Meloxicam as an adjuvant to peginterferon-α-2a and ribavirin treatment for genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C: A randomized trial.

AIM: In this multicenter, randomized trial, we evaluated the effectiveness of meloxicam - a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug - as an adjuvant for enhancing antiviral efficacy and preventing neutropenia during the treatment of patients with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C using peginterferon and ribavirin. METHODS: A total of 60 patients were randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, to either the meloxicam or the control group after stratification by neutrophil count. Both groups received weekly peginterferon-α-2a (180 µg) and a weight-based dose of ribavirin for 48 weeks. The meloxicam group received meloxicam (10 mg/day) for the first 8 weeks after initiation of treatment. RESULTS: Through intent-to-treat analysis, we found that the sustained virological response rate in the meloxicam group (19/30, 63.3%) was significantly higher than in the control group (11/30, 36.7%, P < 0.05). The relapse rate was more than twice as high (45%) in the control group than in the meloxicam group (19.0%); however, this difference was not statistically significant. The rate of neutrophil decrease, calculated by dividing the lowest value observed during the first 8 weeks by pretreatment count, was significantly smaller in the meloxicam group (55.1 ± 14.3%) than in the control group (62.3 ± 9.6%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Meloxicam enhanced antiviral efficacy and reduced the decline in neutrophil counts for the peginterferon and ribavirin treatment of genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C. This drug could be a reasonable adjuvant for the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C. The present study including a small number of patients warrants larger clinical trials.

Is diabetes mellitus an independent risk factor for colon cancer and rectal cancer?

OBJECTIVES: Diabetes mellitus (DM) has been associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). The American College of Gastroenterology Guidelines for Colorectal Cancer Screening 2008 recommend that clinicians be aware of an increased CRC risk in patients with smoking and obesity, but do not highlight the increase in CRC risk in patients with DM. To provide an updated quantitative assessment of the association of DM with colon cancer (CC) and rectal cancer (RC), we conducted a meta-analysis of case-control and cohort studies. We also evaluated whether the association varied by sex, and assessed potential confounders including obesity, smoking, and exercise. METHODS: We identified studies by searching the EMBASE and MEDLINE databases (from inception through 31 December 2009) and by searching bibliographies of relevant articles. Summary relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated with fixed- and random-effects models. Several subgroup analyses were performed to explore potential study heterogeneity and bias. RESULTS: DM was associated with an increased risk of CC (summary RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.26-1.51; n=14 studies) and RC (summary RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.09-1.31; n=12 studies). The association remained when we limited the meta-analysis to studies that either controlled for smoking and obesity, or for smoking, obesity, and physical exercise. DM was associated with an increased risk of CC for both men (summary RR 1.43, 95% CI 1.30-1.57; n=11 studies) and women (summary RR 1.35, 95% CI 1.14-1.53; n=10 studies). For RC, there was a significant association between DM and cancer risk for men (summary RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.07-1.40; n=8 studies), but not for women (summary RR 1.09, 95% CI=0.99-1.19; n=8 studies). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that DM is an independent risk factor for colon and rectal cancer. Although these findings are based on observational epidemiological studies that have inherent limitations due to diagnostic bias and confounding, subgroup analyses confirmed the consistency of our findings across study type and population. This information can inform risk models and specialty society CRC screening guidelines.

Weight-based high- and low-dose ribavirin in combination with peginterferon α-2b therapy for genotype 2 chronic hepatitis C: A randomized trial.

AIM: The optimal ribavirin dose in the treatment of patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 2 remains to be elucidated. We aimed to seek the optimal ribavirin dose required for this genotype in a randomized trial. METHODS: We compared the efficacy and tolerability of the 24-week peginterferon α-2b (1.5 µg/kg/week) therapy in combination with a weight-based higher dose (600-1000 mg) and lower dose (400-800 mg) of ribavirin for genotype 2 patients. Noninferior margin was set at 10%. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients were randomized to a higher-dose or a lower-dose group. Sustained virological response (SVR) by intention-to-treat analysis was achieved in 47/58 (81.0%, 90% confidential interval [CI]: 72.6-89.5) patients in the higher-dose group and 41/60 (68.3%, 90% CI: 58.5-78.2) patients in the lower-dose group (difference, -12.7%; 90% CI, -25.7 to 0.3). Relapse rates were 10% and 21.6% in the higher-dose and the lower-dose groups, respectively. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that ribavirin dose/kg body weight was the only significant predictor of SVR (≥9.5 mg/kg per day vs <9.5 mg/kg per day; odds ratio = 3.34; 95% CI, 1.41-7.92; P = 0.006). Twenty-one (36.2%) in the higher-dose group required ribavirin dose reduction because of anemia, whereas seven patients (11.7%) did in the lower-dose group (P < 0.01). Three of the higher-dose group and two of the lower-dose group required premature termination of therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Weight-based lower-dose ribavirin regimen was not equivalent to the higher-dose counterpart in the treatment of HCV genotype 2. We discourage treating these patients with low-dose ribavirin regimens. The peginterferon therapy in combination with ribavirin at a weight-based higher dose (600-1000 mg) remains the standard-of-care treatment for this genotype.

A patient with obstructive jaundice due to bleeding in the common bile duct after ultrasound-guided liver biopsy.

A-63-year-old man was referred to our hospital for interferon therapy to treat chronic hepatitis C. The patient complained of right upper abdominal pain 1 hour after the ultrasound-guided liver biopsy. Bleeding in the gallbladder and the common bile duct were found on emergency CT. Obstructive jaundice due to the common bile duct hematoma was diagnosed, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP) was performed, and a filling defect thought to be a hematoma was seen in the bile duct on cholangiography. The hematoma in the bile duct was extracted after endoscopic sphincteroyomy.

Differential impact of adherence to pegylated interferon and ribavirin in the treatment of genotype 1 high viral titer chronic hepatitis C.

To clarify the impact of adherence, we treated 122 genotype 1 high viral titer chronic hepatitis C patients with pegylated interferon (peg-IFN) and ribavirin for 48 weeks at nine referral hospitals, and evaluated the prognostic factors with a focus on the adherence to the treatment. This study included 68 (55.7%) treatment-naïve patients and 54 (44.3%) patients who did not respond to the previous treatment. Multivariate analysis revealed adherence to peg-IFN and ribavirin as the only significant predictor. Sustained virological response (SVR) rate was 72.2%, 19.0%, and 27.3% in patients given ≥80%, 60%-80%, and <60% dose peg-IFN, respectively, and was 68.6%, 41.2%, and 5.3% in those given ≥80%, 60%-80%, and <60% dose ribavirin, respectively. SVR rate sharply fell when exposure to peg-IFN was below 80% whereas it decreased in a stepwise manner as for ribavirin. Therefore, ≥80% of peg-IFN and as much as possible dose of ribavirin are desired to achieve SVR in the treatment of genotype 1 high viral titer chronic hepatitis C.