A Controlled Study on Vaginal Blood Flow During Sexual Arousal Among Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Survivors Treated With Conventional Radical or Nerve-Sparing Surgery With or Without Radiotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: Sexual problems among cervical cancer survivors may in part be caused by reduced vaginal blood flow due to damaged hypogastric nerves during radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy and/or by radiation-induced vaginal changes after pelvic radiotherapy. A nerve-sparing modification of radical hysterectomy (NSRH) may preserve vaginal blood flow. Vaginal blood flow during sexual arousal was compared between different treatment modalities. METHODS: We investigated premenopausal women treated for early-stage cervical cancer with radical hysterectomy (n = 29), NSRH (n = 28), NSRH with radiotherapy (n = 14), and controls (n = 31). Genital arousal and subjective sexual arousal in response to sexual stimuli were measured using vaginal photoplethysmography and a questionnaire. Results were compared by using a between-study (treatment groups) by within-study (stimulus) design. RESULTS: Participants were aged 29 to 51 years (mean, 42 years) and at 1 to 14 years (mean, 5 years) after treatment. Measured vaginal blood flow in women treated with NSRH was similar to controls. Women treated with radical hysterectomy had a significantly lower vaginal blood flow compared with controls overall and lower compared with the NSRH group during sexual stimulation. Women treated with radiotherapy had a vaginal blood flow intermediate between the other groups without significant differences. The erotic films were equally effective in enhancing subjective sexual arousal among treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Cervical cancer treatment with radical hysterectomy disrupts the vaginal blood flow response, and this may be prevented by conducting an NSRH. Treatment with radiotherapy did not significantly impact vaginal blood flow, but further investigation is needed with a larger sample.

Clinical characteristics associated with development of recurrence and progression in usual-type vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia.

OBJECTIVE: To identify clinical characteristics associated with recurrence and progression in patients with usual vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (uVIN), which may function as prognostic factors and aid in the treatment of patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-related disease of the genital tract. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed in 73 patients with uVIN treated at the Leiden University Medical Center between 1990 and 2012. All medical records were reviewed for demographics, treatment type, pathology reports, and recurrence and progression rates. RESULTS: The mean age of diagnosis was 43 years, and uVIN was symptomatic in 60.1% of the patients. The median follow-up time was 49 months. High-risk HPV was found in 86.3% of the patients. Smoking was reported in 76.8% of the patients. Eleven of 73 patients were immune compromised. Multicentric HPV-related disease of the cervix or vagina was reported in 75.3% of the patients. Recurrences were diagnosed in 50.7% of the patients after first treatment type that consisted of excision (45.2%), laser (34.2%), imiquimod (8.2%), and combination of excision and laser (12.3%). Higher recurrence rates were only correlated with multifocality of uVIN lesions. Excision, imiquimod therapy, and unifocal lesions showed an increased recurrence-free survival. Human papillomavirus type, smoking, multicentric disease, use of topical steroids, and positive surgical borders were not related to a shorter recurrence-free survival. Progression into vulvar carcinoma occurred in 11 (15.1%) of the patients, 4 of whom were immune compromised. These patients showed a shorter progression-free survival of 54 versus 71.5 months. CONCLUSION: There are no clinical characteristics that form prognostic factors in uVIN, except for multifocality of lesions, which is correlated with a higher recurrence rate. Furthermore, progression of uVIN to carcinoma was accelerated and increased in immune-compromised patients, suggesting that studies of local immunity in uVIN may reveal potentialprognostic factors and aid in the development of new treatment modalities.

Genomic Characterization of Vulvar (Pre)cancers Identifies Distinct Molecular Subtypes with Prognostic Significance.

Purpose: Vulvar cancer (VC) can be subclassified by human papillomavirus (HPV) status. HPV-negative VCs frequently harbor TP53 mutations; however, in-depth analysis of other potential molecular genetic alterations is lacking. We comprehensively assessed somatic mutations in a large series of vulvar (pre)cancers.Experimental Design: We performed targeted next-generation sequencing (17 genes), p53 immunohistochemistry and HPV testing on 36 VC and 82 precursors (sequencing cohort). Subsequently, the prognostic significance of the three subtypes identified in the sequencing cohort was assessed in a series of 236 VC patients (follow-up cohort).Results: Frequent recurrent mutations were identified in HPV-negative vulvar (pre)cancers in TP53 (42% and 68%), NOTCH1 (28% and 41%), and HRAS (20% and 31%). Mutation frequency in HPV-positive vulvar (pre)cancers was significantly lower (P = 0.001). Furthermore, a substantial subset of the HPV-negative precursors (35/60, 58.3%) and VC (10/29, 34.5%) were TP53 wild-type (wt), suggesting a third, not-previously described, molecular subtype. Clinical outcomes in the three different subtypes (HPV+, HPV-/p53wt, HPV-/p53abn) were evaluated in a follow-up cohort consisting of 236 VC patients. Local recurrence rate was 5.3% for HPV+, 16.3% for HPV-/p53wt and 22.6% for HPV-/p53abn tumors (P = 0.044). HPV positivity remained an independent prognostic factor for favorable outcome in the multivariable analysis (P = 0.020).Conclusions: HPV- and HPV+ vulvar (pre)cancers display striking differences in somatic mutation patterns. HPV-/p53wt VC appear to be a distinct clinicopathologic subgroup with frequent NOTCH1 mutations. HPV+ VC have a significantly lower local recurrence rate, independent of clinicopathological variables, opening opportunities for reducing overtreatment in VC. Clin Cancer Res; 23(22); 6781-9. ©2017 AACR.