Nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma previously treated with sorafenib: 5-year results from CheckMate 040.

BACKGROUND: Nivolumab plus ipilimumab demonstrated promising clinical activity and durable responses in sorafenib-treated patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the CheckMate 040 study at 30.7-month median follow-up. Here, we present 5-year results from this cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized 1 : 1 : 1 to arm A [nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg Q3W (four doses)] or arm B [nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg Q3W (four doses)], each followed by nivolumab 240 mg Q2W, or arm C (nivolumab 3 mg/kg Q2W plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg Q6W). The primary objectives were safety, tolerability, investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR), and duration of response (DOR) per RECIST version 1.1. RESULTS: A total of 148 patients were randomized across treatment arms. At 60-month minimum follow-up (62.6-month median follow-up), the ORR was 34% (n = 17), 27% (n = 13), and 29% (n = 14) in arms A, B, and C, respectively. The median DOR was 51.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 12.6 months-not estimable (NE)], 15.2 months (95% CI 7.1 months-NE), and 21.7 months (95% CI 4.2 months-NE), respectively. The median overall survival (OS) was 22.2 months (34/50; 95% CI 9.4-54.8 months) in arm A, 12.5 months (38/49; 95% CI 7.6-16.4 months) in arm B, and 12.7 months (40/49; 95% CI 7.4-30.5 months) in arm C; 60-month OS rates were 29%, 19%, and 21%, respectively. In an exploratory analysis of OS by response (6-month landmark), the median OS was meaningfully longer for responders versus nonresponders for all arms. No new safety signals were identified with longer follow-up. There were no new discontinuations due to immune-mediated adverse events since the primary analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with the primary analysis, the arm A regimen of nivolumab plus ipilimumab continued to demonstrate clinically meaningful responses and long-term survival benefit, with no new safety signals in patients with advanced HCC following sorafenib treatment, further supporting its use as a second-line treatment in these patients.

An update on atezolizumab for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a worldwide problem, with a high prevalence in nonindustrialized countries and a rising incidence in industrialized countries. Its close association with chronic liver diseases and liver cirrhosis represents a significant challenge in its treatment. Sorafenib, the first front-line systemic treatment for unresectable HCC cases, was approved only in 2007. The role of sorafenib remained largely unchallenged until very recently, with the sole exception of a trial demonstrating the noninferiority of lenvatinib, another tyrosine kinase inhibitor. The therapeutic scenario changed dramatically in 2020, when the combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab proved to be significantly superior to sorafenib and, thus, establishing a new standard of care. In this monograph we provide an update about the safety and efficacy of atezolizumab reported in the clinical trials of HCC, as monotherapy or in combination with other agents.

Lenvatinib mesylate to treat hepatocellular carcinoma.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a worldwide healthcare problem, with a rising incidence. In its advanced stage, the prognosis of untreated HCC is very poor. Only in 2007, after a long series of failed trials, the multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor sorafenib demonstrated its superiority over placebo, becoming the first approved frontline therapy for advanced HCC. For a decade, all of the frontline trials using sorafenib as a comparator systematically failed, leaving this drug as the only available treatment in this setting. In 2018, lenvatinib mesylate (another multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor) demonstrated noninferiority compared to sorafenib in the phase III, randomized, controlled REFLECT trial. Currently, lenvatinib represents the only available alternative to sorafenib as a frontline systemic treatment of advanced HCC. In this monograph, we review the main preclinical and clinical evidence that emerged in the trials of lenvatinib, with particular attention to the features differentiating this drug from sorafenib.

Rheumatoid arthritis: new monoclonal antibodies.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an immune-mediated condition which primarily affects the joints, but with critical extra-articular manifestations, including a significantly increased cardiovascular risk. Patients suffering from RA can develop deforming and disabling alterations of the affected joints. Their quality of life can be substantially affected, and their life expectancy is shorter compared to that of healthy subjects. Fortunately, several pathogenic mechanisms characterizing RA have been identified, leading to the development of targeted drugs. Inhibitors of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) were the first developed among biological medications and they dramatically changed the therapeutic perspectives of RA patients. Now, 20 years after the licensing of etanercept (the first anti-TNF drug), more than 10 different biological agents have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Additionally, more and more drugs are under investigation in clinical trials. This review will focus on the more recently approved monoclonal antibodies and the more promising antibodies under investigation.

Regorafenib for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a worldwide problem, with a high prevalence in nonindustrialized countries and a rising incidence in industrialized countries as well. Its close association with chronic liver diseases and liver cirrhosis represents a significant challenge in its treatment. A front-line systemic treatment for unresectable cases of HCC (sorafenib) was identified only in 2007. Following a decade of failed clinical trials with a wide range of drugs for second-line treatment, regorafenib proved its efficacy as a second-line treatment in 2016, when the randomized, placebo-controlled, phase III RESORCE trial demonstrated a meaningful increase in overall survival in the regorafenib treatment arm compared with the placebo arm (10.6 vs. 7.8 months). In this monograph we review the main preclinical and clinical findings in the trials assessing regorafenib for the treatment of HCC patients.

An update of treatments of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients refractory to sorafenib.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains among the neoplastic diseases with the most unfavorable prognosis. Historically, systemic treatments for HCC have been scarce. In particular, sorafenib was the only registered drug for the treatment of unresectable HCC until 2017. Last year, regorafenib was approved by the global regulatory agencies as second-line therapy. Since then, further randomized, controlled trials have been successful in this patient population. This paper deals with the most recent data concerning cabozantinib and ramucirumab, the two drugs that have recently demonstrated efficacy in phase III, randomized, controlled trials in HCC patients who failed previous treatment with sorafenib.

Increased risk of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with coeliac disease on a gluten-free diet: beyond traditional metabolic factors.

BACKGROUND: A gluten-free diet (GFD) is known to be associated with altered macronutrient intake and metabolic syndrome. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the hepatic hallmark of metabolic syndrome. The risk of NAFLD in patients with coeliac disease (CD) adhering to a GFD remains to be fully investigated; in particular, data from real-life clinical settings are lacking. AIM: To assess the prevalence and relative risk of NAFLD in CD patients treated with a GFD. METHODS: Case-control study, with prospective enrolment of CD outpatients following a GFD and controls. Patients were matched for demographic characteristics (age and gender) and metabolic risk factors (overweight, diabetes mellitus, total cholesterol, and triglycerides) using a 1:1 ratio. NAFLD was diagnosed according to the European Association for the Study of the Liver criteria. RESULTS: 202 CD patients and 202 controls were compared. The raw prevalence of NAFLD was 34.7% and 21.8% in the CD and control group, respectively (P = 0.006). Binary logistic regression confirmed an increased risk of NAFLD in the CD group (adjusted odds ratio = 2.90, 95% confidence interval: 1.64-5.15, P < 0.001). Additionally, the relative risk for NAFLD was notably higher in non-overweight CD patients (adjusted odds ratio = 5.71, 95% confidence interval: 2.30-14.19, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: More than one-third of CD patients adhering to a GFD had concurrent NAFLD, accounting for a three-fold increased risk compared to the general population. Dietary advice provided using a patient-tailored approach should assist CD patients with NAFLD in achieving an appropriate nutritional intake whilst reducing the risk of long-term liver-related events.

Hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence in patients with curative resection or ablation: impact of HCV eradication does not depend on the use of interferon.

BACKGROUND: In HCV-infected cirrhotic patients with successfully treated early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the time to HCC recurrence and the effects of sustained viral eradication (SVR) by interferon (IFN)-based or IFN-free regimens on HCC recurrence remain unclear. AIM: To perform an indirect comparison of time to recurrence (TTR) in patients with successfully treated early HCC and active HCV infection with those of patients with SVR by IFN-based and by IFN-free regimens. METHODS: We evaluated 443 patients with HCV-related cirrhosis and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage A/0 HCC who had a complete radiological response after curative resection or ablation. Active HCV infection was present in 328, selected from the Italian Liver Cancer group cohort; 58 patients had SVR achieved by IFN-free regimens after HCC cure, and 57 patients had SVR achieved by IFN-based regimens after HCC cure. Individual data of patients in the last two groups were extracted from available publications. RESULTS: TTR by Kaplan-Meier curve was significantly lower in patients with active HCV infection compared with those with SVR both by IFN-free (P = 0.02) and by IFN-based (P < 0.001) treatments. TTR was similar in patients with SVR by IFN-free or by IFN-based (P = 0.49) strategies. CONCLUSION: In HCV-infected, successfully treated patients with early HCC, SVR obtained by IFN-based or IFN-free regimens significantly reduce tumour recurrence without differences related to the anti-viral strategy used.

A case of inflammatory ascites.

UNLABELLED: CASE BACKGROUND: Ascites appears mainly as a consequence of portal hypertension in patients with liver cirrhosis, or can be caused by several other causes, such us congestive heart failure, peritoneal malignancy, or tuberculosis. In some cases, ascites can pose a diagnostic challenge for clinicians and in some patients, despite thorough and extensive work-up, the origin of this ascites remains unknown. CASE REPORT: In the unusual case hereby reported, a 52-year-old man developed severe ascites in a few weeks, in the absence of known liver disease or congestive hearth failure. We performed laboratory analysis, endoscopic, and imaging investigations, including abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography and 18-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography. Peritoneal fluid analysis showed exudative fluid without neoplastic cells. A diagnostic laparoscopy with multiple diagnostic biopsies was carried out, but no macroscopic cause of the ascites was found; histopathological examination showed minimal aspects of diffuse and non-specific chronic inflammation. CONCLUSIONS: We decided to empirically treat the patient with steroid therapy (methylprednisolone: 0·5 mg/kg/day). Over a period of 6 weeks, his ascites resolved and at 2 months, he was in remission on low-dose methylprednisolone. Our final hypothesis was reactive inflammatory ascites. The literature on ascites and its management has also been reviewed.

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura mimicking an acute meningoencephalitis.

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura is a rare, threatening disease characterized by thrombocytopenia, microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia and organ dysfunction, e.g., neurological impairment and renal insufficiency. We describe a patient with neurological impairment mimicking a meningoencephalitis in whom a thorough clinical evaluation along with appropriate laboratory tests led us to identify an underlying thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. The successful outcome of this patient was based on plasma exchange and immunosuppressive treatment. Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura should be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients presenting with any neurological abnormalities, anaemia and unexplained thrombocytopenia.