[Janus kinase inhibitors : Indications, efficacy, uses, what should be taken into account?] / Januskinaseinhibitoren : Indikationen, Wirkung, Einsatz: Was ist zu beachten?

Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) represent an immunomodulatory targeted therapy in various dermatoses. Throughout the past few years, JAKi have been approved for atopic dermatitis (AD), psoriasis vulgaris (PSO), alopecia areata (AA), and vitiligo. Further indications are currently under investigation. In this article the various systenic and topical JAKi used in dermatology are being presented regarding their efficacy and safety profile. A specific focus will be set on handling with safety issues including screening and control measures during treatment with JAKi. In addition, future use of JAKi in various dermatological diseases for which nowadays only insufficient therapy options are available is being discussed.

Efficacy and Safety of Topical Tacrolimus Microemulsion Applied Twice Daily in Patients with Mild to Moderate Scalp Psoriasis.

INTRODUCTION: Involvement of the scalp is common in psoriasis and severely affects the quality of life of those affected. It is difficult to treat and places special demands on the galenics of a drug formulation. Tacrolimus is a calcineurin inhibitor and is approved as an ointment formulation for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. The efficacy and safety of topically applied tacrolimus have also been studied and proven for psoriasis. However, no proprietary pharmaceutical product is currently approved for this indication. METHODS: A multicenter, double-blind, vehicle-controlled phase 3 study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 0.1% tacrolimus microemulsion when applied topically twice daily in 128 patients independently of sex with scalp psoriasis. RESULTS: The primary efficacy analysis showed a scalp Investigator Global Assessment (s-IGA) of 0 (absence of disease) or 1 (very mild disease) at 8 weeks in 28.6% of subjects in the tacrolimus group, indicating a significantly better response (p = 0.0476, chi-square test) versus 12.7% of subjects in the placebo group (difference of 15.9%-points). The Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) improved over time and was more pronounced in the group treated with tacrolimus-containing microemulsion than in the placebo group, but showed no statistically significant difference after 8 weeks of use (p = 0.193, ANCOVA). The safety analysis revealed no evidence of cutaneous side effects other than those known. Toxicologically relevant serum levels of tacrolimus could be excluded. CONCLUSION: The study data show that 0.1% tacrolimus microemulsion has good efficacy and safety in the treatment of scalp psoriasis.

[Rehabilitation for patients with chronic pruritus]. / Rehabilitation bei Patienten mit chronischem Pruritus.

BACKGROUND: For a long time, chronic pruritus was considered difficult to treat. Modern therapy options and detailed guidelines have created new opportunities for patients to improve their quality of life. However, due to the complexity of the disease, the need for multimodal treatment remains. OBJECTIVES: This article aims to investigate whether dermatological rehabilitation offers additional benefits to those affected and whether it should therefore be part of the treatment concept for chronic pruritus. METHODS: After introduction of the pruritus program of a rehabilitation clinic, a prospective study is presented that focuses on the patient-relevant benefits of therapy. It used standardized questionnaires to record pruritus intensity, the presence of depression, anxiety, itch-related limitations, and quality of life in patients with chronic pruritus before and after rehabilitation. RESULTS: Of the patients surveyed, 91.7% achieved a patient-relevant benefit through rehabilitation. Pruritus intensity, depression, anxiety, itch-related limitations, and restrictions on quality of life decreased significantly. Almost half of all participating patients had been initially diagnosed more than 10 years ago. CONCLUSIONS: Dermatological rehabilitation with a multimodal concept for the treatment of chronic pruritus can help affected patients and should be part of the therapy concept. This should be done as early as possible before the disease progresses over a long period of time and makes treatment more difficult.

Brodalumab Versus Guselkumab in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis with an Inadequate Response to Ustekinumab: A Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Blind Phase 4 Trial (COBRA).

INTRODUCTION: Despite improved treatment options for plaque psoriasis within the last decades, some patients still have an inadequate response to treatment. Direct clinical evaluation between therapies used after biologic failure could facilitate physicians' choice of treatment. METHODS: COBRA (NCT04533737) was a randomized (1:1), blinded (patient and assessor), 28-week, active-comparator trial conducted in Europe from December 2020 to December 2022. The objective was to compare the efficacy and safety of brodalumab versus guselkumab in adults with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and inadequate response to ustekinumab. Patients received either brodalumab 210 mg or guselkumab 100 mg. The primary [having Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)-100 response at week 16] and key secondary (time to PASI-100 response) endpoints were tested in a fixed sequence. RESULTS: Due to delays and enrollment challenges, recruitment was terminated with 113 patients enrolled of 240 planned. The proportion of patients having PASI-100 at week 16 for brodalumab was 53.4% compared with 35.9% for guselkumab [odds ratio (OR) 2.05; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95, 4.44; p = 0.069]. As this was not statistically significant, the hierarchical testing procedure was stopped. All other secondary PASI endpoints had nominal p-values below 0.05 in favor of brodalumab. In the time to PASI response analyses, brodalumab separated from guselkumab in estimated cumulative incidence of patients achieving a response from week 2 onward, suggesting fast onset of action with brodalumab. Quality of life measures improved in both treatment groups. The safety findings were consistent with the known safety profiles. CONCLUSIONS: Brodalumab showed a tendency toward better and earlier effect than guselkumab in patients who had failed ustekinumab. Thus, this trial provides important information in assisting physicians in their choice of therapy for patients who have failed their prior anti-interleukin (IL)-12/23 treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04533737.

Practical Management of the JAK1 Inhibitor Abrocitinib for Atopic Dermatitis in Clinical Practice: Special Safety Considerations.

Abrocitinib, an oral, once-daily, Janus kinase (JAK) 1-selective inhibitor, is approved for the treatment of adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Abrocitinib has shown rapid and sustained efficacy in phase 3 trials and a consistent, manageable safety profile in long-term studies. Rapid itch relief and skin clearance are more likely to be achieved with a 200-mg daily dose of abrocitinib than with dupilumab. All oral JAK inhibitors are associated with adverse events of special interest and laboratory changes, and initial risk assessment and follow-up monitoring are important. Appropriate selection of patients and adequate monitoring are key for the safe use of JAK inhibitors. Here, we review the practical use of abrocitinib and discuss characteristics of patients who are candidates for abrocitinib therapy. In general, abrocitinib may be used in all appropriate patients with moderate-to-severe AD in need of systemic therapy, provided there are no contraindications, e.g., in patients with active serious systemic infections and those with severe hepatic impairment, as well as pregnant or breastfeeding women. For patients aged ≥ 65 years, current long-time or past long-time smokers, and those with risk factors for venous thromboembolism, major adverse cardiovascular events, or malignancies, a meticulous benefit-risk assessment is recommended, and it is advised to start with the 100-mg dose, when abrocitinib is the selected treatment option.