COVID-19 severity in kidney transplant recipients is similar to nontransplant patients with similar comorbidities.

Higher rates of severe COVID-19 have been reported in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) compared to nontransplant patients. We aimed to determine if poorer outcomes were specifically related to chronic immunosuppression or underlying comorbidities. We used a 1:1 propensity score-matching method to compare survival and severe disease-free survival (defined as death and/or need for intensive care unit [ICU]) incidence in hospitalized KTRs and nontransplant control patients between February 26 and May 22, 2020. Patients were matched for risk factors of severe COVID-19: age, sex, body mass index, diabetes mellitus, preexisting cardiopathy, chronic lung disease, and basal renal function. We included 100 KTRs (median age [interquartile range (IQR)]) 64.7 years (55.3-73.1) in three French transplant centers. After a median follow-up of 13 days (7-30), transfer to ICU was required for 34 patients (34%) and death occurred in 26 patients (26%). Overall, 43 patients (43%) developed a severe disease during a median follow-up of 8.5 days (2-14). Propensity score matching to a large French cohort of 2017 patients hospitalized in 24 centers, revealed that survival was similar between KTRs and matched nontransplant patients with respective 30-day survival of 62.9% and 71% (p = .38) and severe disease-free 30-day survival of 50.6% and 47.5% (p = .91). These findings suggest that severity of COVID-19 in KTRs is related to their associated comorbidities and not to chronic immunosuppression.

Incomplete Recovery From Takotsubo Syndrome Is a Major Determinant of Cardiovascular Mortality.

BACKGROUND: Although there is an apparent rapid and spontaneous recovery of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with Takotsubo syndrome (TTS), recent studies have demonstrated a long-lasting functional impairment in those patients. The present study sought to evaluate the predictors of incomplete recovery following TTS and its impact on cardiovascular mortality.Methods and Results:Patients with TTS between 2008 and 2018 were retrospectively enrolled at 3 different institutions. After exclusion of in-hospital deaths, 407 patients were split into 2 subgroups according to whether their LVEF was >50% (recovery group; n=341), or ≤50% (incomplete recovery group; n=66) at the chronic phase. Multivariate logistic regression analysis found that LVEF (odds ratio [OR]: 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.91-0.98; P<0.001) and C-reactive protein levels (OR: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.02-1.22; P=0.02) at discharge were independent predictors of incomplete recovery. At a median follow up of 52 days, a higher cardiovascular mortality was evident in the incomplete recovery group (16% vs. 0.6%; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that incomplete recovery after TTS is characterized by residual systemic inflammation and an increased cardiac mortality at follow up. Altogether, the present study findings determined that patients with persistent inflammation are a high-risk subgroup, and should be targeted in future clinical trials with specific therapies to attenuate inflammation.

Pulmonary embolism in COVID-19 patients: a French multicentre cohort study.

AIMS: While pulmonary embolism (PE) appears to be a major issue in COVID-19, data remain sparse. We aimed to describe the risk factors and baseline characteristics of patients with PE in a cohort of COVID-19 patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a retrospective multicentre observational study, we included consecutive patients hospitalized for COVID-19. Patients without computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA)-proven PE diagnosis and those who were directly admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) were excluded. Among 1240 patients (58.1% men, mean age 64 ± 17 years), 103 (8.3%) patients had PE confirmed by CTPA. The ICU transfer and mechanical ventilation were significantly higher in the PE group (for both P < 0.001). In an univariable analysis, traditional venous thrombo-embolic risk factors were not associated with PE (P > 0.05), while patients under therapeutic dose anticoagulation before hospitalization or prophylactic dose anticoagulation introduced during hospitalization had lower PE occurrence [odds ratio (OR) 0.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.14-0.91, P = 0.04; and OR 0.11, 95% CI 0.06-0.18, P < 0.001, respectively]. In a multivariable analysis, the following variables, also statistically significant in univariable analysis, were associated with PE: male gender (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.003-1.069, P = 0.04), anticoagulation with a prophylactic dose (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.79-0.85, P < 0.001) or a therapeutic dose (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.82-0.92, P < 0.001), C-reactive protein (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.04, P = 0.001), and time from symptom onset to hospitalization (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.006-1.038, P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: PE risk factors in the COVID-19 context do not include traditional thrombo-embolic risk factors but rather independent clinical and biological findings at admission, including a major contribution to inflammation.

Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Is a Major Determinant of Cardiovascular Outcome in Takotsubo Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Recent insights have emphasized the importance of inflammatory response in takotsubo syndrome (TTS). We sought to evaluate the predictors of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and its impact on cardiovascular mortality after TTS.Methods and Results:The 215 TTS patients were retrospectively included between September 2008 and January 2018. SIRS was diagnosed in 96 patients (44.7%). They had lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on admission (34.5% vs. 41.9%; P<0.001) and higher peak brain natriuretic peptide and troponin. At a median follow-up of 518 days, SIRS was associated with increased in-hospital mortality (14.6% vs. 5.0%; P=0.019), overall mortality (29.4% vs. 10.8%; P=0.002), and cardiovascular mortality (10.6% vs. 2.1%; P=0.026). A history of cancer (OR, 3.36; 95% CI: 1.54-7.31; P=0.002) and LVEF <40% at admission (OR, 2.31; 95% CI: 1.16-4.58; P=0.017) were identified as independent predictors of SIRS. On multivariate Cox regression analysis, SIRS (HR, 12.8; 95% CI: 1.58-104; P=0.017), age (HR, 1.09; 95% CI: 1.02-1.16; P=0.01), and LVEF <40% at discharge (HR, 9.88; 95% CI: 2.54-38.4; P=0.001) were independent predictors of cardiovascular death. CONCLUSIONS: SIRS was found in a large proportion of TTS patients and was associated with enhanced myocardial damage and adverse outcome in the acute phase. At long-term follow-up, SIRS remained an independent factor of cardiovascular death.

Periprocedural Predictors of New-Onset Conduction Abnormalities After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

BACKGROUND: New-onset conduction abnormalities (CAs) following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are associated with hospital rehospitalization and long-term mortality, but available predictors are sparse. This study sought to determine clinical predictors of new-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) and new permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation in patients undergoing TAVR.Methods and Results:We enrolled 290 patients who received SAPIEN 3 (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA; n=217) or Evolut R (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA; n=73) from a prospective registry at Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg, France between September 2014 and February 2018. Of 242 patients without pre-existing LBBB, 114 (47%) experienced new-onset LBBB and/or new PPM implantation. A difference between membranous septal length and implantation depth (∆MSID) was the only predictor of CAs for both types of valves. In the multivariate analysis, PR interval and ∆MSID remained as sole predictors of CAs. The risk for adverse clinical events, including all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and heart failure hospitalization, was higher for patients with CAs as compared with patients without CAs (hazard ratio: 2.10; 95% confidence interval: 1.26 to 3.57; P=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Computed tomography assessment of membranous septal anatomy and implantation depth predicted CAs after TAVR with new-generation valves. Future studies are required to identify whether adjustment of the implantation depth can reduce the risk of CAs and adverse clinical outcomes.

Thromboprophylaxis: balancing evidence and experience during the COVID-19 pandemic.

A common and potent consideration has recently entered the landscape of the novel coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19): venous thromboembolism (VTE). COVID-19 has been associated to a distinctive related coagulopathy that shows unique characteristics. The research community has risen to the challenges posed by this « evolving COVID-19 coagulopathy ¼ and has made unprecedented efforts to promptly address its distinct characteristics. In such difficult time, both national and international societies of thrombosis and hemostasis released prompt and timely responses to guide recognition and management of COVID-19-related coagulopathy. However, latest guidelines released by the international Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) on May 27, 2020, followed the American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) on June 2, 2020 showed some discrepancies regarding thromboprophylaxis use. In this forum article, we would like to offer an updated focus on thromboprophylaxis with current incidence of VTE in ICU and non-ICU patients according to recent published studies; highlight the main differences regarding ISTH and CHEST guidelines; summarize and describe which are the key ongoing RCTs testing different anticoagulation strategies in patients with COVID-19; and finally set a proposal for COVID-19 coagulopathy specific risk factors and dedicated trials.

Left ventricular mechanics in the acute phase of Takotsubo cardiomyopathy: distinctive ballooning patterns translate into different diastolic properties.

Although apical and midventricular Takotsubo cardiomyopathies (TTCs) share common triggers and pathophysiological features, little is known about the potential differences in left ventricular (LV) mechanistic properties between these TTC phenotypes. We sought to investigate whether LV systolic and/or diastolic function, as assessed invasively by left heart catheterization (LHC), differ according to ballooning patterns in the acute phase of TTC. One hundred and fourteen TTC patients were retrospectively identified between January 2009 and December 2015 at the University Hospital of Strasbourg, France. A comprehensive list of LV quantitative parameters was derived from LHC analysis for each patient. We examined 2 groups of patients according to ballooning patterns in the acute phase of TTC: patients with apical ballooning ("Apical group"; n = 76) and those with midventricular ballooning ("Midventricular group"; n = 38). LV minimal diastolic pressure (8.72 ± 6.72 vs. 5.02 ± 6.08 mmHg; p = 0.004), LV end diastolic pressure (23.11 ± 8.32 vs. 18.84 ± 8.06 mmHg; p = 0.01), and LV diastolic stiffness (LV stiffness 1: 0.29 ± 0.23 vs. 18.84 ± 8.06 mmHg/mL; p = 0.04-LV stiffness 2: 0.16 ± 0.08 vs. 0.12 ± 0.05 mmHg/mL; p = 0.005) were significantly higher in patients with apical TTC than in the midventricular group. Concomitantly, these findings were associated with significantly higher BNP levels in the apical group (923.91 ± 1164.53 vs. 418.71 ± 557.75 pg/mL; p = 0.004) than in the midventricular group. In the acute phase of stress cardiomyopathy, the classic apical form of TTC is associated with poorer diastolic function compared to the midventricular ballooning variant, as assessed through direct invasive hemodynamic measurements using LHC.

COVID-19 promotes endothelial dysfunction and thrombogenicity: role of proinflammatory cytokines/SGLT2 prooxidant pathway.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular complications. Although cytokines have a predominant role in endothelium damage, the precise molecular mechanisms are far from being elucidated. OBJECTIVES: The present study hypothesized that inflammation in patients with COVID-19 contributes to endothelial dysfunction through redox-sensitive SGLT2 overexpression and investigated the protective effect of SGLT2 inhibition by empagliflozin. METHODS: Human plasma samples were collected from patients with acute, subacute, and long COVID-19 (n = 100), patients with non-COVID-19 and cardiovascular risk factors (n = 50), and healthy volunteers (n = 25). Porcine coronary artery endothelial cells (ECs) were incubated with plasma (10%). Protein expression levels were determined using Western blot analyses and immunofluorescence staining, mRNA expression by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, and the level of oxidative stress by dihydroethidium staining. Platelet adhesion, aggregation, and thrombin generation were determined. RESULTS: Increased plasma levels of interleukin (IL)-1ß, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor-α, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 were observed in patients with COVID-19. Exposure of ECs to COVID-19 plasma with high cytokines levels induced redox-sensitive upregulation of SGLT2 expression via proinflammatory cytokines IL-1ß, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor-α which, in turn, fueled endothelial dysfunction, senescence, NF-κB activation, inflammation, platelet adhesion and aggregation, von Willebrand factor secretion, and thrombin generation. The stimulatory effect of COVID-19 plasma was blunted by neutralizing antibodies against proinflammatory cytokines and empagliflozin. CONCLUSION: In patients with COVID-19, proinflammatory cytokines induced a redox-sensitive upregulation of SGLT2 expression in ECs, which in turn promoted endothelial injury, senescence, platelet adhesion, aggregation, and thrombin generation. SGLT2 inhibition with empagliflozin appeared as an attractive strategy to restore vascular homeostasis in COVID-19.

Carbon monoxide and prognosis in smokers hospitalised with acute cardiac events: a multicentre, prospective cohort study.

Background: Smoking cigarettes produces carbon monoxide (CO), which can reduce the oxygen-carrying capacity of the blood. We aimed to determine whether elevated expiratory CO levels would be associated with a worse prognosis in smokers presenting with acute cardiac events. Methods: From 7 to 22 April 2021, expiratory CO levels were measured in a prospective registry including all consecutive patients admitted for acute cardiac event in 39 centres throughout France. The primary outcome was 1-year all-cause death. Initial in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MAE; death, resuscitated cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock) were also analysed. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05063097). Findings: Among 1379 patients (63 ± 15 years, 70% men), 368 (27%) were active smokers. Expiratory CO levels were significantly raised in active smokers compared to non-smokers. A CO level >11 parts per million (ppm) found in 94 (25.5%) smokers was associated with a significant increase in death (14.9% for CO > 11 ppm vs. 2.9% for CO ≤ 11 ppm; p < 0.001). Similar results were found after adjustment for comorbidities (hazard ratio [HR] [95% confidence interval (CI)]): 5.92 [2.43-14.38]) or parameters of in-hospital severity (HR 6.09, 95% CI [2.51-14.80]) and propensity score matching (HR 7.46, 95% CI [1.70-32.8]). CO > 11 ppm was associated with a significant increase in MAE in smokers during initial hospitalisation after adjustment for comorbidities (odds ratio [OR] 15.75, 95% CI [5.56-44.60]) or parameters of in-hospital severity (OR 10.67, 95% CI [4.06-28.04]). In the overall population, CO > 11 ppm but not smoking was associated with an increased rate of all-cause death (HR 4.03, 95% CI [2.33-6.98] and 1.66 [0.96-2.85] respectively). Interpretation: Elevated CO level is independently associated with a 6-fold increase in 1-year death and 10-fold in-hospital MAE in smokers hospitalized for acute cardiac events. Funding: Grant from Fondation Coeur & Recherche.

Phenotypic clustering of patients hospitalized in intensive cardiac care units: Insights from the ADDICT-ICCU study.

BACKGROUND: Intensive cardiac care units (ICCUs) were created to manage ventricular arrhythmias after acute coronary syndromes, but have diversified to include a more heterogeneous population, the characteristics of which are not well depicted by conventional methods. AIMS: To identify ICCU patient subgroups by phenotypic unsupervised clustering integrating clinical, biological, and echocardiographic data to reveal pathophysiological differences. METHODS: During 7-22 April 2021, we recruited all consecutive patients admitted to ICCUs in 39 centers. The primary outcome was in-hospital major adverse events (MAEs; death, resuscitated cardiac arrest or cardiogenic shock). A cluster analysis was performed using a Kamila algorithm. RESULTS: Of 1499 patients admitted to the ICCU (69.6% male, mean age 63.3±14.9 years), 67 (4.5%) experienced MAEs. Four phenogroups were identified: PG1 (n=535), typically patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; PG2 (n=444), younger smokers with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; PG3 (n=273), elderly patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and conduction disturbances; PG4 (n=247), patients with acute heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Compared to PG1, multivariable analysis revealed a higher risk of MAEs in PG2 (odds ratio [OR] 3.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16-10.0) and PG3 (OR 3.16, 95% CI 1.02-10.8), with the highest risk in PG4 (OR 20.5, 95% CI 8.7-60.8) (all P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Cluster analysis of clinical, biological, and echocardiographic variables identified four phenogroups of patients admitted to the ICCU that were associated with distinct prognostic profiles. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05063097.

TAPSE/sPAP prognostic value for In-Hospital Adverse Events in Patients Hospitalized for Acute Coronary Syndrome.

AIMS: Although several studies have shown that the right ventricular to pulmonary artery (RV-PA) coupling, assessed by the ratio between tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion and systolic pulmonary artery pressure (TAPSE/sPAP) using echocardiography, is strongly associated with cardiovascular events, its prognostic value is not established in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We aimed to assess the in-hospital prognostic value of TAPSE/sPAP among patients hospitalized for ACS in a retrospective analysis from the prospective ADDICT-ICCU study. METHODS AND RESULTS: 481 consecutive patients hospitalized in intensive cardiac care unit (mean age 65±13 years, 73% of male, 46% STEMI) for ACS (either ST-elevation [STEMI] or non-ST-elevation [NSTEMI] myocardial infarction) with TAPSE/sPAP available were included in this prospective French multicentric study (39 centers). The primary outcome was in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) defined as all-cause death, resuscitated cardiac arrest or cardiogenic shock and occurred in 33 (7%) patients. ROC-curve analysis identified 0.55 mm/mmHg as the best TAPSE/sPAP cut-off to predict in-hospital MACEs. TAPSE/sPAP <0.55 was associated with in-hospital MACEs, even after adjustment with comorbidities (OR:19.1, 95%CI[7.78-54.8]), clinical severity including left ventricular ejection fraction (OR:14.4, 95%CI[5.70-41.7]) and propensity-matched population analysis (OR:22.8, 95%CI[7.83-97.2], all p<0.001). After adjustment, TAPSE/sPAP <0.55 showed the best improvement in model discrimination and reclassification above traditional prognosticators (C-statistic improvement: 0.16; global chi-square improvement: 52.8; LR-test p<0.001) with similar results for both STEMI and NSTEMI subgroups. CONCLUSION: A low RV-PA coupling defined as TAPSE/sPAP ratio <0.55 was independently associated with in-hospital MACEs and provided incremental prognostic value over traditional prognosticators in patients hospitalized for ACS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05063097.

Optimal Heart Failure Medical Therapy and Mortality in Survivors of Cardiogenic Shock: Insights From the FRENSHOCK Registry.

BACKGROUND: The effects of pharmacological therapy on cardiogenic shock (CS) survivors have not been extensively studied. Thus, this study investigated the association between guideline-directed heart failure (HF) medical therapy (GDMT) and one-year survival rate in patients who are post-CS. METHODS AND RESULTS: FRENSHOCK (French Observatory on the Management of Cardiogenic Shock in 2016) registry was a prospective multicenter observational survey, conducted in metropolitan French intensive care units and intensive cardiac care units. Of 772 patients, 535 patients were enrolled in the present analysis following the exclusion of 217 in-hospital deaths and 20 patients with missing medical records. Patients with triple GDMT (beta-blockers, renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists) at discharge (n=112) were likely to have lower left ventricular ejection fraction on admission and at discharge compared with those without triple GDMT (n=423) (22% versus 28%, P<0.001 and 29% versus 37%, P<0.001, respectively). In the overall cohort, the one-year mortality rate was 23%. Triple GDMT prescription was significantly associated with a lower one-year all-cause mortality compared with non-triple GDMT (adjusted hazard ratio 0.44 [95% CI, 0.19-0.80]; P=0.007). Similarly, 2:1 propensity score matching and inverse probability treatment weighting based on the propensity score demonstrated a lower incidence of one-year mortality in the triple GDMT group. As the number of HF drugs increased, a stepwise decrease in mortality was observed (log rank; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In survivors of CS, the one-year mortality rate was significantly lower in those with triple GDMT. Therefore, this study suggests that intensive HF therapy should be considered in patients following CS.

Aortic stenosis and the haemostatic system.

Aortic stenosis (AS) affects more than 10% of the population over 80 years of age and constitutes a major risk factor for heart failure, thromboembolic stroke, and death. A better understanding of the disease, including its interaction with the haemostatic system, is a prerequisite to develop prophylactic treatments. AS pathogenesis is a dynamic process involving endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, fibrosis, and calcification. Several studies support the interplay between the components of the haemostatic system such as platelets, the coagulation system, von Willebrand factor, and extracellular micro-particles at each pathophysiological stage of AS. Previous reports have evidenced persistent biological activity of the native valve after transcatheter aortic valve replacement and the subsequent development of microthrombosis that may impact the function of the newly implanted valve. Here, we review the current evidence on the interplay between AS and prothrombotic activity, and we emphasize the clinical consequences of these interactions after aortic valve replacement.

Bioprosthetic valve thrombosis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement and pulmonary embolism due to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a case report.

Background: Bioprosthetic valve thrombosis is a complication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). It is believed to be platelet independent, mainly driven by contact phase activation, and more likely to be targeted by oral anticoagulant (OAC). Case summary: We report case of an 86-year-old man with history of TAVR, who presented an early TAVR aortic valve thrombosis occurring in the context of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and pulmonary embolism. The patient rapidly recovered and was discharged 17 days after readmission. OAC by Coumadin was administered for 3 months. Chest tomography after 3 months showed the disappearance of the hypoattenuated leaflet thickening. Discussion: Although HIT has been fully described and is known for being a prothrombotic disorder, this is the first case report of aortic valve thrombosis after TAVR due to HIT. HIT is rare but possibly lethal. Diagnosis is based on pre-test probability evaluation with the 4T clinical score and confirmation with laboratory evidence of anti-PF4/heparin complexes and positivity of a functional test. Management of HIT is based on heparin discontinuation, and treatment of thrombotic complication with direct anti-IIa inhibitor or anti-Xa inhibitor. According to our knowledge, this case represents the first report of bioprosthetic valve thrombosis after TAVR due to HIT.

Determinants and treatments of heart failure after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: moving up a notch.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis in elderly and comorbid population. Significant improvement in heart function has been observed in patients undergoing TAVI, but numerous patients are readmitted to hospital for heart failure (HF). Moreover, repeat HF hospitalization is strongly associated with an adverse prognosis and increases the financial burden of health care. Although studies have identified pre-existing and post-procedural factors that contribute to HF hospitalization after TAVI, there is a paucity of data regarding optimal post-procedural pharmacological treatments. This review aims to provide an overview of the current understanding of mechanisms, determinants, and potential treatments of HF following TAVI. We first review the pathophysiology of left ventricular (LV) remodelling, coronary microcirculation disorder, and endothelial dysfunction in patients with aortic stenosis and then examine the impact of TAVI on these conditions. We then present evidence of various factors and complications that may interplay with LV remodelling and contribute to HF events after TAVI. Next, we describe the triggers and predictors of early and late HF rehospitalizations following TAVI. Lastly, we discuss the potential of conventional pharmacological treatments, including renin-angiotensin blockers, beta-blockers, and diuretics in TAVI patients. The paper explores the potential of newer drugs, including sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors, anti-inflammatory drugs, and ion supplementation. Comprehensive knowledge in this field may aid in recognizing successful existing therapies, developing effective new treatments, and establishing dedicated patient care strategies during follow-up after TAVI.