Prophylactic enlargement of the thecal sac volume by spinal expansion duroplasty in patients with unresectable malignant intramedullary tumors and metastases prior to radiotherapy.

Unresectable malignant intramedullary tumors and metastases usually require radiotherapy which intensifies spinal cord edema and might result in neurological decline. Spinal expansion duroplasty before radiotherapy enlarges the intrathecal volume and might thus prevent neurological deficits. The study aims to evaluate the clinical course of patients undergoing expansion duroplasty. This retrospective analysis (2007-2016) included all patients with unresectable intramedullary tumors who underwent spinal expansion duroplasty. To assess the degree of preoperative cord enlargement, we calculated the "diameter ratio": diameter of the spinal cord below and above the tumor / diameter of the tumor × 2. The presence of perimedullary cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) at the affected levels was analyzed on the preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We recorded the occurrence of neurological deficits, wound breakdown, and CSF fistula. We screened 985 patients, 11 of which were included. Eight patients had an intramedullary metastasis, three patients a spinal malignant glioma. A diameter ratio ≤ 0.8 representing a significant preoperative intramedullary enlargement was seen in 10 cases (90.9%). Postoperative imaging was available in 9 patients, demonstrating successful decompression in 8 of the 9 patients (88.9%). The postoperative course was uneventful in 9 patients (81.8%). Mean overall survival was 13.4 (SD 16.2) months. Spinal expansion duroplasty prior to radiotherapy is a previously undescribed concept. Despite neoadjuvant radiation, no wound breakdown or CSF fistula occurred. In unresectable intramedullary tumors and metastases, spinal expansion duroplasty seems to be a safe procedure with the potential to prevent neurological decline due to radiation-induced cord swelling.

Surgical or Endovascular Treatment of MCA Aneurysms: An Agreement Study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: MCA aneurysms are still commonly clipped surgically despite the recent development of a number of endovascular tools and techniques. We measured clinical uncertainty by studying the reliability of decisions made for patients with middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A portfolio of 60 MCA aneurysms was presented to surgical and endovascular specialists who were asked whether they considered surgery or endovascular treatment to be an option, whether they would consider recruitment of the patient in a randomized trial, and whether they would provide their final management recommendation. Agreement was studied using κ statistics. Intrarater reliability was assessed with the same, permuted portfolio of cases of MCA aneurysm sent to the same specialists 1 month later. RESULTS: Surgical management was the preferred option for neurosurgeons (n = 844/1320; [64%] responses/22 raters), while endovascular treatment was more commonly chosen by interventional neuroradiologists (1149/1500 [76.6%] responses/25 raters). Interrater agreement was only "slight" for all cases and all judges (κ = 0.094; 95% CI, 0.068-0.130). Agreement was no better within specialties or with more experience. On delayed requestioning, 11 of 35 raters (31%) disagreed with themselves on at least 20% of cases. Surgical management and endovascular treatment were always judged to be a treatment option, for all patients. Trial participation was offered to patients 65% of the time. CONCLUSIONS: Individual clinicians did not agree regarding the best management of patients with MCA aneurysms. A randomized trial comparing endovascular with surgical management of patients with MCA aneurysms is in order.

Impact of Time on Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction Score Results.

PURPOSE: Extended thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (eTICI) score results of 2b or higher are known to be predictors for favorable outcome after acute stroke. Additionally, time is a major factor influencing outcome after ischemic stroke. Until today only little is known about the impact of time on angiographic results regarding the outcome after mechanical thrombectomy; however, this impact might be of interest if an initially unfavorable angiographic result has to be improved. METHODS: Retrospective study of 164 patients with large vessel occlusion of the anterior circulation treated by mechanical thrombectomy. Multiple logistic regression analysis of relevant periprocedural and procedural times in respect to the probability of achieving functional independence at 90 days in respect to different eTICI results was performed to build a time and TICI score-dependent model for outcome prediction in which the influence of time was assumed to be steady among the TICI grades. RESULTS: The probability of achieving a favorable outcome is significantly different between eTICI2b-50, 67, TICI2c and TICI3 results (p < 0.001). The odds for achieving a favorable outcome decrease over time and differ for each TICI category and time point. The individual odds for each patient, time point and TICI grade can be calculated based on this model. CONCLUSION: The impact of periprocedural and procedural times and eTICI reperfusion results adds a new dimension to the decision-making process in patients with primary unfavorable angiographic results.

