Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 37
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Surg ; 24(1): 2, 2024 Jan 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38166905

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The effect of laparoscopic surgery on short-term outcomes in colorectal cancer patients over 90 years old has remained unclear. METHODS: We reviewed 87 colorectal cancer patients aged over 90 years who underwent surgery between 2016 and 2022. Patients were divided into an open surgery group (n = 22) and a laparoscopic surgery group (n = 65). The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of laparoscopic surgery on postoperative outcome in elderly colorectal cancer patients, as compared to open surgery. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients (89.7%) had comorbidities. Frequency of advanced T stage was lower with laparoscopic surgery (p = 0.021). Operation time was longer (open surgery 146 min vs. laparoscopic surgery 203 min; p = 0.002) and blood loss was less (105 mL vs. 20 mL, respectively; p < 0.001) with laparoscopic surgery. Length of hospitalization was longer with open surgery (22 days vs. 18 days, respectively; p = 0.007). Frequency of infectious complications was lower with laparoscopic surgery (18.5%) than with open surgery (45.5%; p = 0.021). Multivariate analysis revealed open surgery (p = 0.026; odds ratio, 3.535; 95% confidence interval, 1.159-10.781) as an independent predictor of postoperative infectious complications. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic colorectal resection for patients over 90 years old is a useful procedure that reduces postoperative infectious complications.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Laparoscopía , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Humanos , Colectomía/efectos adversos , Colectomía/métodos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Japón/epidemiología , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 38(1): 101, 2023 Apr 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37069408

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Several guidelines have recommended surgical resection for localized peritoneal metastases, but the prognosis remains poor. In addition, the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) after curative resection is under debate. The present study compared long-term outcomes between curative and non-curative resection and evaluated the effects of AC after curative resection. METHODS: Using a multicenter database, we retrospectively reviewed 123 colorectal cancer patients with peritoneal metastases between April 2016 and December 2021. Of these patients, 49 underwent curative resection, and 74 underwent non-curative resection. RESULTS: The frequency of broad metastases was lower in the curative resection group (8.2%) than in the non-curative resection group (43.2%, p < 0.001). Among all patients, 5-year overall survival rate was higher in the curative resection group (43.0%) than in the non-curative resection group (7.3%, p = 0.004). Among patients who underwent curative resection, 5-year overall survival rate was significantly higher in the AC group (48.2%) than in the non-AC group (38.1%, p = 0.037). Multivariate analysis of all patients revealed pathological N status and non-curative resection as independent predictors of overall survival. In patients who underwent curative resection, advanced age was an independent predictor of relapse-free survival, and AC was an independent predictor of overall survival. CONCLUSION: This multicenter study of colorectal cancer patients with peritoneal metastases revealed that prognosis was more favorable for curable cases than for non-curable cases. Prognosis was more favorable in the AC group than in the non-AC group after curative resection.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Neoplasias Peritoneales , Humanos , Neoplasias Peritoneales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Peritoneales/cirugía , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Pronóstico , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Tasa de Supervivencia
3.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 408(1): 271, 2023 Jul 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37428230

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic colectomy for transverse colon cancer (TCC) can be technically demanding due to the anatomical complexity of the region. In Japan, the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System (ESSQS) was established to improve the skill of laparoscopic surgeons and further develop surgical teams. We examined the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic colectomy for TCC and evaluated the effects of the Japanese ESSQS in facilitating this approach. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 136 patients who underwent laparoscopic colectomy for TCC between April 2016 and December 2021. Patients were divided into an ESSQS-qualified surgeon group (surgery performed by an ESSQS-qualified surgeon, n = 52) and a non ESSQS-qualified surgeon (surgery performed by a non ESSQS-unqualified surgeon, n = 84). Clinicopathological and surgical features were compared between groups. RESULTS: Postoperative complications occurred in 37 patients (27.2%). The proportion of patients who developed postoperative complications was lower in the ESSQS-qualified surgeon group (8.0%) than that in the non ESSQS-qualified surgeon group (34.5%; p < 0.017). Multivariate analysis revealed "Operation by ESSQS-qualified surgeon surgeon" (odds ratio (OR) 0.360, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.140-0.924; p = 0.033), blood loss (OR 4.146, 95% CI 1.688-10.184; p = 0.002), and clinical N status (OR 4.563, 95% CI 1.814-11.474; p = 0.001) as factors independently associated with postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: The present multicenter study confirmed the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic colectomy for TCC and revealed that ESSQS-qualified surgeon achieved better surgical outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Colectomía , Colon Transverso , Neoplasias del Colon , Laparoscopía , Humanos , Colectomía/efectos adversos , Colon Transverso/cirugía , Colon Transverso/patología , Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Surg Today ; 53(12): 1335-1342, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37072524

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: For advanced left colon cancer, lymph node dissection at the root of the inferior mesenteric artery is recommended. Whether the left colic artery (LCA) should be preserved or resected remains contentious. METHODS: The 367 patients who underwent laparoscopic sigmoidectomy or anterior resection and who were pathologically node-positive were reviewed. Patients were divided into LCA-preserving group (LCA-P, n = 60) and LCA-non-preserving group (LCA-NP, n = 307). Propensity score matching was applied to minimize selection bias and 59 patients were matched. RESULTS: Before matching, the rates of poor performance status and cardiovascular disease were higher in the LCA-P group (p < 0.001). After matching, operation time was longer (276 vs. 240 min, p = 0.001), the frequency of splenic flexure mobilization (62.7% vs. 33.9%, p = 0.003) and lymphovascular invasion (84.7% vs. 55.9%, p = 0.001) was higher in the LCA-P group. Severe postoperative complications (CD ≥ 3) occurred only in the LCA-NP group (0% vs. 8.4%, p = 0.028). The median follow-up period was 38.5 months (range 2.0-70.0 months). The 5-year RFS rates (67.8% vs. 66.0%, p = 0.871) and OS rates (80.4% vs. 74.9%, p = 0.308) were comparable between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic LCA-sparing surgery for left-sided colorectal cancer reduces the risk of severe complications and offers a favorable long-term prognosis.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon , Laparoscopía , Neoplasias del Recto , Humanos , Arteria Mesentérica Inferior/cirugía , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Colon Sigmoide/cirugía , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos
5.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 37(5): 1181-1188, 2022 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35478036

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Although adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) using fluoro-pyrimidine and oxaliplatin (FU + oxaliplatin) is recommended after curative resection for locally advanced colon cancer patients, several randomized controlled trials have shown no additional effect of oxaliplatin in patients aged ≥ 70 years. Here, we examined the effectiveness of FU + oxaliplatin on the long-term outcome of old patients with a high risk of recurrence. METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective study included 346 colon cancer patients diagnosed with pathological T4 and/or N2 disease from 2016 to 2020. They were divided into an old group (≥ 70 years, n = 197) and a young group (< 70 years, n = 167). Propensity score matching was used to minimize selection bias, and 126 patients per group were matched. RESULTS: Before matching, the rates of poor performance status (p < 0.001) and the presence of comorbidities (76.1% vs. 47.9%, p < 0.001) were higher in the old group. Although all baseline factors were similar between groups, after matching, the AC rate was lower in the old group (45.2% vs. 65.1%, p = 0.002). In the old group, relapse-free (82.2% vs. 55.6% and 69.6%, p < 0.05) and overall survival (83.1% vs. 80.0% and 44.4%, p < 0.05) rates were significantly higher in the AC patients with FU + oxaliplatin than in the AC patients with only FU and the non-AC patients. CONCLUSION: The selected old colon cancer patients with a high risk of recurrence gained an additional benefit with respect to prognosis from FU + oxaliplatin as AC.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon , Fluorouracilo , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Neoplasias del Colon/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Fluorouracilo/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Oxaliplatino/uso terapéutico , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Retrospectivos
6.
Surg Endosc ; 36(5): 3068-3075, 2022 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34142238

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of laparoscopic multivisceral resection (Lap-MVR) has been reported by several experienced high-volume centers. The Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System (ESSQS) was established in Japan to improve the skill of laparoscopic surgeons and further develop surgical teams. We examined the safety and feasibility of Lap-MVR in general hospitals, and evaluated the effects of the Japanese ESSQS for this approach. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 131 patients who underwent MVR between April 2016 and December 2019. Patients were divided into the laparoscopic surgery group (LAC group, n = 98) and the open surgery group (OPEN group, n = 33). The clinicopathological and surgical features were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Compared with the OPEN group, BMI was significantly higher (21.9 vs 19.3 kg/m2, p = 0.012) and blood loss was lower (55 vs 380 ml, p < 0.001) in the LAC group. Operation time, postoperative complications, and postoperative hospital stay were similar between the groups. ESSQS-qualified surgeons tended to select the laparoscopic approach for MVR (p < 0.001). In the LAC group, ESSQS-qualified surgeons had superior results to those without ESSQS qualifications in terms of blood loss (63 vs 137 ml, p = 0.042) and higher R0 resection rate (0% vs 2.0%, p = 0.040), despite having more cases of locally advanced tumor. In addition, there were no conversions to open surgery among ESSQS-qualified surgeons, and three conversions among surgeons without ESSQS qualifications (0% vs 15.0%, p = 0.007). Multivariate analysis revealed blood loss (odds ratio 1.821; 95% CI 1.324-7.654; p = 0.010) as an independent predictor of postoperative complications. Laparoscopic approach was not a predictive factor. CONCLUSIONS: The present multicenter study confirmed the feasibility and safety of Lap-MVR even in general hospitals, and revealed superior results for ESSQS-qualified surgeons.


Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Laparoscopía , Humanos , Japón , Laparoscopía/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
Surg Today ; 52(9): 1292-1298, 2022 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35147772

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The number of laparoscopic surgeries for colorectal cancer (CRC) in elderly patients has been increasing. We examined the short- and mid-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for CRC in oldest-old patients (≥ 85 years old) compared with the outcomes in younger patients (< 85 years old). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed primary tumor resection for CRC from April 2015 to December 2020 at six hospitals. Short- and mid-term outcomes were compared after propensity score matching. RESULTS: From the 1374 patients, 126 matched pairs were selected. In the matched cohort, the duration of postoperative hospital stay was longer in the oldest-old patients than in the younger patients (15 days vs. 12 days, p = 0.001). There were no significant differences between the groups in the rate of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 2 postoperative complications (21.4% vs. 15.1%, p = 0.254). The oldest-old patients showed a poorer overall survival (OS) than the younger patients (3-year OS, 79.9% vs. 93.5%, p = 0.005) but comparable recurrence-free survival (RFS) (3-year RFS, 72.2% vs. 81.6%, p = 0.530) and cancer-specific survival rates (CSS) (3-year CSS, 90.1% vs. 99.0%, p = 0.124). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic surgery for CRC in oldest-old patients was performed safely with comparable short-term outcomes to those in younger patients. Although the OS was poorer in the oldest-old patients than in the younger patients, the oncological mid-term outcomes were comparable. Laparoscopic surgery for CRC can be considered acceptable as a treatment in oldest-old patients.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Cirugía Colorrectal , Laparoscopía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Humanos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Surg Today ; 52(5): 804-811, 2022 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35165757

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Anastomotic leakage after right-sided colon cancer surgery is a serious complication that affects postoperative mortality. The Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) has been reported to be a useful predictor of postoperative complications. METHODS: A total of 593 cases of right-sided colon cancer resections performed from 2016 to 2020 were examined. The patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of anastomotic leakage (AL, n = 28; no-AL, n = 565); clinicopathological and surgical characteristics were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The AL group patients had a higher comorbidity rate (96.4% vs. 66.9%, p < 0.001), higher CCI score (p < 0.001), higher blood loss (42 mL vs. 23 mL, p = 0.046), and longer hospital stay (30 days vs. 12 days, p < 0.001) than the no-AL group patients. The percentages of chronic pulmonary disease (14.3% vs. 3.9%, p = 0.029), cerebrovascular disease (14.3% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.022), connective tissue disease (39.3% vs. 3.2%, p < 0.001), leukemia (3.6% vs. 0%, p = 0.042), and moderate to severe liver disease (7.1% vs. 0%, p = 0.002) were significantly higher in the AL group. In the multivariate analysis, CCI ≥ 2 was identified as an independent predictor of postoperative anastomotic leakage (hazard ratio 4.91, 95% confidence interval 2.23-10.85, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CCI could predict anastomotic leakage after right-sided colon cancer surgery.


Asunto(s)
Fuga Anastomótica , Neoplasias del Colon , Fuga Anastomótica/epidemiología , Fuga Anastomótica/etiología , Comorbilidad , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
9.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 35(3): 423-431, 2020 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31897648

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The C-reactive protein to albumin ratio (CAR) is a simple and useful score for predicting the outcomes of patients with various cancers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the CAR and short-term outcomes in oldest-old patients with colorectal cancer. METHODS: A total of 126 patients aged 85 years and older with colorectal cancer who underwent resection for primary colon cancer from April 2015 to December 2018 were included. The preoperative cutoff value of the CAR for predicting postoperative complications was 0.19 on receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Clinical characteristics and inflammation-based scores were compared between patients with a high CAR (CAR ≥ 0.19, n = 44) and a low CAR (CAR < 0.19, n = 82). RESULTS: A high preoperative CAR level (≥ 0.19) was significantly associated with stoma construction (p = 0.004), blood loss (p = 0.003), postoperative complications (p = 0.016), and systemic inflammation marker levels, including a low neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (p = 0.006), a low platelet to lymphocyte ratio (p = 0.005), a low prognostic nutritional index (p < 0.001), and a high modified Glasgow prognostic score (p < 0.001). On univariate and multivariate analyses, only the CAR was an independent predictor of postoperative complications (HR 2.864, p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: A high CAR was significantly associated with postoperative complications for oldest-old patients with colorectal cancer.


Asunto(s)
Proteína C-Reactiva/análisis , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Albúmina Sérica/análisis , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biomarcadores/sangre , Neoplasias Colorrectales/sangre , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Femenino , Escala de Consecuencias de Glasgow , Humanos , Recuento de Leucocitos , Recuento de Linfocitos , Masculino , Monocitos , Neutrófilos , Evaluación Nutricional , Recuento de Plaquetas , Factores de Riesgo
10.
Kyobu Geka ; 73(2): 83-86, 2020 Feb.
Artículo en Japonés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32393711

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTIONS: The number of cases requiring surgical resection for pulmonary aspergillosis has increased in recent years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From April 2008 to March 2019, 10 patients underwent pulmonary resection for chronic pulmonary aspergillosis(CPA) in our hospital. RESULTS: Five patients were diagnosed with simple pulmonary aspergilloma (SPA) and 5 were diagnosed with chronic progressive pulmonary aspergillosis( CPPA). The median age was 73 years, and 8 patients were men. A history of tuberculosis was present in 2 cases, diabetes was present in 3 cases, and prednisolone( PSL) administration was performed in 3 cases. The operative procedures included 1 pneumonectomy, 4 lobectomies, 1 segmentectomy, and 4 wedge resections. The median surgery time was 220.5 minutes, and the median blood loss was 301 ml, requiring perioperative transfusion in 2 cases. Postoperative pneumonia was observed in 2 cases. The median postoperative observation period was 11.5 months, and 6 out of 8 patients did not show postoperative recurrences. CONCLUSIONS: Although patients with pulmonary aspergillosis have a high rate of underlying disease and it is necessary to pay attention to postoperative complications, it has been shown that surgery can be performed safely on these patients by selecting appropriate cases and surgical procedures.


Asunto(s)
Aspergilosis Pulmonar , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Pulmón , Masculino , Neumonectomía , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
11.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 31(2): 217-25, 2016 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26607908

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to clarify whether a surgical-specific risk scoring system estimating the physiologic ability and surgical stress (E-PASS) score was useful for prediction of postoperative morbidity and mortality. METHODS: The E-PASS score consists of the preoperative risk score (PRS), surgical stress score (SSS), and the comprehensive risk score (CRS). Conventional scoring systems [colorectal physiologic and operative severity score for the enumeration of mortality (CR-POSSUM) and the prognostic nutritional index (PNI)] were also examined. We retrospectively compared these scores in patients with or without postoperative complications. We assessed the relationship between these scores, clinicopathological features and postoperative mortality. RESULTS: Postoperative complications developed in 78 patients (33%). American Society of Anesthesiologists score, performance status, PNI score, PRS, SSS, and CRS were significantly higher in patients with postoperative complications than in those without postoperative complications (p < 0.05). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was highest for E-PASS [E-PASS (PRS, 0.74; SSS, 0.62; CRS, 0.78), PNI (0.62), CR-POSSUM (PS, 0.57; OSS, 0.52)]. Multivariate logistic analysis identified CRS ≥ 0.2 as a significant determinant of postoperative complications (p < 0.01; hazard ratio, 4.84). Overall survival was significantly better in the CRS < 0.2 group than in the CRS > 0.2 group (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The E-PASS score system was a useful predictor of postoperative complications and mortality, especially in patients with advanced age.


Asunto(s)
Colectomía/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Colectomía/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Gravedad del Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Curva ROC , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Estrés Fisiológico , Tasa de Supervivencia
12.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 15: 86, 2015 Jul 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26205810

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Signet ring cell carcinoma of the colon and rectum is rare, and most cases are detected at an advanced stage. We present a case of primary signet ring cell carcinoma detected at an early stage by magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (NBI) and crystal violet staining. CASE PRESENTATION: A 73-year-old man visited our hospital for screening colonoscopy. Six years previously, he had undergone endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer. The pathological diagnosis was a well-differentiated adenocarcinoma, invading into the mucosa without lymphovascular invasion. Colonoscopy revealed a flat elevated lesion with a slightly depressed area, 20 mm in diameter, in the cecum. Further, magnifying endoscopy with NBI revealed that the surface pattern was slightly irregular and microvessels had a regular diameter and distribution in the margin of the lesion, but in the central part of the lesion, irregularity in the tumor surface pattern and form as well as in the diameter and distribution of microvessels was noted. Additionally, due to mucus, avascular areas were also observed. Magnifying endoscopy combined with 0.05 % crystal violet staining showed IIIL and VI pit patterns in the margin of the lesion, and a VI pit pattern in the central part of the lesion; however, due to mucus exudate, this finding could not be established with certainty. The lesion was successfully removed en bloc using ESD without complications. The tumor was composed mainly of signet ring cell carcinoma, partially mixed with moderately differentiated (tub2) and well-differentiated (tub1) adenocarcinomas. The tumor cells infiltrated 250 µm into the submucosal layer and involved lymphatic vessels. Therefore, the patient underwent an additional laparoscopic ileocecal resection, and the resected specimen revealed no residual carcinoma or lymph node metastasis. CONCLUSION: In this case report, we present a case of primary signet ring cell carcinoma detected at an early stage and identified by magnifying endoscopy with NBI and crystal violet staining.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células en Anillo de Sello/patología , Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Colonoscopía/métodos , Imagen de Banda Estrecha/métodos , Anciano , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Violeta de Genciana , Humanos , Masculino , Coloración y Etiquetado/métodos
13.
Dig Surg ; 32(1): 32-8, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25678189

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Oldest-old patients generally have several comorbidities, and laparoscopic-assisted colectomy (LAC) has not been performed on these patients. However, the surgical technique of LAC has improved, and its indications have been extended. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of LAC for patients over 85 years old. METHODS: Fifty-eight patients over 85 years old who underwent colectomy were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups (LAC group n = 15; open surgery group (Open group) n = 43), and clinicopathological features, surgical characteristics, and outcomes were compared. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in clinical background characteristics between the groups. The LAC group had longer operation time and greater lymph node dissection (both p < 0.01). Postoperatively, the use of analgesics (p = 0.01) was less and the start of oral liquid intake (p = 0.03) was faster in the LAC group. Postoperative complications occurred in 3 patients (20%) in the LAC group and 13 patients (30%) in the Open group (p = 0.66); delirium (n = 6) and sub-ileus (n = 4) developed only in the Open group. CONCLUSION: After LAC, elderly patients tended to have less postoperative pain and started oral liquid intake earlier. LAC can be safe and effective, preventing postoperative complications that occur specifically in oldest-old patients.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Factores de Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Colectomía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Japón , Laparoscopía , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
14.
Hepatol Res ; 44(13): 1308-19, 2014 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24506195

RESUMEN

AIM: To evaluate hepatic fibrosis and tumor diagnosis preoperatively, we investigated the elasticity calculated by the new parameter of ultrasonography, acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI). METHODS: We examined ARFI of the non-tumorous right and left lateral liver and in the tumor by push pulse of probe in 95 patients with hepatic malignancies undergoing hepatectomy. Measurement of ARFI as hepatic stiffness was indicated as the Vs (m/s). RESULTS: Measuring the Vs in the non-tumor region was achieved in the right liver in 99% and at the left lateral liver in 94%. The Vs in the right liver was significantly lower than in the left lateral liver, and the Vs of the liver tumor was significantly higher than in the non-tumorous liver. The Vs in the right and left lateral liver was correlated with the platelet count, aspartate aminotransferase, fibrotic indices and indocyanine green test. The Vs in the right liver was significantly correlated with the fibrotic marker or index. The Vs of liver cirrhosis and histological stage 4 in the right and left liver was significantly the highest compared to the others. The Vs in the right liver showed a high area under the receiver-operator curve value predicting histological fibrosis. The Vs in the right was significantly correlated with blood loss and postoperative complications, particularly uncontrolled ascites. CONCLUSION: Non-invasive ARFI imaging elastography is useful in evaluating impaired liver function or in the differential diagnosis of liver malignancies, highly hepatic fibrosis and in predicting posthepatectomy morbidity.

15.
Hepatogastroenterology ; 61(134): 1739-43, 2014 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25436372

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To clarify parameters associated with postoperative surgical site infection (SSI) after pancreatectomy, we examined clinicopathological and surgical records in 186 patients who underwent pancreatectomy at a single academic institute. METHODOLOGY: Patient demographics, liver functional parameters, histological findings, surgical records and post-hepatectomy outcomes during hospitalization were compared between the non-SSI and SSI group, in which SSIs included superficial and deep SSIs. RESULTS: The prevalence of SSI (29-35%) has not changed over an 18-year period. With respect to patient demographics and laboratory data, no parameters were associated with postoperative SSI. In surgical records, the operating time in the SSI group tended to be longer in comparison with that in the non- SSI group (618 vs. 553 minutes, respectively) but not significantly different (p=0.070). With respect to postoperative outcomes, time to oral intake in the SSI group was significantly longer than that in the non-SSI group (21.2 vs. 13.7 days, respectively) (p<0.01). Incidences of pancreatic fistula, postoperative bleeding, long-term ascites and re-operation were significantly more frequent in the SSI group in comparison with the non-SSI group (p<0.05). Decrease of body weight after surgery in the SSI group was significantly greater than that in the non- SSI group (-4.1 vs. -2.7kg, respectively) (p<0.05). Period of hospital stay in the SSI group was significantly longer than that in the non-SSI group (37 vs. 25 days) (p<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that only postoperative pancreatic fistula was significantly associated with SSI (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: SSI is an important risk factor of longer hospital stay after pancreatectomy and prevention of pancreatic fistula through the future improvement of surgical procedures is necessary to decrease SSI rates.


Asunto(s)
Pancreatectomía/efectos adversos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Tiempo de Internación , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Tempo Operativo , Pancreatectomía/mortalidad , Fístula Pancreática/diagnóstico , Fístula Pancreática/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/diagnóstico , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/mortalidad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Pérdida de Peso , Adulto Joven
16.
Hepatogastroenterology ; 61(134): 1767-74, 2014 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25436377

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We compared each vessel-sealing device to evaluate safety and efficacy for controlling surgical results in 200 patients undergoing pancreatectomy. METHODOLOGY: Sixty-seven patients applied the hemostatic devices (VS group) consisted of LigaSure™ (LS) or the Harmonic ultrasonic dissector (USD). Results were compared with that of a historical control group (n=134). RESULTS: In pancreaticoduodenectomy, the prevalence of lymph node dissection was high in the VS group. Blood transfusion was significantly less frequent in the VS group than in the control group (p<0.01). The prevalence of surgical site infection and systemic complications was significantly lower in the VS group than in the control group (p<0.05). The duration of hospitalization was significantly shorter in the VS group than in the control group (p<0.01). In distal pancreatectomy, the prevalence of cutting stapler usage for transection was low in the VS group. Postoperative weight loss and the prevalence of surgical site infections was higher in the VS group than in the control group but were more frequently observed in the USD group than in the LS group. CONCLUSIONS: Use of energy sealing devices improves surgical results and avoids pancreatectomy-related complications. These devices are safe and effective for use in pancreatic surgery.


Asunto(s)
Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Técnicas Hemostáticas/instrumentación , Pancreatectomía , Ultrasonido/instrumentación , Anciano , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Pancreatectomía/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
17.
Hepatogastroenterology ; 61(131): 727-31, 2014 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26176065

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To clarify improvement of hepatic resection in the recent years, we examined surgical records of 544 patients who underwent hepatectomy in 3 periods between 1994 and 2011 at a single academic institute. METHODOLOGY: Subjects were divided into 3 groups: group 1 (1994-1999, n = 156), group 2 (2000-2006, n = 228) and group 3 (2007-2011, n = 160). Clinical factors, surgical records and post-hepatectomy outcomes during hospitalization were compared between groups. RESULTS: In group 3, patient age was significantly higher and the incidences of alcoholic or fatty liver and obstructive jaundice were significantly higher than in group 1 (p < 0.05). Preoperative liver function was not different between groups, and only prothrombin activity was significantly better in group 1 in comparison with the other groups (p < 0.05). In comparison with group 1, the incidence of resident surgeons as the main operator were significantly higher than in group 3 (p < 0.01). Incidences of laparoscopic hepatectomy and thoraco-abdominal approach were increased in group 3 (p < 0.01). Incidences of combined organ and major vessels resections were significantly higher in group 3 in comparison with group 1 (p < 0.01). Use of omental wrapping and hemostatic devices were significantly more frequent in group 3 than in group 1 (p < 0.01). Surgical records were not different between groups but the red cell transfusion rate in group 3 was significantly lower than in group 1 (p < 0.05). Hospital stay in group 3 was significantly shorter than in group 1. Incidence of hepatectomy-related complication, particularly bile leakage, was significantly lower in group 3 than in group 1 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: According to this evaluation of different time periods, surgical outcomes have been improved with new surgical procedures and perioperative management.


Asunto(s)
Centros Médicos Académicos , Hepatectomía , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Centros Médicos Académicos/normas , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Competencia Clínica , Femenino , Hepatectomía/efectos adversos , Hepatectomía/métodos , Hepatectomía/mortalidad , Hepatectomía/normas , Humanos , Internado y Residencia , Japón , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Registros Médicos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/normas , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/normas , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
18.
Asian J Endosc Surg ; 17(1): e13257, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37944946

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Thirty-day reoperation rate reflects short-term surgical outcomes following surgery. Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer reportedly has positive effects on postoperative complications. This retrospective study investigated risk factors for 30-day reoperation rate among patients after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery using a multicenter database. METHODS: Participants comprised 3037 patients who had undergone laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer between April 2016 and December 2022 at the Nagasaki University and six affiliated centers, classified into those who had undergone reoperation within 30 days after surgery (RO group; n = 88) and those who had not (NRO group; n = 2949). Clinicopathological characteristics were compared between groups. RESULTS: In the RO group, anastomotic leakage occurred in 57 patients (64.8%), intestinal obstruction in 12 (13.6%), and intraabdominal abscess in 5 (5.7%). Female patients were more frequent, preoperative treatment less frequent, body mass index (BMI) lower, operation time longer, blood loss greater, and hospital stay longer in the RO group (p < .05 each). Multivariate analysis revealed BMI (odds ratio, 0.415; 95% confidence interval, 0.218-0.787; p = .021) and poor performance status (odds ratio, 1.966; 95% confidence interval, 1.106-3.492; p = .021) as independent predictors of reoperation. CONCLUSION: Perioperative measures are warranted for patients with low BMI and poor performance status undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Laparoscopía , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/complicaciones , Japón/epidemiología , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Masculino
19.
Asian J Endosc Surg ; 17(2): e13295, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38414043

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The impact of institutional volume on postoperative outcomes after laparoscopic colectomy is still being debated. This study aimed to investigate whether differences in postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic colon resection exist between high- and low-volume centers. METHODS: Data were reviewed for 1360 patients who underwent laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer between 2016 and 2022. Patients were divided according to whether they were treated at a high-volume center (≥100 colorectal surgeries annually; n = 947) or a low-volume center (<100 colorectal surgeries annually; n = 413). Propensity score matching was applied to balance covariates and minimize selection biases that could affect outcomes. Finally, 406 patients from each group were matched. RESULTS: After matching, patients from high-volume centers showed a higher number of retrieved lymph nodes (19 vs. 17, p < .001) and more frequent involvement of expert surgeons (98.3% vs. 88.4%, p < .001). Postoperative complication rates were similar between groups (p = .488). No significant differences between high- and low-volume centers were seen in relapse-free survival (88.8% each, p = .716) or overall survival (85.7% vs. 82.8%, p = .480). CONCLUSION: The present study suggests that in appropriately educated organizations, relatively safe procedures and good prognosis may be obtained for laparoscopic colectomy cases, regardless of institutional volume.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon , Laparoscopía , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Colectomía/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
20.
Anticancer Res ; 44(4): 1637-1643, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38537977

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIM: Colonic stents have been inserted as a bridge to surgery in patients with resectable colorectal cancer, allowing bowel decompression for systemic assessment and better preparation to avoid stoma construction. However, reports of short- and long-term prognoses for elderly patients remain limited. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed 175 consecutive patients who underwent colonic stent insertion for bowel obstruction followed by curative colectomy. Patients were divided into those >80 years old (Old, n=49) and those <80 years old (Young, n=126). After propensity score matching, 41 patients in each group matched. RESULTS: Before matching, performance status was poorer (p<0.001), postoperative complication rate was higher (p=0.009), adjuvant chemotherapy rate was lower (p<0.001), and hospital stay was longer (p<0.001) in the Old group. After matching, adjuvant chemotherapy rate was lower (9.8% vs. 39.0%; p=0.003) and hospital stay was longer (14 vs. 12 days; p=0.029) in the Old group. Five-year relapse-free survival (42.9% vs. 68.8%; p=0.200), overall survival (66.3% vs. 87.7%; p=0.081), and cancer-specific survival (68.2% vs. 87.7%; p=0.129) rates were comparable between groups. CONCLUSION: Colorectal resection after colonic stent insertion is useful for elderly patients, with potential to reduce postoperative complication rates and achieve good long-term results with appropriate case selection.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Obstrucción Intestinal , Humanos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Retrospectivos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/complicaciones , Stents/efectos adversos , Obstrucción Intestinal/etiología , Obstrucción Intestinal/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA