. METHODS: The analysis included persons diagnosed with any syphilis stage in Maricopa County, Arizona, from January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2021. The Arizona surveillance database (PRISM) was the source of demographic, testing, and treatment data. RESULTS: Of a total of 4028 persons with syphilis, 3038 (75.4%) received at least 1 injection of BPG. Among persons who received an initial BPG injection, only 1719 (56.6%) were diagnosed and treated at the same clinical site type. The Maricopa County Sexually Transmitted Disease Clinic administered BPG to 48.8% (n = 1483) of persons with syphilis who received an initial injection. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings analyze trends in BPG administration that are likely due to treatment referral practices and medication cost. Administration of BPG is not guaranteed at the clinical site of diagnosis, highlighting concerns regarding access to BPG. A burden is placed on patients who are required to leave their diagnosing provider to seek syphilis treatment at other health facilities that administer BPG.


Asunto(s)
Penicilina G Benzatina , Sífilis , Humanos , Penicilina G Benzatina/uso terapéutico , Sífilis/diagnóstico , Sífilis/tratamiento farmacológico , Sífilis/epidemiología , Arizona/epidemiología , Salud Pública , Instituciones de Salud , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico
2.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 30(3): 336-345, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38603742

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We sought to (1) document how health departments (HDs) developed COVID-19 case investigation and contact tracing (CI/CT) interview scripts and the topics covered, and (2) understand how and why HDs modified those scripts. DESIGN: Qualitative analysis of CI/CT interview scripts and in-depth key informant interviews with public health officials in 14 HDs. Collected scripts represent 3 distinct points (initial, the majority of which were time stamped May 2020; interim, spanning from September 2020 to August 2021; and current, as of April 2022). SETTING: Fourteen state, local, and tribal health jurisdictions and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-six public health officials involved in leading CI/CT from 14 state, local, and tribal health jurisdictions (6 states, 3 cities, 4 counties, and 1 tribal area). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Interview script elements included in CI/CT interview scripts over time. RESULTS: Many COVID-19 CI/CT scripts were developed by modifying questions from scripts used for other communicable diseases. Early in the pandemic, scripts included guidance on isolation/quarantine and discussed symptoms of COVID-19. As the pandemic evolved, the length of scripts increased substantially, with significant additions on contact elicitation, vaccinations, isolation/quarantine recommendations, and testing. Drivers of script changes included changes in our understanding of how the virus spreads, risk factors and symptoms, new treatments, new variants, vaccine development, and adjustments to CDC's official isolation and quarantine guidance. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings offer suggestions about components to include in future CI/CT efforts, including educating members of the public about the disease and its symptoms, offering mitigation guidance, and providing sufficient support and resources to help people act on that guidance. Assessing the correlation between script length and number of completed interviews or other quality and performance measures could be an area for future study.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Pandemias/prevención & control , Trazado de Contacto , SARS-CoV-2 , Cuarentena
3.
Clin Infect Dis ; 77(2): 212-219, 2023 07 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36947142

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Public health programs varied in ability to reach people with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and their contacts to encourage separation from others. For both adult case patients with COVID-19 and their contacts, we estimated the impact of contact tracing activities on separation behaviors from January 2020 until March 2022. METHODS: We used a probability-based panel survey of a nationally representative sample to gather data for estimates and comparisons. RESULTS: An estimated 64 255 351 adults reported a positive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 test result; 79.6% isolated for ≥5 days, 60.2% isolated for ≥10 days, and 79.2% self-notified contacts. A total of, 24 057 139 (37.7%) completed a case investigation, and 46.2% of them reported contacts to health officials. More adults who completed a case investigation isolated than those who did not complete a case investigation (≥5 days, 82.6% vs 78.2%, respectively; ≥10 days, 69.8% vs 54.8%; both P < .05). A total of 84 946 636 adults were contacts of a COVID-19 case patient. Of these, 73.1% learned of their exposure directly from a case patient; 49.4% quarantined for ≥5 days, 18.7% quarantined for ≥14 days, and 13.5% completed a contact tracing call. More quarantined among those who completed a contact tracing call than among those who did not complete a tracing call (≥5 days, 61.2% vs 48.5%, respectively; ≥14 days, 25.2% vs 18.0%; both P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Engagement in contact tracing was positively correlated with isolation and quarantine. However, most adults with COVID-19 isolated and self-notified contacts regardless of whether the public health workforce was able to reach them. Identifying and reaching contacts was challenging and limited the ability to promote quarantining, and testing.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Aislamiento de Pacientes , Cuarentena , Aislamiento de Pacientes/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuarentena/estadística & datos numéricos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Trazado de Contacto , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano
4.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 29(9): 1921-1924, 2023 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37579512

RESUMEN

Using a nationally representative panel survey, we examined isolation behaviors among persons in the United States who had positive SARS-CoV-2 test results during January 2021-March 2022. Compared with persons who received provider-administered results, persons with home-based results had 29% (95% CI 5%-47%) lower odds of following isolation recommendations.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Trazado de Contacto/métodos , Prueba de COVID-19
5.
Sex Transm Dis ; 50(5): 298-303, 2023 05 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36693196

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Syphilis is a public health concern as cases are rising each year. If untreated, syphilis is associated with significant morbidity and risk of vertical transmission during pregnancy. For people with late latent and unknown duration stages, 3 injections of benzathine penicillin G (BPG) at 1-week intervals are recommended. Our study quantified treatment for people diagnosed with late latent and unknown duration syphilis in Maricopa County, Arizona with a secondary analysis of pregnant women to assess completion of 3 injections of BPG in multiple time intervals. METHODS: Maricopa County syphilis case data were extracted from the state-run database (PRISM). Records were reviewed for people with late latent and unknown duration syphilis during January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2021. Treatment types and time intervals between treatments were analyzed. RESULTS: Of a total of 14,924 people with syphilis reported in Maricopa County, 5372 (36.0%) were staged as late latent or unknown duration syphilis. Completion of 3 BPG injections in the time frame of 7 to 9 days was 42.9% (n = 2302). Completion among pregnant women (n = 406) with 3 injections was 68.7% (n = 279). CONCLUSIONS: The completion rate of 3 BPG injections for people with late latent or unknown duration syphilis is low. An unmet need exists to identify barriers to treatment including access to BPG and public health follow-up after the first injection. Prioritized effort is needed to identify and classify patients as having earlier stages of syphilis that require only 1 BPG injection.


Asunto(s)
Penicilina G Benzatina , Sífilis , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Penicilina G Benzatina/uso terapéutico , Sífilis/diagnóstico , Sífilis/tratamiento farmacológico , Sífilis/complicaciones , Arizona/epidemiología , Salud Pública , Transmisión Vertical de Enfermedad Infecciosa , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico
6.
Clin Infect Dis ; 75(Suppl 2): S326-S333, 2022 10 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35723606

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Sixty-four state, local, and territorial health departments (HDs) in the United States report monthly performance metrics on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) case investigation and contact tracing (CI/CT) activities. We describe national CI/CT efforts from 25 October 2020 through 24 December 2021, which included 3 peaks in COVID-19 case reporting. METHODS: Standardized CI/CT data elements submitted by the 64 HDs were summarized as monthly performance metrics for each HD and the nation. These included measures of CI/CT completeness, timeliness, and workloads. We calculated contact tracing efficacy as the proportion of new cases that occurred in persons identified as contacts within the 14 days before the case was reported. RESULTS: A total of 44 309 796 COVID-19 cases were reported to HDs, with completed HD interviews in 18 153 353 (41%). Less than half of interviews yielded ≥1 contact. A total of 19 939 376 contacts were identified; 11 632 613 were notified (58%), with 3 618 846 undergoing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing within 14 days of notification. Of the total reported cases, 2 559 383 occurred in recently identified contacts. CONCLUSIONS: We document the resource-intense nationwide effort by US HDs to mitigate the impact of COVID-19 through CI/CT before and after vaccines became widely available. These results document the coverage and performance of CI/CT despite case surges and fluctuating workforce and workloads.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Trazado de Contacto , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Trazado de Contacto/métodos , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
7.
Sex Health ; 19(4): 286-298, 2022 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35760766

RESUMEN

This review assessed sexual health and sexually transmitted infection (STI) burden among American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) peoples within the context of current clinical and public health services. We conducted a review of published literature about sexual health and bacterial STIs among AI/AN populations in the United States using Medline (OVID), CINAHL (EbscoHost) and Scopus. Peer-reviewed journals published during 1 January 2005-2 December 2021 were included and supplemented by other publicly available literature. A total of 138 articles from reference lists met inclusion criteria, including 85 peer-review articles and 53 additional references. Results indicate a disproportionate burden of STIs is carried by AI/AN populations compared to non-Hispanic Whites. Risk for STIs in AI/AN people has origins in historical trauma and structural and social determinants of health. STI services are available for AI/AN populations, but many barriers to care exist. Community-based sexual health programming has been successful, but has thus far focused primarily on adolescents and young adults. A myriad of factors contributes to high rates of STIs among AI/AN populations. Longstanding disparities show a clear need to increase the availability of integrated, low-barrier STI prevention and treatment services. Implementation of multi-level (individual, physician, clinic, healthcare organisation, and/or community level), culturally relevant sexual health and STI interventions should be community-based and person-centred, acknowledge social determinants of health, and grounded in deep respect and understanding of AI/AN histories and cultures.


Asunto(s)
Salud Sexual , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual , Adolescente , Humanos , Conducta Sexual , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/prevención & control , Población Blanca , Adulto Joven
8.
Bull World Health Organ ; 99(4): 287-295, 2021 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33953446

RESUMEN

Triple elimination is an initiative supporting the elimination of mother-to-child transmission of three diseases - human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, syphilis and hepatitis B. Significant progress towards triple elimination has been made in some regions, but progress has been slow in sub-Saharan Africa, the region with the highest burden of these diseases. The shared features of the three diseases, including their epidemiology, disease interactions and core interventions for tackling them, enable an integrated health-systems approach for elimination of mother-to-child transmission. Current barriers to triple elimination in sub-Saharan Africa include a lack of policies, strategies and resources to support the uptake of well established preventive and treatment interventions. While much can be achieved with existing tools, the development of new products and models of care, as well as a prioritized research agenda, are needed to accelerate progress on triple elimination in sub-Saharan Africa. In this paper we aim to show that health systems working together with communities in sub-Saharan Africa could deliver rapid and sustainable results towards the elimination of mother-to-child transmission of all three diseases. However, stronger political support, expansion of evidence-based interventions and better use of funding streams are needed to improve efficiency and build on the successes in prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV. Triple elimination is a strategic opportunity to reduce the morbidity and mortality from HIV infection, syphilis and hepatitis B for mothers and their infants within the context of universal health coverage.


La triple élimination est une initiative visant à soutenir l'éradication de la transmission mère-enfant de trois maladies ­ l'infection au virus de l'immunodéficience humaine (VIH), la syphilis et l'hépatite B. Bien que des avancées considérables aient été observées en ce sens dans certaines régions, les progrès demeurent lents en Afrique subsaharienne, pourtant durement touchée par ces maladies. Les caractéristiques communes aux trois affections, notamment leur épidémiologie, les interactions entre elles et les principales interventions nécessaires à leur prise en charge permettent aux systèmes de santé d'adopter une approche intégrée pour éviter la transmission mère-enfant. Plusieurs obstacles entravent actuellement la triple élimination en Afrique subsaharienne, parmi lesquels l'absence de politiques, de stratégies et de ressources pour garantir la disponibilité de traitements préventifs et curatifs bien établis. Les outils existants offrent déjà de nombreuses solutions; mais pour accélérer la progression de cette triple élimination en Afrique subsaharienne, il est indispensable de développer de nouveaux produits et modèles de soins, ainsi qu'un programme de recherche prioritaire. Dans le présent document, nous voulons montrer que si les systèmes de santé collaborent avec les communautés en Afrique subsaharienne, ils pourront obtenir des résultats rapides et durables en vue d'éradiquer la transmission mère-enfant des trois maladies susmentionnées. Néanmoins, une telle démarche implique un soutien politique massif, l'expansion des interventions fondées sur des données scientifiques, et une meilleure utilisation des sources de financement afin d'améliorer l'efficacité et de s'appuyer sur les réussites en matière de prévention de la transmission du VIH de la mère à l'enfant. La triple élimination représente une occasion stratégique de réduire la morbidité et la mortalité liées à l'infection au VIH, à la syphilis et à l'hépatite B, tant chez les mères que chez les nourrissons, dans un contexte de couverture maladie universelle.


La triple eliminación es una iniciativa que apoya la eliminación de la transmisión maternoinfantil de tres enfermedades: la infección por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana (VIH), la sífilis y la hepatitis B. En algunas regiones se han logrado avances significativos hacia la triple eliminación, pero los progresos se han desarrollado con mayor lentitud en el África subsahariana, la región con la mayor carga de estas enfermedades. Las características comunes de las tres enfermedades, como su epidemiología, las interacciones entre ellas y las intervenciones básicas para combatirlas, permiten un enfoque integrado de los sistemas de salud para la eliminación de la transmisión maternoinfantil. Los obstáculos actuales para la triple eliminación en el África subsahariana incluyen la falta de políticas, estrategias y recursos para apoyar la adopción de intervenciones preventivas y de tratamiento bien establecidas. Aunque se puede lograr mucho con las herramientas existentes, se necesita el desarrollo de nuevos productos y modelos de atención, así como una agenda de investigación prioritaria, para acelerar el progreso de la triple eliminación en el África subsahariana. En este documento pretendemos demostrar que los sistemas de salud que trabajan conjuntamente con las comunidades del África subsahariana podrían obtener resultados rápidos y sostenibles hacia la eliminación de la transmisión maternoinfantil de las tres enfermedades. Sin embargo, se necesita un mayor apoyo político, la ampliación de las intervenciones basadas en la evidencia y un mejor uso de los flujos de financiación para mejorar la eficiencia y aprovechar los éxitos en la prevención de la transmisión maternoinfantil del VIH. La triple eliminación es una oportunidad estratégica para reducir la morbilidad y la mortalidad de la infección por el VIH, la sífilis y la hepatitis B para las madres y sus hijos en el contexto de la cobertura sanitaria universal.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH , Hepatitis B , Sífilis , África del Sur del Sahara/epidemiología , Femenino , VIH , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Hepatitis B/epidemiología , Hepatitis B/prevención & control , Humanos , Lactante , Transmisión Vertical de Enfermedad Infecciosa/prevención & control , Sífilis/epidemiología , Sífilis/prevención & control
9.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 70(3): 83-87, 2021 Jan 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33476317

RESUMEN

Case investigation and contact tracing are core public health tools used to interrupt transmission of pathogens, including SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); timeliness is critical to effectiveness (1,2). In May 2020, CDC funded* 64 state, local, and territorial health departments† to support COVID-19 response activities. As part of the monitoring process, case investigation and contact tracing metrics for June 25-July 24, 2020, were submitted to CDC by 62 health departments. Descriptive analyses of case investigation and contact tracing load, timeliness, and yield (i.e., the number of contacts elicited divided by the number of patients prioritized for interview) were performed. A median of 57% of patients were interviewed within 24 hours of report of the case to a health department (interquartile range [IQR] = 27%-82%); a median of 1.15 contacts were identified per patient prioritized for interview§ (IQR = 0.62-1.76), and a median of 55% of contacts were notified within 24 hours of identification by a patient (IQR = 32%-79%). With higher caseloads, the percentage of patients interviewed within 24 hours of case report was lower (Spearman coefficient = -0.68), and the number of contacts identified per patient prioritized for interview also decreased (Spearman coefficient = -0.60). The capacity to conduct timely contact tracing varied among health departments, largely driven by investigators' caseloads. Incomplete identification of contacts affects the ability to reduce transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Enhanced staffing capacity and ability and improved community engagement could lead to more timely interviews and identification of more contacts.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/prevención & control , Trazado de Contacto , COVID-19/epidemiología , Humanos , Administración en Salud Pública , Práctica de Salud Pública , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
10.
BMC Pediatr ; 21(1): 166, 2021 04 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33832443

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Between 2014 and 2016, Brazil experienced a severe shortage in penicillin supply, resulting in a lack of treatment among some pregnant women and newborns with syphilis and the use of non-evidence-based regimens. This study evaluated all live births in Fortaleza reported with CS in 2015 in order to identify the different therapeutic regimens used in newborns during this period of penicillin shortage. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study design was conducted using manually extracted data from medical chart review of maternal and infant cases delivered in 2015 from all public maternity hospitals in the city of Fortaleza. Data collection occurred from June 2017 to July 2018. RESULTS: A total of 575 congenital syphilis cases were reported to the municipality of Fortaleza during 2015 and 469 (81.5%) were analyzed. Of these, only 210 (44.8%) were treated with a nationally-recommended treatment. As alternative therapeutic options, ceftriaxone was used in 65 (13.8%), Cefazolin in 15 (3.2%) and the combination of more than one drug in 179 (38.2%). Newborns with serum VDRL titers ≥1:16 (p = 0.021), who had some clinical manifestation at birth (p = 0.003), who were born premature (p <  0.001), with low birth weight (p = 0.010), with jaundice indicative of the need for phototherapy (p = 0.019) and with hepatomegaly (p = 0.045) were more likely to be treated with penicillin according to national treatment guidelines compared to newborns treated with other regimens. CONCLUSION: During the period of shortage of penicillin in Fortaleza, less than half of the infants reported with CS were treated with a nationally-recommended regimen, the remaining received treatment with medications available in the hospital of birth including drugs that are not part of nationally or internationally-recommended treatment recommendations.


Asunto(s)
Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo , Sífilis Congénita , Brasil/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Penicilinas/uso terapéutico , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sífilis Congénita/tratamiento farmacológico , Sífilis Congénita/epidemiología
11.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 26(6): 1192-1200, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32441638

RESUMEN

We conducted a nationwide retrospective study in Japan to evaluate the effectiveness of oral amoxicillin or ampicillin as alternatives to injectable benzathine penicillin G for treating pregnant women with syphilis and preventing congenital syphilis (CS). We investigated 80 pregnant women with active syphilis treated with amoxicillin or ampicillin during 2010-2018. Overall, 21% (15/71) had pregnancies resulting in CS cases, and 3.8% (3/80) changed therapies because of side effects. Among 26 patients with early syphilis, no CS cases occurred, but among 45 with late syphilis, 15 (33%) CS cases occurred. Among 57 patients who started treatment >60 days before delivery, 8 (14%) had CS pregnancy outcomes. We found oral amoxicillin potentially ineffective for preventing CS cases among pregnant women with late syphilis but potentially effective in those with early syphilis. Prospective studies are needed to definitively evaluate the efficacy of amoxicillin for the treatment of pregnant women with syphilis to prevent CS.


Asunto(s)
Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo , Sífilis , Amoxicilina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Embarazo , Mujeres Embarazadas , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sífilis/tratamiento farmacológico , Sífilis/epidemiología
12.
BMC Infect Dis ; 20(1): 405, 2020 Jun 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32522244

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Syphilis is a sexually and vertically transmitted infection caused by the bacteria Treponema pallidum for which there are few proven alternatives to penicillin for treatment. For pregnant women infected with syphilis, penicillin is the only WHO-recommended treatment that will treat the mother and cross the placenta to treat the unborn infant and prevent congenital syphilis. Recent shortages, national level stockouts as well as other barriers to penicillin use call for the urgent identification of alternative therapies to treat pregnant women infected with syphilis. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, non-comparative trial will enroll non-pregnant women aged 18 years and older with active syphilis, defined as a positive rapid treponemal and a positive non-treponemal RPR test with titer ≥1:16. Women will be a, domized in a 2:1 ratio to receive the oral third generation cephalosporin cefixime at a dose of 400 mg two times per day for 10 days (n = 140) or benzathine penicillin G 2.4 million units intramuscularly based on the stage of syphilis infection (n = 70). RPR titers will be collected at enrolment, and at three, six, and nine months following treatment. Participants experiencing a 4-fold (2 titer) decline by 6 months will be considered as having an adequate or curative treatment response. DISCUSSION: Demonstration of efficacy of cefixime in the treatment of active syphilis in this Phase 2 trial among non-pregnant women will inform a proposed randomized controlled trial to evaluate cefixime as an alternative treatment for pregnant women with active syphilis to evaluate prevention of congenital syphilis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial identifier: www.Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03752112. Registration Date: November 22, 2018.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Cefixima/uso terapéutico , Sífilis/tratamiento farmacológico , Brasil/epidemiología , Protocolos de Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Fase II como Asunto , Femenino , Humanos , Penicilina G Benzatina/uso terapéutico , Distribución Aleatoria , Sífilis/microbiología , Sífilis/prevención & control , Resultado del Tratamiento , Treponema pallidum/efectos de los fármacos , Treponema pallidum/aislamiento & purificación
13.
Bull World Health Organ ; 97(8): 548-562P, 2019 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31384073

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To generate estimates of the global prevalence and incidence of urogenital infection with chlamydia, gonorrhoea, trichomoniasis and syphilis in women and men, aged 15-49 years, in 2016. METHODS: For chlamydia, gonorrhoea and trichomoniasis, we systematically searched for studies conducted between 2009 and 2016 reporting prevalence. We also consulted regional experts. To generate estimates, we used Bayesian meta-analysis. For syphilis, we aggregated the national estimates generated by using Spectrum-STI. FINDINGS: For chlamydia, gonorrhoea and/or trichomoniasis, 130 studies were eligible. For syphilis, the Spectrum-STI database contained 978 data points for the same period. The 2016 global prevalence estimates in women were: chlamydia 3.8% (95% uncertainty interval, UI: 3.3-4.5); gonorrhoea 0.9% (95% UI: 0.7-1.1); trichomoniasis 5.3% (95% UI:4.0-7.2); and syphilis 0.5% (95% UI: 0.4-0.6). In men prevalence estimates were: chlamydia 2.7% (95% UI: 1.9-3.7); gonorrhoea 0.7% (95% UI: 0.5-1.1); trichomoniasis 0.6% (95% UI: 0.4-0.9); and syphilis 0.5% (95% UI: 0.4-0.6). Total estimated incident cases were 376.4 million: 127.2 million (95% UI: 95.1-165.9 million) chlamydia cases; 86.9 million (95% UI: 58.6-123.4 million) gonorrhoea cases; 156.0 million (95% UI: 103.4-231.2 million) trichomoniasis cases; and 6.3 million (95% UI: 5.5-7.1 million) syphilis cases. CONCLUSION: Global estimates of prevalence and incidence of these four curable sexually transmitted infections remain high. The study highlights the need to expand data collection efforts at country level and provides an initial baseline for monitoring progress of the World Health Organization global health sector strategy on sexually transmitted infections 2016-2021.


Asunto(s)
Salud Global , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Infecciones por Chlamydia/epidemiología , Femenino , Gonorrea/epidemiología , Humanos , Bloqueo Interauricular , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Sífilis/epidemiología , Tricomoniasis/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
14.
Sex Transm Dis ; 45(10): 690-695, 2018 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30204746

RESUMEN

This article summarizes a multistate outbreak of heterosexual syphilis, including 134 cases of syphilis in adults and adolescents and at least 2 cases of congenital syphilis, which occurred on an American Indian reservation in the United States during 2013-2015. In addition to providing salient details about the outbreak, the article seeks to document the case-finding and treatment activities undertaken, their relative success or failure, and the lessons learned from a coordinated, multiagency response. Of 134 adult cases of syphilis, 40% were identified by enhanced, interagency contact tracing and partner services, 26% through symptomatic testing, and 16% through screening of asymptomatic individuals as the result of an electronic medical record screening prompt. A smaller proportion of cases were identified by community screening events in high-morbidity communities; high-risk venue-based screening events; other screening, including screening upon request; and prenatal screening at first trimester, third trimester, and day of delivery. Future heterosexual syphilis outbreak responders should act quickly to coordinate a package of high-yield case-finding and treatment activities-potentially including activities that seek to do the following: (1) increase prenatal screening, (2) improve community awareness and symptomatic test seeking, (3) educate providers and improve general screening for syphilis, (4) implement electronic medical record reminders for providers, (5) screen high-morbidity communities and at high-risk venues, and (6) form novel partnerships to accomplish partner services work when the context does not allow for traditional, disease intervention specialist-only partner services.


Asunto(s)
Brotes de Enfermedades , Indígenas Norteamericanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Sífilis/etnología , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Heterosexualidad , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/etnología , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/microbiología , Tercer Trimestre del Embarazo , Diagnóstico Prenatal , Parejas Sexuales , Sífilis Congénita/etnología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
15.
PLoS Med ; 14(6): e1002328, 2017 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28654637

RESUMEN

Melanie Taylor and colleagues discuss global initiatives for surveillance of sexually transmitted diseases.


Asunto(s)
Vigilancia de la Población , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/epidemiología , Humanos , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/etiología
16.
PLoS Med ; 14(12): e1002473, 2017 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29281619

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Benzathine penicillin G (BPG) is the only recommended treatment to prevent mother-to-child transmission of syphilis. Due to recent reports of country-level shortages of BPG, an evaluation was undertaken to quantify countries that have experienced shortages in the past 2 years and to describe factors contributing to these shortages. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Country-level data about BPG shortages were collected using 3 survey approaches. First, a survey designed by the WHO Department of Reproductive Health and Research was distributed to 41 countries and territories in the Americas and 41 more in Africa. Second, WHO conducted an email survey of 28 US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention country directors. An additional 13 countries were in contact with WHO for related congenital syphilis prevention activities and also reported on BPG shortages. Third, the Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI) collected data from 14 countries (where it has active operations) to understand the extent of stock-outs, in-country purchasing, usage behavior, and breadth of available purchasing options to identify stock-outs worldwide. CHAI also conducted in-person interviews in the same 14 countries to understand the extent of stock-outs, in-country purchasing and usage behavior, and available purchasing options. CHAI also completed a desk review of 10 additional high-income countries, which were also included. BPG shortages were attributable to shortfalls in supply, demand, and procurement in the countries assessed. This assessment should not be considered globally representative as countries not surveyed may also have experienced BPG shortages. Country contacts may not have been aware of BPG shortages when surveyed or may have underreported medication substitutions due to desirability bias. Funding for the purchase of BPG by countries was not evaluated. In all, 114 countries and territories were approached to provide information on BPG shortages occurring during 2014-2016. Of unique countries and territories, 95 (83%) responded or had information evaluable from public records. Of these 95 countries and territories, 39 (41%) reported a BPG shortage, and 56 (59%) reported no BPG shortage; 10 (12%) countries with and without BPG shortages reported use of antibiotic alternatives to BPG for treatment of maternal syphilis. Market exits, inflexible production cycles, and minimum order quantities affect BPG supply. On the demand side, inaccurate forecasts and sole sourcing lead to under-procurement. Clinicians may also incorrectly prescribe BPG substitutes due to misperceptions of quality or of the likelihood of adverse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Targets for improvement include drug forecasting and procurement, and addressing provider reluctance to use BPG. Opportunities to improve global supply, demand, and use of BPG should be prioritized alongside congenital syphilis elimination efforts.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/provisión & distribución , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Penicilina G Benzatina/provisión & distribución , Penicilina G Benzatina/uso terapéutico , Sífilis Congénita/prevención & control , Sífilis Congénita/transmisión , Femenino , Geografía , Salud Global , Promoción de la Salud , Humanos , Transmisión Vertical de Enfermedad Infecciosa/prevención & control , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Salud Pública
17.
Sex Transm Infect ; 93(S4): S3-S15, 2017 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28747410

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) of syphilis and HIV continue to be important yet preventable causes of perinatal and infant morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVES: To systematically review, critically appraise and perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the operational characteristics of dual rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for HIV/syphilis and evaluate whether they are cost effective, acceptable and easy to use. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: We searched seven electronic bibliographic databases from 2012 to December 2016 with no language restrictions. Search keywords included HIV, syphilis and diagnosis. REVIEW METHODS: We included studies that evaluated the operational characteristics of dual HIV/syphilis RDTs. Outcomes included diagnostic test accuracy, cost effectiveness, ease of use and interpretation and acceptability. All studies were assessed against quality criteria and assessed for risk of bias. RESULTS: Of 1914 identified papers, 18 were included for the meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy for HIV and syphilis. All diagnostic accuracy evaluation studies showed a very high sensitivity and specificity for HIV and a lower, yet adequate, sensitivity and specificity for syphilis, with some variation among types of test. Dual screening for HIV and syphilis was more cost effective than single rapid tests for HIV and syphilis and prevented more adverse pregnancy outcomes. Qualitative data suggested dual RDTs were highly acceptable to clients, who cited time to result, cost and the requirement of a single finger prick as important characteristics of dual RDTs. CONCLUSION: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis can be used by policy-makers and national programme managers who are considering implementing dual RDTs for HIV and syphilis. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO 2016:CRD42016049168.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH/diagnóstico , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Sífilis/diagnóstico , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/transmisión , Humanos , Transmisión Vertical de Enfermedad Infecciosa/prevención & control , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/prevención & control , Resultado del Embarazo , Diagnóstico Prenatal , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Sífilis/transmisión , Sífilis Congénita/prevención & control , Sífilis Congénita/transmisión
18.
Sex Transm Dis ; 43(1): 30-3, 2016 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26650993

RESUMEN

Delays in syphilis treatment may contribute to transmission. We evaluated time to treatment for symptomatic patients with syphilis by clinical testing site in 2 Arizona counties. Fewer patients were tested and treated at publicly funded sexually transmitted disease clinics, but received the timeliest treatment; these clinics remain crucial to syphilis disease control.


Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Sífilis/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Arizona/epidemiología , Femenino , Reforma de la Atención de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proveedores de Redes de Seguridad , Sífilis/prevención & control , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
19.
Sex Transm Dis ; 43(6): 402-6, 2016 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27196262

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Increasing numbers of reported primary and secondary (P&S) syphilis cases in the United States suggest the need for improved surveillance methods. An outbreak detection method using reported syphilis test results, which can be counted before the conclusion of a syphilis case investigation, could lead to timelier outbreak detection. METHODS: The historical limits comparison method was used to compare the number of positive rapid plasma reagin results reported during 2011-2014 with data for the preceding 3 years. An outbreak alert was generated when the monthly count of positive rapid plasma reagin quantitative results was greater than the historical mean plus 2 standard deviations for 2 consecutive months. RESULTS: Three outbreak alerts occurred during 2011-2014. The first alert occurred in December 2012 in Maricopa County (Phoenix area). Primary and secondary cases subsequently increased from 10 in January 2013 to 15 in March followed by 5 months of consecutive increases. A second alert was generated for Maricopa County in May 2014. Primary and secondary cases increased from 29 in May to 42 in July 2014. Reported cases remained elevated for approximately 7 months after the second alert. In December 2013, an outbreak alert occurred for Pima County (Tucson area). The number of reported P&S syphilis cases in Pima County increased from 6 in February to 15 in March. Counts of reported cases remained elevated for approximately 6 months after the alert. CONCLUSIONS: Use of historical limits comparison method based on syphilis laboratory results can provide an outbreak alert before increases in reported cases of P&S syphilis.


Asunto(s)
Brotes de Enfermedades , Sífilis/epidemiología , Arizona/epidemiología , Chancro/epidemiología , Monitoreo Epidemiológico , Humanos , Sífilis/diagnóstico , Sífilis/prevención & control
20.
Sex Transm Dis ; 43(2 Suppl 1): S28-41, 2016 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26779685

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The asymptomatic nature and suboptimal screening rates of sexually transmitted diseases (STD) call for implementation of successful interventions to improve screening in community-based clinic settings with attention to cost and resources. METHODS: We used MEDLINE to systematically review comparative analyses of interventions to improve STD (chlamydia, gonorrhea, or syphilis) screening or rescreening in clinic-based settings that were published between January 2000 and January 2014. Absolute differences in the percent of the target population screened between comparison groups or relative percent increase in the number of tests or patients tested were used to score the interventions as highly effective (>20% increase) or moderately effective (5%-19% increase) in improving screening. Published cost of the interventions was described where available and, when not available, was estimated. RESULTS: Of the 4566 citations reviewed, 38 articles describing 42 interventions met the inclusion criteria. Of the 42 interventions, 16 (38.1%) were categorized as highly effective and 14 (33.3%) as moderately effective. Effective low-cost interventions (<$1000) included the strategic placement of specimen collection materials or automatic collection of STD specimens as part of a routine visit (7 highly effective and 1 moderately effective) and the use of electronic health records (EHRs; 3 highly effective and 4 moderately effective). Patient reminders for screening or rescreening (via text, telephone, and postcards) were highly effective (3) or moderately effective (2) and low or moderate cost (<$1001-10,000). Interventions with dedicated clinic staff to improve STD screening were highly effective (2) or moderately effective in improving STD screening (1) but high-cost ($10,001-$100,000). CONCLUSIONS: Successful interventions include changing clinic flow to routinely collect specimens for testing, using EHR screening reminders, and reminding patients to get screened or rescreened. These strategies can be tailored to different clinic settings to improve screening at a low cost.


Asunto(s)
Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Promoción de la Salud , Tamizaje Masivo , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/organización & administración , Derivación y Consulta/organización & administración , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/prevención & control , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo/normas , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Tamizaje Masivo/tendencias , Prevalencia , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/diagnóstico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA