RESUMEN
The impact of hydroxyurea (HU) on the ovarian reserve of female patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) remains poorly elucidated. Only direct histological analysis of ovarian follicle density can effectively evaluate HU's effect on ovarian reserve. By analyzing digitized slides of ovarian tissue from girls and young women with SCD who underwent ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) before hematological stem cell transplantation (HSCT), we meticulously counted follicles and categorized them based on their growth stage. We then calculated the densities of different follicle types and assessed their correlation with patient characteristics, clinical manifestations, and treatments extracted from medical records. Seventy-six SCD patients participated in the study, with a median age at OTC of 10.2 years (interquartile range [IQR] 7.5, 14.6), and 50 (65.8%) were prepubertal. Of these, 35 patients (46.1%) had received HU, with a median daily dosage of 23.0 mg/kg (IQR 20.0, 25.0) and median exposure time of 44 months (IQR 24.0, 54.0). Primordial follicle density was comparable between the HU and non-HU groups (5.8 follicles/mm2 [IQR 1.0, 13.3] versus 4.2 follicles/mm2 [IQR 1.1, 14.4], respectively; P = .95). However, in the HU group, after adjusting for age, the density of growing follicles was marginally lower compared to the non-HU group (P = .09). Notably, other parameters such as vaso-occlusive crisis did not affect follicular density. In conclusion, exposure to hydroxyurea did not demonstrate a reduction in ovarian reserve in girls/women with SCD. Therefore, fertility preservation measures before initiating HU treatment do not seem necessary.
Asunto(s)
Tumores Neuroendocrinos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/diagnóstico por imagen , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/cirugía , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagenología Tridimensional , Interpretación de Imagen Radiográfica Asistida por ComputadorRESUMEN
Chronic pancreatitis is a complex multifactorial fibro-inflammatory disease. Consensus guidelines are needed for the histopathological evaluation of non-autoimmune chronic pancreatitis (CP). An international working group with experts on the histopathology of CP evaluated 15 statements generated from evidence on seven key clinically relevant questions. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to evaluate the level of evidence available for each statement. To determine the level of agreement, the working group voted on the statements for strength of agreement, using a nine-point Likert scale, and Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficients were calculated. Strong consensus was obtained for 12 statements relating to all seven key questions including that: the cardinal features of CP are the triad of fibrosis, loss of acinar tissue and duct changes; there are no unique histopathological features that distinguish the different aetiologies of CP; clinical history and laboratory investigations, including genetic testing, are important in establishing the aetiology of CP; there is no reproducible and universally accepted histological grading system for assessing severity of CP, although classification as "mild", "moderate" and "severe" is usually applied; scoring systems for fibrosis are not validated for clinical use; asymptomatic fibrosis is a common finding associated with ageing, and not necessarily evidence of CP; there are no obvious diagnostic macroscopic features of early CP; histopathology is not the gold standard for the diagnosis of CP; and cytology alone is not a reliable method for the diagnosis of CP. Cardinal histopathological features of CP are well-defined and internationally accepted and pathological assessment is relevant for the purpose of differential diagnosis with other pancreatic diseases, especially cancer. However, a reliable diagnosis of CP requires integration of clinical, laboratory and imaging features and cannot be made by histology alone.