Healthcare burden of pulmonary hypertension owing to lung disease and/or hypoxia.

BACKGROUND: Group 3 pulmonary hypertension (PH) encompasses PH owing to lung diseases and/or hypoxia. Treatment patterns, healthcare resource use, and economic burden to US payers of Group 3 PH patients were assessed. METHODS: This retrospective observational study extracted data from July 1, 2010 to June 30, 2013 from two Truven Health Analytics MarketScan databases. Adult Group 3 PH patients were identified based on claims for PH (ICD-9-CM 416.0/416.8), a related lung disease, and an echocardiogram or right heart catheterization (RHC). The index date was the date of the first PH claim; data were collected for 12 months pre- and post-index. A difference-in-difference approach using generalized estimating equations was done to account for baseline differences. RESULTS: Group 3 PH patients (n = 2,236) were matched 1:1 to controls on lung disease. PH patients had higher all-cause resource utilization and annual healthcare costs ($44,732 vs. $7,051) than controls. Costs were driven by inpatient admissions (35.4% of total costs), prescriptions (33.0%), and outpatient care (26.5%). Respiratory-related costs accounted for 11.4% of post-index annual costs for PH patients. PH diagnosis was not confirmed in the majority of PH patients (<7% RHC use) but nevertheless, 22% of PH patients post-index had claims for drugs approved for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). CONCLUSIONS: Group 3 PH poses a significant clinical and economic burden. Given the low use of RHC and the prevalence of PAH-indicated prescriptions that are not currently approved for Group 3 PH, this study suggests some Group 3 PH patients may not be receiving guideline-recommended treatment.

Safety and efficacy of sitaxsentan 50 and 100 mg in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: To assess safety and efficacy of sitaxsentan 50 and 100 mg in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). BACKGROUND: Sitaxsentan is a highly selective endothelin-A receptor antagonist that was recently withdrawn by the manufacturer because of a pattern of idiosyncratic liver injury. METHODS: Before sitaxsentan withdrawal, this 18-week double-blind, placebo-controlled study randomized patients with PAH to receive placebo or sitaxsentan 50 or 100 mg once daily. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline in 6-min walk distance (6MWD) at week 18. Changes in World Health Organization (WHO) functional class and time to clinical worsening (TTCW) were secondary endpoints. The primary efficacy analysis was powered for sitaxsentan 100 mg versus placebo. RESULTS: Of 98 randomized patients, 61% were WHO functional class II at baseline. Improvement from baseline to week 18 in 6MWD occurred with sitaxsentan 100 but not 50 mg; a strong placebo effect was observed. At week 18, WHO functional class was improved or maintained in more patients receiving sitaxsentan 100 mg than placebo (P = 0.038); 0% versus 12% of patients deteriorated, respectively. TTCW was not significantly different for 100-mg sitaxsentan patients than placebo (P = 0.090). Adverse events (AEs) occurring more frequently with sitaxsentan (50 or 100 mg) included headache, peripheral edema, dizziness, nausea, extremity pain, and fatigue; most AEs were of mild or moderate severity. CONCLUSION: Sitaxsentan 100 mg improved functional class but not 6MWD in PAH patients who were mostly WHO functional class II at baseline. No patient receiving sitaxsentan 100 mg experienced clinical worsening; sitaxsentan was well tolerated.

Monitoring for Pulmonary Hypertension Following Pulmonary Embolism: The INFORM Study.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary hypertension and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension may develop after a pulmonary embolism event. A ventilation-perfusion scan is recommended as a first-line modality for suspected chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. In this study, we determined the prevalence of pulmonary hypertension following incident pulmonary embolism and the disease-monitoring patterns in this population. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective claims database analysis of incident pulmonary embolism cases (July 1, 2010 to September 30, 2011) and extracted data for 1 year prior to and 2 years after the incident pulmonary embolism event. Data were analyzed for diagnoses and symptoms related to pulmonary hypertension, claims consistent with other heart or lung diseases, diagnostic imaging tests, and time to first diagnostic imaging test post pulmonary embolism. RESULTS: Of the 7068 incident pulmonary embolism patients that met eligibility criteria, 87% had a claim for a pulmonary hypertension-related symptom and 7.6% had a claim for pulmonary hypertension during follow-up. Only 55% of all pulmonary embolism patients had diagnostic procedural claim(s) post pulmonary embolism: echocardiogram, 47%; computed tomographic angiography, 20%; ventilation-perfusion scan, 6%; and right heart catheterization or pulmonary angiography, <1%. The mean time from pulmonary embolism diagnosis to first screening test was 131 days. CONCLUSIONS: Despite exhibiting pulmonary hypertension-related symptoms, many pulmonary embolism patients did not undergo imaging tests that could diagnose pulmonary hypertension or chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. This study suggests that physician education about the risk of pulmonary hypertension and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension after pulmonary embolism may need to be improved.