One-Stop Management with Perfusion for Transfer Patients with Stroke due to a Large-Vessel Occlusion: Feasibility and Effects on In-Hospital Times.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In-hospital time delays lead to a relevant deterioration of neurologic outcomes in patients with stroke with large-vessel occlusions. At the moment, CT perfusion is relevant in the triage of late-window patients with stroke. We conducted this study to determine whether one-stop management with perfusion is feasible and leads to a reduction of in-hospital times. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this observational study, we report the first 15 consecutive transfer patients with stroke with externally confirmed large-vessel occlusions who underwent flat panel detector CT perfusion and thrombectomy in the same room. Preinterventional imaging consisted of noncontrast flat panel detector CT and flat panel detector CT perfusion, acquired with a biplane angiography system. The flat panel detector CT perfusion was used to reconstruct a flat panel detector CT angiography to confirm the large-vessel occlusions. After confirmation of the large-vessel occlusion, the patient underwent mechanical thrombectomy. We recorded time metrics and safety parameters prospectively and compared them with those of transfer patients whom we treated before the introduction of one-stop management with perfusion. RESULTS: Fifteen transfer patients underwent flat panel detector CT perfusion and were treated with mechanical thrombectomy from June 2017 to January 2019. The median time from symptom onset to admission was 241 minutes. Median door-to-groin time was 24 minutes. Compared with 23 transfer patients imaged with multidetector CT, it was reduced significantly (24 minutes; 95% CI, 19-37 minutes, versus 53 minutes; 95% CI, 44-66 minutes; P < .001). Safety parameters were comparable between groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this small series, one-stop management with perfusion led to a significant reduction of in-hospital times compared with our previous workflow.

The problem of strict image-based inclusion criteria for mechanical thrombectomy - an analysis of stroke patients with an initial low CBV-ASPECTS score.

INTRODUCTION: Endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke with large artery occlusion has become the standard of care. However, the question if a subgroup of patients, with a low cerebral blood volume Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score (CBV-ASPECTS) ≤ 7 should be excluded from endovascular treatment remains open. Therefore; we investigated the difference of outcome between patients who were treated by endovascular treatment vs patients who did not receive endovascular treatment. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed our stroke database for all patients who presented within six hours of onset with unfavourable imaging findings and who received endovascular treatment or best medical treatment alone. Unfavourable imaging was defined as a CBV-ASPECTS ≤ 7, which was an exclusion criterion for endovascular treatment at our institution before 2015. RESULTS: From 60 patients with an initial CBV-ASPECTS ≤ 7, 40 received best medical treatment and 20 were treated with endovascular treatment. Arterial hypertension and atrial fibrillation was more present in patients without endovascular treatment, the other baseline characteristics and percentage of patients treated with intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator were not significantly different in both groups. At discharge, 40% of the interventional treated patients had a favourable outcome (eight of 20 (40%) vs six of 40 (15%; p = 0.031). The median values of the National Institute of Health Stroke Score and modified Rankin Scale at discharge were significantly lower in the treated cohort (6.5 (2.5-10.5) vs 16 (9.5-22.5); p = 0.006; 3 (0-5.5) vs 5 (4.5-5.5); p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Patients with a CBV-ASPECTS ≤ 7 are likely to benefit from therapy and therefore may not be excluded from endovascular treatment. Further randomised trials are warranted to validate the data.

Diagnosing Early Ischemic Changes with the Latest-Generation Flat Detector CT: A Comparative Study with Multidetector CT.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: One-stop management of mechanical thrombectomy-eligible patients with large-vessel occlusion represents an innovative approach in acute stroke treatment. This approach reduces door-to-reperfusion times by omitting multidetector CT, using flat detector CT as pre-mechanical thrombectomy imaging. The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of the latest-generation flat detector CT with multidetector CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospectively derived data from patients with ischemic stroke with large-vessel occlusion and mechanical thrombectomy were analyzed in this monocentric study. All included patients underwent multidetector CT before referral to our comprehensive stroke center and flat detector CT in the angiography suite before mechanical thrombectomy. Diagnosis of early ischemic signs, quantified by the ASPECTS, was compared between modalities using cross tables, the Pearson correlation, and Bland-Altman plots. The predictive value of multidetector CT- and flat detector CT-derived ASPECTS for functional outcome was investigated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: Of 25 patients, 24 (96%) had flat detector CT with sufficient diagnostic quality. Median multidetector CT and flat detector CT ASPECTSs were 7 (interquartile range, 5.5-9 and 4.25-8, respectively) with a mean period of 143.6 ± 49.5 minutes between both modalities. The overall sensitivity was 85.1% and specificity was 83.1% for flat detector CT ASPECTS compared with multidetector CT ASPECTS as the reference technique. Multidetector CT and flat detector CT ASPECTS were strongly correlated (r = 0.849, P < .001) and moderately predicted functional outcome (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.738; P = .007 and .715; P = .069, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Determination of ASPECTS on flat detector CT is feasible, showing no significant difference compared with multidetector CT ASPECTS and a similar predictive value for functional outcome. Our findings support the use of flat detector CT for emergency stroke imaging before mechanical thrombectomy to reduce door-to-groin time.