Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Emerg Med ; 58(1): 72-76, 2020 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31677978

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Shoulder pseudodislocation, or "drooping shoulder," presents with acute pain and deformity of the joint, with radiographs demonstrating inferior subluxation of the humeral head relative to the glenoid fossa. The diagnosis must be made promptly and distinguished from true glenohumeral dislocation, both to avoid unnecessary attempts at closed reduction and to facilitate investigation of the underlying cause, which may include septic arthritis, hemarthrosis, or other emergent etiologies. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) may be useful in the evaluation of emergency department (ED) patients with suspected pseudodislocation. CASE REPORT: A 50-year old female presented to the ED with an acutely painful and deformed shoulder but atypical history and physical examination. Initial radiography appeared to show a glenohumeral dislocation, but POCUS, done to guide intra-articular lidocaine injection, led to recognition of pseudodislocation and subsequent diagnosis of calcific tendinitis/bursitis, a condition not previously associated with inferior humeral subluxation. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: Shoulder pseudodislocation must be considered in the evaluation of patients with suspected glenohumeral dislocation, but atypical features on history, physical examination, or initial plain radiography. POCUS may facilitate prompt diagnosis and identification of the underlying etiology.

2.
Ann Emerg Med ; 74(6): 772-774, 2019 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31080024

RESUMEN

Cardiac arrest and resuscitation of the pregnant woman at gestational term is rare. Depending on the circumstances of cardiac arrest and its timing, options are limited for allowing successful resuscitation of both mother and neonate. Herein, we describe the use of tandem perimortem cesarean section and thoracotomy for open-chest cardiac massage in a young woman with newly diagnosed peripartum cardiomyopathy. We used goal-directed resuscitation including diagnostic ultrasonography and capnography to assist in decision making and successfully resuscitated both mother and neonate to hospital discharge without discernable long-term complications.


Asunto(s)
Cardiomiopatías/complicaciones , Cesárea/métodos , Paro Cardíaco/terapia , Masaje Cardíaco/métodos , Periodo Periparto , Resucitación/métodos , Toracotomía/métodos , Femenino , Paro Cardíaco/etiología , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Complicaciones Cardiovasculares del Embarazo , Adulto Joven
3.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 13(9): 1111-7, 2016 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27338216

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To determine whether resident abdominopelvic CT reports considered prospectively concordant with the final interpretation are also considered concordant by other blinded specialists and abdominal radiologists. METHODS: In this institutional review board-approved retrospective cohort study, 119 randomly selected urgent abdominopelvic CT examinations with a resident preliminary report deemed prospectively "concordant" by the signing faculty were identified. Nine blinded specialists from Emergency Medicine, Internal Medicine, and Abdominal Radiology reviewed the preliminary and final reports and scored the preliminary report with respect to urgent findings as follows: 1.) concordant; 2.) discordant with minor differences; 3.) discordant with major differences that do not alter patient management; or 4.) discordant with major differences that do alter patient management. Predicted management resulting from scores of 4 was recorded. Consensus was defined as majority agreement within a specialty. Consensus major discrepancy rates (ie, scores 3 or 4) were compared to the original major discrepancy rate of 0% (0/119) using the McNemar test. RESULTS: Consensus scores of 4 were assigned in 18% (21/119, P < .001, Emergency Medicine), 5% (6/119, P = .03, Internal Medicine), and 13% (16/119, P < .001, Abdominal Radiology) of examinations. Consensus scores of 3 or 4 were assigned in 31% (37/119, P < .001, Emergency Medicine), 14% (17/119, P < .001, Internal Medicine), and 18% (22/119, P < .001, Abdominal Radiology). Predicted management alterations included hospital status (0-4%), medical therapy (1%-4%), imaging (1%-10%), subspecialty consultation (3%-13%), nonsurgical procedure (3%), operation (1%-3%), and other (0-3%). CONCLUSIONS: The historical low major discrepancy rate for urgent findings between resident and faculty radiologists is likely underreported.


Asunto(s)
Errores Diagnósticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Internado y Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Pelvis/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiografía Abdominal/estadística & datos numéricos , Radiología/estadística & datos numéricos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/estadística & datos numéricos , Errores Diagnósticos/prevención & control , Humanos , Michigan/epidemiología , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA