Overnight switch from rasagiline to safinamide in Parkinson's disease patients with motor fluctuations: a tolerability and safety study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: When switching between monoamine oxidase type B (MAO-B) inhibitors, a 15-day suspension period is a precautionary measure to avoid a serotonin syndrome and hypertensive crisis. However, this indication results in a major inconvenience for parkinsonian patients because of the worsening of their clinical condition. In routine clinical practice, neurologists often perform a substitution of these two drugs without solution of continuity (i.e. overnight), to avoid worsening of fluctuations and prolonged OFF periods. Therefore, a safety open label study was performed to investigate the possible risks of switching overnight from rasagiline to safinamide. METHODS: The study population included 20 advanced patients with Parkinson's disease on stable treatment with rasagiline and levodopa (alone or in combination with other anti-parkinsonian medication). The possible occurrence of serotonin syndrome and hypertension was monitored through a strict clinical observation and a 24-h Holter recording (ABPM) performed twice, whilst subjects were on rasagiline and immediately after switching to safinamide. RESULTS: No cases of serotonin syndrome or hypertensive crisis occurred during the study. Changes that were not significant occurred in the primary end-point: 24-h mean blood pressure (BP) had a mild +4.4% increase in the ABPM2 versus ABPM1 (P = 0.17), 24-h systolic and diastolic BP values were slightly higher at ABPM2 compared to ABPM1 (respectively +3.3%, P = 0.13; and 5.4%, P = 0.08) and 24-h systolic BP variability was unchanged between the two ABPM evaluations (from 8.6 ± 2.9 to 8.9 ± 1.8; P = 0.27). CONCLUSION: The results of the present study confirm that the overnight switch from rasagiline to safinamide is safe and well tolerated by patients.

Drug utilization, safety, and effectiveness of exenatide, sitagliptin, and vildagliptin for type 2 diabetes in the real world: data from the Italian AIFA Anti-diabetics Monitoring Registry.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In Italy, the reimbursed use of incretin mimetics and incretin enhancers was subject to enrollment of patients into a web-based system recording the general demographic and clinical data of patients. We report the utilization data of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP1) receptor agonists and dipeptidylpeptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitors in clinical practice as recorded by the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) Monitoring Registry. METHODS AND RESULTS: From February 2008 to August 2010, 75,283 patients with type 2 diabetes were entered into the registry and treated with exenatide, sitagliptin, or vildagliptin. The treatment was administered to patients in a wide range of ages (≥75 years, n = 6125 cases), body mass index (BMI) (≥35 kg/m(2), n = 22,015), and metabolic control (HbA(1c) ≥ 11% ((96 mmol/mol), n = 3151). Overall, 1116 suspected adverse drug reactions were registered, including 12 cases of acute pancreatitis (six on exenatide). Hypoglycemic episodes mainly occurred in combination with sulfonylureas. Treatment discontinuation for the three drugs (logistic regression analysis) was negatively associated with the male gender and positively with baseline HbA1c, diabetes duration, and, limitedly to DPP-4 inhibitors, with BMI. Treatment discontinuation (including loss to follow-up, accounting for 21-26%) was frequent. Discontinuation for treatment failure occurred in 7.7% of cases (exenatide), 3.8% (sitagliptin), and 4.1% (vildagliptin), respectively, corresponding to 27-40% of all discontinuations, after excluding lost to follow-up. HbA1c decreased on average by 0.9-1.0% (9 mmol/mol). Body weight decreased by 3.5% with exenatide and by 1.0-1.5% with DPP-4 inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: In the real world of Italian diabetes centers, prescriptions of incretins have been made in many cases outside the regulatory limits. Nevertheless, when appropriately utilized, incretins may grant results at least in line with pivotal trials.

Three years of experience: the Italian registry and safety data update.

At the end of 2006, a pharmacovigilance program on natalizumab was settled by the Italian Pharmaceutical Agency, and on January 2007, multiple sclerosis patients poorly responding to the immunomodulating therapies or with an aggressive clinical form of disease from onset initiated to be registered and to receive the medication. On February 2010, almost 3,000 cases have been treated with natalizumab. The drop-out rate is 10%. Almost 800 cases received cycles of natalizumab for more than 18 months. One case of PML was reported and other adverse events are similar to those described in phase III studies. The majority of cases remained stable, while in 25% of cases, an improvement of disability was documented.

Effect of sex, age and transmission category on the progression to AIDS and survival of zidovudine-treated symptomatic patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of transmission category and demographic, clinical and immunological characteristics on the progression to AIDS and survival of zidovudine-treated patients. DESIGN: Prospective multicentre cohort study of symptomatic non-AIDS patients. SETTING: Eighty-three clinical centres reporting data to the National Zidovudine Registry. PATIENTS: A total of 1468 patients enrolled between July 1987 and January 1991 were analysed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Three-year AIDS-free survival probability estimates since therapy start. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of progression to AIDS and survival. RESULTS: Faster progression was associated with increasing age (8% risk increase for a 5-year increase), low baseline CD4+ count (39% risk increase for 100 x 10(6)/l cells decrease), and zidovudine > 1000 mg/day (20% risk increase compared with < or = 1000 mg/day). Homosexual men had a 33% risk increase compared with other risk groups. The presence of fever and oral candidiasis at enrolment were also independently associated with a higher risk of progression. Differences in the risk of progression were not significant between men and women. Older age, baseline CD4+ count, homosexual behaviour, fever and oral candidiasis were independently associated with a shorter survival. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that age and baseline CD4+ count are independent predictors of progression, but do not provide evidence for differences in clinical outcome between the sexes. The higher risk of progression to AIDS and shorter survival for homosexual men appears to be correlated with the higher risk of developing Kaposi's sarcoma.

Phase II controlled trial of post-exposure immunization with recombinant gp160 versus antiretroviral therapy in asymptomatic HIV-1-infected adults. VaxSyn Protocol Team.

OBJECTIVE: To alter the natural course of HIV-1 infection by inducing or potentiating immune responses to HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein. DESIGN: Multicentre, double-blind, three-arm, placebo-controlled study. SETTING: Outpatients attending clinics in two University Hospitals. PATIENTS: Ninety-nine asymptomatic HIV-1-infected adults with CD4+ T-cell counts > 400 and < 600 x 10(6)/l and no previous antiretroviral therapy were included. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to three groups treated with: (i) gp160 in alum over a 2-year period in combination with placebo for the full study duration (n = 32); (ii) gp160 in alum over a 2-year period in combination with zidovudine for the full study duration (n = 34); and (iii) alum over a 2-year period in combination with zidovudine for the full study duration (n = 33). RESULTS: Immunotherapy was well tolerated and no significant differences in disease progression were seen in the treatment groups. The majority of patients (85%) receiving gp160 showed persistent lymphoproliferative responses to the immunogen and to a different Env antigen preparation. CD4+ cell count changes in patients receiving zidovudine alone were significantly higher than those seen in patients receiving immunotherapy alone after 1 year of treatment. Zidovudine administration was associated with initial transient reduction of plasma viraemia. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged immunization with a soluble HIV-1 subunit provided no benefit to asymptomatic HIV-1-infected patients and was inferior to zidovudine monotherapy. Furthermore, immunization with gp160 shortened the duration of the transient viral load reduction induced by zidovudine.

Quality of life outcomes of combination zidovudine- didanosine-nevirapine and zidovudine-didanosine for antiretroviral-naive advanced HIV-infected patients.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the quality of life outcomes in antiretroviral-naive patients randomized to zidovudine plus didanosine versus zidovudine plus didanosine plus nevirapine for treatment of advanced HIV disease (the Istituto Superiore di Sanità 047 trial). DESIGN: A 48-week randomized, double-blind trial. METHODS: Sixty patients were enrolled and evaluated over 24 weeks. Quality of life was assessed using a modified version of the Medical Outcomes Study-HIV Health Survey. For analysis, we calculated two summary scores reflecting the physical (PHS) and the mental (MHS) components of health. RESULTS: Although the three-drug combination was superior at inducing immunologic and virologic responses, the two-drug regimen was superior for both PHS and MHS, especially at week 8 where differences were both statistically and clinically significant (5.8 and 9.2 points, respectively, P< 0.02 for both). Quality of life changes paralleled trends in body weight and Karnofsky performance status score. CONCLUSION: Although a three-drug antiretroviral therapy regimen was superior in terms of short term virologic/immunologic response, the two-drug regimen was better in terms of quality of life. In general, triple therapy remains the most effective treatment option. However, quality of life assessments can yield results that may be discordant with and complementary to those obtained using conventional endpoints. Comparative trials should collect a comprehensive range of outcome measures, including patient-reported quality of life, in order to provide clinicians and patients with additional information that may influence treatment decisions.

Long-term follow-up of zidovudine therapy in asymptomatic HIV infection: results of a multicenter cohort study. The Italian Zidovudine Evaluation Group.

In 1990 the results of a placebo-controlled study conducted within the AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG 019) showed that in the short term, zidovudine was effective in slowing progression to advanced disease in HIV-infected asymptomatic patients with low CD4 cell counts. More recently, the preliminary results of the Concorde Trial suggested that while the data at 1 year agreed with those of ACTG 019, no sustained clinical benefit was detectable at 3 years for early versus deferred therapy. Therefore, the length of the clinical usefulness of zidovudine in this population is still to be determined. We evaluated the 2-year outcome of zidovudine therapy in asymptomatic patients through the prospective follow-up of a cohort of 936 subjects with low CD4+ (< 500/mm3) counts who strictly satisfied, at enrollment, the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the ACTG 019 trial. The clinical end point of the analysis was the development of AIDS. The majority (72.2%) of the individuals in the cohort acquired HIV infection through intravenous drug use; 26.6% were women. The median baseline CD4 cell count was 308/mm3. At 55 weeks of mean follow-up, the progression rate to AIDS (3.2 events per hundred person-years) appears to be comparable to that already reported at the same mean follow-up time for the ACTG 019 zidovudine-treated asymptomatic patients. After 124 weeks of mean follow-up, the overall rate of progression to AIDS was 5.2 per hundred person-years.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Plasma viremia titration and RNA quantitation in ICD-p24 negative HIV type-1-infected patients.

Quantitative culture of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) was performed on 202 plasma samples obtained from asymptomatic and early symptomatic HIV-1 infected patients (mean CD4+ count: 186/mm3) before antiretroviral therapy was started. HIV could be isolated from 84% of the plasma samples (titers ranging from 10(0) to 10(2.75) TCID50/ml). Immune complex dissociated p24 antigen (ICD-p24) was detected in 66% of the samples. Only 23 samples (11%) were negative for both ICD-p24 as well as HIV culture. Discordant results were obtained in 55 samples, and 45 samples negative for ICD-p24 were positive for HIV culture. A significant proportion (42%) of patients that were negative for ICD-p24 belonged to a very advanced group with very low CD4+ cell count. However, almost 90% of these ICD-p24 negative samples were positive for HIV plasma viremia, stressing the value of this virological marker in patients with low CD4+ cell count and without any detectable ICD-p24 antigenemia. HIV-1 RNA was detected in all ICD-p24 negative plasma samples tested by the branched DNA (bDNA) assay. A very good correlation was found between high RNA copy number and HIV plasma isolation in samples obtained from patients with low CD4+ cell count, suggesting that HIV-1 RNA quantitation may also reflect viral infectivity of plasma.

A randomized trial comparing the introduction of ritonavir or indinavir in 1251 nucleoside-experienced patients with advanced HIV infection.

ISS-IP1, a multicenter, randomized, 48-week open trial, was designed to compare the introduction of ritonavir or indinavir in patients with previous nucleoside experience and CD4+ cell counts below 50/mm3. Concomitant antiretroviral treatment with nucleoside analogs was allowed. Primary efficacy measures were survival and time to a new AIDS-defining event or death, analyzed through the whole period of observation by the intention-to-treat approach. Primary toxicity measures were time to treatment discontinuation and adverse events, grade at least 3/serious, analyzed by an on-treatment approach. Evaluation-of efficacy also included CD4+ cell and RNA response. The trial enrolled 1251 patients in 5 months. At baseline, mean CD4+ cell count was about 20 cells/mm3 and mean HIV RNA copy number was 4.9 log10/ml in both groups. Overall, 402 patients in the ritonavir group and 250 patients in the indinavir group permanently discontinued the assigned treatment (relative risk, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.68-2.30; p = 0.0001), with most of this difference dependent on a higher number of discontinuation for adverse events in the ritonavir group. After a mean follow-up of 307 days (ritonavir, 304; indinavir, 309), 124 deaths (ritonavir, 61; indinavir, 63; relative risk, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.67-1.36; p = 0.80) and 330 new AIDS-defining events (ritonavir, 170; indinavir, 160; relative risk, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.85-1.31; p = 0.60) were observed. CD4+ cell counts increased in both groups in patients still receiving treatment, with about 100 cells gained by week 24 and 150 cells gained by week 48. Body weight also increased over time in both groups. Analysis of RNA response showed a decrease of 1.5 log10 or higher in both treatment groups. Overall, 400 patients in the ritonavir group and 338 patients in the indinavir group developed at least one grade 3/serious new adverse event during follow-up (relative risk, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.28-1.72; p = 0.0001). Favorable CD4+ cell and RNA responses at 24 and 48 weeks were observed in both groups of patients remaining on treatment. Indinavir showed slightly better effects in sustaining RNA, CD4+ cell, and body weight responses. Ritonavir and indinavir results were comparable in terms of clinical outcome (survival and AIDS-defining events).

Plasma HIV-1 copy number and in vitro infectivity of plasma prior to and during combination antiretroviral treatment.

Some studies on untreated patients have shown a general correlation between plasma HIV copy number and plasma infectivity in in vitro models. Recent observations also indicate that HIV-RNA level is an important predictor of perinatal transmission and may also have a role in heterosexual transmission. To further analyse the correlation between HIV viral load and plasma infectivity, we studied the relationship between HIV-1 plasma copy number and plasma infectivity prior to and during treatment with antiretroviral combination regimens in HIV-1 infected adults. Plasma infectivity was assessed in vitro by coculture of plasma from HIV-positive patients with PHA-stimulated fresh PBMC from uninfected donors. A positive plasma isolation, in almost all cases (43/45) and irrespective of treatment status, was associated with an HIV viral load higher than 100000 copies per ml, with higher plasma HIV-1 RNA values in isolation-positive samples compared with isolation-negative samples (median values, 710000 vs. 37500 copies per ml, respectively). SI and NSI strains had similarly high viral load values (470000 vs. 790000 copies per ml), but CD4 counts were lower in the SI phenotype group. Our data indicate that low levels of viral load are only exceptionally associated with isolation from plasma in the in vitro model we used. This observation confirms indirectly the presence of an association between viral load and infectivity. The requisite of a high plasma viral load in order to obtain infectivity (i.e. positivity of HIV isolation from plasma) also seems maintained under antiretroviral treatment, adding confidence in the conclusion that reductions in viral load translate into reduction of plasma infectivity. Due to the extreme complexity of factors determining transmission, a very prudent interpretation of the results is essential when information from experimental studies has to be transferred to clinical situations requiring assessment of risks or clinical decisions.

Hospitalizations and costs of treatment for protease inhibitor-based regimens in patients with very advanced HIV-infection (CD4 < 50/mm(3)).

PURPOSE: To describe the cost of hospitalization and treatment in patients with very advanced disease who tart different regimens based on a protease inhibitor (PI). METHOD: An observational retrospective analysis was performed on data from a 48-week randomized, multicenter study. Analysis was based on a subgroup of centers that were geographically defined. Costs of ordinary hospital admissions and of antiretroviral treatment were considered. Incidence of hospitalization and number of days free from hospitalization during the period of observation were calculated. Cost and hospitalization measures were compared among patients receiving three different therapeutic regimens: only PI, PI plus one nucleoside, or PI plus two nucleosides. A multivariate analysis was used to assess cost differences, controlling for variables potentially able to influence outcome. RESULTS: Overall, among 166 patients starting PI (PI plus two nucleosides, 71;PI plus one nucleoside, 65; only PI, 30), 162 ordinary hospital admissions were observed during about 1 year of follow-up. Monthly rates of admission per person and incidence of first hospitalization on 100 person-months showed a clear inverse relationship with the number of drugs comprising the baseline treatment regimen, with the lower rates for the triple therapy group (0.06 and 3.9, respectively), intermediate values for the dual therapy group (0.10 and 8.1, respectively), and higher rates for the PI monotherapy group (0.15 and 13.7, respectively). The average number of days free from hospitalization per month was 29.5 in the triple therapy group, 28.6 in the dual therapy group, and 27.9 in the monotherapy group. The results of cost analysis showed, despite higher cost of antiretroviral treatment, that global costs were progressively lower using regimens of increasing potency: Compared to PI monotherapy, global cost (costs of antiretroviral treatment and of hospitalizations combined) per month per patient was 31.9% lower for the triple therapy group and 19.3% lower for the dual therapy. Global cost for the triple therapy was 15.7% lower compared to global cost for dual therapy. After adjustment for CD4 count, AIDS status, and Karnofsky score, both hospitalization costs and global costs were significantly lower for triple therapy compared to monotherapy (p =.002 and.039, respectively). CONCLUSION: In advanced and nucleoside-experienced patients, PI-containing regimens have a differential impact according to the overall strength of the regimen, with the best effects on both hospitalizations and treatment costs obtained using PI within potent combination regimens.

HIV-related morbidity and mortality in patients starting protease inhibitors in very advanced HIV disease (CD4 count of < 50 cells/microL): an analysis of 338 clinical events from a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: AIDS defining events occur infrequently in the presence of CD4 counts above 200 cells/microL. It is, however, uncertain for most of the AIDS defining conditions whether this threshold can be considered equally safe in patients with a previously very low CD4 nadir. METHODS: We evaluated in detail all the AIDS defining events observed during a 48-week clinical trial in 1251 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-experienced patients who started protease inhibitors (PIs) at CD4 counts below 50 cells/microL. The type of event, immunological status at the moment of event and time between start of PI treatment and event occurrence were analysed cumulatively and by event type; event rates were calculated. RESULTS: Concomitant data on CD4 counts were available for 338 AIDS defining events (81% of total events). Median time between start of treatment with PI and event was 94.5 days and median absolute CD4 value at the occurrence of event was 20 per microL. Only 14 events (in 12 patients) were observed above the threshold of 200 CD4 cells/microL. An analysis of the 67 deaths with concomitantly available CD4 counts (57%) showed a median CD4 count of 10 cells/microL, with only four deaths occurring in the presence of a CD4 count above 100 cells/microL. CONCLUSIONS: Very few clinical AIDS defining conditions were observed in patients who start PIs at very low CD4 counts and with treatment restore absolute values in CD4 counts above 200 cells/microL. This threshold can therefore be considered a clinically effective goal of treatment with respect to occurrence of all AIDS defining conditions in patients starting PIs in very advanced HIV disease.

[Decrease in notifications of AIDS dementia complex in 1989-1990 in Italy: possible role of the early treatment with zidovudine]. / Diminuzione delle notifiche di AIDS Dementia Complex nel periodo 1989-1990 in Italia: possibile ruolo del trattamento precoce con zidovudina.

We evaluated the incidence of AIDS dementia complex (ADC) in groups of patients who acquired infection through different risk behaviours, and attempted to evaluate the possible role of zidovudine (AZT) treatment in preventing or delaying the onset of ADC. The Italian National AIDS Registry was used to study patients with AIDS for whom ADC was reported as an index disease. Relative risk of presenting ADC between different patient categories has been determined. Logistic regression was used to analyse temporal trends in the proportion of AIDS cases presenting with ADC. Of the 6466 cases reported between August '87 and August '90, ADC was seen in 640 (9.9%). I. V. drug addicts had twice the risk (estimated odds ratio: 1.9; 95% confidence interval: 1.5-2.6, p less than 0.001), compared to homo/bisexuals, of presenting with ADC. There is significant evidence (p less than 0.0001) that after a progressive increase in the period '87-'89, it began a definite decrease in the monthly proportion of ADC cases, starting August '89. AZT was introduced in Italy in July 1987 for patients with AIDS or advanced ARC. The incidence of AIDS dementia complex at the moment of AIDS diagnosis in our population of patients, began to decline 24 months after the introduction of systematic AZT treatment in Italy. This could have been due to inhibition of HIV replication in the Central Nervous System among patients who initiated AZT-treatment before developing full-blown AIDS.

Survival of zidovudine-treated patients with AIDS compared with that of contemporary untreated patients. Italian Zidovudine Evaluation Group.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the long-term effectiveness of zidovudine (AZT) in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). This assessment has never been adequately done because controlled clinical trials were stopped early and survival comparisons were made with historical controls. DESIGN: Nonrandomized contemporary observational study of patients treated and not treated with zidovudine. SETTING: Twenty-three AIDS treatment centers throughout Italy that reported cases to the National Registry of AIDS Cases between July 1987 and March 1988. PATIENTS: One hundred fifty-nine zidovudine-treated and 112 untreated patients with AIDS, the majority of whom had acquired human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection through intravenous drug use. OUTCOME MEASURES: Median survival and 1- and 2-year survival for treated and untreated groups, as estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was also used to identify independent predictors of survival among the variables studied. RESULTS: Patients were similar with respect to CD4/CD8 ratio, age, sex, clinical and immunological status at diagnosis, and source of HIV infection. After 24 months, survival was 45.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 36.1% to 55.7%) in the treated group and 20.5% (95% CI, 12.6% to 28.3%) in the untreated group, with median survival of 21.2 and 9.6 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Possible biases of this study include imperfect matching for clinical status and better overall medical care of treated patients. Nevertheless, we believe that the observed differences in survival were primarily due to zidovudine treatment.

Risk factors and occurrence of rash in HIV-positive patients not receiving nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor: data from a randomized study evaluating use of protease inhibitors in nucleoside-experienced patients with very low CD4 levels (<50 cells/microL).

BACKGROUND: Most of the studies evaluating rash in HIV-positive patients have focused on nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI), particularly nevirapine, and little is known about the occurrence of rash and the risk factors for its development in patients receiving regimens not based on NNRTI. METHODS: We evaluated all cases of rash observed during a 48-week randomized multicentre trial in 1251 nucleoside-experienced patients who started treatment with protease inhibitors (ritonavir or indinavir) at CD4 counts below 50 cells/microL. Incidence rates for rash were calculated according to gender, clinical status, age, use of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) prophylaxis and use of individual antiretroviral drugs at enrollment. Differences between groups defined according to the above characteristics were tested for statistical significance using the log-rank test in a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. All factors that gave results in the univariate analyses below the significance level of 0.05 were included in a multivariate analysis using a Cox regression model. RESULTS: During a follow-up period of 9690 person-months, 66 patients (5.3%) developed rash (0.68 events/100 person-months). In the univariate analyses, risk of rash did not differ with trial treatment (indinavir or ritonavir), clinical status, PCP prophylaxis, or age. During follow-up, rash was observed in 7.5% of enrolled women and in 4.5% of enrolled men (P=0.03). Serious rash occurred in 4.5% of enrolled women and in 1.6% of enrolled men (P=0.003). Use of HAART (P<0.001) and inclusion of zidovudine and of zalcitabine in the prescribed regimen (P=0.02) appeared to be associated with a lower risk of rash. In the multivariate analysis, the variables that remained significantly predictive of rash were gender (risk for women compared to men: 1.65, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.00-2.72, P=0.048) and use of a non-HAART regimen (risk for non-HAART patients compared to HAART: 2.73, 95% CI: 1.49-5.02, P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, about 5% of HIV-positive patients who started treatment with protease inhibitors at very low CD4 counts developed rash, generally in the first few weeks after treatment. Risk was significantly higher in women and in patients who did not receive a HAART regimen. Our data indicate that women have a higher risk of rash than men, also with regimens that do not include NNRTI.

A randomized trial (ISS 901) of switching to didanosine versus continued zidovudine after the diagnosis of AIDS.

Although the efficacy of switching from zidovudine (AZT) to didanosine (ddI) has already been evaluated in controlled studies, prior investigations were not specifically designed to evaluate this issue in patients with acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS). This open, randomized, multicenter study (ISS 901) was designed to evaluate the clinical benefit in patients with AIDS of switching to ddI after 6-18 months of AZT and no major intolerance. Patients were randomized to continue AZT, maintaining the current dosage at randomization (n = 79), or to receive ddI (n = 80) at the dosage of 375 mg and 250 mg b.i.d. for body weight > 60 and < or = 60 kg, respectively. Primary efficacy measures were survival and time to new AIDS-defining events, analyzed by the intent-to-treat approach. The two groups were comparable for baseline characteristics, follow-up (15 months), and time spent on allocated treatment. At the end of the study, 104 patients (48 AZT, 56 ddI) had died and 90 had at least one new AIDS-defining event (44 AZT, 46 ddI). Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival and of time to first new AIDS-defining event showed no differences between the treatment groups. No differences were detected in other efficacy measurements (p24 antigenemia, CD4+ count, Karnofsky score, and body weight), occurrence of severe toxicities, and treatment modifications. Pancreatitis occurred only in ddI-treated patients (6%). In our population of patients with advanced disease, switching from AZT to ddI did not produce apparent benefits, suggesting that application of this strategy earlier in the course of human immunodeficiency virus disease should be considered.

A randomized trial (ISS 902) of didanosine versus zidovudine in previously untreated patients with mildly symptomatic human immunodeficiency virus infection.

In this multicenter study (ISS 902), 554 previously untreated patients with <500 CD4 cells/mm3 and mildly symptomatic human immunodeficiency virus disease were randomized to receive zidovudine or didanosine (ddI). After a mean follow-up of 20 months, 80 patients (40 zidovudine, 40 ddI) had died and 146 had at least one AIDS-defining event (73 zidovudine, 73 ddI). Overall, no difference was found between treatments with respect to progression to AIDS or death. The analysis of relative risk (RR) of progression over time, however, showed an initially minor risk for zidovudine patients and an inversion in the zidovudine-ddI RR in the second and third years of follow-up. Didanosine showed a greater effect on CD4 cell count response. The two drugs confirmed the toxicity patterns already reported in other trials, with a low occurrence of pancreatitis (ddI 1.3%, zidovudine 0.4%). The overall results suggest that, in this population, zidovudine and ddI monotherapies have comparable long-term clinical efficacy and that more powerful regimens should be preferred.

A randomized, double-blind trial on the use of a triple combination including nevirapine, a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase HIV inhibitor, in antiretroviral-naive patients with advanced disease.

The immunologic and virologic activity of nevirapine in combination with two nucleosides (zidovudine [ZDV] and didanosine [ddI]) was evaluated in antiretroviral-naive patients with a CD4 count <200/mm3 or clinical AIDS. In all, 68 patients were enrolled in a 48-week double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. A group of 32 patients received ZDV + ddI + nevirapine, and 36 patients received ZDV + ddI. Primary efficacy parameters were the activity on HIV-1 RNA and on peripheral blood CD4+ cells, with differences between groups analyzed by the Wilcoxon's nonparametric two-sample test. Baseline RNA was high in both treatment groups (median values, 5.8 and 5.7 log10). RNA and CD4 responses were significantly higher with the triple combination (median RNA reductions, 2.69 versus 1.05 log10 at 24 weeks and 1.97 versus 1.20 log10 at 48 weeks; median CD4 increases, 81 versus 64 cells/mm3 at 24 weeks and 101 versus 27 cells/mm3 at 48 weeks). This study demonstrates that a triple combination of ZDV + ddI + nevirapine used as first-line regimen in antiretroviral-naive patients can induce sustained virologic and immunologic response in patients with low CD4 count or a previous diagnosis of AIDS.