Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
2.
BMJ Case Rep ; 16(5)2023 May 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37192779

RESUMEN

Organising pneumonia after a mild COVID-19 infection has been increasingly reported and poses a diagnostic challenge to physicians especially in immunocompromised patients. We report a patient with a background of lymphoma in remission on rituximab who presented with prolonged and persistent fever after recovering from a mild COVID-19 infection. The initial workup showed bilateral lower zone lung consolidation; however, the infective and autoimmune workup were unremarkable. Subsequently, a bronchoscopy with transbronchial lung biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of organising pneumonia. A tapering glucocorticoid regimen was commenced with prompt resolution of the patient's clinical symptoms, and subsequent resolution of biochemical markers and radiological lung changes 3 months later. This case highlights the importance of early recognition of the diagnosis of organising pneumonia in immunocompromised populations after a mild COVID-19 infection as it shows promising response to glucocorticoid therapy.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Neumonía Organizada , Neumonía , Humanos , COVID-19/patología , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Neumonía/tratamiento farmacológico , Pulmón/patología , Huésped Inmunocomprometido
3.
Patient Educ Couns ; 103(5): 1049-1051, 2020 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31866195

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To measure the level of shared decision-making (SDM) in primary care consultations in Malaysia, a multicultural, middle-income developing country. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in an urban, public primary care clinic. Convenience sampling was used to recruit participants, and audio-recorded consultations were scored for SDM levels by two independent raters using the OPTION tool. Univariate and multivariate analysis was conducted to determine factors significantly associated with SDM levels. RESULTS: 199 patients and 31 doctors participated. Mean consultation time was 14.3 min (+ SD 5.75). Patients' age ranged from 18 to 87 years (median age of 57.5 years). 52.8 % of patients were female, with three main ethnicities (Malay, Chinese, Indian). The mean OPTION score was found to be 7.8 (+ SD 3.31) out of 48. After a multivariate analysis, only patient ethnicity (ß= -0.142, p < 0.05) and increased consultation time (ß = 0.407, p < 0.01) were associated with higher OPTION scores. CONCLUSIONS: Patients in Malaysia experience extremely poor levels of SDM in general practice. Higher scores were associated with increased consultation time and patient ethnicity. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Malaysian general practitioners should aim to develop and practice cultural competency skills to avoid biased SDM practice towards certain ethnicities.


Asunto(s)
Comunicación , Toma de Decisiones Conjunta , Participación del Paciente , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Atención Primaria de Salud/métodos , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Médicos Generales , Humanos , Malasia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud
4.
J Eval Clin Pract ; 25(6): 1074-1079, 2019 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31099120

RESUMEN

It is common for primary care providers (PCPs) to manage complex multimorbidity. When caring for patients with multimorbidity, PCPs face challenges to tackle several issues within a short consultation in order to address patients' complex needs. Furthermore, some PCPs may lack access to a multidisciplinary team and need to manage multimorbidity within the confine of a PCP-patient partnership only. Instead of attempting to address multiple health issues within a single consultation, it would be more feasible and time effective for PCPs and patients to jointly prioritize the health issue to focus on. Using the Malaysian primary care setting as a case study, a dual-layer-shared decision-making approach is proposed whereby PCPs and patients make decisions on which disease(s) (layer 1) and treatment(s) (layer 2) to prioritize. This dual-layer model aims to address the challenges of short consultation time and limited healthcare resources by encouraging PCPs and patients to discuss, negotiate, and agree on the decision during the consultation to ensure patients' health needs are addressed.


Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones Conjunta , Afecciones Crónicas Múltiples/terapia , Participación del Paciente/métodos , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Humanos , Malasia , Prioridad del Paciente , Relaciones Médico-Paciente
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA