Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Tech Coloproctol ; 27(12): 1191-1200, 2023 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37930579

RESUMEN

Non-excisional techniques for pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) have gained popularity over the last years. The aim of this study was to review short and long-term outcomes for non-excisional techniques with special focus on the additive effect of treatment of the inner lining of the sinus cavity and the difference between primary and recurrent PSD. A systematic search was conducted in Embase, Medline, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane and Google Scholar databases for studies on non-excisional techniques for PSD including pit picking techniques with or without additional laser or phenol treatment, unroofing, endoscopic techniques and thrombin gelatin matrix application. Outcomes were recurrence rates, healing rates, complication rates, wound healing times and time taken to return to daily activities. In total, 31 studies comprising 8100 patients were included. Non-excisional techniques had overall healing rates ranging from 67 to 100%. Recurrence rates for pit picking, unroofing and gelatin matrix application varied from 0 to 16% depending on the follow-up time. Recurrence rates after additional laser, phenol and endoscopic techniques varied from 0 to 29%. Complication rates ranged from 0 to 16%, and the wound healing time was between three and forty-seven days. The return to daily activities varied from one to nine days. Non-excisional techniques are associated with fast recovery and low morbidity but recurrence rates are high. Techniques that attempt to additionally treat the inner lining of the sinus have worse recurrence rates than pit picking alone. Recurrence rates do not differ between primary and recurrent disease.


Asunto(s)
Seno Pilonidal , Humanos , Seno Pilonidal/cirugía , Gelatina , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Cicatrización de Heridas , Fenol/uso terapéutico , Recurrencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Br J Surg ; 105(8): 1014-1019, 2018 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29663311

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The intraoperative classification of appendicitis dictates the patient's postoperative management. Prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended for complex appendicitis (gangrenous, perforated, abscess), whereas preoperative prophylaxis suffices for simple appendicitis. Distinguishing these two conditions can be challenging. The aim of this study was to assess interobserver variability in the classification of appendicitis during laparoscopy. METHODS: Short video recordings taken during laparoscopy for suspected appendicitis were shown to surgeons and surgical residents. They were asked to: classify the appendix as indicative of no, simple or complex appendicitis; categorize the appendix as normal, phlegmonous, gangrenous, perforated and/or abscess; and decide whether they would prescribe postoperative antibiotics. Inter-rater reliability was evaluated using Fleiss' κ score and the S* statistic. RESULTS: Some 80 assessors participated in the study. Video recordings of 20 patients were used. Interobserver agreement was minimal for both the classification of appendicitis (κ score 0·398, 95 per cent c.i. 0·385 to 0·410) and the decision to prescribe postoperative antibiotic treatment (κ score 0·378, 0·362 to 0·393). Agreement was slightly higher when published criteria were applied (κ score 0·552, 0·537 to 0·568). CONCLUSION: There is considerable variability in the intraoperative classification of appendicitis and the decision to prescribe postoperative antibiotic treatment.


Asunto(s)
Apendicectomía/métodos , Apendicitis/clasificación , Laparoscopía/métodos , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Apendicitis/cirugía , Apéndice/patología , Apéndice/cirugía , Estudios Transversales , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Proyectos Piloto , Cirujanos
3.
Colorectal Dis ; 12(9): 862-7, 2010 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19788490

RESUMEN

AIM: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy, morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic peritoneal lavage for patients with perforated diverticulitis. METHOD: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library and CINAHL databases, Google Scholar and five major publisher websites without language restriction. All articles which reported the use of laparoscopic peritoneal lavage for patients with perforated diverticulitis were included. RESULTS: Two prospective cohort studies, nine retrospective case series and two case reports reporting 231 patients were selected for data extraction. Most (77%) patients had purulent peritonitis (Hinchey III). Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage successfully controlled abdominal and systemic sepsis in 95.7% of patients. Mortality was 1.7%, morbidity 10.4% and only four (1.7%) of the 231 patients received a colostomy. CONCLUSION: There have been no publications of high methodological quality on laparoscopic peritoneal lavage for patients with perforated colonic diverticulitis. The published papers do, however, show promising results, with high efficacy, low mortality, low morbidity and a minimal need for a colostomy.


Asunto(s)
Diverticulitis del Colon/terapia , Lavado Peritoneal/métodos , Peritonitis/terapia , Diverticulitis del Colon/complicaciones , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Peritonitis/etiología
4.
Colorectal Dis ; 12(3): 179-86, 2010 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19183330

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of clinical evaluation and cross-sectional imaging modalities such as ultrasound and computed tomography for patients with suspected colonic diverticulitis and to determine the value of these examinations in clinical decision-making. METHOD: A prospective analysis was conducted of 802 consecutive patients that presented with abdominal pain at the emergency department. Initial clinical diagnoses and management proposals were compared to the final diagnoses and therapeutic strategies for all patients. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients were identified with colonic diverticulitis as the final diagnosis. The positive and negative predictive values for the clinical diagnosis of colonic diverticulitis were 0.65 and 0.98 respectively. Additional cross-sectional imaging had a positive and negative predictive value of respectively 0.95 and 0.99 or higher. These additional examinations led to a correct change of the initial clinical diagnosis in 37% of the patients, and a change in management in only 7%. CONCLUSION: The accuracy of the clinical diagnosis for colonic diverticulitis is low. Ultrasound and computed tomography have superior diagnostic accuracy but these examinations rarely change the initial management proposal.


Asunto(s)
Diverticulitis del Colon/diagnóstico por imagen , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Derivación y Consulta , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Anciano , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Gastroenteritis/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ovario/diagnóstico por imagen , Planificación de Atención al Paciente , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Anomalía Torsional/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía , Infecciones Urinarias/diagnóstico por imagen
5.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 190(1): 240-3, 2008 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18094318

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to determine the frequency of hyperechogenicity of renal parenchyma in children with acute abdominal illness and to evaluate the assumed transient feature of this hyperechogenicity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2005 and February 2006, 189 consecutive patients (112 boys and 77 girls; mean age, 10 years) presenting with acute abdominal pain were examined with sonography. Patients with a known history of renal disease and those with acute urinary tract infection were excluded from the study. Echogenicity of the renal cortex in comparison with adjacent liver was recorded. Renal cortex echogenicity was divided into three groups; group 1, renal cortex echogenicity less than liver parenchyma echogenicity; group 2, renal cortex echogenicity similar to that of liver parenchyma; and group 3, renal cortex echogenicity greater than that of liver parenchyma. Patients with hyperechogenicity were reexamined with sonography after 2 weeks or more. The final sonographic diagnosis and clinical outcome were noted. RESULTS: Renal cortex echogenicity was equal to or greater than that of the liver parenchyma in 18% (n = 34) of 189 patients. Increased echogenicity of the renal cortex returned to normal in 2 or more weeks in all patients. Three patients had no follow-up. Clinical diagnoses were idiopathic acute abdominal pain (n = 74), appendicitis (n = 83), mesenteric lymphadenitis (n = 15), ileocecitis (n = 7), gastroenteritis (n = 7), Crohn's disease (n = 1), intussusception (n = 1), and pneumonia (n = 1). No concurrent renal disease was diagnosed. CONCLUSION: Increased echogenicity of renal parenchyma in children with acute illness is a transient feature and does not necessarily indicate renal disease.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Riñón/diagnóstico por imagen , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Gastroenteritis/complicaciones , Humanos , Hígado/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Linfadenitis Mesentérica/complicaciones , Neumonía/complicaciones , Ultrasonografía
6.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 146(36): 1696-8, 2002 Sep 07.
Artículo en Holandés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12244775

RESUMEN

A 30-year-old man with flu-like symptoms for several weeks presented at the emergency room with pain in the left upper abdomen. There was no history of trauma. The patient had a spontaneous rupture of the spleen due to mononucleosis infectiosa. He was successfully treated with conservative management during a 7-day period of hospitalisation. Spontaneous splenic rupture is a rare but potentially lethal complication of infectious mononucleosis. Alarming symptoms are left upper abdominal pain, worsening during inspiration, and haemodynamic instability. Although splenectomy is the accepted treatment for haemodynamically unstable patients, some patients, may be adequately treated with conservative management. They should be observed during the critical phase and must comply to a period of restricted physical activity after they are discharged from the hospital. There is no consensus about the length or content of this restriction period.


Asunto(s)
Mononucleosis Infecciosa/complicaciones , Rotura del Bazo/etiología , Rotura del Bazo/terapia , Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Adulto , Reposo en Cama , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Rotura Espontánea/etiología , Rotura Espontánea/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA